|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Michael S. Rosen wrote: - quote - > I cannot wait for the changes to the Third Party Designee
I'm agreeing with you 100% here.> rules for 2003. It is so frustrating to have an IRS agent > tell me they can't talk to me because the authorization has > expired. Not too long ago I sent a letter instead, > requesting resolution for my client's problem. When no > response was received, I called and was able to get this > much from the agent - typically when there is no POA on file > they will ignore the correspondence. That is just > unbelievable. They could at least contact the taxpayer > directly to confirm the circumstances. First however, that third party designee I think does not extend to after the fact negotiations with IRS, but only pertains to what's on the return itself. For instance, return filed last year, and this year client gets a CP 2000 letter. Even if you don't get a POA from client, you can still submit information to IRS on a case. The few times I've done this, I've never been disappointed. I even called IRS once after maybe 60 days, telling them about the letter I had submitted, they found it, and after affirming what I knew that they couldn't discuss the case with me, she said. wait a minute.....;;;..... I waited....;;;.... Then "Your client will be hearing from us shortly and will be smiling." I grinned and said thanks very much! But I don't think shooting from the hip like that is a good idea these days. Since Rosetti left, I'm not sure I have a good idea what's going through their heads these days. In short, always get a POA, even though you might have that little box on page 2 checked. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Michael S. Rosen" <mike_20878[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I cannot wait for the changes to the Third Party Designee
Whenever I have sent correspondence to the Service, without> rules for 2003. It is so frustrating to have an IRS agent > tell me they can't talk to me because the authorization has > expired. Not too long ago I sent a letter instead, > requesting resolution for my client's problem. When no > response was received, I called and was able to get this > much from the agent - typically when there is no POA on file > they will ignore the correspondence. That is just > unbelievable. They could at least contact the taxpayer > directly to confirm the circumstances. a POA on file, they have ALWAYS responded to the taxpayer. I have no idea why an agent told you otherwise, and his response is totally contrary to my experience. Barry Picker, CPA/PFS, CFP << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I cannot wait for the changes to the Third Party Designee rules for 2003. It is so frustrating to have an IRS agent tell me they can't talk to me because the authorization has expired. Not too long ago I sent a letter instead, requesting resolution for my client's problem. When no response was received, I called and was able to get this much from the agent - typically when there is no POA on file they will ignore the correspondence. That is just unbelievable. They could at least contact the taxpayer directly to confirm the circumstances. Mike << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| correspondence, ignoring, irs, poa |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |