Kerry Nichols wrote:

- quote -

I'm in the process of switching from RIA to CCH at work.
Both are good. The CCH thesaurus search capabilities are
more advanced. Also, I was switching due to a content
problem with federal source materials that has since been
resolved by RIA. They're fairly even, though CCH seems to
have some better deals for (at least certain kinds of) small
practioners.

If money was not a hindrance, I'd opt for getting Tax
Analysts, BNA, CCH, Matthew Bender, etc. through Lexis
Nexis.

/brian

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->

knichols[at]rfoods.com (Kerry Nichols) wrote:

- quote -


- quote -


Stu

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->

Kerry Nichols wrote:

- quote -

It will depend on exactly which product you are looking at
from each outfit. Both companies offer a number of
different products and packages, so it's important to let us
know which packages you are looking at.

--
Ed Zollars, CPA
Phoenix, Arizona

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->

I am looking for a comparison of the 2 products in order to
purchase one of them. What are the opinions of the users of
these services?

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->