|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Reno Master" <RenoMaster2003[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > [1] Isn't there some time limit imposed on the IRS for
Yes, there is a ten year statute of limitations on> notifying people and collecting monies "owed" so they can't > terrorize the citizenry like this? If not, there should be! collections (subject to all sorts of exceptions). The ten years doesn't begin to run until assessment, and there could be taxes assessed for up to three years after a return is filed, so it is quite possible for the IRS to be collecting based on a 1989 return. - quote - > [2] Aren't they at least obliged to provide a copy of the
No. However, you have the right to request a transcript,> form in-question and to explain why there's money owed? which will give you that information. - quote - > [3] How should we handle this as we're not inclined to let
As others have pointed out, you need the help of a> this go unquestioned (especially after their misleading > first missive)?!? professional experienced in IRS collection matters, probably a CPA or EA. (A lawyer is probably overkill at the moment, unless it turns out that there is something very wrong that has to be litigated.) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > Reno Master wrote:
One possible cause for lack of notice is a change of> > Or at least a regulation! The IRS recently informed my wife > > and me (without providing a copy of the 13-year-old form > > in-question or sufficiently detailed justification for their > > action) that they were applying the overpayment on our 2000 > > tax return to my wife's 1989!!! 1040. Btw, this only became > > apparent in their third missive as the first one implied > > there was something wrong with our 2000 return, per se, > > while the second notified us of the adjustment to our 2001 > > return to account for the un-applying of the overpayment. > > This notification and action is coming out of left field as > > far as we're concerned, as this is the first time my wife's > > heard that she owes anything for 1989. Why didn't she hear > > about this a decade ago when they were reviewing 1989 > > returns?!? Naturally, she no longer has a copy of that > > year's return. > > > [1] Isn't there some time limit imposed on the IRS for > > notifying people and collecting monies "owed" so they can't > > terrorize the citizenry like this? If not, there should be! > > > [2] Aren't they at least obliged to provide a copy of the > > form in-question and to explain why there's money owed? > > > [3] How should we handle this as we're not inclined to let > > this go unquestioned (especially after their misleading > > first missive)?!? > Here is a clear cut case of getting tax professional help, > either an Enrolled Agent (EA) or Certified Public > Accountant (CPA) who specializes in representation work. > See your local Yellow Pages (TM) for one. > BTW, the IRS did notify your wife about the tax debt. > Some time; some how. address. I had a client who did not receive notice of an audit on a return they filed when they lived in Texas. They later moved to Virginia and filed timely returns with the correct new address. The audit notices were returned to the IRS because the post office change of address expires after six month. Seems the IRS folks did not know how to use the computer to look up an address on a subsequent return. I was able to have the case reopened and corrected. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Reno Master wrote: - quote - > Or at least a regulation! The IRS recently informed my wife
There is: However, collection has a period of limitations> and me (without providing a copy of the 13-year-old form > in-question or sufficiently detailed justification for their > action) that they were applying the overpayment on our 2000 > tax return to my wife's 1989!!! 1040. Btw, this only became > apparent in their third missive as the first one implied > there was something wrong with our 2000 return, per se, > while the second notified us of the adjustment to our 2001 > return to account for the un-applying of the overpayment. > This notification and action is coming out of left field as > far as we're concerned, as this is the first time my wife's > heard that she owes anything for 1989. Why didn't she hear > about this a decade ago when they were reviewing 1989 > returns?!? Naturally, she no longer has a copy of that > year's return. > [1] Isn't there some time limit imposed on the IRS for > notifying people and collecting monies "owed" so they can't > terrorize the citizenry like this? If not, there should be! of TEN (10) years from the date of ASSESSMENT (which can be later than the date the return was filed, especially if something was changed later). - quote - > [2] Aren't they at least obliged to provide a copy of the
They should have provided an explanation.> form in-question and to explain why there's money owed? - quote - > [3] How should we handle this as we're not inclined to let
You need to find out what's going on for tax year 1989.> this go unquestioned (especially after their misleading > first missive)?!? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Reno Master wrote: - quote - > Or at least a regulation! The IRS recently informed my wife
Here is a clear cut case of getting tax professional help,> and me (without providing a copy of the 13-year-old form > in-question or sufficiently detailed justification for their > action) that they were applying the overpayment on our 2000 > tax return to my wife's 1989!!! 1040. Btw, this only became > apparent in their third missive as the first one implied > there was something wrong with our 2000 return, per se, > while the second notified us of the adjustment to our 2001 > return to account for the un-applying of the overpayment. > This notification and action is coming out of left field as > far as we're concerned, as this is the first time my wife's > heard that she owes anything for 1989. Why didn't she hear > about this a decade ago when they were reviewing 1989 > returns?!? Naturally, she no longer has a copy of that > year's return. > [1] Isn't there some time limit imposed on the IRS for > notifying people and collecting monies "owed" so they can't > terrorize the citizenry like this? If not, there should be! > [2] Aren't they at least obliged to provide a copy of the > form in-question and to explain why there's money owed? > [3] How should we handle this as we're not inclined to let > this go unquestioned (especially after their misleading > first missive)?!? either an Enrolled Agent (EA) or Certified Public Accountant (CPA) who specializes in representation work. See your local Yellow Pages (TM) for one. BTW, the IRS did notify your wife about the tax debt. Some time; some how. Cheer$, Harlan LUnsford, EA in LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Reno Master" <RenoMaster2003[at]hotmail.com> writes: - quote - > The IRS recently informed my wife
I suspect that you and your wife weren't married in 1989 and> and me (without providing a copy of the 13-year-old form > in-question or sufficiently detailed justification for their > action) that they were applying the overpayment on our 2000 > tax return to my wife's 1989!!! that she was married to, and filed a joint return with, someone else for 1989. Step one is to call the IRS and ask what the balance due for 1989 represents. Phil Marti Topeka, KS << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Or at least a regulation! The IRS recently informed my wife and me (without providing a copy of the 13-year-old form in-question or sufficiently detailed justification for their action) that they were applying the overpayment on our 2000 tax return to my wife's 1989!!! 1040. Btw, this only became apparent in their third missive as the first one implied there was something wrong with our 2000 return, per se, while the second notified us of the adjustment to our 2001 return to account for the un-applying of the overpayment. This notification and action is coming out of left field as far as we're concerned, as this is the first time my wife's heard that she owes anything for 1989. Why didn't she hear about this a decade ago when they were reviewing 1989 returns?!? Naturally, she no longer has a copy of that year's return. [1] Isn't there some time limit imposed on the IRS for notifying people and collecting monies "owed" so they can't terrorize the citizenry like this? If not, there should be! [2] Aren't they at least obliged to provide a copy of the form in-question and to explain why there's money owed? [3] How should we handle this as we're not inclined to let this go unquestioned (especially after their misleading first missive)?!? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |