|
#3
| |||
| |||
| A.G. Kalman <agk202[at]netscape.net> wrote: - quote - > I have had experience with temporary rental activity of
That is what I have done in similar situations. As a> buyers and owners. In each case the property was treated as > a not-for-profit activity that limited the deductions to no > more than the income received. No Schedule E was prepared. > The income was entered as Other Income and the expenses went > on the Schedule A where they would normally appear.... > including the points paid to the lender to acquire the first > mortgage. clarification, I believe that the mortgage interest and real estate taxes would normally be deductible IN FULL (no limitations, "passive" or otherwise). Any OTHER deductions would be limited to the excess of income over the interest and tax deductions. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Dave Brandman" <davebrandman[at]no.spam.me.comcast.net> wrote: - quote - > I purchased in August 2003 a house that will become my
From your facts, It is likely that you have a loss on> permanent home in June 2004. The previous owner of the home > is renting the home back from me for 10 months while his own > new home is being built. He is paying market rates for the > rental. > I will have a net rental loss for both 2003 and for the > entire 10 month period, in particular because I paid 3.5 > points (about $11,000) on the mortgage to buy down the rate > to 3%. Were it not for this expense, I would have a net > profit on the rental. > I am married, and gross family income is over $150K. > Is there any way I can preserve the full benefit of this > deduction. "active rental real estate", in which case you can deduct such loss, up to $25,000 per year, from other income. I would download Pub 527 to confirm that you did in fact actively participate in renting the property, although its hard, based on your comments, to think you didn't. Mike Lewis, CPA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Dave Brandman wrote: - quote - > I purchased in August 2003 a house that will become my
It's not clear to me that the $11,000 is a deductible> permanent home in June 2004. The previous owner of the home > is renting the home back from me for 10 months while his own > new home is being built. He is paying market rates for the > rental. > I will have a net rental loss for both 2003 and for the > entire 10 month period, in particular because I paid 3.5 > points (about $11,000) on the mortgage to buy down the rate > to 3%. Were it not for this expense, I would have a net > profit on the rental. > I am married, and gross family income is over $150K. > Is there any way I can preserve the full benefit of this > deduction. expense. It would only be deductible if it were prepaid interest paid to acquire your main home. You appear to be treating this property not as a "not-for-profit" temporary activity, but as a rental. In addition, even if it was your main home, the points would have to be reasonable and typical of what is going on in that area of the country. I don't know if your buy down of the loan is typical or atypical. I have had experience with temporary rental activity of buyers and owners. In each case the property was treated as a not-for-profit activity that limited the deductions to no more than the income received. No Schedule E was prepared. The income was entered as Other Income and the expenses went on the Schedule A where they would normally appear.... including the points paid to the lender to acquire the first mortgage. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Dave Brandman" <davebrandman[at]no.spam.me.comcast.net> wrote: - quote - > I purchased in August 2003 a house that will become my
I am not sure you are able to deduct the points you paid on> permanent home in June 2004. The previous owner of the home > is renting the home back from me for 10 months while his own > new home is being built. He is paying market rates for the > rental. > I will have a net rental loss for both 2003 and for the > entire 10 month period, in particular because I paid 3.5 > points (about $11,000) on the mortgage to buy down the rate > to 3%. Were it not for this expense, I would have a net > profit on the rental. > I am married, and gross family income is over $150K. > Is there any way I can preserve the full benefit of this > deduction. this property. The rules for deducting points are pretty clear: 1 - The settlement statement must identify them; 2 - they must be computed as a percentage of the loan principal; 3 - they must not exceed the normal amount charged in the area; 4 - they must be paid from the buyer's funds; 6 - you must use the cash method of account on your tax return; 7 - they must be related to your principal residence. I think the small hoop for you is #7. Since the property will NOT be your principal residence at any time during 2003 I believe you are not eligible to deduct the points you paid to purchase the property. You may be eligible to amortize the points over the life of the loan and I certainly think you could add the points to your cost basis of the property, but I do not agree with a full deduction in 2003. Had your use been split in 2003, I would have no problem with the deduction of the points. The problem that I see is that there was not only no personal use in 2003, but all the use was business use. The caveat here is that I have not fully researched this issue. Sorry, and good luck, Gene E. Utterback, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I purchased in August 2003 a house that will become my permanent home in June 2004. The previous owner of the home is renting the home back from me for 10 months while his own new home is being built. He is paying market rates for the rental. I will have a net rental loss for both 2003 and for the entire 10 month period, in particular because I paid 3.5 points (about $11,000) on the mortgage to buy down the rate to 3%. Were it not for this expense, I would have a net profit on the rental. I am married, and gross family income is over $150K. Is there any way I can preserve the full benefit of this deduction. Dave ------------------- Dave Brandman Atlanta, GA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| estate, question, real, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| real estate partnership Donald S. Goldman: I have a small interest in a real estate partnership (7I get periodic payments and at the end of the year a K-1 showing the income (which because... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 12-11-2006 12:19 AM | |
| LLC / Real Estate Question FE: In late January 2003, I bought a single family home, fixed it up, then put it back on the market. It closes next week, the last week of October... | Taxes | 2 | 11-02-2003 05:10 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |