|
#2
| |||
| |||
| janztaxnospam[at]aol.com (JanZtaxNOSPAM) writes: - quote - > Does anyone have any suggestions of where to go/who to
She needs to file her petition in Tax Court. It may be> call/what to do next? time for her to hire a representative. Phil Marti Topeka, KS << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "JanZtaxNOSPAM" <janztaxnospam[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Does anyone have any suggestions of where to go/who
The taxpayer needs to petition the U.S. Tax Court. That> to call/what to do next? doesn't mean he necessarily needs to hire an attorney and be prepared to go to trial. Once the petition is filed and the case is docketed, your local IRS Appeals office will contact the taxpayer about getting the case settled. Appeals usually will give the taxpayer an opportunity to meet face-to-face to explain his position. If the facts are as straightforward as you say, it would seem that the Appeals Officer would recommend a stipulated agreement to settle the case with no change to the tax liability. Once a Statutory Notice of Deficiency (SNOD) has been issued, the only formal avenue available to the taxpayer to challenge IRS' position without paying the tax first is to petition the Tax Court. The petition filing fee is $60. The U.S. Tax Court has a website where you can get more information. According to the information posted under About the Court, "The vast majority of cases are settled by mutual agreement without the necessity of a trial." You can download a Petition for Small Tax Cases by clicking on forms. The taxpayer's petition needs to mailed to the Tax Court's address shown in the SNOD by the 90th day in order for the Tax Court to have jurisdiction. I recommend it be mailed certified return receipt requested. Barney Byrd << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| JanZtaxNOSPAM <janztaxnospam[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Does anyone have any suggestions of where to go/who to
Given that a 90 day letter has been issued, I would refer the> call/what to do next? Where are all those nice IRS people > who are so helpful when you bring your unresolved cases to > the NAEA and CSEA conferences??? client to a qualified tax attorney. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Let me start out by saying that I have consciously chosen not to do representation work in my practice because I get too frustrated dealing with the IRS. As a result, I probably don't know enough about policies and procedures. So, I hope someone has a suggestion about where to go next. Someone who was not a client contacted me about a letter he had received from the IRS. It turned out to be an examination report. The report assessed additional tax of $6000 which was somehow related to penalties for early retirement plan distributions, and denial of a lifetime learning credit. I say "somehow related" because there is absolutely no information in the report that indicates how this calculation was done. The AGI and taxable income of the original return were not changed. The "new" IRA tax is listed as $5409. On line 16a of the original return is $33,188 with 0 taxable (all was rolled over). Line 15b is $17,200, for a total retirement distribution of 50,388. None was a SIMPLE so how could the penalty be $5409? (This is not to say that it's impossible that there was another retirement plan distribution that the clients missed but that would have changed the AGI if the IRS was aware of it.) And, there's no explanation for why the lifetime learning credit was denied (they meet income restrictions). I called the Atlanta office which issued the report and they said they couldn't do anything; I should write a letter. I called the taxpreparer hotline and they said they couldn't do anything. So, I did write a letter on August 11 asking for an explanation (just what I've said above) and attaching the brokerage form that shows the rollover of the $33,188 distribution and a letter from the school, saying that the spouse spent $17,200 on tuition (higher education, therefore not subject to the early distribution penalty). I faxed the letter to the # given to me by the GA office. There has been no response to my letter but the taxpayers recently received a notice of deficiency dated Aug 29 and saying they have 90 days to petition tax court. So I tried calling the GA IRS office again and again they said they couldn't help. They couldn't even tell me if my letter had been received but said "if you have an acknowledgement of the fax being sent (which I do), it's been received." Today I called the taxpayer advocate but she said she couldn't do anything. She suggested I file an amended return but THE ORIGINAL RETURN IS CORRECT (as far as I know)!! Does anyone have any suggestions of where to go/who to call/what to do next? Where are all those nice IRS people who are so helpful when you bring your unresolved cases to the NAEA and CSEA conferences??? Any help appreciated, Jan Zobel EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |