|
#22
| |||
| |||
| "Peter C. Gatto" <pgattocpa[at]excite.com> wrote: - quote - > "Bob Oaks" <bobinsfoNOSPAM[at]yahoo.com> wrote
Ah, that explains it, Peter. I live in San Francisco, so> > > Peter C. Gatto <pgattocpa[at]excite.com> wrote: > > > > It reminds me of when I bought my first house almost 20 > > > > years ago for $73,000. My father thought I was crazy. When > > > > I sold it for three times that amount he just shook his head > > > > in disbelief. > > Goodness; you're obviously not in California! > Sorry Bob, I haven't been on MTM for a bit. > Yes, I do live in CA. The house was in Richmond which is in > the East Bay across from SF. The main problem is the school > district went down hill from when I was a kid. Also, > certain parts of the city have relatively high crime, so the > whole city gets the taint. Otherwise I should have been > able to sell it for six times what I paid as Richmond is a > coastal city with temperate weather and the longest > coastline of any of the Bay Area cities. 15 miles from SF. > Of course, we moved to a city with a much better school > district and lower crime so we paid a commensurately higher > price. (Twice what we sold the old house for.) In the > three years we've been here, the value of the house has gone > up over 50%. > Absolutely ridiculouis. Of course, as I shake my head, I am > looking and sounding like my father did 20 years ago. certainly know where Richmond is (the mysterious East Bay), but even so the low cost of housing did surprise me. I'm used to seeing 2 bedroom 1 bath fixers for half a million or more Fortunately we bought our house over 20 years ago.Couldn't afford it today! << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| "Bob Oaks" <bobinsfoNOSPAM[at]yahoo.com> wrote - quote - > > Peter C. Gatto <pgattocpa[at]excite.com> wrote:
Sorry Bob, I haven't been on MTM for a bit.> > > It reminds me of when I bought my first house almost 20 > > > years ago for $73,000. My father thought I was crazy. When > > > I sold it for three times that amount he just shook his head > > > in disbelief. > Goodness; you're obviously not in California! Yes, I do live in CA. The house was in Richmond which is in the East Bay across from SF. The main problem is the school district went down hill from when I was a kid. Also, certain parts of the city have relatively high crime, so the whole city gets the taint. Otherwise I should have been able to sell it for six times what I paid as Richmond is a coastal city with temperate weather and the longest coastline of any of the Bay Area cities. 15 miles from SF. Of course, we moved to a city with a much better school district and lower crime so we paid a commensurately higher price. (Twice what we sold the old house for.) In the three years we've been here, the value of the house has gone up over 50%. Absolutely ridiculouis. Of course, as I shake my head, I am looking and sounding like my father did 20 years ago. Regards, Peter << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" <hlunsfordns[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Gary Goodman wrote:
It seems to me that there are a lot of gifts involved in a> > Any cites for paying for a child's wedding *NOT* as a > > taxable gift? I favor the "throwing a party at which the kid > > just happens to get married" philosophy. Of course this > > doesn't work if you throw a lump of money at the kid and say > > "here's the money for your wedding, pay the caterer, etc. on > > your own." > > > Has anybody had the IRS question this? > I can't answer the question about IRS's attitude, but for it > to be considered a taxable gift, the expenditure would have > to be over 11,000$. I can't imagine a wedding costing that > much. (or even 22,000$ assuming joint gift!) wedding. Each attendee is given a gift, his share of the cost of the reception. Divided up this way, I really can't see much of anything exceeding the $11k ($22k joint) limit. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| Bob Oaks wrote: - quote - > "Michael T Wing CPA" <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
My first home cost $23,500, 1970$, in the Hudson Valley in NY.> > Peter C. Gatto <pgattocpa[at]excite.com> wrote: > > > It reminds me of when I bought my first house almost 20 > > > years ago for $73,000. My father thought I was crazy. When > > > I sold it for three times that amount he just shook his head > > > in disbelief. > Goodness; you're obviously not in California! -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| "Michael T Wing CPA" <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Peter C. Gatto <pgattocpa[at]excite.com> wrote: > > It reminds me of when I bought my first house almost 20 > > years ago for $73,000. My father thought I was crazy. When > > I sold it for three times that amount he just shook his head > > in disbelief. > Goodness; you're obviously not in California! << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Peter C. Gatto <pgattocpa[at]excite.com> wrote: - quote - > It reminds me of when I bought my first house almost 20
Add to Moderator's comment, "...and buy a home!"> years ago for $73,000. My father thought I was crazy. When > I sold it for three times that amount he just shook his head > in disbelief. > ================================================== ========== > Moderator: > It's just more evidence that encouraging your children to > either shack-up or elope is in your economic best interest! > ================================================== ========== MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Frederick Jorden wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford wrote:
Grief! Now I KNOW yankees are godless; imagine getting> > Gary Goodman wrote: > > > Any cites for paying for a child's wedding *NOT* as a > > > taxable gift? I favor the "throwing a party at which the kid > > > just happens to get married" philosophy. Of course this > > > doesn't work if you throw a lump of money at the kid and say > > > "here's the money for your wedding, pay the caterer, etc. on > > > your own." > > > > > Has anybody had the IRS question this? > > I can't answer the question about IRS's attitude, but for it > > to be considered a taxable gift, the expenditure would have > > to be over 11,000$. I can't imagine a wedding costing that > > much. (or even 22,000$ assuming joint gift!) > You must have never been to a NY wedding! $11,000, chump > change. Get a quote for the Tavern on the Green. married in a tavern. ![]() C$, HL << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| A.G. Kalman wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford <hlunsfordns[at]bellsouth.net> wrote:
Right of course. But even the more ludricrous! lol> > Gary Goodman wrote: > > > Any cites for paying for a child's wedding *NOT* as a > > > taxable gift? I favor the "throwing a party at which the kid > > > just happens to get married" philosophy. Of course this > > > doesn't work if you throw a lump of money at the kid and say > > > "here's the money for your wedding, pay the caterer, etc. on > > > your own." > > > > > Has anybody had the IRS question this? > > I can't answer the question about IRS's attitude, but for it > > to be considered a taxable gift, the expenditure would have > > to be over 11,000$. I can't imagine a wedding costing that > > much. (or even 22,000$ assuming joint gift!) > $44,000 for joint to bride and groom. C$, HL << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Joel Berry, CPA wrote: - quote - > "Gary Goodman" <XgaryX[at]gdgoodman.com> wrote:
Ah finally , we have a winner!> > Any cites for paying for a child's wedding *NOT* as a > > taxable gift? I favor the "throwing a party at which the kid > > just happens to get married" philosophy. Of course this > > doesn't work if you throw a lump of money at the kid and say > > "here's the money for your wedding, pay the caterer, etc. on > > your own." > > > Has anybody had the IRS question this? > If your child is your dependent in the year in question, and > does not file a joint tax return with his or her new spouse, > the expenditures count as support, as follows: > Rev. Rul. 76-184, 1976-1 CB 44 -- IRC Sec. 152 > Reference(s): Code Sec. 152; Reg § 1.152-1 > Full Text: > A parent made expenditures for a child's wedding apparel and > accessories, the wedding reception, and for flowers for the > wedding party, church, and reception. The child did not file > a joint return for the year in which the child was married. > Section 152(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 defines > the term "dependent" as including a child of the taxpayer, > "over half of whose support for the calendar year in which > the taxable year of the taxpayer begins, was received from > the taxpayer." The term "support" is defined in section > 1.152-1(a)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations as including > food, shelter, clothing, medical and dental care, education, > and the like. > Held, the expenditures made by the parent in the instant > case for the child's wedding apparel and accessories, the > wedding reception, and for flowers for the wedding party, > church, and reception, are part of the child's support for > purposes of determining whether the child is the parent's > dependent for Federal income tax purposes. But..... IF the childbride had filed a joint return with her new hubby? C$, HL << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <hlunsfordns[at]bellsouth.net> wrote - quote - > I can't answer the question about IRS's attitude, but for it
You need an updated imagination! <G> Perhaps the problem is> to be considered a taxable gift, the expenditure would have > to be over 11,000$. I can't imagine a wedding costing that > much. (or even 22,000$ assuming joint gift!) in the Napoleonic translation. Here are the figures from a few years ago by region and nationally: Total Cost Per Person Cost Northeast 31,777.00 168.13 Southeast 17,142.00 90.70 Midwest 19,324.00 102.24 West Coast 17,517.00 92.68 All USA 18,874.00 99.86 Interestingly, I just saw a quick fact that nationally, the average cost of a divorce is $20,000 - roughly the same cost as the average wedding. It reminds me of when I bought my first house almost 20 years ago for $73,000. My father thought I was crazy. When I sold it for three times that amount he just shook his head in disbelief. Peter C. Gatto, CPA ================================================== ========== Moderator: It's just more evidence that encouraging your children to either shack-up or elope is in your economic best interest! ================================================== ========== << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <hlunsfordns[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Gary Goodman wrote:
I will send my kids to LA for their weddings > > Any cites for paying for a child's wedding *NOT* as a > > taxable gift? I favor the "throwing a party at which the kid > > just happens to get married" philosophy. Of course this > > doesn't work if you throw a lump of money at the kid and say > > "here's the money for your wedding, pay the caterer, etc. on > > your own." > > > Has anybody had the IRS question this? > I can't answer the question about IRS's attitude, but for it > to be considered a taxable gift, the expenditure would have > to be over 11,000$. I can't imagine a wedding costing that > much. (or even 22,000$ assuming joint gift!) . Up hereweddings can easily exceed $22,000. Drew Edmundson, CPA (NC) e-mail is my first name at nccpa dot com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" <hlunsfordns[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Gary Goodman wrote:
Harlan, you must not have kids of marryin' age. My daughter> I can't answer the question about IRS's attitude, but for it > to be considered a taxable gift, the expenditure would have > to be over 11,000$. I can't imagine a wedding costing that > much. (or even 22,000$ assuming joint gift!) got married in May, and my son is getting married in January. Wedding costs are unbelievable, and that's for a "regular", i.e. not a "country club", wedding. I continue to be amazed at some of the costs for wedding items. Around thirty years ago, before I became a CPA, my family was in the bridal business. I couldn't believe then how much people spent on weddings. The cost has gotten worse since then. Joel Berry, CPA Sugar Land, Texas << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > Gary Goodman wrote:
You must have never been to a NY wedding! $11,000, chump> > Any cites for paying for a child's wedding *NOT* as a > > taxable gift? I favor the "throwing a party at which the kid > > just happens to get married" philosophy. Of course this > > doesn't work if you throw a lump of money at the kid and say > > "here's the money for your wedding, pay the caterer, etc. on > > your own." > > > Has anybody had the IRS question this? > > > I can't answer the question about IRS's attitude, but for it > to be considered a taxable gift, the expenditure would have > to be over 11,000$. I can't imagine a wedding costing that > much. (or even 22,000$ assuming joint gift!) change. Get a quote for the Tavern on the Green. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <hlunsfordns[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Gary Goodman wrote:
$44,000 for joint to bride and groom.> > Any cites for paying for a child's wedding *NOT* as a > > taxable gift? I favor the "throwing a party at which the kid > > just happens to get married" philosophy. Of course this > > doesn't work if you throw a lump of money at the kid and say > > "here's the money for your wedding, pay the caterer, etc. on > > your own." > > > Has anybody had the IRS question this? > I can't answer the question about IRS's attitude, but for it > to be considered a taxable gift, the expenditure would have > to be over 11,000$. I can't imagine a wedding costing that > much. (or even 22,000$ assuming joint gift!) Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Wedding expenses traditionally are paid for by the parents of the bride. This dates well back to medieval times. Thus if the parents Pay for the wedding, it is not a gift. If however, the Parents Give money to the bride and or groom ant they use it to finance wdding expenses, The IRS may look at it as a Gift. Most likely The IRS would want to be assured that the funds are actually used for the wedding and not an end run around the gift tax laws. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Gary Goodman" <XgaryX[at]gdgoodman.com> wrote: - quote - > Any cites for paying for a child's wedding *NOT* as a
If your child is your dependent in the year in question, and> taxable gift? I favor the "throwing a party at which the kid > just happens to get married" philosophy. Of course this > doesn't work if you throw a lump of money at the kid and say > "here's the money for your wedding, pay the caterer, etc. on > your own." > Has anybody had the IRS question this? does not file a joint tax return with his or her new spouse, the expenditures count as support, as follows: Rev. Rul. 76-184, 1976-1 CB 44 -- IRC Sec. 152 Reference(s): Code Sec. 152; Reg § 1.152-1 Full Text: A parent made expenditures for a child's wedding apparel and accessories, the wedding reception, and for flowers for the wedding party, church, and reception. The child did not file a joint return for the year in which the child was married. Section 152(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 defines the term "dependent" as including a child of the taxpayer, "over half of whose support for the calendar year in which the taxable year of the taxpayer begins, was received from the taxpayer." The term "support" is defined in section 1.152-1(a)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations as including food, shelter, clothing, medical and dental care, education, and the like. Held, the expenditures made by the parent in the instant case for the child's wedding apparel and accessories, the wedding reception, and for flowers for the wedding party, church, and reception, are part of the child's support for purposes of determining whether the child is the parent's dependent for Federal income tax purposes. Joel Berry, CPA Sugar Land, Texas << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Gary Goodman" <XgaryX[at]gdgoodman.com> wrote: - quote - > Any cites for paying for a child's wedding *NOT* as a
I asked the same question of this group in Dec 2002 and got> taxable gift? I favor the "throwing a party at which the kid > just happens to get married" philosophy. Of course this > doesn't work if you throw a lump of money at the kid and say > "here's the money for your wedding, pay the caterer, etc. on > your own." > Has anybody had the IRS question this? a number of interesting replies, mostly along the "throwing a party" line. A search of Subject: Re: Is Wedding a "gift?"? should find it. -bill cc: copy of most replies direct to questioner. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Gary Goodman wrote: - quote - > Any cites for paying for a child's wedding *NOT* as a
I can't answer the question about IRS's attitude, but for it> taxable gift? I favor the "throwing a party at which the kid > just happens to get married" philosophy. Of course this > doesn't work if you throw a lump of money at the kid and say > "here's the money for your wedding, pay the caterer, etc. on > your own." > Has anybody had the IRS question this? to be considered a taxable gift, the expenditure would have to be over 11,000$. I can't imagine a wedding costing that much. (or even 22,000$ assuming joint gift!) Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA in LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Gary Goodman" <XgaryX[at]gdgoodman.com> wrote: - quote - > Any cites for paying for a child's wedding *NOT* as a
You mean does it pass the snicker test? There is NOTHING> taxable gift? I favor the "throwing a party at which the kid > just happens to get married" philosophy. Of course this > doesn't work if you throw a lump of money at the kid and say > "here's the money for your wedding, pay the caterer, etc. on > your own." > Has anybody had the IRS question this? about financing a wedding party which would be deductible, unless there would be some business purpose for the party. Gifts are not deductible, no matter how you structure them. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Gary Goodman <XgaryX[at]gdgoodman.com> wrote: - quote - > Has anybody had the IRS question this?
No, but a couple of clients have asked about it. I favorhaving the parents cut checks for the major expenses DIRECTLY, rather than just handing a lump sum of money to the kids. An alternate approach, I suppose, would be to ask the kids to submit an itemized list of expenses paid (a sort of an "accountable plan" <g> ). MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| child, paying, wedding |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Child Tax Credit advance check for deceased child Matthew Seitz: My only child died in 2002. I received a 2003 Child Tax Credit advance check. What should I do with the check? <<... | Taxes | 8 | 08-17-2003 03:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |