|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Pyrafan <pyrafan[at]aol.commuhhuh> wrote: - quote - > Art Kamlet wrote:
I read this as a partial sale, partial donation.> > Pyrafan <pyrafan[at]aol.commuhhuh> wrote: > > > Thanks for the responses. The decision was made to make the > > > sale at the offered value and make the NPO donation > > > directly. > > You realize that since he donated appreciated property, he > > is limited to using only 30% of AGI as his donation, and if > > he had more than that, he could have carried the remaineer > > forward. > If this were a donation of appreciated property, that might > be relevant. It was a SALE of appreciated property. Part of > the proceeds of the sale were donated. > I don't know why this was so confusing. Seller. Buyer. > Donation. __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Art Kamlet wrote: - quote - > Pyrafan <pyrafan[at]aol.commuhhuh> wrote:
If this were a donation of appreciated property, that might> > Thanks for the responses. The decision was made to make the > > sale at the offered value and make the NPO donation > > directly. > You realize that since he donated appreciated property, he > is limited to using only 30% of AGI as his donation, and if > he had more than that, he could have carried the remaineer > forward. be relevant. It was a SALE of appreciated property. Part of the proceeds of the sale were donated. I don't know why this was so confusing. Seller. Buyer. Donation. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Pyrafan <pyrafan[at]aol.commuhhuh> wrote: - quote - > Thanks for the responses. The decision was made to make the
You realize that since he donated appreciated property, he> sale at the offered value and make the NPO donation > directly. > In answer to the "dancing around" question, the seller is > anxious to keep his tax due at zero, if possible. Because of > a combination of Schedule E losses, child tax credits, and > medical expenses, the additional Schedule A benefit of a > donation in the amount of the pledge would not be fully > realized. is limited to using only 30% of AGI as his donation, and if he had more than that, he could have carried the remaineer forward. So in this limited case, he could have actually had a carruyforward? - quote - > I did misunderstand the marginal tax rate, which
__> TurboTax Schedule D shows at 10%, so fears of a 28% "take" > were unrealistic, though the seller may yet have a balance > due. Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for the responses. The decision was made to make the sale at the offered value and make the NPO donation directly. In answer to the "dancing around" question, the seller is anxious to keep his tax due at zero, if possible. Because of a combination of Schedule E losses, child tax credits, and medical expenses, the additional Schedule A benefit of a donation in the amount of the pledge would not be fully realized. I did misunderstand the marginal tax rate, which TurboTax Schedule D shows at 10%, so fears of a 28% "take" were unrealistic, though the seller may yet have a balance due. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| pyrafan[at]aol.commuhhuh (Pyrafan) wrote: - quote - > I know more or less how tax *deductions* for collectible
Why all the dancing around? You get the same tax effect by> capital gains work. I don't know this. > Situation: A collectible needs to be sold to raise cash. The > offer is on the table for, say, $10K. The seller would like > to avoid as much of the 28% collectible capital gain as > possible. The seller also has a pledge to a 501(c)(3) > organization in the amount of $2K. > Is it any kind of red flag, or more important, fraudulent, > for the buyer to reduce the purchase price by the amount of > the pledge, then make a donation to the NPO in that amount > to take the deduction himself? > The seller gets a reduced capital gain, AND fulfills the > pledge, avoiding embarrasment as well as possible collection > activity. The buyer gets a deduction AND most likely > short-term cap gain tax on the increased gain when he > resells the collectible. Does the NPO have any > responsibility to the IRS when a third party fulfills a > pledge? Or is this just a win-win one-time tax shelter? merely selling the "collecteble" for FMV ($10) and claiming the capital gains (at 25% or less) and then donating $2K to the charity. The capital gains rate will NOT be higher than your highest marginal tax rate (see the worksheet in the Schedule D instructions), so that is a wash. Involving the buyer in this scheme is not necessary. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| bdsouza[at]yahoo.com (Brian D'Souza) wrote: - quote - > pyrafan[at]aol.commuhhuh (Pyrafan) wrote:
[snip]- quote - > The buyer would certainly not be entitled to the deduction.
Likewise, the seller would not get the deduction, because he> He has received something tangible of value in exchange for > his contribution, specifically, a $2,000 discount on the > purchase. did not make the contribution; his full benefit comes from the reduction in taxable gain. If the seller takes the deduction, it smells like fraud; if the seller doesn't, he's found a new way to pay too much tax, because both lose the deduction. -- Chris Green << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| pyrafan[at]aol.commuhhuh (Pyrafan) writes: - quote - > Situation: A collectible needs to be sold to raise cash. The
I want to make sure I understand. The item is worth> offer is on the table for, say, $10K. The seller would like > to avoid as much of the 28% collectible capital gain as > possible. The seller also has a pledge to a 501(c)(3) > organization in the amount of $2K. > Is it any kind of red flag, or more important, fraudulent, > for the buyer to reduce the purchase price by the amount of > the pledge, then make a donation to the NPO in that amount > to take the deduction himself? $10,000. You want to sell it for $8,000 with the purchaser giving the other $2,000 to the NPO as fulfillment of your pledge. I don't see any problem, BUT: 1. Whether this satisfies your pledge is between you and the NPO. 2. The purhcaser doesn't get a deduction for the $2,000 because he spent $10,000 ($8,000 to you and $2,000 to the NPO) and got $10,000 worth of merchandise. As long as no one tries to pretend that there was a charitable contribution in all this, there's nothing wrong. Phil Marti Topeka, KS << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| pyrafan[at]aol.commuhhuh (Pyrafan) wrote: - quote - > I know more or less how tax *deductions* for collectible
I'll bet there is no specific rule covering this. And that> capital gains work. I don't know this. > Situation: A collectible needs to be sold to raise cash. The > offer is on the table for, say, $10K. The seller would like > to avoid as much of the 28% collectible capital gain as > possible. The seller also has a pledge to a 501(c)(3) > organization in the amount of $2K. > Is it any kind of red flag, or more important, fraudulent, > for the buyer to reduce the purchase price by the amount of > the pledge, then make a donation to the NPO in that amount > to take the deduction himself? > The seller gets a reduced capital gain, AND fulfills the > pledge, avoiding embarrasment as well as possible collection > activity. The buyer gets a deduction AND most likely > short-term cap gain tax on the increased gain when he > resells the collectible. Does the NPO have any > responsibility to the IRS when a third party fulfills a > pledge? Or is this just a win-win one-time tax shelter? the IRS would characterize this as fraud, if they were to discover the conditions placed on the buyer. The buyer would certainly not be entitled to the deduction. He has received something tangible of value in exchange for his contribution, specifically, a $2,000 discount on the purchase. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I know more or less how tax *deductions* for collectible capital gains work. I don't know this. Situation: A collectible needs to be sold to raise cash. The offer is on the table for, say, $10K. The seller would like to avoid as much of the 28% collectible capital gain as possible. The seller also has a pledge to a 501(c)(3) organization in the amount of $2K. Is it any kind of red flag, or more important, fraudulent, for the buyer to reduce the purchase price by the amount of the pledge, then make a donation to the NPO in that amount to take the deduction himself? The seller gets a reduced capital gain, AND fulfills the pledge, avoiding embarrasment as well as possible collection activity. The buyer gets a deduction AND most likely short-term cap gain tax on the increased gain when he resells the collectible. Does the NPO have any responsibility to the IRS when a third party fulfills a pledge? Or is this just a win-win one-time tax shelter? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| cap, donation, gain, lieu |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Stock Donation HKS: How do you record a charitable donation of stock? | Microsoft Money | 4 | 12-27-2007 02:05 PM | |
| Reinv Gain from 2003 shows now as gain in IRA - M2004 - Bobb -: I'm REBUYING a mutual fund in an IRA that I owned years ago. I previously sold it all in 2003 and not problem until I just entered my new purchase... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 04-05-2006 06:24 PM | |
| Donation accounting Bryan: If I donate $200 in clothing, toys, etc to an institution, how do I account for it in money? In the past I've just used the cash account, but then... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 11-15-2004 03:14 PM | |
| Gain column includes previous historical sale gain amount? Chris Barker: I've discovered a curious bug in Money 2004. I had an investment in a mutual fund that I sold and liquidated in its entirety. Several months later I... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-12-2004 05:17 PM | |
| copy on cd in lieu of floppy cee: subject: Money Deluxe 2004 Can data be copied on a CD instead of floppy disc? | Microsoft Money | 2 | 09-15-2004 03:54 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |