|
#12
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > You're right, there's absolutely nothing confusing at this
Harlan, they don't grow us Polish folk that tall.....> point. I wouldn't touch his former practice with a ten foot > Pole! (pun intended) Your favorite blonde, female, Polish-type Northern lady..... Helen, EA in PA Member of The Tax Gang President, PA Society of Enrolled Agents Campaigning for NAEA Board of Directors - Looking for YOUR vote << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > Phoebe Roberts, EA wrote:
Sloppy terminology on my part, for lack of better> > That deal wouldn't make sense at any price for me. Our > > fixed cost (software, paper, occupancy, CPE, malpractice > > coverage, clerical time to copy and assemble, etc. - > > everything but prep and review costs) for a simple return is > > about $50, assuming we added the hypothetical 500 new > > clients. > While I'm scratching my head I'm wondering about your > definition of fixed costs. My MBA tells me that some of > those items you mention are indeed fixed costs, e.g. > occupancy, CPE, insurance, but the rest are what we refer to > as variable costs, i.e. they vary with the volume. terminology. (And sloppy analysis, to some extent, but we don't normally see a huge variance in volume from year to year). When we set our prices for the coming year, we analyze the cost of a client without regard to the time it takes to do their return, then add a per-hour rate for prep time. That "fixed cost" includes both the truly fixed costs you mentioned and (many) variable costs that aren't related to prep and review time. It helps us remember that we can't make anything on low-dollar returns, because we don't have the volume. - quote - > on average 36
On a good day, I can get the client to hand over their> minutes later he's out the door. information in 36 minutes. Heck, it takes me 36 minutesto get a return from "ready to print" to "ready to deliver," and we e-file all our returns, too! Good thing everyone's different. ![]() Phoebe ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| mark kominkiewicz CPA wrote: - quote - > Met yet again with the seller. Spoke of "lessor" valuation,
Gene Dobre! I think.> 5% down, and terms over 3 years(40/30/30 on receipts, not > revenue.) (instead of 2). Frankly, the vibe I got was kinda > odd. > I told him I wanted to see his Schedule C. He just about > froze. He wasn't comfortable discussing this schedule c, > because he didn't want to "lead me down a confusing path." > Confusing, what's so damn confusing. He mumbled something > about a nice "cash" business. I told him I have no way of > verifying whats going on. No PL, no cash flows, nothing. > Just a schedule showing returns and receipts by month for > the last year. Don't know if there is a spike, or not. > Strikes me as odd I guess, since I figured this kinda stuff > should be at his fingertips. You're right, there's absolutely nothing confusing at this point. I wouldn't touch his former practice with a ten foot Pole! (pun intended) Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Met yet again with the seller. Spoke of "lessor" valuation, 5% down, and terms over 3 years(40/30/30 on receipts, not revenue.) (instead of 2). Frankly, the vibe I got was kinda odd. I figured with the terms I worked up, it might be doable for me. Not easy though. Thought an extra year would help in transition. I also spoke of non compete, retention language, new client language, old client new fees language, and old client additional fees language. I told him I wanted to see his Schedule C. He just about froze. He wasn't comfortable discussing this schedule c, because he didn't want to "lead me down a confusing path." Confusing, what's so damn confusing. He mumbled something about a nice "cash" business. I told him I have no way of verifying whats going on. No PL, no cash flows, nothing. Just a schedule showing returns and receipts by month for the last year. Don't know if there is a spike, or not. Strikes me as odd I guess, since I figured this kinda stuff should be at his fingertips. We went back and forth a few times. I left the meeting with my list (mentioned above), a request for the sched c, and gave him a couple of days to think it over. Say, anything else to discuss if such a contract comes up? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Phoebe Roberts, EA wrote: - quote - > mark kominkiewicz CPA wrote:
While I'm scratching my head I'm wondering about your> > this deal doesn't make sense at any price? > Your MBA should be able to tell you that, too. ![]() > That deal wouldn't make sense at any price for me. Our > fixed cost (software, paper, occupancy, CPE, malpractice > coverage, clerical time to copy and assemble, etc. - > everything but prep and review costs) for a simple return is > about $50, assuming we added the hypothetical 500 new > clients. definition of fixed costs. My MBA tells me that some of those items you mention are indeed fixed costs, e.g. occupancy, CPE, insurance, but the rest are what we refer to as variable costs, i.e. they vary with the volume. IF I could speak Polish (instead of mediocre Russian), and IF the practice were offered to me and IF in this geographical area, I might consider it, for my variable costs are low enough. Just my time and a bit more paper and toner, cause my usual federal and two state returns are all efiled and I print out client's copy on the spot, wrap it up in a little blue folder, collect my check, and on average 36 minutes later he's out the door. Sometimes I wish I did have a clerk, though. Expecially blonde, ... ohnevermind. I'd just have to raise my rates to pay her. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA ================================================== ========== Moderator: Maintaining a mistress may be an ordinary and necessary business expense. I know of one case where, upon audit, the mistress' income was added back in to the business owner's income. The IRS just does not understand $60,000 a year clerical workers. It's a rough game. <g================================================ ============ << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Considering all of this, would a counteroffer of about 45%
I was offered a small (80 returns, lower than my normal> to 55% make sense? I am trying to figure out at want point > (diminishing marginal return)such a deal makes sense? Or > this deal doesn't make sense at any price? fees) practice for $10 a client, counting only clients that I actually prepared a return for the next year. That was the ASKING price, I didn't even try to negotiate. The seller was a retired CPA using the retail version of TurboTax with white-out over the "self-prepared" legend. Bought it, increased most of the fees, kept about 70% of the clients. -- Don EA in Upstate NY << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| mark kominkiewicz CPA wrote: - quote - > this deal doesn't make sense at any price?
Your MBA should be able to tell you that, too. ![]() That deal wouldn't make sense at any price for me. Our fixed cost (software, paper, occupancy, CPE, malpractice coverage, clerical time to copy and assemble, etc. - everything but prep and review costs) for a simple return is about $50, assuming we added the hypothetical 500 new clients. Assuming 15 minutes of prep and review time, you could still make a decent hourly rate. But you're probably going to have 15 minutes of "Hey, I'm the new guy" conversation, 5-10 minutes to get familiar with the client and the file (assuming there is a file), 5-10 minutes to set it up in the computer (assuming the seller hasn't computerized, which wouldn't surprise me), and 10-15 minutes of prep and review time. So 35-50 minutes, for which you'll get about $30. If your other returns are $100 returns, you probably have a good system for handling them, and you might be able to make money on an $80 return. But if your average return is $200-300, you're just buying yourself the opportunity to work for cheap. Phoebe ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Knew that damn MBA of mine would come in handy. Did a quick SWOT yesterday, about 6 strengths, 20 weaknesses, 2 opportunities, 5 threats. Still waiting for the gent to respond. Considering all of this, would a counteroffer of about 45% to 55% make sense? I am trying to figure out at want point (diminishing marginal return)such a deal makes sense? Or this deal doesn't make sense at any price? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > With an average of 80 per return, I doubt there is any
As it was so aptly put in Monty Python and the Holy Grail> upside in price, or at least very little. "Run Away, Run Away". << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| mark_kominkiewicz_cpa[at]hotmail.com (mark kominkiewicz CPA) wrote: - quote - > I have been contacted about an interesting opporunity. I am
Yep, spent a couple of hours with this guy on Saturday.> CPA in the midwest, relatively small practice, but quite > active. > Recently, a small one person tax practice contacted me > inquiring about purchasing his business. Here is what I > know so far: > 1. About 45k in revenues, 500 1040's and 30 or so 1129's. > Some yearly writeup work, but not much. > 2. He is retiring and had the business about 29 years. > 3. His client base is primarily Polish and speak polish. > My story is I am a CPA with small practice, 38 years old, > and speak polish (thought sloppily I might add). Been doing > taxes for some time, got the entrepreneur bug in me. > Whats next? Valuation? CPA firms go for .9 to 1.5 > revenues, based on revenue type (compilation, write up, > audit, tax etc). What about retention? A factor here? > Downpayment? Average is 0 to 25%, with terms over 3-5 > years, some interest bearing some not. What about growth? > Should I consider marketing now? What about resale? How > difficult would it be to sell if I had too? Wants 45K up front or 50K over 2 years. I thought he ran the practice kinda sloppily. Looked a bit unorganized, but so what. Considering I was Polish, and he and his clients were Polish, he thinks it would work out naturally. Looking closer at the number, his 1x valuation may be off. With an average of 80 per return, I doubt there is any upside in price, or at least very little. Same goes for other services. Strikes me strictly as a 1040 practice. He has had these clients for some time, and works out of his home. Uses his home number as business number too. No routine in terms of client interaction. They can call when they want. No rules on business hours or access. Valuation should be somewhat lower, maybe .75. And the 11.1% per year seems kinda high too ( 22,500 + 2500 int) x 2 years) I spent today watching the bears win (finally), and getting some questions together, which I faxed over to him. Big one was a copy of the schedule c he files for the last 3 years. No offense, but I think this guy is really old school, and has a tough time separating business from life. My big thing is say I purchase and find out in a few years I want to sell. I think it would be tough to get out. (Old friend said in whatever deal you get into, whats your exit strategy? good advise) Still stewing about it. Was 60/40 to go for it, now 55/45 against. Guy wants out though. He's got to be close to 70 years old now. I probably could come up with an offer. Plus the us polskis stick with each. Will keep up to date. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| mark kominkiewicz CPA wrote: - quote - > 1. About 45k in revenues, 500 1040's and 30 or so 1129's.
I agree with Dick - are you sure you want those clients?> Some yearly writeup work, but not much. (The only person I know in real life who does that volume of returns has a staff of 5-6, and she's grossing a heck of a lot more than $45k.) We bought a practice that needed a substantial fee increase (between 50% and 200%, depending on the client), and ended up retaining about 25% of the prior CPA's clients. Between paying for those clients (we paid based on our billings, so if the client didn't return, we didn't pay for them), and attempting to get and keep the 75% who didn't stay with us long-term, it turned out to be a bad deal. And that was without having to do any software conversion, re-entering data, etc. Can you do another 500 returns this tax season? We have a very small practice, so 25 new returns is a big increase for us, and the years we've added more than that have just been horrible - new clients take a lot more work than established clients do, and you usually can't bill for that extra effort. - quote - > Whats next? Valuation? CPA firms go for .9 to 1.5
We've purchased a couple of times. Our standard agreement> revenues, based on revenue type (compilation, write up, > audit, tax etc). What about retention? A factor here? > Downpayment? Average is 0 to 25%, with terms over 3-5 > years, some interest bearing some not. What about growth? > Should I consider marketing now? What about resale? How > difficult would it be to sell if I had too? is a 3-4 year payout based on our billings to retained clients for services the prior CPA had performed, capped at 100% of their actual billings on a client by client basis. One payment in late April, one in late October, no interest. Example with a 3-year payout: 10 clients, prior CPA did tax returns only, $100 per return. Year 1: We do returns for 9 clients, billing $150 per return for a total of $1350. We pay old CPA 1/3 = $450. We have a maximum of $450 additional liability (9 clients retained times $100 per return, less $450 already paid), which is actually a cap of $50 more per client. Year 2: We do returns for 7 clients, billing $150 per return for a total of $1,050. We also do a return for one client's new S-corp and bill $500. We pay the old CPA 1/3 of 1,050 = $350. At this point, we've paid $100 per client, so we have no liability for Year 3. Personally, I wouldn't buy the practice you've described. But if I did, I'd anticipate spending the entire time between now and April 15th assimilating them, with no time for additional marketing. I'd also assume no resale possibility - you might keep some of them long enough to pass on to your successor, but it's too early to think about that. Phoebe ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I have been contacted about an interesting opporunity. I am
fees of clients that return. This works pretty well for me. Normally it is> CPA in the midwest, relatively small practice, but quite > active. > Recently, a small one person tax practice contacted me > inquiring about purchasing his business. Here is what I > know so far: > 1. About 45k in revenues, 500 1040's and 30 or so 1129's. > Some yearly writeup work, but not much. > 2. He is retiring and had the business about 29 years. > 3. His client base is primarily Polish and speak polish. > My story is I am a CPA with small practice, 38 years old, > and speak polish (thought sloppily I might add). Been doing > taxes for some time, got the entrepreneur bug in me. > Whats next? Valuation? CPA firms go for .9 to 1.5 > revenues, based on revenue type (compilation, write up, > audit, tax etc). What about retention? A factor here? > Downpayment? Average is 0 to 25%, with terms over 3-5 > years, some interest bearing some not. What about growth? > Should I consider marketing now? What about resale? How > difficult would it be to sell if I had too? > The only Polish I speak is food (and I could go for some right now) so..... What I have done when I have purchased practices is offer a percentage of the 50% the first year, 25% the second and third. I don't know if your person wants all money up front or not. - quote - > I am planning on buying out a practice in a few years in my town now. We are going about 1.2 over gross in the last year. Just a couple of ways to look at things. Helen, EA in PA Member of The Tax Gang President, PA Society of Enrolled Agents Campaigning for NAEA Board of Directors - Looking for YOUR vote << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > I have been contacted about an interesting opporunity. I am
Unless 45K is a typo, that's less than $80 per 1040 after> CPA in the midwest, relatively small practice, but quite > active. > Recently, a small one person tax practice contacted me > inquiring about purchasing his business. Here is what I > know so far: > 1. About 45k in revenues, 500 1040's and 30 or so 1129's. > Some yearly writeup work, but not much. > 2. He is retiring and had the business about 29 years. you take the 1129's into consideration. Strikes me as long-term failure to raise rates. I suggest you take a very hard look at what you would charge for the work and determine the anount of the underpricing differential. Be aware that all businesses are very prone to customer desertion when when prices upon change of ownership. - quote - > 3. His client base is primarily Polish and speak polish.
Be aware that ethnic businesses are very prone to customer> My story is I am a CPA with small practice, 38 years old, > and speak polish (though sloppily I might add). Been doing > taxes for some time, got the entrepreneur bug in me. desertion just because of change of ownership - quote - > Whats next? Valuation? CPA firms go for .9 to 1.5
Others with experience in this area should respond if they> revenues, based on revenue type (compilation, write up, > audit, tax etc). What about retention? A factor here? > Downpayment? Average is 0 to 25%, with terms over 3-5 > years, some interest bearing some not. What about growth? > Should I consider marketing now? What about resale? How > difficult would it be to sell if I had too? disagree with me. My brother has been trying to sell the 1040 side of his practice for several years. Maybe he wants too much? But all the takers fade away. So my suspicion is that you may well be a god-send to this practitioner. I would be very wary of buying an underpriced business. My suggestion is that you merge the practice into one office and pay him as an employee this tax season with him raising the rates. Then pay him $x per repeat return you do for each of the next 5 years. If he raises the rates, he has to listen to the arguments and you get a decent idea of what next tax season's volume will be. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have been contacted about an interesting opporunity. I am CPA in the midwest, relatively small practice, but quite active. Recently, a small one person tax practice contacted me inquiring about purchasing his business. Here is what I know so far: 1. About 45k in revenues, 500 1040's and 30 or so 1129's. Some yearly writeup work, but not much. 2. He is retiring and had the business about 29 years. 3. His client base is primarily Polish and speak polish. My story is I am a CPA with small practice, 38 years old, and speak polish (thought sloppily I might add). Been doing taxes for some time, got the entrepreneur bug in me. Whats next? Valuation? CPA firms go for .9 to 1.5 revenues, based on revenue type (compilation, write up, audit, tax etc). What about retention? A factor here? Downpayment? Average is 0 to 25%, with terms over 3-5 years, some interest bearing some not. What about growth? Should I consider marketing now? What about resale? How difficult would it be to sell if I had too? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| practice, proprietroship, small, tax, valuing |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Investment re-valuing Jeff Micksch: My 401(k) company uses fractional shares and fractional values. The accounts they use are not directly referenced on any particular exchange. I had... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 01-11-2007 07:32 PM | |
| Is this a common practice among accountants? Kate: Recently we discovered the new web thing called itax. At least it's new to our county. So, just for fun we looked up all of the property taxes... | Taxes | 20 | 12-01-2003 05:03 PM | |
| Practice question.... Nan Eklund: I have a lot of long-time clients who call about April 10 and want an extension. I can usually get their withholding and usually have a fair... | Taxes | 5 | 10-30-2003 03:21 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |