| | |||
| |||
| Michael T Wing CPA wrote: - quote - > Or, another option is to try a more sophisticated newsgroup
You can tell our CompuServe backgrounds <grin> , back where> reader, such as Agent or Virtual Access, that allows easy > highlighting and editing of quoted material. quoting was generally *not* considered appropriate in the old forums. That said, if you simply want the choice of top/bottom posting, Mozilla (and I presume Netscape, which is based on Mozilla) offers the option to automatically position the cursor at the top or bottom *AND* you set the default differently for each server--so your news posts can default to bottom posting while mail can default to top posting. -- Ed Zollars, CPA Phoenix, Arizona << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Dick Adams <rdadams[at]smart.net> wrote: - quote - > Anyone have an answer?
Apparently the workaround for Outlook Express goes somethinglike this: Hit the DELETE key to clear the empty line, scroll down to the bottom of the quote, hit ENTER to add blank line, and then begin typing. <g But, a bit more seriously, this also demonstrates another weakness of OE as a newsgroup reader, namely its inflexibility when "quoting." Basically it's an "all or none" proposition, and it appears to be set globally for ALL reply functions (email, newsgroups, etc.). Editing the quoted material can be a "pain." But (no offense to anyone) it is also a "pain" for other people to have to scroll through an entire quoted message (of, say, 4 or 5 paragraphs) simply to read your 2 line reply, and thereafter remain confused as to just ~which~ point in the quoted material you were responding to. If I may suggest, turn the quote function OFF and then simply begin your reply with a brief topical comment like: "Responding to Ed Zollar's comment that "partners" can NEVER be viewed as "employees," it is my understanding that..." Be sure to include the NAME of the person you are replying to, rather than simply using a pronoun, because replies occasionally get out of sync and/or don't thread properly. Or, another option is to try a more sophisticated newsgroup reader, such as Agent or Virtual Access, that allows easy highlighting and editing of quoted material. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |