| | |||
| |||
| John H. Fisher wrote: - quote - > IR-2004-14, Jan. 28, 2004
darn it! I wonder how many of my clients that will affect.> TREASURY AND IRS PROPOSE NEW TAX FORM FOR CORPORATE TAX RETURNS > WASHINGTON - In an effort to increase the transparency of corporate tax > return filings, today the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service > released a new proposed draft form, Schedule M-3, Net Income (Loss) > Reconciliation for Corporations with Total Assets of $10 Million or More, > for use by certain corporate taxpayers filing Form 1120, U.S. Corporation > Income Tax Return. The new Schedule M-3 would expand the current Schedule > M-1, which has not been updated in several decades. I'll worry about that tomorrow. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| IR-2004-14, Jan. 28, 2004 TREASURY AND IRS PROPOSE NEW TAX FORM FOR CORPORATE TAX RETURNS WASHINGTON - In an effort to increase the transparency of corporate tax return filings, today the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service released a new proposed draft form, Schedule M-3, Net Income (Loss) Reconciliation for Corporations with Total Assets of $10 Million or More, for use by certain corporate taxpayers filing Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return. The new Schedule M-3 would expand the current Schedule M-1, which has not been updated in several decades. Schedule M-1 reconciles a corporation's financial accounting income or loss with the taxable income or loss reported on the Form 1120. Large and Midsize Business (LMSB) taxpayers (those with total assets of $10 million or more) will complete the new Schedule M-3 in lieu of completing Schedule M-1. Small Business and Self-Employed (SB/SE) taxpayers will not be required to complete the new Schedule M-3 and will continue to complete Schedule M-1. Other federal tax returns that also require the completion of Schedule M-1 (e.g., Form 1065, U.S. Partnership Return of Income, and Form 1120S, U.S. Income Tax Return for an S Corporation) may incorporate Schedule M-3 in the future. "The proposed Schedule M-3 will make differences between financial accounting net income and taxable income more transparent. This will help agents determine from the return whether the return should be audited and identify the differences that matter most in the audit of the return. We see benefits to taxpayers and the IRS from the new Schedule: a reduction in unnecessary audits and a swifter focus on those differences that are more likely to arise when taxpayers take aggressive positions or engage in aggressive transactions. In addition, the increased transparency will have a deterrent effect," stated Treasury Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy Pam Olson. "The new Schedule will let the IRS sharpen and improve monitoring of corporate compliance," said IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson. "Our objective is to identify and resolve potential audit issues promptly. This information will help us do so." "These changes will enable us to focus our compliance resources on returns and issues that need to be examined and avoid those that do not," said Deborah M. Nolan, IRS Large and Mid-Size Business Division Commissioner. "Increasing the transparency of corporate tax returns is critical to our objectives to provide certainty to taxpayers sooner and to improve overall compliance." The Treasury and IRS expect that the proposed Schedule M-3 will be finalized for use with federal income tax returns for tax years ending on or after December 31, 2004. The draft Schedule M-3, along with a general description of Schedule M-3, is attached and may be accessed on www.irs.gov. Instructions for Schedule M-3 will be released in the future and will be available on www.irs.gov. Comments are requested regarding proposed Schedule M-3, including comments on ways to minimize taxpayer burden. In addition, comments are requested on significant difficulties that taxpayers may encounter if the use of Schedule M-3 is required for a tax year that begins before Schedule M-3 is finalized. Comments should be submitted by April 30, 2004 to: Susan Blake Internal Revenue Service Office of Pre-Filing and Technical Guidance 1111 Constitution Ave. NW Mint Bldg M3-353 LM:PFT Washington, DC 20224 Telephone number 202-283-8414 email address: PFTG2[at]irs.gov "Jack" - John H. Fisher - TaxService[at]aol.com Philadelphia, Pa - Atlantic City, NJ - West Wildwood, NJ My Newsgroups & Boards at: http://members.aol.com/TaxService/index.html Where Ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise!= ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| corporate, form, returns, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Married filing seperate returns vs filing joint returns K.H.: Assuming that our AGI is over ~300K (personal exemptions are completely phased out), shall we file separately so that my wife can claim our two... | Taxes | 4 | 12-12-2003 04:44 AM | |
| Corporate debt Martha Matthews, EA: TP has C Corp (he is only shareholder) with a loan due TP from money he put into company. Can he not take a salary and take repayments of the loan... | Taxes | 1 | 10-30-2003 02:42 PM | |
| Corporate Name Change Wade: How does one change the name of a stock (and symbol) when a company (such as AOL) decides to do so | Microsoft Money | 3 | 10-19-2003 05:52 PM | |
| Corporate bonds CWatters: I have a situation where the capital gain on a bond isn't taxable but the income is. Is there a way to flag this in Money so that it appears... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 07-13-2003 04:35 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |