|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Don Priebe <priebe[at]iname.com> wrote: - quote - > A firm I previously worked for did not receive a renewal of
I suppose that if Congress REALLY wanted to promote efiling,> their NY approval due to unresolved issues from the previous > year. Their NY e-files were held in abeyance by the state > for several weeks until they finally resolved the issues and > were put back on the approved list. they would pass "preemptive" legislation that FORCES states to accept federal efiling credentials if they (the state) wish to participate in efiling at all. One of the (many) things that prevent me from getting excited about efiling is the potential range of problems I could face in various states where I file less than a handful of returns (3 in CA, 1 in NY). MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| I've been checking the rules because CA has started the efile-for-all requirement this year (if we did over 100 returns last year, anyway). We've been Federally and California approved for years. We do some clients who have moved away but send their stuff to us. And some who have out-of-state property (as rentals in Hawaii). So far, we can handle every situation (even Oregon since we are not "doing business in Oregon") EXCEPT New York. Have a client who moved to Colorado (Fed efile ok, CO efile ok) but owns a farm rental in upstate NY. Would I have to get licensed in NY to do a NY NR electronically? According to NY - YES. Forget it. Nan, EA in LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > One of the Gear-Up speakers claims that he efiles state
A firm I previously worked for did not receive a renewal of> returns with no prior registration with the state(s) in > question and has never had a return rejected. In some cases > the state will (retroactively) ask for a copy of his federal > authorization, in others they ask for nothing. their NY approval due to unresolved issues from the previous year. Their NY e-files were held in abeyance by the state for several weeks until they finally resolved the issues and were put back on the approved list. -- Don EA in Upstate NY << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Nan Eklund <naneklund[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Thanks to the NY preparers. I keep rereading the NY
Me too!! <g> instructions and - for one single return - U.S. Post Office > gets my business. One of the Gear-Up speakers claims that he efiles state returns with no prior registration with the state(s) in question and has never had a return rejected. In some cases the state will (retroactively) ask for a copy of his federal authorization, in others they ask for nothing. However, I would note that his home state is CA (so he is obviously registered there), and he has never specifically mentioned NY. I point this out because CA and NY are the two states that I would expect to be the most picky on this point. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Thanks to the NY preparers. I keep rereading the NY instructions and - for one single return - U.S. Post Office gets my business. Nan, EA in LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Nan Eklund" <naneklund[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > I've been ok'd for efiling IRS and CA for years. However,
You have to register with NYS. I think you can get the form> one client has a NR NY state rental. Have to efile Fed and > CA. Checking the NY home page, it looks as though I have to > get formally approved by NY to efile a non-resident return > there. > Is that correct? Hard to read their rules....... at their website (don't recall the form #) -- <<< Benjamin Yazersky CPA [NJ & NY] > > << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > I've been ok'd for efiling IRS and CA for years. However,
Yes. You have to submit Form TR-584-MN before you can be> one client has a NR NY state rental. Have to efile Fed and > CA. Checking the NY home page, it looks as though I have to > get formally approved by NY to efile a non-resident return > there. > Is that correct? Hard to read their rules....... approved to e-file a NY return. http://www.tax.state.ny.us/PDF/elf/tr584mn_602.pdf (of course for one return, you might consider the US Postal Service ... ) -- Don EA in Upstate NY << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I've been ok'd for efiling IRS and CA for years. However, one client has a NR NY state rental. Have to efile Fed and CA. Checking the NY home page, it looks as though I have to get formally approved by NY to efile a non-resident return there. Is that correct? Hard to read their rules....... Nan, EA in LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| preparers, ques |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Question for NYS preparers Wcm7315: This year, Line 56 on IT 201, is new. It is the "sales and use tax" line, which requests payment of sales tax on purchases bought out of state... | Taxes | 5 | 01-21-2004 01:08 PM | |
| Should Tax Preparers be Licenced? Will Eckenstein: I'm a college student doing resarch on tax preparers for one of my final esays. My thesis statement is: "Tax preparers should be certified or... | Taxes | 55 | 01-07-2004 02:55 AM | |
| Should Tax preparers be licenced by the Gov.? Will Eckenstein: I'm a college student grathering reserch for my final paper. My working thesis is "Individual tax preparers should be certified in some way in... | Taxes | 6 | 12-17-2003 09:43 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |