|
#21
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > Really simple. there is nothing I can find anywhere that
.....And just how are you going to do that when he has moved> > > says an employer MUST use the US mail to furnish the W-2 to > > > the employee. As you noted, that is one way, and one many > > > use. > > > > > If anyone else can point to an actual mailing *requirement*, > > > I'd be thrilled to know about it. > > Mailing it to "general delivery, <city> ", although it won't > > go through and will be returned to you (assuming that it > > isn't actually delivered!) will constitute timestamped proof > > that you did "have it available" by the due date..... > But the requirement isn't to "have it available", it's to > "furnish it to the employee". and left no forwarding address? [Remember that the sub-thread I responded to addressed that of a former employee that one no longer has contact with....] << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| Larry Mitchell, E.A. <larryamitchell[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Following is an excerpt from the instructions for Form W-2:
That says that mailing is _one way_ to meet the requirement.> "Furnishing Copies B, C and 2 to employees. Furnish copies > B, C, and 2 of Form W-2 to your employees, generally by > February 2, 2004. You will meet the 'furnish' requirement > if the form is properly addressed and mailed on or before > the due date." > It certainly appears to use the word "mailed". Therefore > requiring the taxpayer to spend 37 cents for each employee. My employer handed me my W-2 in January; are you claiming that he didn't meet the requirement because he didn't mail it instead? Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| D. Stussy <kd6lvw[at]kd6lvw.ampr.org> wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford wrote:
But the requirement isn't to "have it available", it's to> > Really simple. there is nothing I can find anywhere that > > says an employer MUST use the US mail to furnish the W-2 to > > the employee. As you noted, that is one way, and one many > > use. > > > If anyone else can point to an actual mailing *requirement*, > > I'd be thrilled to know about it. > Mailing it to "general delivery, <city> ", although it won't > go through and will be returned to you (assuming that it > isn't actually delivered!) will constitute timestamped proof > that you did "have it available" by the due date..... "furnish it to the employee". Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| jik[at]kamens.brookline.ma.us (Jonathan Kamens) wrote: - quote - > I agree that the IRS permits employers to make W-2's
Following is an excerpt from the instructions for Form W-2:> available for pick-up by employees who report to work at the > same location as the W-2's between when the W-2's are issued > and January 31, as long as those employees are notified of > how and where to pick up their W-2's. In other words, a > central distribution point for people in a building is > acceptable -- the IRS does not actually require someone to > walk around the building delivering the W-2's to each > individual. > The question then, is what the IRS requirement is for > employees who do *not* report to work at the same location > as the W-2's between when they are issued and January 31. > The revenue ruling I cited clearly indicates that in this > situation, regardless of whether the employee is expected to > return to work after January 31, the employer is obligated > to make a reasonable effort to get the W-2 into the > employee's hands by January 31. Mailing it by January 31 is > one accepted way to do that, but not the only one. > Merely making the document available for pick-up by an > employee who won't be there to pick it up is not acceptable. > Anyone who claims that it is, is simply wrong. > I simply can't understand why anyone would continue to > advocate for this position after reading the revenue ruling > I cited. I've had enough of banging my head against this > particular wall, so this is my last word on the topic. "Furnishing Copies B, C and 2 to employees. Furnish copies B, C, and 2 of Form W-2 to your employees, generally by February 2, 2004. You will meet the 'furnish' requirement if the form is properly addressed and mailed on or before the due date." It certainly appears to use the word "mailed". Therefore requiring the taxpayer to spend 37 cents for each employee. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| I agree that the IRS permits employers to make W-2's available for pick-up by employees who report to work at the same location as the W-2's between when the W-2's are issued and January 31, as long as those employees are notified of how and where to pick up their W-2's. In other words, a central distribution point for people in a building is acceptable -- the IRS does not actually require someone to walk around the building delivering the W-2's to each individual. The question then, is what the IRS requirement is for employees who do *not* report to work at the same location as the W-2's between when they are issued and January 31. The revenue ruling I cited clearly indicates that in this situation, regardless of whether the employee is expected to return to work after January 31, the employer is obligated to make a reasonable effort to get the W-2 into the employee's hands by January 31. Mailing it by January 31 is one accepted way to do that, but not the only one. Merely making the document available for pick-up by an employee who won't be there to pick it up is not acceptable. Anyone who claims that it is, is simply wrong. I simply can't understand why anyone would continue to advocate for this position after reading the revenue ruling I cited. I've had enough of banging my head against this particular wall, so this is my last word on the topic. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > Jonathan Kamens wrote:
Mailing it to "general delivery, <city> ", although it won't> > Harlan Lunsford <lunstax[at]bellsouth.net> writes: > > > But of course the employer is under no compunction, legal or > > > otherwise, to spend 37 cents on a stamp. All that is > > > requried is to be made available. > > As I said before, I don't think that's correct. I've > > already quoted IRS documents which state explicitly that the > > employer is obligated to furnish the W4 to the employee, not > > merely to make it available for him to pick up. You haven't > > responded to that posting; how do you reconcile your > > position with IRS documents which seem to say the opposite? > SEEM to say? I rest my case. > Really simple. there is nothing I can find anywhere that > says an employer MUST use the US mail to furnish the W-2 to > the employee. As you noted, that is one way, and one many > use. > If anyone else can point to an actual mailing *requirement*, > I'd be thrilled to know about it. go through and will be returned to you (assuming that it isn't actually delivered!) will constitute timestamped proof that you did "have it available" by the due date..... << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > As I said before, I don't think that's correct. I've
The latter paragraph speaks only of an employee not expected> > > already quoted IRS documents which state explicitly that the > > > employer is obligated to furnish the W4 to the employee, not > > > merely to make it available for him to pick up. You haven't > > > responded to that posting; how do you reconcile your > > > position with IRS documents which seem to say the opposite? > > SEEM to say? > I was trying to be polite, but since that seems to have > confused you, I'll be more direct. The IRS documents are > clear. You are wrong. > > If anyone else can point to an actual mailing *requirement*, > > I'd be thrilled to know about it. > Revenue ruling 55-145 explicitly rejects your assertion that > making the statement available for pickup "without making an > effort to deliver it to the employee" is sufficient. See > http://www.taxlinks.com/rulings/1955/revrul55-145.htm. > "The mere preparation of the Form W-2 by the employer and > holding it at his place of business until the employee calls > for it are not sufficient compliance with the law and > regulations." to still be coming by the place of business to pick the W-2 up. It does not contemplate continued employment. If IRS *required* employers to mail out W-2's, there would be something more substantial in the publications than use of the generic word "furnish". Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > As I said before, I don't think that's correct. I've
I was trying to be polite, but since that seems to have> > already quoted IRS documents which state explicitly that the > > employer is obligated to furnish the W4 to the employee, not > > merely to make it available for him to pick up. You haven't > > responded to that posting; how do you reconcile your > > position with IRS documents which seem to say the opposite? > SEEM to say? confused you, I'll be more direct. The IRS documents are clear. You are wrong. - quote - > If anyone else can point to an actual mailing *requirement*,
Revenue ruling 55-145 explicitly rejects your assertion that> I'd be thrilled to know about it. making the statement available for pickup "without making an effort to deliver it to the employee" is sufficient. See http://www.taxlinks.com/rulings/1955/revrul55-145.htm. "The mere preparation of the Form W-2 by the employer and holding it at his place of business until the employee calls for it are not sufficient compliance with the law and regulations." Can you cite a later revenue ruling which contradicts this one? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Jonathan Kamens wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford <lunstax[at]bellsouth.net> writes:
SEEM to say? I rest my case.> > But of course the employer is under no compunction, legal or > > otherwise, to spend 37 cents on a stamp. All that is > > requried is to be made available. > As I said before, I don't think that's correct. I've > already quoted IRS documents which state explicitly that the > employer is obligated to furnish the W4 to the employee, not > merely to make it available for him to pick up. You haven't > responded to that posting; how do you reconcile your > position with IRS documents which seem to say the opposite? Really simple. there is nothing I can find anywhere that says an employer MUST use the US mail to furnish the W-2 to the employee. As you noted, that is one way, and one many use. If anyone else can point to an actual mailing *requirement*, I'd be thrilled to know about it. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <lunstax[at]bellsouth.net> writes: - quote - > But of course the employer is under no compunction, legal or
As I said before, I don't think that's correct. I've> otherwise, to spend 37 cents on a stamp. All that is > requried is to be made available. already quoted IRS documents which state explicitly that the employer is obligated to furnish the W4 to the employee, not merely to make it available for him to pick up. You haven't responded to that posting; how do you reconcile your position with IRS documents which seem to say the opposite? In addition to the excerpts I posted before, here is another excerpt, from the 2004 Form W2 instructions: "Furnish Copies B, C, and 2 of Form W-2 to your employees, generally, by January 31, 2005. You will meet the "furnish" requirement if the form is properly addressed and mailed on or before the due date." I've seen it stated here numerous times that if the employer cannot put the W2 in the employee's hand, it is sufficient for the employer to mail the W2 such that it is postmarked January 31 or earlier. However, I've never seen it claimed by anyone besides you that it is sufficient merely to have the W4 available for pick-up, and I don't think it is. Here are links to previous articles in this newsgroup, several of which were posted by prominent readers of the group who are far more knowledgeable than I am, claiming that the employer is obligated to put the W4 in the mail (some of these actually refer to 1099's, not W2's, but I believe the rule is the same for both): http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain The case of an employer who cannot furnish a W2 to a former employee because the employee left no address is an interesting boundary case. On the one hand, I doubt the IRS wants to penalize an employer for making a good-faith effort to furnish all required W2's, but on the other hand, I believe that the employer was *required* to get a valid W4 with an address from the employee before paying wages, so it seems to me that if the employer failed to do that, the employer is at least partially at fault for now being unable to even mail the W2 to the last known address for the employee (i.e., that would have been the address on the W4, if the employer had gotten one from the employee). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > the language seems to agree with what my understanding
And if it comes back, save it (in the unopened envelope) in> > > has always been, i.e., that the employer must deliver it > > > directly to the employee or mail it by January 31. > > We have a client who would have great difficulty in doing > > this for one of their employees. The employee apparently is > > in jail--somewhere. Lived alone and apparently left no > > forwarding address. > Mail to last known address is all you can do. the case that it's somehow contested later that you never TRIED to mail it. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > the language seems to agree with what my understanding
But of course the employer is under no compunction, legal or> > > has always been, i.e., that the employer must deliver it > > > directly to the employee or mail it by January 31. > > We have a client who would have great difficulty in doing > > this for one of their employees. The employee apparently is > > in jail--somewhere. Lived alone and apparently left no > > forwarding address. > Mail to last known address is all you can do. otherwise, to spend 37 cents on a stamp. All that is requried is to be made available. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Mail to last known address is all you can do.
Gave no address to start with. When given the W4 form, shesaid she would have to check her address and get back with them. Never showed back up. Carol What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > the language seems to agree with what my understanding
Mail to last known address is all you can do.> > has always been, i.e., that the employer must deliver it > > directly to the employee or mail it by January 31. > We have a client who would have great difficulty in doing > this for one of their employees. The employee apparently is > in jail--somewhere. Lived alone and apparently left no > forwarding address. __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > the language seems to agree with what my understanding
We have a client who would have great difficulty in doing> has always been, i.e., that the employer must deliver it > directly to the employee or mail it by January 31. this for one of their employees. The employee apparently is in jail--somewhere. Lived alone and apparently left no forwarding address. Carol What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <lunstax[at]bellsouth.net> writes: - quote - > There IS no deadline for employers to mail out said
The IRS seems to disagree with you.> documents. > Contrary to public opinion, payor do not have to mail the > docs, merely to have them available for pickup at place of > business. http://www.irs.gov/faqs/faq-kw244.html says that the employer "must provide employess with a Form W-2 by January 31." Publication 15 says that the employer must "furnish each employee a completed Form W-2" by January 31. The language in these two documents does not seem to agree with your assertion that they only have to make them available; the language seems to agree with what my understanding has always been, i.e., that the employer must deliver it directly to the employee or mail it by January 31. But of course, as we've discussed numerous times in this newsgroup, it's not like the IRS tries very hard to enforce this requirement. Businesses don't tend to get in trouble for delivering W-2's a bit late as long as it's only a bit late. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Read" <read.tull[at]att.net> wrote: - quote - > I can't remember when is the deadline for employers to mail
Jan. 31st.> out W2s, and 1099s Missy << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Read wrote: - quote - > I can't remember when is the deadline for employers to mail
There IS no deadline for employers to mail out said> out W2s, and 1099s documents. Contrary to public opinion, payor do not have to mail the docs, merely to have them available for pickup at place of business. And they must have them "available" by January 31st. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I can't remember when is the deadline for employers to mail
Don't know about a deadline to "mail out" W2s and 1099s but> out W2s, and 1099s the forms are supposed to be available to the recipient on January 31. Carol What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Read wrote: - quote - > I can't remember when is the deadline for employers to mail
The recipient copy is normally due by January 31, which I> out W2s, and 1099s believe is extended to February 2. The IRS/SSA copies are due by February 28(!), extended to March 1 this year. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| deadline |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Conversion to Roth + marriage deadline? Garry W: I have an end-of-year question I'm scratching my head over. My fiancee and I are planning to marry sometime in the new year. She's been interested... | Taxes | 4 | 12-29-2003 12:56 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |