|
#4
| |||
| |||
| dan[at]evans-legal.com (Dan Evans) wrote: - quote - > ronnirubin[at]sprintmail.com (Arthur L. Rubin) wrote:
Not entirely. It seems the question of whether your office> > It has been stated that travel between home and a secondary > > work location is deductible under under section 162(b) (as > > opposed to be excluded as commuting under section 262 or > > under paragraph 280A(a)) only if there is a qualified home > > office as defined under 280A(c). > > > I don't follow the reasoning. > The "reasoning" is that all travel is considered to be > commuting until you get to an office (or other place of > employment). So, if you have two offices, Office A and > Office B, traveling from home to either office is considered > to be a commute 9and personal), but travel between the two > offices is considered to be a business expense. > If you have an office at home, then you're already at one > office, and travel to the second office is business (and not > personal). > Once you accept the premise (that travel from home to an > office is not deductible, but travel from office to office > is), it's logically consistent. at home is an "office" for the purpose of travel expenses (as opposed to being excluded as personal or commuting expenses under section 262) is distinct from the question of whether it qualifies as a home office under section 280A. Travel expenses do not seem to me to be "with respect to the use of a dwelling unit which is used by the taxpayer during the taxable year as a residence." << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Paul A. Thomas wrote: - quote - > "Dave Woods, EA" <d.woods[at]verizon.net> wrote
Agreed that the trip to "Burger Chef" isn't a Schedule C> > The rationale is, if your main place of business is at home, > > then travel to any OTHER business location is treated the > > same as if you worked in an office downtown and went to the > > same second location. Your "commute" would the distance > > from the bed to the computer. > Let's be clear on this. As long as the travel from the home > office and a CLIENT is being deducted I'm Ok with that. > But, travel from the "home office" to your job at Burger > Chef is commuting, not deductible on Schedule C as it's not > related to that business. expense, but it might not be commuting either - see "two job mileage." ;-) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| ronnirubin[at]sprintmail.com (Arthur L. Rubin) wrote: - quote - > It has been stated that travel between home and a secondary
The "reasoning" is that all travel is considered to be> work location is deductible under under section 162(b) (as > opposed to be excluded as commuting under section 262 or > under paragraph 280A(a)) only if there is a qualified home > office as defined under 280A(c). > I don't follow the reasoning. commuting until you get to an office (or other place of employment). So, if you have two offices, Office A and Office B, traveling from home to either office is considered to be a commute 9and personal), but travel between the two offices is considered to be a business expense. If you have an office at home, then you're already at one office, and travel to the second office is business (and not personal). Once you accept the premise (that travel from home to an office is not deductible, but travel from office to office is), it's logically consistent. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Dave Woods, EA" <d.woods[at]verizon.net> wrote - quote - > The rationale is, if your main place of business is at home,
Let's be clear on this. As long as the travel from the home> then travel to any OTHER business location is treated the > same as if you worked in an office downtown and went to the > same second location. Your "commute" would the distance > from the bed to the computer. office and a CLIENT is being deducted I'm Ok with that. But, travel from the "home office" to your job at Burger Chef is commuting, not deductible on Schedule C as it's not related to that business. -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia taxman[at]negia.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin[at]sprintmail.com> wrote: - quote - > It has been stated that travel between home and a secondary
The rationale is, if your main place of business is at home,> work location is deductible under under section 162(b) (as > opposed to be excluded as commuting under section 262 or > under paragraph 280A(a)) only if there is a qualified home > office as defined under 280A(c). > I don't follow the reasoning. Are the travel expenses > considered to be "with respect to the use of a dwelling unit > which is used by the taxpayer during the taxable year as a > residence." (280A(a))? > There seem to be no regulations relating to section 280A, so > I'm not sure of the interpretations. then travel to any OTHER business location is treated the same as if you worked in an office downtown and went to the same second location. Your "commute" would the distance from the bed to the computer. -- David M. Woods, EA Boston, MA 02109 Postings here are general information only and not to be relied upon as advice. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| It has been stated that travel between home and a secondary work location is deductible under under section 162(b) (as opposed to be excluded as commuting under section 262 or under paragraph 280A(a)) only if there is a qualified home office as defined under 280A(c). I don't follow the reasoning. Are the travel expenses considered to be "with respect to the use of a dwelling unit which is used by the taxpayer during the taxable year as a residence." (280A(a))? There seem to be no regulations relating to section 280A, so I'm not sure of the interpretations. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| commuting, home, office |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| "news" and "fyi" links on the "Track My Portfolio" page tom: no longer work in my Money 2000. When I click them, I get "MSN Money-Page Not Found" and "The page you requested could not be found." But there is a... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 10-25-2007 11:34 PM | |
| Deleting "overdue" recurring bills on "my money" home page Nadine: Hopefully somebody can help me with this problem. I use Microsoft Money 2006 - Esential Bills. The problem is that I keep getting reminders on my... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 04-30-2007 07:03 PM | |
| Problem with keeping track of shared expenses, "His", "Hers", "Ours" and How much do I owe you? P.Constantineau: Hi all, My girlfriend and I are having trouble figuring how to use money 2005 to indicate us how much we owe each other. I have setup Money 2005... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 04-03-2006 02:01 PM | |
| Money 2002 transaction status flags ("E", "C", "R") have all disappeared Nick Tonkin: Hi, After many months of using Money 2002, yesterday I suddenly noticed that the column in my resgister that shows the cleared status of each... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 02-28-2004 04:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |