|
#50
| |||
| |||
| Ed Zollars, CPA" <ezollar[at]mindspring.com> wrote: - quote - > Steve Horton wrote:
Ed, you are showing your age > > I would organize the directories by year then by client and > > after tax season copy on a data CD, Keep in mind nasty > > things can happen to a pc - viruses, failed hard drives > > ,etc. so having an indexed backup on CD by year is > > important. > True, but you also have to remember that nasty things can > happen to CDs (they aren't forever) and, as well, it's very > likely that, over time, they will become an orphaned > technology (remember vinyl records and Bernoulli boxes > <grin> ) so you always have to keep those issues in mind as > well as considering the need to "update" your backups every > few years to both preserve them before the older backup hits > its limit on being readable and to be sure you don't get > stuck with having to try and do the equivalent of reading a > 10 Meg Bernoulli cartridge today <grin> . Mine too! I believe thenext format to die will be the Zip drives, followed closely by floppy disks. Drew Edmundson, CPA (NC) e-mail is my first name at nccpa dot com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#49
| |||
| |||
| "Joel Berry, CPA" <joelDELETE[at]sugarlandcpas.com> wrote: - quote - > "Gene E. Utterback, EA" <eagent[at]alliancetax.com> wrote:
I usually get a signed release from the client, however in> > "Michael T Wing CPA" <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: > > I highly recommend getting as paperless as you can, it saves > > a ton of space and can really simplify your life. Last week > > a self employed client called from a car dealership almost > > 600 miles away. He was buying a car and needed a copy of > > his return. It was very simply to bring up the PDF file > > with his return and fax directly from that program to the > > dealership. I didn't have to print anything - even the bill > > for an additional copy of the return was e-mailed to the > > client. > I don't want to stray too far from the topic of this thread, > but I'm curious about your faxing the return to the > dealership. Do you get written client approval before > faxing a copy to a third party? Whenever I am asked to > provide a copy of a return to a third party, I usually > provide the copy to my client and let them forward it to the > third party. I usually send them a PDF copy of the return > by e-mail. I've created a custom "stamp' with my signature > so I can send a "signed" copy of the return. the case I mentioned the client himself called from the dealership and needed a copy right away. This particular client lives in SC while my office is in MD. I've known him for years and started doing work for him when he was working here in MD. There was no quick way for me to send the return to the client directly and since he was at the dealership I say no issue in sending it directly to him via the dealer's fax. When I send data via e-mail I use a Digital ID from VeriSign. This helps to ensure to the recipient who sent the e-mail and also helps to ensure that it was not tampered with. Please note that I said "helps to insure" and not guarantees! I have never had a third part, except for the taxing authorities, request my signature on a tax return. Gene E. Utterback, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#48
| |||
| |||
| Thanks to everyone for the great comments so far. While I am digesting them, let me just comment on the "backup" issue. I definitely agree that you shouldn't even ~think~ of going paperless until you have a tried, true, and preferably "war tested" backup procedure in place. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#47
| |||
| |||
| Michael T Wing CPA <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > I finally got one of those snazzy all-in-one printer copier
For those using CD-Rs as backup you should read this> scanners. So now I'm thinking about going largely "paperless," > by which I mean that copies of tax returns and related > documentation (such that I choose to retain) would be stored in > online format only. The returns would be printed directly to > file using the related print drivers, while other documents > would be scanned and linked to the return file. > I know others around here are doing this, so I wondered how you > have organized your online filing system a/k/a directory > structure. Seems like I could set up one directory for each tax > year and put all clients' stuff for that year in it. Or, I could > set up a separate directory for each client and add successive > stuff each year. Or, I could get more involved than that with > separate year subdirectories under each client, etc., etc. > So, what has worked well in this regard? I'm using Paperport 9 > with PDF file formats, if that makes a difference. article: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/32593.html Some CD-Rs die in less than 2 years after recording. Drew Edmundson, CPA (NC) e-mail is my first name at nccpa dot com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#46
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I finally got one of those snazzy all-in-one printer copier
Been relatively paperless for a number of years. PDF format> scanners. So now I'm thinking about going largely > "paperless," by which I mean that copies of tax returns and > related documentation (such that I choose to retain) would > be stored in online format only. The returns would be printed > directly to file using the related print drivers, while other > documents would be scanned and linked to the return file. > I know others around here are doing this, so I wondered how > you have organized your online filing system a/k/a directory > structure. Seems like I could set up one directory for each > tax year and put all clients' stuff for that year in it. Or, > I could set up a separate directory for each client and add > successive stuff each year. Or, I could get more involved > than that with separate year subdirectories under each client, > etc., etc. > So, what has worked well in this regard? I'm using Paperport > 9 with PDF file formats, if that makes a difference." is the way to go. Director structure I use is like this 2002taxes BNA - portfolio Plus software Data FAM - Fixed Asset Manager software PM - Practice manager software PR - CFS Payroll software Proseries - Tax prep software. Other years with the same basic setup. PDF files are stored in the data directory. Most of my work papers are in XLS format in another directory on the same level as 2002taxes called WTB. I use the tabs very much and thus have up to 10 years of workpapers in a single XLS file with my client code as the file name. For Word files a Word directory and client directory. I use ATB and those files are stored in the Data file under the year of the tax form Very little kept in paper format - usually only w-2's for e-filer and brokerage statements. Though I do plan on scanning W-2's this year. I find that this works well as all the year specific software and data is under one directory and all the none year specific software is located elsewhere. -- Regards, Mark X Rigotti << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#45
| |||
| |||
| Drew Edmundson wrote: - quote - > We have a 3 tier structure.
I am just an observer in this regard, but I like this above> In the root directory we have the alphabet > First subdirectory is the client name and number > Second subdirectory is the year > We name our files client number + tr (or wp for work papers) > + year.pdf. > So Joe Blow, client number 3003, tax year 2000 return would > be accessed as follows: > \\b\blow3003\2000\3003tr00.pdf > We keep the work papers in a separate file in the same > directory, usually just lumped all together. In other words > if I do a projection for 2003 and then keep copies of W-2s, > 1099s, etc. all the scanned pages would be in one work paper > file. > Yes I know we have a year 2100 problem in the file naming > system but I won't be here to worry about it. ![]() > I am not sure I like our system but it sure has made > scanning historical files easier. description best. I would comment that in Windows, you can do a Start|Search of your "Tax Files" outer folder for all folders named, for example "1997". If you wanted to copy all of the 1997 folders to a CD, it would be easy to select them all. (Ctrl+A or shift+mouseclick) If you wanted to delete all of the 1997 folders at some future time, the same would apply. My point is that you are not giving up the ability to access the year folders by having the years under the client-named folder. If the folder were grouped by years, I wonder if your folder-naming within each year would be so consistent to allow the same method of mass selection of the files for a particular client. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#44
| |||
| |||
| Michael T Wing CPA wrote: - quote - > I finally got one of those snazzy all-in-one printer copier
If you were to do this by [calendar] year, then each year on> scanners. So now I'm thinking about going largely "paperless," > by which I mean that copies of tax returns and related > documentation (such that I choose to retain) would be stored in > online format only. The returns would be printed directly to > file using the related print drivers, while other documents > would be scanned and linked to the return file. > I know others around here are doing this, so I wondered how you > have organized your online filing system a/k/a directory > structure. Seems like I could set up one directory for each tax > year and put all clients' stuff for that year in it. Or, I could > set up a separate directory for each client and add successive > stuff each year. Or, I could get more involved than that with > separate year subdirectories under each client, etc., etc. January 1 (of the following year) could then be dumped onto a CD-ROM disk.... This gives a preference to grouping by time instead of by client. - quote - > So, what has worked well in this regard? I'm using Paperport 9
<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
> with PDF file formats, if that makes a difference. > Thanks for the spins! |
|
#43
| |||
| |||
| "Michael T Wing CPA" <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > I finally got one of those snazzy all-in-one printer copier
First - Adobe PDF is the ONLY way to go! IMHO, you have> scanners. So now I'm thinking about going largely "paperless," > by which I mean that copies of tax returns and related > documentation (such that I choose to retain) would be stored in > online format only. The returns would be printed directly to > file using the related print drivers, while other documents > would be scanned and linked to the return file. > I know others around here are doing this, so I wondered how you > have organized your online filing system a/k/a directory > structure. Seems like I could set up one directory for each tax > year and put all clients' stuff for that year in it. Or, I could > set up a separate directory for each client and add successive > stuff each year. Or, I could get more involved than that with > separate year subdirectories under each client, etc., etc. > So, what has worked well in this regard? I'm using Paperport 9 > with PDF file formats, if that makes a difference. passed the first and biggest hurdle. As for the directory file structure, we start with a folder named CLIENT DATA. In that folder we have 2000 CLIENT FILES, 2001 CLIENT FILES, 2002 CLIENT FILES, and so on and so for each year. In each year we have the clients by name AND year again, for instance Smith 2001, Jones 2002. So that the structure looks like this Client Data\ 2000 Client Files\ Smith 2000 - or Client Data \ 2001 Client Files \ Jones 2001 We do this for several reasons: First, when we back up we use an encrypted FTP application to copy all the files to an offsite Linux server. Second, we all lose and gain clients from year to year. By using YEAR Client Files we only have to set up a folder for a real client and not keep stuff for clients that are long gone. Third, by archiving the folders older than the statute of limitations onto a CD we can effectively delete the really old stuff from the workstations. Fourth, we supply our clients with a DATA CD instead of a paper copy of their returns. By titiling their folders with their names AND years we can simply drag and drop their entire folder onto the CD when we finis with their return for the year. This way they have a copy of everything we had when we delivered the return. I highly recommend getting as paperless as you can, it saves a ton of space and can really simplify your life. Last week a self employed client called from a car dealership almost 600 miles away. He was buying a car and needed a copy of his return. It was very simply to bring up the PDF file with his return and fax directly from that program to the dealership. I didn't have to print anything - even the bill for an additional copy of the return was e-mailed to the client. Good luck and please keep us posted about your progress and how like it. Gene E. Utterback, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#42
| |||
| |||
| Michael T Wing CPA <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > I finally got one of those snazzy all-in-one printer copier
Not an answer to your query but three words of advice:> scanners. So now I'm thinking about going largely "paperless," > by which I mean that copies of tax returns and related > documentation (such that I choose to retain) would be stored in > online format only. The returns would be printed directly to > file using the related print drivers, while other documents > would be scanned and linked to the return file. > I know others around here are doing this, so I wondered how you > have organized your online filing system a/k/a directory > structure. Seems like I could set up one directory for each tax > year and put all clients' stuff for that year in it. Or, I could > set up a separate directory for each client and add successive > stuff each year. Or, I could get more involved than that with > separate year subdirectories under each client, etc., etc. > So, what has worked well in this regard? I'm using Paperport 9 > with PDF file formats, if that makes a difference. > Thanks for the spins! Backup. Backup. Backup. Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#41
| |||
| |||
| "Michael T Wing CPA" <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > I finally got one of those snazzy all-in-one printer copier
I would organize the directories by year then by client and> scanners. So now I'm thinking about going largely "paperless," > by which I mean that copies of tax returns and related > documentation (such that I choose to retain) would be stored in > online format only. The returns would be printed directly to > file using the related print drivers, while other documents > would be scanned and linked to the return file. > I know others around here are doing this, so I wondered how you > have organized your online filing system a/k/a directory > structure. Seems like I could set up one directory for each tax > year and put all clients' stuff for that year in it. Or, I could > set up a separate directory for each client and add successive > stuff each year. Or, I could get more involved than that with > separate year subdirectories under each client, etc., etc. > So, what has worked well in this regard? I'm using Paperport 9 > with PDF file formats, if that makes a difference. after tax season copy on a data CD, Keep in mind nasty things can happen to a pc - viruses, failed hard drives ,etc. so having an indexed backup on CD by year is important. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#40
| |||
| |||
| Michael T Wing CPA <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > I finally got one of those snazzy all-in-one printer copier
Well... I am largely paperless and I am struggling with> scanners. So now I'm thinking about going largely "paperless," > by which I mean that copies of tax returns and related > documentation (such that I choose to retain) would be stored in > online format only. The returns would be printed directly to > file using the related print drivers, while other documents > would be scanned and linked to the return file. > I know others around here are doing this, so I wondered how you > have organized your online filing system a/k/a directory > structure. Seems like I could set up one directory for each tax > year and put all clients' stuff for that year in it. Or, I could > set up a separate directory for each client and add successive > stuff each year. Or, I could get more involved than that with > separate year subdirectories under each client, etc., etc. > So, what has worked well in this regard? I'm using Paperport 9 > with PDF file formats, if that makes a difference. your specific problem. I have been using years as subdirectories under clients. Like this: John Smith 1998 1999 2000 Bill Jones 2001 2002 2003 This seems to work very well when I need to go back into previous years. However, I am buying a much larger practice and back-ups will become a problem. I will be limited to about 30Gig of storage per removable media. If I cannot get all the data on one removable media, I will have to switch to having one or more years on each removable disk. Hope this helps... -- Christopher Mewhort, EA, CGA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#39
| |||
| |||
| I finally got one of those snazzy all-in-one printer copier scanners. So now I'm thinking about going largely "paperless," by which I mean that copies of tax returns and related documentation (such that I choose to retain) would be stored in online format only. The returns would be printed directly to file using the related print drivers, while other documents would be scanned and linked to the return file. I know others around here are doing this, so I wondered how you have organized your online filing system a/k/a directory structure. Seems like I could set up one directory for each tax year and put all clients' stuff for that year in it. Or, I could set up a separate directory for each client and add successive stuff each year. Or, I could get more involved than that with separate year subdirectories under each client, etc., etc. So, what has worked well in this regard? I'm using Paperport 9 with PDF file formats, if that makes a difference. Thanks for the spins! MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |