|
#1
| |||
| |||
| xfire[at]earthlink.net says... - quote - > I am a medically retired Firefighter from a 37 Act County in
snip> California. I rehabilitated under Calif Gov Code 31725.6, > and returned to work in a "Non-Safety" position. You do not state what section of the Gov Code you retired under. If your disability is "heart" then there are further problems you might face. This is the "presumptive" provision which is not excludable income. I can't answer your initial questions as I have never had a client in that status but I consider myself an expert in the other acpects of disability 37 act pensions (I am retired disability law enforcement from San Diego). Feel free to contact me further on this forum only. Cliff Powell CA Tax Preparer << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| xfire[at]earthlink.net (Bob W) wrote: - quote - > I am a medically retired Firefighter from a 37 Act County in > California. I rehabilitated under Calif Gov Code 31725.6, > and returned to work in a "Non-Safety" position. > Had I chosen to take a service-connected disability and > retire, then I would have received 50% of my Final Average > Salary. This would have been tax free (CA & IRS). > My question is for the Calif Tax Preparers that have dealt > with clients in this category. > When your client retired from the "Non-Safety" position, > what did their monthly check consist of? > A. 50% of FAS, Tax Free, based on their salary as of the > date of injury? > B. A + all COLA's up to the date of retirement? > C. (A&B) + the FAS from the Non-Safety position. > D. ?????????????? > Sorry if this is the wrong group, but I couldn't find any > other group to post this question to. Thanks in advance for > your help This should have been explained to you by your county retirement system before you accepted a rehab'd position. Under CA Govt. Code section 31725.6(g), your service credit will continue as a safety member, as defined in Govt. Code 31469.3, and not withstanding the restrictions of section 31560 limiting saftey member service to an actual safety position. In addition, you should be paid for any difference between the disability retirement pay rate and the rehab salary, if it is less. But you are actually working for less money, because your wages in the new position, not being paid under the disability provisions of the Govt. Code, are taxable. The differential pay is not taxable. When you retire it will be the same as if you had been retired initially, unless you have earned service credit putting you over fifty percent of FAS, in which case the amount exceeding the fifty percent will be taxable.If the new position FAS is higher, your 50% for purposes of Internal Revenue Code section 104(a) will be based on that amount when you retire, not the original amount. Timothy E Kelly, Esq. Certified Specialist, Taxation Law State Bar of Califonria Board of Legal Specialization << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I am a medically retired Firefighter from a 37 Act County in California. I rehabilitated under Calif Gov Code 31725.6, and returned to work in a "Non-Safety" position. Had I chosen to take a service-connected disability and retire, then I would have received 50% of my Final Average Salary. This would have been tax free (CA & IRS). My question is for the Calif Tax Preparers that have dealt with clients in this category. When your client retired from the "Non-Safety" position, what did their monthly check consist of? A. 50% of FAS, Tax Free, based on their salary as of the date of injury? B. A + all COLA's up to the date of retirement? C. (A&B) + the FAS from the Non-Safety position. D. ?????????????? Sorry if this is the wrong group, but I couldn't find any other group to post this question to. Thanks in advance for your help << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| act, california, county, retirement |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Re: Mandatory E-Filing - New California Law Ed Zollars, CPA: Nan Eklund wrote: > Also, no penalty applies if there is "reasonable cause" to > not efile. "Reasonable cause" includes TAXPAYER'S ELECTION > to... | Taxes | 5 | 08-09-2003 01:45 AM | |
| Now accepting California clients !!! Michael T Wing CPA: Yes, that's right! If you need to file a tax return in California on or after January 1, 2004 and DON'T want to incur additional return preparation... | Taxes | 2 | 08-04-2003 07:10 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |