|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Ernie Klein <eckleinspammenot[at]pacbell.net> wrote - quote - > Well, a google search shows that I have posted to this group
According to the survey I got, my coreness rating was 0.002.> 22 (this post makes 23) times in the past 7 years and I got > a survey request. So I guess an average of 3.14 posts per > year makes me a 'core poster'. > Go figure. I believe I had either 7 or 9 posts in the applicable 12 month period. I don't see how 0.002 gets me in the top 10%, much less the top 20%. So if you figure out how you got a survey, let me know your methodolgy! Peter << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| I got a survey and I think my coreness was something like ..37 -- don't remember the rest of the statistics (like how many posts I had). Although I've responded to posts in prior years, in this last year I've mainly posted to ask questions. So, my level of "coreness" is definitely on a different level than that of some of you who are involved with mtm on a more daily basis. Anyway, I'm glad you're all out there and willing to deal with these questions (including mine). Jan Zobel EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > To put it simply, the more people post follow-ups to a
I disagree!!> > > person's messages, the higher that person's coreness will > > > be. > Looks like coreness could have a negative correlation to > knowledge. If a poster is generally wrong, he will get > follow-ups! Uh, oops. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Charles Markham, EA" <goaheadandspamaway[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > [snip] > Aw come on--you GOT to tell us who the core posters are! > Charles Markham, EA Sorry Charles, you'll have to ask each other. ;-) Besides, your own informed opinion of the MTM is probably more accurate than my mathematical model. cheers, Enrique << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| "Charles Markham, EA" <goaheadandspamaway[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Aw come on--you GOT to tell us who the core posters are!
Well, a google search shows that I have posted to this group22 (this post makes 23) times in the past 7 years and I got a survey request. So I guess an average of 3.14 posts per year makes me a 'core poster'. Go figure. -- -Ernie- "There are only two kinds of computer users -- those who have suffered a catastrophic hard drive failure, and those who will." Have you done your backup today? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > To put it simply, the more people post follow-ups to a
Looks like coreness could have a negative correlation to> > person's messages, the higher that person's coreness will > > be. Also, the coreness measure will not be easily fooled by > > massive posting: a troll might post 1000 messages to a > > newsgroup, but if no one posts follow-ups (i.e. if he is > > ignored) his coreness degree will come out at zero. > > Coreness is by no means an infallible > > measure (for example, it cannot measure how knowledgeable a > > participant is), but it does provide a helpful indicator of > > prominent participants in a newsgroup. knowledge. If a poster is generally wrong, he will get follow-ups! -- Don EA in Upstate NY << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > P.S. About Coreness
Aw come on--you GOT to tell us who the core posters are!> Coreness is a mathematical measure of the centrality of an > actor in a communications network (and a newsgroup is a > virtual network, with all its criss-crossing of messages). > To put it simply, the more people post follow-ups to a > person's messages, the higher that person's coreness will > be. Also, the coreness measure will not be easily fooled by > massive posting: a troll might post 1000 messages to a > newsgroup, but if no one posts follow-ups (i.e. if he is > ignored) his coreness degree will come out at zero. > More technically, I am using Borgatti-Everett's continuous > core-periphery model as implemented in a software tool they > wrote called UCINET. Coreness is by no means an infallible > measure (for example, it cannot measure how knowledgeable a > participant is), but it does provide a helpful indicator of > prominent participants in a newsgroup. > I used coreness to select the participants in each of twelve > professionally-oriented newsgroups that would receive an > invitation to take the survey. Specifically, of all people > who posted to the newsgroups over a 12 month period, only > the top 20% ranked by coreness were included in the sample > (in the larger newsgroups, only the top 10%). Charles Markham, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "D.F. Manno" <dommanno[at]netscape.net> wrote: - quote - > Coreness is a mathematical measure of the centrality of an
I am wondering if coreness really works in this group> actor in a communications network (and a newsgroup is a > virtual network, with all its criss-crossing of messages). > To put it simply, the more people post follow-ups to a > person's messages, the higher that person's coreness will > be. Also, the coreness measure will not be easily fooled by > massive posting: a troll might post 1000 messages to a > newsgroup, but if no one posts follow-ups (i.e. if he is > ignored) his coreness degree will come out at zero. anyway. This is essentially a question and answer forum so the responses to a message are more focused on the question being asked (and the amount of debate amongst the experts that it generates) than any centrality of the poster. -- I do not recall being voted the Village Idiot... but my name was on the ballot. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| D.F. Manno wrote: - quote - > I got a followup e-mail from the guy taking the survey,....
I also received a follow-up email and sent it to the trash.Lois << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Dick Adams wrote: - quote - > Drew Edmundson <cfdaqw[at]nccpa.info> wrote:
I got a followup e-mail from the guy taking the survey, It> > Dr. Adams, can you put on your professor's hat and explain > > what a "coreness degree" is? > It is Professor Adams, not Dr. Social Science research > methodologies are very touchy-feelly. Several of these > methodologies (likert scores for one) are frowned upon > in other disciplines. That means I have no Social > Science research references available nor do I currently > have any interest in acquiring any. > So back to degree of coreness. Maybe it's an entropy > metric where "0" is highly-structured and "1" is chaos. includes the following: P.S. About Coreness Coreness is a mathematical measure of the centrality of an actor in a communications network (and a newsgroup is a virtual network, with all its criss-crossing of messages). To put it simply, the more people post follow-ups to a person's messages, the higher that person's coreness will be. Also, the coreness measure will not be easily fooled by massive posting: a troll might post 1000 messages to a newsgroup, but if no one posts follow-ups (i.e. if he is ignored) his coreness degree will come out at zero. More technically, I am using Borgatti-Everett's continuous core-periphery model as implemented in a software tool they wrote called UCINET. Coreness is by no means an infallible measure (for example, it cannot measure how knowledgeable a participant is), but it does provide a helpful indicator of prominent participants in a newsgroup. I used coreness to select the participants in each of twelve professionally-oriented newsgroups that would receive an invitation to take the survey. Specifically, of all people who posted to the newsgroups over a 12 month period, only the top 20% ranked by coreness were included in the sample (in the larger newsgroups, only the top 10%). -- D.F. Manno dommanno[at]netscape.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Drew Edmundson wrote: (Actually, Professor Adams wrote ![]() - quote - > So back to degree of coreness. Maybe it's an entropy
As my number was less than 0.1, I would have guessed the> metric where "0" is highly-structured and "1" is chaos. other way around.... -- This account is subject to a persistent MS Blaster and SWEN attack. I think I've got the problem resolved, but, if you E-mail me and it bounces, a second try might work. However, please reply in newsgroup. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Drew Edmundson wrote: - quote - > Dick Adams <rdadams[at]smart.net> wrote:
No chaos is defined as the reciprocal of zero divided by> > A graduate student at the University of Bradford in England > > is conducting a research survey and has sent surveys to many > > of us. While I have yet to read the survey, I encourage > > everyone who has received a survey to respond to it. > > > Assisting academics in their research is good karma. > Dr. Adams, can you put on your professor's hat and explain > what a "coreness degree" is? > ================================================== ========= > It is Professor Adams, not Dr. Social Science research > methodologies are very touchy-feelly. Several of these > methodologies (likert scores for one) are frowned upon > in other disciplines. That means I have no Social > Science research references available nor do I currently > have any interest in acquiring any. > So back to degree of coreness. Maybe it's an entropy > metric where "0" is highly-structured and "1" is chaos. > ================================================== ========= one. QED Social scientists prove the world is the way they wish it was. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Dick Adams <rdadams[at]smart.net> wrote: - quote - > A graduate student at the University of Bradford in England
Thanks for the validation, Dick. I received the survey and> is conducting a research survey and has sent surveys to many > of us. While I have yet to read the survey, I encourage > everyone who has received a survey to respond to it. > Assisting academics in their research is good karma. was debating whether this might be some scam or other. Sad, how paranoid we are getting about unsolicited email!! Herb << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Dick Adams <rdadams[at]smart.net> wrote: - quote - > A graduate student at the University of Bradford in England
Dr. Adams, can you put on your professor's hat and explain> is conducting a research survey and has sent surveys to many > of us. While I have yet to read the survey, I encourage > everyone who has received a survey to respond to it. > Assisting academics in their research is good karma. what a "coreness degree" is? Drew Edmundson, CPA (NC) e-mail is my first name at nccpa dot com ================================================== ========= It is Professor Adams, not Dr. Social Science research methodologies are very touchy-feelly. Several of these methodologies (likert scores for one) are frowned upon in other disciplines. That means I have no Social Science research references available nor do I currently have any interest in acquiring any. So back to degree of coreness. Maybe it's an entropy metric where "0" is highly-structured and "1" is chaos. ================================================== ========= << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Dick Adams wrote: - quote - > A graduate student at the University of Bradford in England
I got it too, but the survey was to be found on a web site,> is conducting a research survey and has sent surveys to many > of us. While I have yet to read the survey, I encourage > everyone who has received a survey to respond to it. > Assisting academics in their research is good karma. with the link posted in the email message. This coupled with the fact that the email address was in Poland, made me quickly press the delete key. No way. And his name isn't even "Sven", either! lol Although I agree with your second paragraph in principal. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA in LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I responded. I had a friend living in England who did taxes for DOD employees, mostly teachers, and he told me some of the differences between the Inland Revenue and the Internal Revenue. Some of the questions are difficult to answer since they have assumptions that don't quite fit. Nan, EA in LA PREJUDICE can be divided into PRE-JUDGEMENTS (easier than thinking) and BIGOTRY (easier to feel good about oneself when one can push down another group). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| Dick Adams <rdadams[at]smart.net> writes: - quote - > Assisting academics in their research is good karma.
Perhaps, but spamming newsgroup participants is bad karma.If he wanted to reach MTM participants he should have posted his survey in the newsgroup. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| A graduate student at the University of Bradford in England is conducting a research survey and has sent surveys to many of us. While I have yet to read the survey, I encourage everyone who has received a survey to respond to it. Assisting academics in their research is good karma. Dick << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| moderator, survey |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Short survey on how you manage your personal finances. aa1900@excite.com: We are trying to get a better idea of how you manage your finances. To that end, we have created a short anonymous survey (should take a minute or... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 03-17-2008 09:45 PM | |
| M07 survey, FWIW (May be old news... I'm slow.) Dick Watson: I don't know how long it's been there, but there's a M07 survey posted at http://survey.euro.confirmit.com/wix1/p60164124.aspx. I only happened... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 06-06-2007 11:35 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |