|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Katiej_1958[at]yahoo.com (Katie Jaques) wrote: snip - quote - > A competent tax adviser would have suggested that the
Or doesn't ask until after they have made the sales.> taxpayer time either the move or the stock transactions so > as to avoid this problem. Of course, it often happens that > the client can't control the timing, for one reason or > another. Drew Edmundson, CPA (NC) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| lrnich[at]juno.com (Lois Nicholson) wrote: - quote - > Suppose a taxpayer moves to a different state sometime
In a word: Yes.> during the year, and throughout the year sold various > securities. Suppose the sales that occurred when the > taxpayer lived in "state A" resulted in large capital gains > while those that occurred when the taxpayer lived in "state > B" resulted in large capital losses. For federal purposes, > the gains and losses essentially offset each other. > However, would the taxpayer owe a huge state tax bill in > state A and have a big loss (that would be difficult to > offset) in state B? The effect depends somewhat, however, on how each state calculates taxable income or tax liability for a nonresident or part-year resident. Most states that have graduated rates calculate the tax on the basis of the taxpayer's total income from all sources, and then prorate the result by the ratio of in-state income to total income (sometimes TI, sometimes AGI, depending on the state). The result is that the in-state income is taxed at the same average rate per dollar of AGI or TI that would have applied if the taxpayer had been a resident. The capital losses included in total income could reduce the rate of tax due on the capital gains included in in-state income. They still wouldn't offset, though. (Generally the proration percentage can be more than 100%.) In a flat-rate state that calculation wouldn't make any difference, because every dollar is taxed at the same rate anyway. And you're right, the out-of-state capital loss won't offset the in-state capital gain. So you have a net capital gain in State A and a net capital loss, subject to limitation, in State B. A competent tax adviser would have suggested that the taxpayer time either the move or the stock transactions so as to avoid this problem. Of course, it often happens that the client can't control the timing, for one reason or another. Katie in San Diego The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Lois Nicholson wrote: - quote - > Suppose a taxpayer moves to a different state sometime
Tha'ts right!> during the year, and throughout the year sold various > securities. Suppose the sales that occurred when the > taxpayer lived in "state A" resulted in large capital gains > while those that occurred when the taxpayer lived in "state > B" resulted in large capital losses. For federal purposes, > the gains and losses essentially offset each other. > However, would the taxpayer owe a huge state tax bill in > state A and have a big loss (that would be difficult to > offset) in state B? Although I can't comment on the magnitude of state A's tax you know. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| lrnich[at]juno.com (Lois Nicholson) writes: - quote - > Suppose a taxpayer moves to a different state sometime
The gains and losses are attributable to the state of> during the year, and throughout the year sold various > securities. Suppose the sales that occurred when the > taxpayer lived in "state A" resulted in large capital gains > while those that occurred when the taxpayer lived in "state > B" resulted in large capital losses. For federal purposes, > the gains and losses essentially offset each other. > However, would the taxpayer owe a huge state tax bill in > state A and have a big loss (that would be difficult to > offset) in state B? residence at the time of the transaction. How it winds up affecting the state returns depends on how the states handle it. Some go strictly by what happened during residence and others figure the full year and apply a percentage based on the percentage of income earned while a residence. Phil Marti Topeka, KS << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Lois Nicholson" <lrnich[at]juno.com> wrote: - quote - > Suppose a taxpayer moves to a different state sometime
Possibly - depending on how the states treat the items> during the year, and throughout the year sold various > securities. Suppose the sales that occurred when the > taxpayer lived in "state A" resulted in large capital gains > while those that occurred when the taxpayer lived in "state > B" resulted in large capital losses. For federal purposes, > the gains and losses essentially offset each other. > However, would the taxpayer owe a huge state tax bill in > state A and have a big loss (that would be difficult to > offset) in state B? individually. Gene E. Utterback, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Lois Nicholson wrote: - quote - > Suppose a taxpayer moves to a different state sometime
It depends on the states, but I think you've got the gist of> during the year, and throughout the year sold various > securities. Suppose the sales that occurred when the > taxpayer lived in "state A" resulted in large capital gains > while those that occurred when the taxpayer lived in "state > B" resulted in large capital losses. For federal purposes, > the gains and losses essentially offset each other. > However, would the taxpayer owe a huge state tax bill in > state A and have a big loss (that would be difficult to > offset) in state B? it. If "A" is AZ, then the allocation percentage cannot exceed 100%, so your tax essentially cannot exceed what you would pay if you were an "A" resident the entire year. If "B" is CA, and your losses exceed $3000, you may not be able to carry over ANY of the excess to future years. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| Lois Nicholson wrote: - quote - > However, would the taxpayer owe a huge state tax bill in
The answer there is going to depend on the state laws> state A and have a big loss (that would be difficult to > offset) in state B? involved and how they handle part year resident return situations. So without knowing the two states involved and then being "up to speed" on the intricacies of each state's laws, it's going to be impossible to say. -- Ed Zollars, CPA Phoenix, Arizona << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Suppose a taxpayer moves to a different state sometime during the year, and throughout the year sold various securities. Suppose the sales that occurred when the taxpayer lived in "state A" resulted in large capital gains while those that occurred when the taxpayer lived in "state B" resulted in large capital losses. For federal purposes, the gains and losses essentially offset each other. However, would the taxpayer owe a huge state tax bill in state A and have a big loss (that would be difficult to offset) in state B? Thanks, Lois Nicholson << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| capital, gains or losses, partyear, returns, state |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Reporting capital gains/losses on foreign accounts P.: I'm a Resident Alien and I have foreign bank accounts and hold stocks in them. Now my questions regarding capital gains/losses on these stocks as I... | Taxes | 1 | 01-03-2004 03:36 AM | |
| Capital gains Losses ...can they be carried backwards ? Cindy white: Capital gains Losses in the Year 2001 and 2002 ...can they be carried backwards and offset against prior year Capital gains ? Under what... | Taxes | 2 | 08-29-2003 05:22 AM | |
| "^~"" FREE - STATE OF THE ART ADVERTISING "^~"" Dave: Free impossible to resist state-of-the-art advertising. Yours for the asking at: http://www.flyinads.com/7584 +Ff:1CnY?HK@fUhEa^:_ | Microsoft Money | 1 | 08-06-2003 10:16 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |