|
#4
| |||
| |||
| SamJack wrote: - quote - > My question is this, was IRS obligate to come to a decision within
Not really--in reality, assuming the IRS acted properly in> the 30 days they specified? If so, do I have a case to get my penalty > reduced/waived? denying that you had reasonable cause (a fact we can't say much about since you gave no details), the fact that they didn't act for an extra 30 days actually gave you use of those funds for another 30 days. Absent some really strange facts, most likely you didn't suffer any harm from the IRS not acting within the time period they mentioned--and, in any event, they weren't under any obligation to act within that period to begin with. -- Ed Zollars, CPA Phoenix, Arizona << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "SamJack" <infomaker[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > I was charged a large penalty for for filing my return late
I do believe it is possible to appeal. But sitting here and> in year 2000. > Recently, I wrote a letter making a case for 'reasonable' > cause in an attempt to get the penalty reduced or > eliminated. Which is allowed by IRS reg. > Unfortunately, it was denied. > After I sent a letter, I received a notice from IRS saying > that they received the letter and that day would act within > 30 days from the date the notice was generated. > Almost two months (60 days) later, I recieved the denial. > My question is this, was IRS obligate to come to a decision within > the 30 days they specified? If so, do I have a case to get my penalty > reduced/waived? > Any help would be greatly appreciated. not having seen any of the paperwork or correspondence that you have, its hard to be more specific as to what might be involved in your case. You might want to consult with your own CPA/tax advisor. -- <<< Benjamin Yazersky CPA [NJ & NY] > > << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "SamJack" <infomaker[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Almost two months (60 days) later, I recieved the denial.
No.> My question is this, was IRS obligated to come to a decision > within the 30 days they specified? - quote - > If so, do I have a case to get my penalty reduced/waived?
The abatement denial letter you received from IRS should bedesignated an 854C letter. I haven't reviewed one in a while but as I recall the letter runs two or three pages. Toward the end, the letter should explain that you have the right to appeal the denial and the procedures for pursing an appeal. If the penalty has been paid and you are within the statutory time limit (two years as I recall), another option is to file suit in U.S.district court of the U.S. Court of Claims. Due the expense and complexity of going to court, filing suit is not a meaningful option for most taxpayers. If your facts support a reason cause exception for failing to file by the due date, you should should invoke your appeal rights. But before you do so, it would benefit you to consult with a tax professional, preferably a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) or an Enrolled Agent (EA). Reasonable cause exceptions for failing to file by the due date are covered in Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) 20, Chapter 1. For your convenience, I've pasted a link below. At the link, click on "Relief from Penalties" and "Methods of Appealing Penalties." http://www.irs.gov/irm/part20/ch01s01.html Barney Byrd << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| SamJack wrote: - quote - > I was charged a large penalty for for filing my return late
Were they obligated? Not in the least. After all, you're> in year 2000. > Recently, I wrote a letter making a case for 'reasonable' > cause in an attempt to get the penalty reduced or > eliminated. Which is allowed by IRS reg. > Unfortunately, it was denied. > After I sent a letter, I received a notice from IRS saying > that they received the letter and that day would act within > 30 days from the date the notice was generated. > Almost two months (60 days) later, I recieved the denial. > My question is this, was IRS obligate to come to a decision within > the 30 days they specified? If so, do I have a case to get my penalty > reduced/waived? dealing with the government here, and the bureacracy. Their corrspondence workload varies, from heavy to extremely overburdensome, and I'm really amazed sometimes that they manage to answer everything. eventually. Christmas Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "SamJack" <infomaker[at]yahoo.com> wrote - quote - > My question is this, was IRS obligate to come
No, but it would be nice if they were a tad more realistic> to a decision within the 30 days they specified? about the timing of correspondence, in both directions. - quote - > If so, do I have a case to get my penalty
No, but you can ask again. Basically asking for them to> reduced/waived? review the denial. You have to really believe that the "cause" is reasonable, maybe even being able to show that the cause has been accepted by the Service in the past. Look for PLR's, or court cases that support your position. -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia taxman at negia.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I was charged a large penalty for for filing my return late in year 2000. Recently, I wrote a letter making a case for 'reasonable' cause in an attempt to get the penalty reduced or eliminated. Which is allowed by IRS reg. Unfortunately, it was denied. After I sent a letter, I received a notice from IRS saying that they received the letter and that day would act within 30 days from the date the notice was generated. Almost two months (60 days) later, I recieved the denial. My question is this, was IRS obligate to come to a decision within the 30 days they specified? If so, do I have a case to get my penalty reduced/waived? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Sam << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| federal, income, penalty, reasonale, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Underpayment Penalty sftydvr: What is the proper method of avoiding an under payment of taxes penalty for a situation where the sale of a large asset occurred in the last part... | Taxes | 6 | 10-25-2003 09:34 PM | |
| Opinion Penalty? Dick Adams: Taxpayer is approached with an investment opportunity that has significant tax benefits. Being a prudent person, taxpayer goes to CPA for advice. ... | Taxes | 12 | 10-24-2003 06:30 AM | |
| underpayment tax penalty question Collean: I read that: The underpayment can also be avoided by prepaying through withholding and estimated tax payments an amount equal to 100% or more of... | Taxes | 1 | 09-26-2003 08:31 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |