Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #4  
Old 01-21-2004, 12:11 PM
D. Stussy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is this a valid casualty loss?

Pistolesi wrote:

- quote -

> Take this scenario one step further ... here's aprx what
> happened to me last year [I'm fully covered with $100
> deductible]:
> [1] Car was totalled (rear ender).
> [2] Existing note aprx $15,500.
> [3] FMV $9,800.
> [4] Replacement cost $32,000.
> [5] I'm out the cash to pay the balance of the loan ($15,500 - $9,800).
> Further, I now have additional expenses of higher priced
> vehicle, loss of my [installed] executive phone, and higher
> payment for longer period of time. {It was a nice car
> [pouting].}
> How do I calculate my deductible loss?


Incomplete information: INSURANCE.
Many areas REQUIRE auto insurance.

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #3  
Old 01-21-2004, 11:52 AM
Herb Smith
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is this a valid casualty loss?

"Pistolesi" <pistolesi[at]nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:

- quote -

> Take this scenario one step further ... here's aprx what
> happened to me last year [I'm fully covered with $100
> deductible]:
> [1] Car was totalled (rear ender).
> [2] Existing note aprx $15,500.
> [3] FMV $9,800.
> [4] Replacement cost $32,000.
> [5] I'm out the cash to pay the balance of the loan ($15,500 - $9,800).
> Further, I now have additional expenses of higher priced
> vehicle, loss of my [installed] executive phone, and higher
> payment for longer period of time. {It was a nice car
> [pouting].}
> How do I calculate my deductible loss?


Assuming that the insurance covered $9,700 ($100 deductible)
of the $9800 FMV, you have no significant loss to deduct. In
your list above, items (2), (4) and (5) are totally
irrelevant to the calculation of "deductible loss". The
gross loss starts with the difference between the FMV
immediately BEFORE the accident ($9,800) and the FMV AFTER
the accident ($0). That nets to $9,800. Then subtract any
insurance reinbursement ($9,700) to get a "net loss" of
$100. Subtract $100 (because that is the law) and you have
NO deductible loss to claim. The fact that your note is
$15,500 and the car FMV is only $9,800 is a consequence of
taking a long repayment period (or high interest rate) on a
vehicle that depreciates faster than you are paying if off.
Not the IRS's fault that you are upside down on your loan.

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #2  
Old 01-20-2004, 08:26 AM
Nan Eklund
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is this a valid casualty loss?

If you are totally covered by insurance, you have no
casualty loss. (The $100 isn't going to get anywhere.).
Replacement costs never count.

Nan, EA in LA

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #1  
Old 01-20-2004, 07:28 AM
Arthur L. Rubin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is this a valid casualty loss?

Pistolesi wrote:

- quote -

> Take this scenario one step further ... here's aprx what
> happened to me last year [I'm fully covered with $100
> deductible]:
> [1] Car was totalled (rear ender).
> [2] Existing note aprx $15,500.
> [3] FMV $9,800.
> [4] Replacement cost $32,000.
> [5] I'm out the cash to pay the balance of the loan ($15,500 - $9,800).


If the insurance company's stated FMV is accurate, your
loss is the $100 deductible. Sorry.

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
 
Old 01-20-2004, 07:09 AM
Stuart O. Bronstein
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is this a valid casualty loss?

"Pistolesi" <pistolesi[at]nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:

- quote -

> Take this scenario one step further ... here's aprx what
> happened to me last year [I'm fully covered with $100
> deductible]:
> [1] Car was totalled (rear ender).
> [2] Existing note aprx $15,500.
> [3] FMV $9,800.
> [4] Replacement cost $32,000.
> [5] I'm out the cash to pay the balance of the loan ($15,500 -
> $9,800).


Maybe I misunderstand, but I have a little problem with 3
and 4. How can the fair market value be $9800 and
replacement cost be more than three times the amount? They
should be the same number - at least that's what the
insurance companies say.

Or do you mean that you replaced your $9800 car with one
that cost you $32000?

Stu

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #-1  
Old 01-16-2004, 06:20 AM
Pistolesi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is this a valid casualty loss?

Take this scenario one step further ... here's aprx what
happened to me last year [I'm fully covered with $100
deductible]:

[1] Car was totalled (rear ender).
[2] Existing note aprx $15,500.
[3] FMV $9,800.
[4] Replacement cost $32,000.
[5] I'm out the cash to pay the balance of the loan ($15,500 - $9,800).

Further, I now have additional expenses of higher priced
vehicle, loss of my [installed] executive phone, and higher
payment for longer period of time. {It was a nice car
[pouting].}

How do I calculate my deductible loss?

Sandy

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
 

Tags
casualty, loss, valid
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Money/MSN can't find a valid ticker symbol
Warren Sisson: I hold some Viacom Inc. class B shares - symbol VIAB. When getting quotes or updating prices, MSN says The symbol is invalid. If I get quotes...
Microsoft Money 2 08-14-2004 04:29 PM
Unable to use a valid stock symbol
: I put in a stock and later deleted it. Now I go back and try to reinput same stock with the same symbol, (FASMX), and it keeps stating that that...
Microsoft Money 1 11-26-2003 02:10 AM
Do I have a casualty loss?
Cheryl: Do these facts indicate a casualty loss AND in what Year should it be reported - 2002 when the loss happened, or 2003 when I received the funds and...
Taxes 3 11-09-2003 06:21 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57 AM.