|
#3
08-08-2003, 02:01 AM
| |||
| |||
 Re: Mandatory E-Filing - New California Law - quote - > > > > > The California Legislature has enacted within the 2003-2004
But you have to have enough to drag them into the courts.> > > > > California State Budget Mandatory E-Filing of Individual Tax > > > > > Return. > > > > > > > > > Tax Preparers are subject to a penalty of $50 per return > > > > > filed by paper. Effective Jan. 1. 2004. > > > > > > > > > I have posted the new law at > > > > > http://www.istcsandiego.com/tax%20news.htm > > > > You probably should have stated that there was a limitation > > > > on application: 100 or more returns. 25 or less then kills > > > > the requirement. > > > I wonder how they plan to enforce it on out of state > > > preparers. I would fall under their minimum filing number > > > requirement but I am sure there are preparers in Nevada and > > > Arizona who file over 100 CA returns a year. > > State, national nor planetary boundaries have never impeded > > California from seeking to enforce their law and regulation! > But the Interstate Commerce Clause will! They know the little guy cannot afford this route. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
08-07-2003, 06:39 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Mandatory E-Filing - New California Law - quote - > > > > The California Legislature has enacted within the 2003-2004
But the Interstate Commerce Clause will!> > > > California State Budget Mandatory E-Filing of Individual Tax > > > > Return. > > > > > > > Tax Preparers are subject to a penalty of $50 per return > > > > filed by paper. Effective Jan. 1. 2004. > > > > > > > I have posted the new law at > > > > http://www.istcsandiego.com/tax%20news.htm > > > You probably should have stated that there was a limitation > > > on application: 100 or more returns. 25 or less then kills > > > the requirement. > > I wonder how they plan to enforce it on out of state > > preparers. I would fall under their minimum filing number > > requirement but I am sure there are preparers in Nevada and > > Arizona who file over 100 CA returns a year. > State, national nor planetary boundaries have never impeded > California from seeking to enforce their law and regulation! << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
08-06-2003, 11:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Mandatory E-Filing - New California Law Frederick Jorden wrote: - quote - > Dave Woods, EA wrote:
You think he's joking about the planetary boundaries? He's not:> > "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote: > > > Larry wrote: > > > > The California Legislature has enacted within the 2003-2004 > > > > California State Budget Mandatory E-Filing of Individual Tax > > > > Return. > > > > > > > Tax Preparers are subject to a penalty of $50 per return > > > > filed by paper. Effective Jan. 1. 2004. > > > > > > > I have posted the new law at > > > > http://www.istcsandiego.com/tax%20news.htm > > > You probably should have stated that there was a limitation > > > on application: 100 or more returns. 25 or less then kills > > > the requirement. > > I wonder how they plan to enforce it on out of state > > preparers. I would fall under their minimum filing number > > requirement but I am sure there are preparers in Nevada and > > Arizona who file over 100 CA returns a year. > State, national nor planetary boundaries have never impeded > California from seeking to enforce their law and regulation! http://www.caltax.org/member/digest/.../sept01-03.htm Sam << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
08-05-2003, 08:59 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Mandatory E-Filing - New California Law Dave Woods, EA wrote: - quote - > "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote:
State, national nor planetary boundaries have never impeded> > Larry wrote: > > > The California Legislature has enacted within the 2003-2004 > > > California State Budget Mandatory E-Filing of Individual Tax > > > Return. > > > > > Tax Preparers are subject to a penalty of $50 per return > > > filed by paper. Effective Jan. 1. 2004. > > > > > I have posted the new law at > > > http://www.istcsandiego.com/tax%20news.htm > > You probably should have stated that there was a limitation > > on application: 100 or more returns. 25 or less then kills > > the requirement. > I wonder how they plan to enforce it on out of state > preparers. I would fall under their minimum filing number > requirement but I am sure there are preparers in Nevada and > Arizona who file over 100 CA returns a year. California from seeking to enforce their law and regulation! -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
08-03-2003, 10:42 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Mandatory E-Filing - New California Law "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote: - quote - > Larry wrote:
I wonder how they plan to enforce it on out of state> > The California Legislature has enacted within the 2003-2004 > > California State Budget Mandatory E-Filing of Individual Tax > > Return. > > > Tax Preparers are subject to a penalty of $50 per return > > filed by paper. Effective Jan. 1. 2004. > > > I have posted the new law at > > http://www.istcsandiego.com/tax%20news.htm > You probably should have stated that there was a limitation > on application: 100 or more returns. 25 or less then kills > the requirement. preparers. I would fall under their minimum filing number requirement but I am sure there are preparers in Nevada and Arizona who file over 100 CA returns a year. -- David M. Woods, EA Boston, MA 02109 Postings here are general information only and not to be relied upon as advice. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| california, efiling, law, mandatory |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| tax filing Jeff Bishop: Hello Everyone, I bought MS Money 2004 this year so that I could file my federal tax return for free. Well, I have used hrblock.com now for 3... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 03-05-2004 05:22 AM | |
| Re: Mandatory e-filing Wcm7315: > Of course, if the bill now in Congress becomes law, balance > due clients who want the April 30 extended due date will be > *required* to use... | Taxes | 2 | 07-07-2003 09:25 AM | |
| Re: Mandatory e-filing Rufus Leaking: > So, "You have to do this, unless the voting taxpayer/client > says otherwise"? yes, and it was rammed thru the legislature. The folks at MDR... | Taxes | 1 | 07-04-2003 09:21 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
