|
#12
| |||
| |||
| sheesh3[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - > The PO Box is paid for by a for-profit and is shared with a
If one were to take the rational action of allocating> non-profit. > My client works for the for-profit and is a volunteer with > the non-profit. His job duties with the for-profit require > him to check the mail. His volunteer duties (he is an > unpaid officer) with the non-profit require him to check the > mail. > Based on what I am reading above, I could also declare the > PO to be a non-profit stop. > So which is it? I doubt it can be both or the IRS would be > upset at double counting the miles. Can the TP pick? any deductible travel costs of each segment to the purpose of the destination, it doesn't matter. The PO was your FIRST business stop. If it weren't I'd have to say the TP could pick. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin[at]sprintmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I don't think you can justify it on that basis. The
To clarify:> justification I would use is that it IS a business > location, because a business function (picking up > business mail) is done there. Whether the PO Box > cost is paid for by the business or by the individual, > or used for business and non-business mail, is only > relevent for the deductiblility of the PO Box as > a business expense; or, if the business is a > separate entity (as opposed to a Schedule C > business), whether the personal use constitutes > income TO the individual. The PO Box is paid for by a for-profit and is shared with a non-profit. My client works for the for-profit and is a volunteer with the non-profit. His job duties with the for-profit require him to check the mail. His volunteer duties (he is an unpaid officer) with the non-profit require him to check the mail. Based on what I am reading above, I could also declare the PO to be a non-profit stop. So which is it? I doubt it can be both or the IRS would be upset at double counting the miles. Can the TP pick? thanks, bex << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > Leave home, drive to PO and check for profit and non-profit
I don't think you can justify it on that basis. The> > > mail (30 miles). > > I would make that one no credit. However, the PO would seem > > to be a business location. (It's only HOME offices which > > have the exclusive use rule.) > > > Leave PO and drive to another location > > > and deliver a for=profit paycheck to an employee (10 miles). > > Business. > > > Leave paycheck location and drive to a volunteer meeting > > > (different org) (25 miles). > > Charity. > > > Return home (35 miles) > > > Charity (probable). > > > I see 90 deductible volunteer miles and no deductible Sched A > > > miles. > > I make it 60 charity miles and 10 business miles. > I agree with your remarks on this one now that I have > thought through it some more. Because the Biz is paying for > a single PO Box and letting the NPO use it, it is still a > "Biz" location. justification I would use is that it IS a business location, because a business function (picking up business mail) is done there. Whether the PO Box cost is paid for by the business or by the individual, or used for business and non-business mail, is only relevent for the deductiblility of the PO Box as a business expense; or, if the business is a separate entity (as opposed to a Schedule C business), whether the personal use constitutes income TO the individual. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Leave home, drive to PO and check for profit and non-profit
I agree with your remarks on this one now that I have> > mail (30 miles). > I would make that one no credit. However, the PO would seem > to be a business location. (It's only HOME offices which > have the exclusive use rule.) > > Leave PO and drive to another location > > and deliver a for=profit paycheck to an employee (10 miles). > Business. > > Leave paycheck location and drive to a volunteer meeting > > (different org) (25 miles). > Charity. > Return home (35 miles) > Charity (probable). > > I see 90 deductible volunteer miles and no deductible Sched A > > miles. > I make it 60 charity miles and 10 business miles. thought through it some more. Because the Biz is paying for a single PO Box and letting the NPO use it, it is still a "Biz" location. TP of course asked what would happen if the NPO rented there own box there, separate from biz. My gut says at that point with two distinct stops in the same physical location (analogous to driving to a shopping center for two errands) TP could pick which way the miles count, but could not double count the miles. I would make the same case for TP goes to the PO and mails letters for biz and personal. The personal mail shouldn't trump the biz mail right? Do you agree? Thanks, bex << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| sheesh3[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - > How about this scenario a TP just presented me with.
I would make that one no credit. However, the PO would seem> TP does volunteer work with two organizations. TP is an > officer of one, and a regular volunteer with the other. > TP also is the officer of a Corporation that has no > fixed place of business. > TP's duties for both the Corp. and the Nonprofit he is an > officer of require him to check the mail, do the bills, > payroll, etc. TP is not claiming a home office deduction > for any organizations because he admits to doing his own > bill-paying, etc at the same desk. > As a general statement, I gather the following would be > true for this TP: > 1 - Any miles driven for either non-profit would be > deductible on Schedule A. That would include meetings, > getting the mail, going to work the conventions, etc. > 2 - Any miles driven for the business are not deductible > until he makes the second and subsequent business stops, > because he is not taking a home-office deduction. > Is this correct? > So on a trip like this: > Leave home, drive to PO and check for profit and non-profit > mail (30 miles). to be a business location. (It's only HOME offices which have the exclusive use rule.) - quote - > Leave PO and drive to another location
Business.> and deliver a for=profit paycheck to an employee (10 miles). - quote - > Leave paycheck location and drive to a volunteer meeting
Charity.> (different org) (25 miles). Return home (35 miles) Charity (probable). - quote - > I see 90 deductible volunteer miles and no deductible Sched A
I make it 60 charity miles and 10 business miles.> miles. Alternatively, one can calulate the number of charity miles that would be required for all the charity stops, and the number of business miles that would be required for all the business stops, and use that to prorate the full 100 miles between the two categories -- but I don't know if that would hold up. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| How about this scenario a TP just presented me with. TP does volunteer work with two organizations. TP is an officer of one, and a regular volunteer with the other. TP also is the officer of a Corporation that has no fixed place of business. TP's duties for both the Corp. and the Nonprofit he is an officer of require him to check the mail, do the bills, payroll, etc. TP is not claiming a home office deduction for any organizations because he admits to doing his own bill-paying, etc at the same desk. As a general statement, I gather the following would be true for this TP: 1 - Any miles driven for either non-profit would be deductible on Schedule A. That would include meetings, getting the mail, going to work the conventions, etc. 2 - Any miles driven for the business are not deductible until he makes the second and subsequent business stops, because he is not taking a home-office deduction. Is this correct? So on a trip like this: Leave home, drive to PO and check for profit and non-profit mail (30 miles). Leave PO and drive to another location and deliver a for=profit paycheck to an employee (10 miles). Leave paycheck location and drive to a volunteer meeting (different org) (25 miles). Return home (35 miles) I see 90 deductible volunteer miles and no deductible Sched A miles. Does this TP need reduce the mileage because TP also checked the mail for the for-profit? Does TP need to reduce the mileage because TP made the stop in the middle? bex << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Maren Purves wrote: - quote - > Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
No. It's ANY business-to-business travel.> > Maren Purves wrote: > > > does this mean that it is tax deductible when I drive from > > > my job to my farm (opposite direction to driving home)? and > > > does this mean driving to my farm from home is tax > > > deductible? > > > > > - I always considered that commuting and as such not tax > > > deductible ... - > > Generally, driving between two business sites (including a > > home office as a business site) is deductible. An IRS agent > > has suggested it should be allocated to the business you are > > driving TO, but I can't find any direct support in the code > > or regulations. > My understanding was that this was only if you're in the > same business (as in "occupation') - I'm a software engineer > who farms on the side. - quote - > Also, you're implying that if I don't claim a home office, a
Actually, having a home office doesn't have property tax> trip from home to the farm is not deductible (not claiming a > home office as that would have property tax implications), > right? implications, at least in California. It MAY have city business license tax implications, but you might have the same implications even if you have a disqualified home office. But -- without doing additional research as to whether have a home office is NECESSARY in order to claim business-to-business mileage, that would be my position: travel from home to the farm is not deductible unless you have a home office or the farm is far enough away that you have to sleep during the trip. (The "away from home" rule.) - quote - > > I'm not sure if I answered your question.
If you kept adequate records, you can probably amend your> Kinda. At least something more to look into and read up > about. As I didn't mean to do this for last year anyway, I > think I got some time, but if anybody has more information > about this, I'd appreciate it. returns back to 2000, if it seems appropriate. Some elections have to be taken on the original return (or, at least, within 6 months of the original due date), but others can be taken on any amended return for an open year. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin wrote: - quote - > Maren Purves wrote:
My understanding was that this was only if you're in the> > does this mean that it is tax deductible when I drive from > > my job to my farm (opposite direction to driving home)? and > > does this mean driving to my farm from home is tax > > deductible? > > > - I always considered that commuting and as such not tax > > deductible ... - > Generally, driving between two business sites (including a > home office as a business site) is deductible. An IRS agent > has suggested it should be allocated to the business you are > driving TO, but I can't find any direct support in the code > or regulations. same business (as in "occupation') - I'm a software engineer who farms on the side. Also, you're implying that if I don't claim a home office, a trip from home to the farm is not deductible (not claiming a home office as that would have property tax implications), right? - quote - > I'm not sure if I answered your question.
Kinda. At least something more to look into and read upabout. As I didn't mean to do this for last year anyway, I think I got some time, but if anybody has more information about this, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Maren << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Maren Purves wrote: - quote - > does this mean that it is tax deductible when I drive from
Generally, driving between two business sites (including a> my job to my farm (opposite direction to driving home)? and > does this mean driving to my farm from home is tax > deductible? > - I always considered that commuting and as such not tax > deductible ... - home office as a business site) is deductible. An IRS agent has suggested it should be allocated to the business you are driving TO, but I can't find any direct support in the code or regulations. I'm not sure if I answered your question. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin wrote: - quote - > gd wrote:
does this mean that it is tax deductible when I drive from> > 3. Can I leverage > > buy-a-big-vehicle-and-qualify-for-section-179 for my > > teaching? > I can't imagine how you USE a big vehicle in your business. > Remember that travel from your home to the work site is > commuting (unless you have a home office), and is > non-deductible. Travel between your IT job and your > teaching job IS deductible. my job to my farm (opposite direction to driving home)? and does this mean driving to my farm from home is tax deductible? - I always considered that commuting and as such not tax deductible ... - Thanks, Maren << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| gd wrote: - quote - > I have a full-time job as IT person with a company - and on the side,
Only if they treat you as a subcontractor, with your> I teach IT security classes to whosoever who will pay. > For the past two years, I have taught an IT security class > in Spring semesters at a state university. The university > hires me as a part-time lecturer and I get paid. > My questions are as follows: > 1. Can I consider this on-the-side activity as a business? > If not, what do I need to do to be considered a business? renumeration reported on a 1099-misc instead of a W-2. - quote - > 2. Does being a "lecturer" per university lecturer make me a
Dunno. This is something you take up with them.> University employee and not a business? - quote - > 3. Can I leverage
No. there is absolutely no valid business reason, assuming> buy-a-big-vehicle-and-qualify-for-section-179 for my > teaching? you are a subcontractor versus W-2 employee, for such a vehicle. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| gd wrote: - quote - > I have a full-time job as IT person with a company - and on the side,
If you treat it as a business for all other purposes, it's> I teach IT security classes to whosoever who will pay. > For the past two years, I have taught an IT security class > in Spring semesters at a state university. The university > hires me as a part-time lecturer and I get paid. > My questions are as follows: > 1. Can I consider this on-the-side activity as a business? > If not, what do I need to do to be considered a business? likely you will be able (and required) to treat it as a business for tax purposes. Others can give the 9 rules.... - quote - > 2. Does being a "lecturer" per university lecturer make me a
I got a 1099 as a substitute lecturer at a community> University employee and not a business? college. (Whether it should have been a W-2 is a separate question.) This seems close enough that I'd go with whichever option the University takes -- if they took a W-4 and give you a W-2, you're an employee. (If THEY set the course time, it's more likely to lean that way. If the University sets the course syllabus and gives the student credit, that also leans toward "employee".) If they took a W-9 and give you a 1099-MISC, then THEY consider you an independent contractor. They could be correct. - quote - > 3. Can I leverage
I can't imagine how you USE a big vehicle in your business.> buy-a-big-vehicle-and-qualify-for-section-179 for my > teaching? Remember that travel from your home to the work site is commuting (unless you have a home office), and is non-deductible. Travel between your IT job and your teaching job IS deductible. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| gd_souza[at]hotmail.com (gd) wrote - quote - > I have a full-time job as IT person with a company - and on the
It's possible that the university treats you as an employee> side, I teach IT security classes to whosoever who will pay. > For the past two years, I have taught an IT security class > in Spring semesters at a state university. The university > hires me as a part-time lecturer and I get paid. > My questions are as follows: > 1. Can I consider this on-the-side activity as a business? (in which case you are....well...an employee.) It's also possible that you are treated as an independent contractor, and they issue you a Form 1099 with the amount they paid you in Box 7 as Non-Employee Compensation, in which case you are self-employed (in-business). - quote - > If not, what do I need to do to be considered a business?
If you have other income from other individuals orbusinesses that you taught classes to, then you are self-employed. - quote - > 2. Does being a "lecturer" per university lecturer make me a
You would have to ask the university how you are being> University employee and not a business? treated. Did you get a W-2 or 1099 from them? - quote - > 3. Can I leverage
I have to begin wondering when the IRS will challange the> buy-a-big-vehicle-and-qualify-for-section-179 for my > teaching? vehicle deductions based on "ordinary and necessary" need for an SUV to get to and from the college. In any event, if the usage of the vehicle (any vehicle) is less than 50% for business, then the answer is "no", as Section 179 isn't applicable to assets used less than 50% for business. Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a full-time job as IT person with a company - and on the side, I teach IT security classes to whosoever who will pay. For the past two years, I have taught an IT security class in Spring semesters at a state university. The university hires me as a part-time lecturer and I get paid. My questions are as follows: 1. Can I consider this on-the-side activity as a business? If not, what do I need to do to be considered a business? 2. Does being a "lecturer" per university lecturer make me a University employee and not a business? 3. Can I leverage buy-a-big-vehicle-and-qualify-for-section-179 for my teaching? - GD << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| business |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Quicken Business vs. Money Business. Whats better??? ontheway: I have been working with MS Money 2003 Deluxe and SB and am having SERIOUS issues with the invoice creation program. I need and hope for MUCH MORE... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 11-01-2004 02:24 AM | |
| Money 2003 for Business vs. Quicken home and Business? kdnms: Trying to find out from someone who has used both, if the Money for business software offers better features than Quicken Home & Business? | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-21-2003 12:46 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |