|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thank you all for clarifying our issues. Looks like we are tilting towards keeping status quo and continue as IL LLC. Once again many thanks << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| katiej_1958[at]yahoo.com (Katie Jaques) wrote: - quote - > ysamba[at]hotmail.com (A Yarlagadda) wrote:
Exactly. California Corporations Code section 17451 says, in> > However in 2002, significant amount of our revenues started > > coming from CA, b'cos one of us moved to CA to work for a > > customer in California. In 2002, the member who moved to CA, > > did pay CA State taxes (along with his part of LLC income) > > as CA is his residence state. > > > Question1: Do we have to register our LLC with Franchise Tax > > Board of California as a Foreign LLC ? (Form CA 568 etc..) > > and pay the minimum dues? Only now we came to know of > > this...so checking out for help. > Yes, your LLC is doing business in California and must > register with the California Secretary of State and must > file Form 568 and pay the $800 minimum tax plus the fee > based on total income. relevant part, "(a) Before transacting intrastate business in this state, a foreign limited liability company shall register with the Secretary of State. In order to register, a foreign limited liability company shall submit to the Secretary of State an application for registration as a foreign limited liability company, signed by a person with authority to do so under the laws of the state of its organization, on a form prescribed by the Secretary of State and setting forth: (1) The name of the foreign limited liability company and, if different, the name under which it proposes to transact business in this state. (2) The state and date of its organization and a statement that the foreign limited liability company is authorized to exercise its powers and privileges in that state. (3) The name and address of an agent for service of process on the foreign limited liability company meeting the qualifications specified in paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 17061, unless a corporate agent is designated, in which case only the name of the agent shall be set forth. (4) A statement that the Secretary of State is appointed the agent of the foreign limited liability company for service of process if the agent has resigned and has not been replaced or if the agent cannot be found or served with the exercise of reasonable diligence. (5) The address of the principal executive office of the foreign limited liability company and of its principal office in this state, if any. "(b) Annexed to the application for registration shall be a certificate from an authorized public official of the foreign limited liability company's jurisdiction of organization to the effect that the foreign limited liability company is in good standing in that jurisdiction, if the laws of that jurisdiction permit the issuance of those certificates; or, in the alternative, a statement by the foreign limited liability company that the laws of its jurisdiction of organization do not permit the issuance of those certificates." In addition to the minimum tax that Katie noted, there may be an additional fee for a foreign LLC qualifying to do business in California. The last time I did one of these for a corporation there was an additional charge of about $500. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| katiej_1958[at]yahoo.com (Katie Jaques) wrote: - quote - > snip
Sorry, that last sentence is misleading. The nonresident> As members, each of you is a taxpayer in each of those > states as well. As you know, there is no individual income > tax in Texas, so neither of you will be required to file > there. Both of you are required to file in California (one > resident, one nonresident) and pay tax to California on the > portion of the LLC's income that arises from California > sources. member owes tax to California on the portion of the LLC's income from California sources. The resident member owes tax to California on his entire distributive share of income from the LLC, from all sources. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| ysamba[at]hotmail.com (A Yarlagadda) wrote: - quote - > We are a two owners/members owned LLC, incorporated in IL
Yes, your LLC is doing business in California and must> and been there since 2001. Both the owners/members were > working in IL at that time, so we incorporated there and > have been filing Personal (including LLC's Income) Federal > and IL State taxes. > However in 2002, significant amount of our revenues started > coming from CA, b'cos one of us moved to CA to work for a > customer in California. In 2002, the member who moved to CA, > did pay CA State taxes (along with his part of LLC income) > as CA is his residence state. > Question1: Do we have to register our LLC with Franchise Tax > Board of California as a Foreign LLC ? (Form CA 568 etc..) > and pay the minimum dues? Only now we came to know of > this...so checking out for help. register with the California Secretary of State and must file Form 568 and pay the $800 minimum tax plus the fee based on total income. - quote - > In Nov 2003, the other member who was still in IL, moved to
I can think of no reason to keep an address for the LLC in> TX as part of job relocation (also happens to work as > employee of another company. He takes care of billing, > filing etc. for our LLC). As of now we are expecting > significant revenues for our LLC to flow from CA customers > (even through 2004 and possibly 2005). > Now we were wondering the following.. > Question2. Does continuing to keep the IL business address > with Legal authorities (IRS, State taxes) makes sense? Is > there any long term benefit of having record of doing > business in same state? (We would like to use a IL freinds > house address as our LLC address....any issues with this) Illinois if it is no longer doing business there. Since the LLC is organized in Illinois it may be required to continue filing information returns there. However, if it has no activity in Illinois, no income will be apportioned to Illinois and there will be no income subject to the 1.5% property tax replacement tax. You may want to consider reorganizing the LLC in California or Texas. - quote - > Question3: For our customers and suppliers, we intend to
Use whatever address is most convenient for business> give TX address (as one of the member is there to handle > office work) where all invoices and checks could be sent for > clearance. Is this ok or any issues? purposes. NEVER let the state tax tail wag the business dog! But it really doesn't matter for state tax purposes what mailing address you use. State taxes are driven by where the business is conducted, not where it gets its mail. - quote - > Question4: For year 2003, which state taxes should we file
LLC is not a very good vehicle in Texas because Texas> for the LLC -- IL, Part TX and also foreign LLC fees for CA?? imposes its franchise tax on the LLC as if it were a C corporation. As noted above, you probably need to continue filing in Illinois as long as the LLC is organized there, and if it did any business in Illinois in 2003, it will have some income subject to the 1.5% replacement tax. It must also file in California and Texas because it is doing business there. - quote - > Question5: For year 2004, which state taxes should we file
Probably all three, as noted above.> for the LLC - IL, TX, CA. As members, each of you is a taxpayer in each of those states as well. As you know, there is no individual income tax in Texas, so neither of you will be required to file there. Both of you are required to file in California (one resident, one nonresident) and pay tax to California on the portion of the LLC's income that arises from California sources. Same thing in Illinois. Income is sourced to the states by an apportionment formula. For California purposes, the formula consists of three factors (property, payroll, sales) with the sales factor double weighted. Illinois uses a single factor of sales or gross receipts. You probably need professional help to prepare your returns and those of the LLC this year. Katie in San Diego The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| We are a two owners/members owned LLC, incorporated in IL and been there since 2001. Both the owners/members were working in IL at that time, so we incorporated there and have been filing Personal (including LLC's Income) Federal and IL State taxes. However in 2002, significant amount of our revenues started coming from CA, b'cos one of us moved to CA to work for a customer in California. In 2002, the member who moved to CA, did pay CA State taxes (along with his part of LLC income) as CA is his residence state. Question1: Do we have to register our LLC with Franchise Tax Board of California as a Foreign LLC ? (Form CA 568 etc..) and pay the minimum dues? Only now we came to know of this...so checking out for help. In Nov 2003, the other member who was still in IL, moved to TX as part of job relocation (also happens to work as employee of another company. He takes care of billing, filing etc. for our LLC). As of now we are expecting significant revenues for our LLC to flow from CA customers (even through 2004 and possibly 2005). Now we were wondering the following.. Question2. Does continuing to keep the IL business address with Legal authorities (IRS, State taxes) makes sense? Is there any long term benefit of having record of doing business in same state? (We would like to use a IL freinds house address as our LLC address....any issues with this) Question3: For our customers and suppliers, we intend to give TX address (as one of the member is there to handle office work) where all invoices and checks could be sent for clearance. Is this ok or any issues? Question4: For year 2003, which state taxes should we file for the LLC -- IL, Part TX and also foreign LLC fees for CA ?? Question5: For year 2004, which state taxes should we file for the LLC - IL, TX, CA. many thanks << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| address, business, changing, state, taxes |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Equitable relief for State Taxes M. Holland: Does equitable relief that has been granted for federal taxes automatically apply to the state taxes owed? If not, is there a similar way to get... | Taxes | 1 | 07-17-2003 01:29 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |