|
#29
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Without the returns, how would IRS know that the deposits
They wouldn't have known, of course. It seems as though a> made were all that was owed? letter would have been a much better route than having an officer drive that distance. Carol What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed. Semper Gumby (Always Flexible) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#28
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > What address does the corp use on its filings?
Well, there is your reason!> Not the home address. They actually use a PO box since > he is a builder and works out of a temporary office at > the subdivision. Since the RO might not know where the temporary site office is and the corporation address of record is a PO BOX, the next logical place to contact (IN PERSON) is the Owners Residence! << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#27
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > What address does the corp use on its filings? > Not the home address. They actually use a PO box since he is a builder and works out of a temporary office at the subdivision. - quote - > How experienced is the agent?
Good question.- quote - > 3. on way to bar
Carol> We can forget that one!! <G> Nearest city only sells beer and wine. What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed. Semper Gumby (Always Flexible) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > The OP called the IRS employee an "agent" in error.
I believe her card said "agent". I will check on Monday.Carol What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed. Semper Gumby (Always Flexible) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#25
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > clj1219[at]aol.comhbts5677 (CLJ1219) writes: - quote - > What really confused us was the fact that all taxes had been > paid just the returns themselves had not been received (with > the exception of the 1120S which had just been completed). > They were 2002 and 2003 941s. > Without the returns how would IRS know that the deposits made were all that was owed? Phil Marti Topeka, KS << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| "Phil Marti" <philmarti[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > I used to keep a stash of "Your Business Taxes", f/k/a "Mr.
Howdy Phil,> Business Man's" kits in the trunk of my car. When I saw a > new business in my territory I'd stop in within the month > for a quick howdy-do, my card, and a suggestion not to get > behind in employment taxes. That plus a mention that it > wouldn't take them long to find a neighboring business that > could tell them what happens when you do get behind led to > wonderful compliance. When I was promoted out of that area > I had no in-business employment taxpayers. > IMO it's a shame that the IRS has gotten so far away from > preventing problems before they start. Nowadays it seems > like by the time they get there it's hopeless. It's nice to > hear your story and from Taxman Hog that they're actually > working FTD alerts. Maybe there's a cause for hope. - quote - > In the BIG reorganization a new branch was created called TEC
patterns.Taxpayer Education Communications supposed to get to the TP before falling into non-compliance They use a variety of flashy publications and communication mediums, WEB pages, WEB-CAST, Seminars, partnering with other agencies with similar interest to convey their message. - quote - > Their activity is not supposed to remove the RO's responsibility of fostering/assuring compliance,
entities and getting out on the "verge of non-compliance" (FTD-ALERTS), Recent quarter TDA's &but it does leave us with more time to do the "DIRTY" work levy & Seizure on severely non-compliant TDI's now called (BAL-DUES & DEL-RETS). - quote - > My ongoing inventory of as many as 79 TP entities now is comprised of 15% IMF cases & 85% BMF cases, of those BMF cases many are TRUST FUND taxes, 30+ TFRP investigations going on simultaneously. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > It sounds so routine to me. And it's possible that
What address does the corp use on its filings? How> > > somehow there were notices sent to taxpayer before and he > > > didn't want to admit that he disregharded them > > That was the thing--it *was* such a routine matter. Why the > > home visit for something so routine and so fresh? > > > FWIW, if this client said he didn't receive any notices, as > > far as we're concerned, he didn't. He is probably our most > > honest and truthful client. We are quite sure we didn't see > > any notices. We handle all notices as they come in and > > don't recall these coming in. Also, the agent wouldn't tell > > us why she made the home visit opposed to a notice and could > > not tell us if notices had been sent previously. She said > > she did not know if notices had been sent already. Carol > Probably notices were mailed, since that's SOP for IRS. > Where they ended up is anybody's guess. (Change of > address? Post office problems?) > But you know there is one more possibility,and that is that > the IRS agent who was assigned the case needed an excuse to > get out of the office. So instead of using the telephone, > she took a whole day, see what I mean? I find even the > rare audits that I do indulge in, it's always at my office, > cause these local IRS types just love to get out of the > office. > > What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed. > > Semper Gumby (Always Flexible) > One thing you might try before bounding out of bed is waking > up gradually, stretching like a snake, bending and > stretching, exercising in bed before the feet hit the floor. experienced is the agent? (An inexperienced agent may not realize the power of the telephone.) I can think of a few other reasons for an agent to make a visit before a phone call. 1. girlfriend/boyfriend/spouse in neighborhood (possible entry in "How to Live in Sin for Fun and Profit"?) 2. on way home 3. on way to bar 4. subterfuge if would have been late to office 5. excuse to leave early. As to stretching, until I had back surgery a month ago I had to do some stretching exercises before I could get out of bed. The first several days I was home I had to sleep on the sofa so I could roll onto the floor and get up from there. Gary << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Where they ended up is anybody's guess. (Change of
LOL. If he lived in my town the "post office problem" might> address? Post office problems?) be the key. I'm still waiting on concert tickets from 1995! - quote - > But you know there is one more possibility,and that is that
It was a nice day and it has been real pretty out in that> the IRS agent who was assigned the case needed an excuse to > get out of the office. area. <G - quote - > One thing you might try before bounding out of bed is waking
LOL. Only way I can get out of bed these days! It hurts> up gradually, stretching like a snake, bending and > stretching, exercising in bed before the feet hit the floor. too much to do otherwise. Carol What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed. Semper Gumby (Always Flexible) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > In the above case and the original posters statement, I saw
They left a card. The spouse was not home. In fact, no one> lack of professionalism by the RO by NOT identifying > themselves! was at home. What really confused us was the fact that all taxes had been paid just the returns themselves had not been received (with the exception of the 1120S which had just been completed). They were 2002 and 2003 941s. Carol What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed. Semper Gumby (Always Flexible) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <hlunsfordns[at]bellsouth.net> writes: - quote - > But you know there is one more possibility,and that is that
Well, thanks for pushing one of my buttons. After 7+ years> the IRS agent who was assigned the case needed an excuse to > get out of the office. So instead of using the telephone, > she took a whole day, see what I mean? I find even the > rare audits that I do indulge in, it's always at my office, > cause these local IRS types just love to get out of the > office. of retirement you'd think I get over it, but evidently not. The OP called the IRS employee an "agent" in error. We (including those of us who are defrocked) Revenue OFFICERS have been known to get cranky when slapped with the label of "agent." Revenue officers are compliance officers, not pencil pushers doing audits. "Oh, don't worry about how you're going to pay it. The folks in Collection will talk to you about that. Sign here." I still remember the first day it rained after I became an R/O. Regardless of what we had scheduled, we were ordered to load up a full day's work an hit the street in order to prove that revenue officers don't melt in the rain. A lot has changed, but the fact that an R/O wouldn't have the case if it could have been resolved through correspondence and phone calls hasn't. The R/O's job is in large part out of the office, not in. Phil Marti Topeka, KS << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| "Charles Markham, EA" <goaheadandspamaway[at]aol.com> writes: - quote - > I have seen this exact same thing happen recently. The IRS
This is wonderful news.> goes on various projects. I believe they recently decided > to have Revenue Officers visit small businesses that have a > history of being slightly "irregular" in their filings. I used to keep a stash of "Your Business Taxes", f/k/a "Mr. Business Man's" kits in the trunk of my car. When I saw a new business in my territory I'd stop in within the month for a quick howdy-do, my card, and a suggestion not to get behind in employment taxes. That plus a mention that it wouldn't take them long to find a neighboring business that could tell them what happens when you do get behind led to wonderful compliance. When I was promoted out of that area I had no in-business employment taxpayers. IMO it's a shame that the IRS has gotten so far away from preventing problems before they start. Nowadays it seems like by the time they get there it's hopeless. It's nice to hear your story and from Taxman Hog that they're actually working FTD alerts. Maybe there's a cause for hope. Phil Marti Topeka, KS << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| Carol: I have seen this exact same thing happen recently. The IRS goes on various projects. I believe they recently decided to have Revenue Officers visit small businesses that have a history of being slightly "irregular" in their filings. I had two cases of this in the Boston area. You described the scenario to a T. I know you feel this was a waste of taxpayer money, but I must think that for my clients it really was a wake up call, and really a very inexpensive one for the IRS. Just the travel time, and I think sloppy lackadasical filing habits are "stepping stones" to getting very behind in things like payroll taxes. So, while I agree it wasn't the standard operating procedure, it must be a new one. Charles << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > It sounds so routine to me. And it's possible that
Probably notices were mailed, since that's SOP for IRS.> > somehow there were notices sent to taxpayer before and he > > didn't want to admit that he disregharded them > That was the thing--it *was* such a routine matter. Why the > home visit for something so routine and so fresh? > FWIW, if this client said he didn't receive any notices, as > far as we're concerned, he didn't. He is probably our most > honest and truthful client. We are quite sure we didn't see > any notices. We handle all notices as they come in and > don't recall these coming in. Also, the agent wouldn't tell > us why she made the home visit opposed to a notice and could > not tell us if notices had been sent previously. She said > she did not know if notices had been sent already. Carol Where they ended up is anybody's guess. (Change of address? Post office problems?) But you know there is one more possibility,and that is that the IRS agent who was assigned the case needed an excuse to get out of the office. So instead of using the telephone, she took a whole day, see what I mean? I find even the rare audits that I do indulge in, it's always at my office, cause these local IRS types just love to get out of the office. - quote - > What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed.
One thing you might try before bounding out of bed is waking> Semper Gumby (Always Flexible) up gradually, stretching like a snake, bending and stretching, exercising in bed before the feet hit the floor. Cheer$, HL << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > It does seem strange that for a business return, the call would
He did move his business location but it was probably more> come to the home UNLESS the business changed location in the > past 3 years - and for some reason, isn't listed in the local > phone book. like 4 or 5 years ago. It has been quite some time at any rate. He's a builder, so he works out of a construction office in the subdivision. Carol What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed. Semper Gumby (Always Flexible) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I never perpetuate my clients non-compliance
Neither do we. However, we are quick to remind them that wecan only tell them what they need to pay. It is up to them to actually *do* that. - quote - > I was referring to no letters had been sent to the main
As far as we can tell, no letters had been sent to ANY> address of this business address for this client--his business address or home address. And his home address has either NEVER shown up on returns for the corporation or haven't in several years. <G> And we missed putting his new home address on his K-1 this past year. Carol What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed. Semper Gumby (Always Flexible) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > I am sure you are not
The final act of accounting, --IS-- the filing of the> > interested in perpetuating the clients non compliance. > But that's the key--all taxes had been paid and accounted > for! Only forms were missing. returns, it completes circular loop of automated checks & balances. Example: In the last six months I have had SEVERAL cases which involved 941 accounts where the TP had made all their FTD's deposits on time and in perfect amounts, but failed to file the 941 returns, 1, 2, 3 & 4 quarters in a row!? What logical reason could explain this? When I made contact, it became apparent that the TP either changed payroll systems, service companies, or signed up for EFTPS, in all cases they appeared to develop the perception that the return(s) were being filed by the act of either ADP/PAYCHEX/INTERPAY executing the deposits currently that the period prior to the transition would be taken care of, it never did, and in these particular cases it was a one period 941 filing lapse. One CPA, thought that by making the TELEPHONE EFTPS deposit that they were also fulfilling their obligation to file the 941, not so of course, I got her straightened out, things are resolved. In all these cases once I secured the TAX RETURN, it posted and settled to Status-10 (No balance due no refund due) perfect! The end result of all these cases was an opportunity to show the professional face of the IRS to Tax payers with Benin (retrospectively speaking) issues. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > "Wayne Brasch" <waynebrasch[at]stowetel.com> wrote:
I see the RRA-98 pendulum starting to swing in the other> > "TaxmanHog" <taxmanhog[at]comcast.net> wrote: > > If you, the client and the RO can find common ground > > everyone will be happy, if not, I am sure you are not > > interested in perpetuating the clients non compliance. > I never perpetuate my clients non-compliance, but in the > case I was referring to no letters had been sent to the main > address of this business and the Revenue Officer showed up > at the door of one of the owners homes. I believe letters > sent prior to the visit would have been a more appropriate > way to handle this particular matter. direction, HQ's advice to the field to clamp down on excessive delays in making what is called FIRST CONTACT, by issuing preliminary letters before field contact. I personally am still trying to find the correct balance of soft handling VS Blitzkrieg handling, timing and turn over to close cases is the driving force, risking poor quality investigations & unprofessional conduct and inappropriate dispositions might be the end result of this campaign. Not that I would allow that to happen myself, I can & do see it happening in the office. In the above case and the original posters statement, I saw lack of professionalism by the RO by NOT identifying themselves! All field personnel are required to Identify themselves by MR./MS Surname, and Employee Number!, they can leave a calling card which contains this information. The only excuse I can make, and it's lame, is that THIRD PARTY pre warnings were not sent, and the Officer/Agent was aware of that fact, they tried to remain discreet after encountering the spouse, this behavior was a unsuccessful attempt to NOT violate the privacy of the TAXPAYER being investigated, they ended up making investigative disclosures, and embarrassed the Business Owner. Some of the investigations being done with minimal precontact by letter are: FTD ALERTS This is a type of case where the 941 tax deposits are suddenly slowing in a QUARTER, the master file generated a letter to the TP asking why they are slow in depositing, in the old days (six months ago and prior) a paper follow-up record is also printed for tax examiners or revenue officers to follow-up on when time permits. The NEW & IMPROVED version of ICS release last summer now allows these PAPER ALERT FOLLOW-UP records to load in a group managers incoming inventory immediately, he then has to triage & assign these to all his Officers, who in turn ++++NEED++++ to make in person contact in FIFTEEN DAYS, or else! bad reviews will result. No more playing games with the timing of this compliance investigation! The follow-up activity in the case is critical to both seriously non compliant taxpayers and marginal non-compliant, This is what early intervention is all about, if I recall correctly it was an issue with GAO, Congress and the President that the IRS get out there and stop the hemorrhaging. This automation improvement combined with RRA-98 protocols, and schizophrenic Management attitudes HQ & LOCAL, leaves the RO stuck in a kind of dilemma. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| "Wayne Brasch" <waynebrasch[at]stowetel.com> wrote: - quote - > "CLJ1219" <clj1219[at]aol.comhbts5677> wrote:
I'm glad to hear someone else make this statement. I've> I don't know what caused this visit except for the > fact that it has been recently said that the "kinder, > gentler" IRS is a thing of the past. noticed this with the last couple of audits I've been involved with. Joel Berry, CPA Sugar Land, Texas << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| CLJ1219 wrote: - quote - > Anyone heard of this?
In general, home visits are usually scheduled in advance.> One of our clients, a gentleman who has been in business for > greater than 10 years and who has several businesses > throughout that time, received a home visit from an IRS > agent. The client nor his wife were at home at the time of > the visit. It might have been fortunate for the agent since > there had recently been a murder of two real estate agents > at a model home nearby and the wife is a real estate agent. > The home visit was prompted by, according to the agent, late > 941s, 940 and a 1120S. The 940 was for 2002, the 941s were > for third and fourth quarter 2002 and the 1120S was for tax > year 2002 which was extended until September 15, 2003. The > man's home address is NOT the address for the business and > never has been and appears absolutely nowhere in connection > with the business. Also, his wife is not a shareholder of > the company and the agent said that it was strictly > employment and income tax related and not personal > tax-related. > The client called our office in a panic after his wife > returned home and found the business card from the IRS > agent. We had him come into our office the following > morning and he called the agent from there. He executed a > POA, which incidentially the agent never asked us to fax to > her. By the end of the short (7-10 minute) phone call, she > said that if he would mail to her a signed copy of the 940, > the fourth quarter 941 (she found the third quarter) and the > 1120S that she would consider the case closed. > This somehow just does not FEEL right. Maybe it is the fact > that he never received any notices for those forms (he said > he didn't and none of us recalled seeing any). Maybe it was > the fact that the agent never did answer the direct question > of why she went to their house. Maybe it was the fact that > she spoke to my employer with the POA being faxed to her. > Maybe it was the "ease" with which there was a solution to > the problem. Maybe it was her lack of knowledge of how a S > corp is taxed. I don't know why but it just does not feel > right. During my IRS career, there were only two exceptions that I know of (and did): 1) In the "non-filer" program, IRS employees (including myself) would actively go into the field without announcement looking for those who failed to respond to our letters and phone calls. Our purpose in doing so was to try to make contact - or to verify that the taxpayer had moved, etc.... 2) Again, in the "non-filer" program, I once did show up at the taxpayer's business unannounced. Although the taxpayer did contact me and send in a tax return, we (my superior and I) didn't find it credible - and the purpose of the visit was first to look over the business (he failed to report) for indications of activity that supported what we thought might be the true story. The unannounced part was when I then walked in and informed the taxpayer owner that it appears that there were descrepencies and that his return was going to be audited. Upon return to my office, I then sent him a list of the issues attached to the official examination opening letter. Neither of these situations seem close enough to what you describe with merely late payroll tax returns being examined. However, also note that I left the IRS about 10 years ago, so policy may have changed. Lastly, it occurs to me that this could have been a Revenue Officer (i.e. "collection" agent) call instead of an examination call - and for some sort of compliance purpose. It does seem strange that for a business return, the call would come to the home UNLESS the business changed location in the past 3 years - and for some reason, isn't listed in the local phone book. Does the business card address belong to a known IRS office for your area? If not, you could ask TIGTA - on the grounds of this being an "irregular visit" (at best) and an IMPOSTOR case (at worst). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Is the client being
LOL. Not to our knowledge. He is quite happy doing what he> considered for some sort of government position? has done for almost 20 years. - quote - > You don't sound outraged,
No. Just don't want a good client, a good citizen harassed.- quote - > it doesn't sound like she did anything
confusing is more like it. It sounded like such a big deal> particularly awful, on Wednesday afternoon only to be handled with "if you will get me those forms in the mail today we will close this out" on Thursday. Carol << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |