| | |||
| |||
| garysport[at]aol.comjknnot (GarySport) wrote: - quote - > I have a question about Schedule C, Line H "If you started
At the very least, what you should do is include an> or acquired this business in 2003, check here." The > instructions say "Check this box if you acquired or opened > this business in 2003. Also check the box if you are > reopening or restarting this business after temporarily > closing it, and you did not file a 2002 Schedule C." If a > service business is resumed after a sabbatical year, is that > called a "reopening"? I didn't liquidate any assets, and > there is no product or inventory. And what exactly is the > purpose of this question and what are the ramifications of > checking "yes" or "no." If I check "yes" the IRS will think > it's a new business. But that will look funny when I list > the depreciation for "assets placed in service prior to > 2003" since a new business wouldn't have "prior assets." So > that part makes me think I'd be better off by checking "no" > that it is not a new or reopened business. But if I check > "no" the IRS will wonder why there was not a 2003 Schedule C > So there is a "Catch 22" with either answer, and there> are pluses and minuses for going either route. I'd > appreciate any comments/suggestions. Thanks. attachment sheet explaining the terms of why you didn't make any money last year in the side business. This will go a long way for you in explaining ahead of time why there is a gap in your Schedule C filing, because there are less than honest scenarios that could explain your situation. Explain your innocence beforehand, to reduce the chances of a grumpy agent who presumes guilt before innocence. Next, go to a tax pro and have him/her determime if amending your 2002 return would be of benefit, because the depreciation shouldn't go to waste (that is, just because you decided to skip a year and NOT take the depreciation credit does not change that that year's depreciation still counts; but there are some situations where that doesn't matter so much, so pay for a pro to analyze your business situation). Third, the new business checkbox offers a convenient means for an auditor to determine whether certain deductions of a newly formed business should instead be treated as Sec195 startup costs; that is, instead of deducting the full amount, expenses considered as startup costs are spread over a 5 year period. Yep, you gotta check the box, you oughta include an attachment explaining yourself, and you will undoubtedly benefit from visiting a tax pro who can evaluate your situation more fully. Shannon Gass, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a question about Schedule C, Line H "If you started or acquired this business in 2003, check here." The instructions say "Check this box if you acquired or opened this business in 2003. Also check the box if you are reopening or restarting this business after temporarily closing it, and you did not file a 2002 Schedule C." If a service business is resumed after a sabbatical year, is that called a "reopening"? I didn't liquidate any assets, and there is no product or inventory. And what exactly is the purpose of this question and what are the ramifications of checking "yes" or "no." If I check "yes" the IRS will think it's a new business. But that will look funny when I list the depreciation for "assets placed in service prior to 2003" since a new business wouldn't have "prior assets." So that part makes me think I'd be better off by checking "no" that it is not a new or reopened business. But if I check "no" the IRS will wonder why there was not a 2003 Schedule C So there is a "Catch 22" with either answer, and thereare pluses and minuses for going either route. I'd appreciate any comments/suggestions. Thanks. GS << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| line, sched |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Better off line help Roger: I have a dialup connection so I find the fact that Money 2006 only provides help using the internet really frustrating. I got Money 20006 for... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 05-20-2006 05:24 AM | |
| Payee line and memo line need to be reversed for certain transacti DALLAS STARS: I currently am using Money 2004. Here is my question- I import my transactions each month. The only problem is that evry transaction that is a... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 04-19-2006 07:49 AM | |
| Line of Credit stan: How can I set up my line of credit account where when I make a payment with principal and interest only the principal will be added to the line of... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 08-17-2004 07:36 PM | |
| Can you collect unemployment if you have a side business?, "SCHED C". Andy Green: If you make 60,000 a year at a big company, and have a side business that generates from -500 - 2,000 a year, a sole propiertership that you use a... | Taxes | 7 | 01-07-2004 03:14 AM | |
| What happens with Sched. C COGS error Wolf: In looking over my 2002 return yesterday I noticed an error which must have been a problem with Turbo Tax because it involves the Sched C COGS... | Taxes | 1 | 01-03-2004 03:55 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |