|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Nan Eklund wrote: - quote - > How about personal service corporations?
I thought your's was a sub S?> We're squeeking clean........aren't we..... Cheer$, harlan Lunsford, EA on the other side. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Ed Zollars, CPA wrote: - quote - > You are assigning responsibility to the wrong
I actually printed a sign that I carry in my briefcase for> party--information reporting responsibility is doled out > under the IRC itself, and the last time I checked only the > United States Congress had the authority to put anything in > there (the President can act via the veto to try and keep > something out, and the courts can strike down a provision, > but you have to get the Congress to go along with any move > to place text in there--so this is their baby). > I point this out because our Congress-critters have done an > excellent public relations job of somehow convincing the > country they have nothing to do with anything someone might > find objectionable in the IRC--in those cases, they've > gotten the public to blame it on the IRS. Now, the IRS is > responsible for some things--but not this one. > Mr. Thomas and/or Mr. Grassley are where you start if you > want this changed... those occasions: DON'T BLAME THE IRS! WRITE TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT! -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Arthur Kamlet wrote: - quote - > Nan Eklund <naneklund[at]aol.com> wrote:
.....Although the instructions for "B" say ATTORNEYS. Other> > Individuals yes, corporations no. They seem to think > > corporations report all their income honestly. (g) > Except for a) healthcare corporations and > b) legal services corporations > who, I gather, the IRS thinks do not report their income > honestly? :^) "legal services" such as process servers DON'T have mandatory reporting if they are incorporated. You also forgot that the 1099-misc got "fishy" this year: c) Fish purchases (usually then sub-reported in box 5) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| How about personal service corporations? We're squeeking clean........aren't we..... Nan, EA (and president of a personal services tax company). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Arthur Kamlet wrote: - quote - > Except for a) healthcare corporations and
You are assigning responsibility to the wrong> b) legal services corporations > who, I gather, the IRS thinks do not report their income > honestly? :^) party--information reporting responsibility is doled out under the IRC itself, and the last time I checked only the United States Congress had the authority to put anything in there (the President can act via the veto to try and keep something out, and the courts can strike down a provision, but you have to get the Congress to go along with any move to place text in there--so this is their baby). I point this out because our Congress-critters have done an excellent public relations job of somehow convincing the country they have nothing to do with anything someone might find objectionable in the IRC--in those cases, they've gotten the public to blame it on the IRS. Now, the IRS is responsible for some things--but not this one. Mr. Thomas and/or Mr. Grassley are where you start if you want this changed... -- Ed Zollars, CPA Phoenix, Arizona << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Nan Eklund <naneklund[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Individuals yes, corporations no. They seem to think
Except for a) healthcare corporations and> corporations report all their income honestly. (g) b) legal services corporations who, I gather, the IRS thinks do not report their income honestly? :^) __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Individuals yes, corporations no. They seem to think corporations report all their income honestly. (g) Nan, EA in LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| 3D Peruna wrote: - quote - > I have a small professional services firm that frequently
Corporations do not receive 1099's. However it is incumbent> uses other consultants as part of my services. I know that > the self-employed guys get 1099's. What about the > professional corporations that I have used? on you to have documentation in your files. There is a form for this, no doubt you've seen it? a W-9 form, on which the payee certifies his business structure (proprietor, partnership or corporation) and whether or not he is subject to backup withholding. The law says you must have one of these on every payee before you pay them the very first dollar; and if not, withhold a rather large percentage for taxes, irrespective of whether or not you will wind up paying them over 600$ by year's end. Last time I looked that percentage was 31%. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a small professional services firm that frequently uses other consultants as part of my services. I know that the self-employed guys get 1099's. What about the professional corporations that I have used? Thanks, Paul << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| 1099, send |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| 1099-B Lee: IS Ms Money 2007 Deluxe capable of tracking 1099-B form transactions? I can't seem to get the Tax Reports it show anything for 1099-B nor figure... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-04-2008 03:41 AM | |
| Proper to send 1099-misc? Rob: I refunded a sizable sum to a company this year-- money I had claimed as income last year. Is it proper to send these folks a 1099-misc ? ... | Taxes | 1 | 12-09-2003 08:46 AM | |
| Filing with differences in 1099-R Cliff: I am a California tax preparer. Starting in January 2004 many of my clients who are retired on law enforcement disability pensions will begin... | Taxes | 12 | 09-09-2003 05:15 AM | |
| Sub-S, salary, distribution and 1099. Do B: I'm filing a 1120S for a new Sub-S for the first time this year for the 2002 tax year. I have of course put this off until the last possible... | Taxes | 3 | 09-05-2003 02:17 AM | |
| 1099 or W-2?? Greg Alaksdjflk: I was offered an option by the company I work with to work full time at $100,000.00/year+benefits or by independent contract (1099)... | Taxes | 7 | 08-04-2003 07:29 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |