| |||||||
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > > If it was a 2002 calendar year estate, then the loss
You are absolutely right that if 2002 was not the final year> > > > belonged on the beneficiaries' returns in 2002. If it > > > > was a fiscal year that began in 2002 and ended in 2003 > > > > (you don't make that clear), then the info on the K-1 > > > > goes on the 2003 return of the beneficiaries. > > > Calendar year 2002 > > > > > SNIP Does it matter that the estate did not actually > > > cease to exist until 2003? > > Yes. 2003 will be its final year, not 2002. > > > By saying that it was final in 2002 means that it does not > > exist in 2003. > If the estate was not closed by 12/31/2002 then you can not > pass out the capital loss to the beneficiaries until the > year the estate is closed and you file the real final 1041. > What ever capital loss was not used by the estate in 2002 > may be carried to 2003 and passed out to the beneficiaries > if that is the final year. > If all assets were distributed and no income will be earned > in 2003 then you might be able to say the estate was closed > for tax purposes in 2002. of the estate, the capital loss could not be passed out to the beneficiaries. But in the original question the poster DID say that it was the final year. (He said something to the effect that he filed the FINAL return for a 2002 estate in April of 2003, but it wasn't clear whether it was a fiscal or calendar year estate.) It was only in a later message that he said that the estate was not closed until 2003. He seems to be giving mixed messages. But losses (capital or otherwise) cannot be passed out to the beneficiaries until the final return. Vida Freeman, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote in - quote - > Hedberg wrote:
SNIP> > "Vida Freeman" <pippen[at]ix.netcom.com> wrote: - quote - > > > If it was a 2002 calendar year estate, then the loss
If the estate was not closed by 12/31/2002 then you can not> > > belonged on the beneficiaries' returns in 2002. If it > > > was a fiscal year that began in 2002 and ended in 2003 > > > (you don't make that clear), then the info on the K-1 > > > goes on the 2003 return of the beneficiaries. > > Calendar year 2002 > > > SNIP Does it matter that the estate did not actually > > cease to exist until 2003? > Yes. 2003 will be its final year, not 2002. > By saying that it was final in 2002 means that it does not > exist in 2003. pass out the capital loss to the beneficiaries until the year the estate is closed and you file the real final 1041. What ever capital loss was not used by the estate in 2002 may be carried to 2003 and passed out to the beneficiaries if that is the final year. If all assets were distributed and no income will be earned in 2003 then you might be able to say the estate was closed for tax purposes in 2002. Martha Matthews, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Hedberg wrote: - quote - > "Vida Freeman" <pippen[at]ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Yes. 2003 will be its final year, not 2002.> > "Hedberg" <hhedberg[at]swbell.net> wrote > > > Filed the final tax return for an estate in April 2003 for > > > tax year 2002. The estate had a long term capital loss for > > > 2002 in excess of the $3000 maximum and because this was the > > > estate's final return, the loss in excess of $3000 gets > > > distributed among the beneficiaries and reported to them on > > > Schedule K-1 of form 1041 line 13C. The question that I > > > have is, is this capital loss carryover available for use > > > against the beneficiaries 2002 capital gains or 2003 capital > > > gains? The instructions for 1041 Schedule K don't seem to > > > answer this question. > > If it was a 2002 calendar year estate, then the loss > > belonged on the beneficiaries' returns in 2002. If it was a > > fiscal year that began in 2002 and ended in 2003 (you don't > > make that clear), then the info on the K-1 goes on the 2003 > > return of the beneficiaries. > Calendar year 2002 > Wow. That's not the answer that I anticipated. I assumed > that because the loss in excess of $3000 could not be used > to reduce estate income in 2002 that it could not be used to > reduce beneficiaries' incomes for 2002 either. Does it > matter that the estate did not actually cease to exist until > 2003? By saying that it was final in 2002 means that it does not exist in 2003. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Vida Freeman" <pippen[at]ix.netcom.com> wrote: - quote - > "Hedberg" <hhedberg[at]swbell.net> wrote
Calendar year 2002> > Filed the final tax return for an estate in April 2003 for > > tax year 2002. The estate had a long term capital loss for > > 2002 in excess of the $3000 maximum and because this was the > > estate's final return, the loss in excess of $3000 gets > > distributed among the beneficiaries and reported to them on > > Schedule K-1 of form 1041 line 13C. The question that I > > have is, is this capital loss carryover available for use > > against the beneficiaries 2002 capital gains or 2003 capital > > gains? The instructions for 1041 Schedule K don't seem to > > answer this question. > If it was a 2002 calendar year estate, then the loss > belonged on the beneficiaries' returns in 2002. If it was a > fiscal year that began in 2002 and ended in 2003 (you don't > make that clear), then the info on the K-1 goes on the 2003 > return of the beneficiaries. Wow. That's not the answer that I anticipated. I assumed that because the loss in excess of $3000 could not be used to reduce estate income in 2002 that it could not be used to reduce beneficiaries' incomes for 2002 either. Does it matter that the estate did not actually cease to exist until 2003? Thanks Harold << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hedberg <hhedberg[at]swbell.net> wrote: - quote - > Filed the final tax return for an estate in April 2003 for
The items on the 2002 K-1 form all go on the beneficiaries> tax year 2002. The estate had a long term capital loss for > 2002 in excess of the $3000 maximum and because this was the > estate's final return, the loss in excess of $3000 gets > distributed among the beneficiaries and reported to them on > Schedule K-1 of form 1041 line 13C. The question that I > have is, is this capital loss carryover available for use > against the beneficiaries 2002 capital gains or 2003 capital > gains? The instructions for 1041 Schedule K don't seem to > answer this question. 2002 tax return, as specified in the column (c) heading. Its right on the K-1 form. If necessary, the beneficiaries may have to amend their 2002 returns. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Hedberg" <hhedberg[at]swbell.net> wrote - quote - > Filed the final tax return for an estate in April 2003 for
If it was a 2002 calendar year estate, then the loss> tax year 2002. The estate had a long term capital loss for > 2002 in excess of the $3000 maximum and because this was the > estate's final return, the loss in excess of $3000 gets > distributed among the beneficiaries and reported to them on > Schedule K-1 of form 1041 line 13C. The question that I > have is, is this capital loss carryover available for use > against the beneficiaries 2002 capital gains or 2003 capital > gains? The instructions for 1041 Schedule K don't seem to > answer this question. belonged on the beneficiaries' returns in 2002. If it was a fiscal year that began in 2002 and ended in 2003 (you don't make that clear), then the info on the K-1 goes on the 2003 return of the beneficiaries. Vida Freeman, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Filed the final tax return for an estate in April 2003 for tax year 2002. The estate had a long term capital loss for 2002 in excess of the $3000 maximum and because this was the estate's final return, the loss in excess of $3000 gets distributed among the beneficiaries and reported to them on Schedule K-1 of form 1041 line 13C. The question that I have is, is this capital loss carryover available for use against the beneficiaries 2002 capital gains or 2003 capital gains? The instructions for 1041 Schedule K don't seem to answer this question. Thanks for any thoughts. Harold << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| beneficiaries, carryover, estate, loss, year |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| transactions frmo year 2005 showing in year 2006 Jack W: Using Mney 2004. 4 transactions for year 2005 are showing up in year 2006 under the category and payee list, but they are not showing up as a... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-18-2006 11:04 PM | |
| 2004 Strategy Question: Have a substantial long-term capital loss carryover sinc720d: I have a decent sized (over $10K) LONG-TERM capital loss carryover heading into 2004. The loss comes from stock held for close to 3 years. ... | Taxes | 2 | 01-07-2004 02:36 AM | |
| Re: Can we move / reclaim a charitable contribution in a later year from the donation year?! Seth Breidbart: David <webmaster@crmsolmag.8m.com> wrote: > We donated appoximately $10,000 in stock to a temple we > belonged to in 2001. They asked what we... | Taxes | 2 | 07-03-2003 08:17 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |