|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Barry Margolin <barmar[at]alum.mit.edu> wrote: - quote - > an_ordinary_guy_158[at]hotmail.com (Bill) wrote:
However, I hope to get a decent amount of income from a> > Some "Safe Harbor" thoughts: If you pay estimated taxes to > > bring your total withholding and E/T payments to equal the > > total tax due for 2002, you will avoid penalties. > Although since he's been laid off halfway through this year, > his tax due for 2003 will probably be much less than it was > for 2002. partnership in which I materially participate. So I believe I have to pay estimated taxes since there is no withholding for this K-1 income. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| an_ordinary_guy_158[at]hotmail.com (Bill) wrote: - quote - > Dave posted:
Bill: The $1,000 shortfall safe harbor doesn't apply if you> > I was recently layed off from my full-time (W-2) > > job. My income for the remainder of the year > > will likely come from a partnership (K-1). > > I didn't plan on paying estimated taxes, but > > now I think I have to. Is there any problem to > > start paying quarterly estimated taxes now, > > even though I missed the first payment > > deadline on April 15? > > Also, I'd like to pay the minimum estimated tax > > necessary to avoid penalty, even if it means a > > bigger tax bill on April 15, 2004. How do I > > determine the amount of estimated taxes to > > pay? > Given the info provided, the only honest answer is to direct > you to Form 1040-ES, which will provide the format for > developing a projection of your total 2003 income and then > estimating the taxes which will be due. > Some "Safe Harbor" thoughts: If you pay estimated taxes to > bring your total withholding and E/T payments to equal the > total tax due for 2002, you will avoid penalties. And, if > your total *advance* payments are equal to a sum which is > not more than $1,000 less than your total tax bill, you > should avoid penalties. > But the best advice is to obtain a 1040-ES, read the form > and do the math. make estimated payments, just withholding. Also just paying in the amount of last year's tax doesn't work unless the payments are roughly equal. In Dave's case he must apply Withholding to the first 2 quarters, and if he needs more in the 2 installments than he had in Withholding, he will have a penalty unless Annualizing corrects this. The 1040ES won't do him too much good, and it hasn't been revised for the Post-May 5 rates and rules. Ed << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| an_ordinary_guy_158[at]hotmail.com (Bill) wrote: - quote - > Some "Safe Harbor" thoughts: If you pay estimated taxes to
Although since he's been laid off halfway through this year,> bring your total withholding and E/T payments to equal the > total tax due for 2002, you will avoid penalties. his tax due for 2003 will probably be much less than it was for 2002. So applying this safe harbor will likely result in being extremely overwithheld, which is not usually a good financial plan. And since he'll be paying all this estimated tax while not earning any wages, it will probably have a significant impact to his personal cash flow. In this situation, I'd suggest aiming for the $1,000 less than the total 2003 tax criterion. -- Barry Margolin, barmar[at]alum.mit.edu Level(3) Communicaions, Woburn, MA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Dave posted: - quote - > I was recently layed off from my full-time (W-2)
Given the info provided, the only honest answer is to direct> job. My income for the remainder of the year > will likely come from a partnership (K-1). > I didn't plan on paying estimated taxes, but > now I think I have to. Is there any problem to > start paying quarterly estimated taxes now, > even though I missed the first payment > deadline on April 15? > Also, I'd like to pay the minimum estimated tax > necessary to avoid penalty, even if it means a > bigger tax bill on April 15, 2004. How do I > determine the amount of estimated taxes to > pay? you to Form 1040-ES, which will provide the format for developing a projection of your total 2003 income and then estimating the taxes which will be due. Some "Safe Harbor" thoughts: If you pay estimated taxes to bring your total withholding and E/T payments to equal the total tax due for 2002, you will avoid penalties. And, if your total *advance* payments are equal to a sum which is not more than $1,000 less than your total tax bill, you should avoid penalties. But the best advice is to obtain a 1040-ES, read the form and do the math. Bill << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| estimated, paying, start, taxes |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Estimated Taxes Peter: I have a question on paying estimated taxes. I work as an employee and have federal & state taxes withheld. My wife started a job in February for... | Taxes | 1 | 07-10-2003 02:10 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |