|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > "At the same time we wrote a contract for deed"
As a matter of state law, check your state, this may besufficient to start the ownership clock under some facit of equitable title . I suspect the question has come up already and there are answers within tax attorney or PA or EA circles. Either get a reliable tax answer OR wait out the deadline as to ownership if the $$ gain count. PS you can structure a sale to deliver ownership later. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| Mail Ias wrote: - quote - > I have a question about the Ownership and Use Tests
For real estate, the strictest defintion is title. You have> described in Publication 523 "Selling Your Home". > In August of 1998 my parents helped me purchase my first > home. The home was purchased from another individual. My > parents where the ones who technically purchased the home =96 > their names were on the deed and mortgage, etc. At the same > time we wrote a contract for deed in which I would make the > mortgage payments and live in the home until I was able to > get my own mortgage. They never lived in the home. Only > me. > In September 2001 I got married and my wife moved into the > home. In May of 2002 we "refinanced" and got the mortgage > and deed in our name. On the county records it looks like > any other sale. > We're looking to sell and move up to a nicer home, but are > concerned we may be charged capital gains if we sell before > May 2004. I've gotten different opinions from different > accountants. (My normal accountant is on vaction right now, > and I recall him telling me that I met the ownerhip test. > Other accountants have claimed I'd owe captial gains because > I didn't meet the ownership test). > So, using the "owned the home for at least two years and > lived in it for two of the last five years" exemption =96 does > this meet the ownership test? In other words is there any > case law on the books now about what exactly defines > ownership? held title only since May 2002. Under looser definitions, you may have been the effective owner, but why not hold until (or close escrow on) May 2004 so as to avoid the whole problem? If you don't have a buyer right now, you're only looking at a 9 month delay - where 2 months of that will typically be the escrow period anyway. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a question about the Ownership and Use Tests described in Publication 523 "Selling Your Home". In August of 1998 my parents helped me purchase my first home. The home was purchased from another individual. My parents where the ones who technically purchased the home – their names were on the deed and mortgage, etc. At the same time we wrote a contract for deed in which I would make the mortgage payments and live in the home until I was able to get my own mortgage. They never lived in the home. Only me. In September 2001 I got married and my wife moved into the home. In May of 2002 we "refinanced" and got the mortgage and deed in our name. On the county records it looks like any other sale. We're looking to sell and move up to a nicer home, but are concerned we may be charged capital gains if we sell before May 2004. I've gotten different opinions from different accountants. (My normal accountant is on vaction right now, and I recall him telling me that I met the ownerhip test. Other accountants have claimed I'd owe captial gains because I didn't meet the ownership test). So, using the "owned the home for at least two years and lived in it for two of the last five years" exemption – does this meet the ownership test? In other words is there any case law on the books now about what exactly defines ownership? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| capital, gains, ownership, principle, question, residence, sale, test |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Which one is my principle residence? John Smith: I live in a house in Gerogia. My wife and kids live in a house in Tennessee. I drive to Tennessee to see them on Friday night and go to Georgia on... | Taxes | 16 | 08-25-2003 11:51 AM | |
| Capital Gains: Primary Residence qualification JS: In August of 1999, we purchased our home and began to rent our Condo. Now in August of 2003, we would like to sell the condo and use the proceeds... | Taxes | 3 | 08-12-2003 01:03 PM | |
| current capital gains question sligo: What are the laws for short and long term cap gains for tax year 2003? Thank you, Seamus J.. Wilson <<... | Taxes | 1 | 08-11-2003 10:00 AM | |
| Sale of rent house once primary residence Mimi Seibel: How does one get Proseries to associate the Sale of Main Home Exclusion with the Disposition of Asset on a Sch. E rent proeprty? I can not figure... | Taxes | 2 | 07-12-2003 08:10 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |