|
#9
| |||
| |||
| No, but the database is a database. Since MSISAM is, apparently, derived from Jet, it seems likely that it supports some or all of the logical locking that Jet does. Money could have used this. It didn't. Money could also have used file level locking to just prevent the file from being opened twice--Excel and Word have had this for a decade or so--but they didn't. As to your question about MS Support, it's tough to say. It would seem that they do not appreciate the issues with file robustness or can't get the product group to care. But the only people who really know aren't going to chime in here and tell us the real facts. "Arthur" <no.body.lives.here[at]xoxy.net> wrote in message news:t6s4b05vt38lokje0jvfiujpa4a3itmqsf[at]4ax.com... - quote - > Yeh, the MS OS file system is not a data base system. > Do we assume MS support knows this and asks the > appropriate question when corrupt data is the problem? > It would be nice if MS added a warning sheet to their > box about never sharing open files. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Yeh, the MS OS file system is not a data base system. Do we assume MS support knows this and asks the appropriate question when corrupt data is the problem? It would be nice if MS added a warning sheet to their box about never sharing open files. arthur -- On Sun, 23 May 2004 22:06:22 -0600, "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > I opened the file from the notebook on WiFi with the file also open on the > desktop. Bad news. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I opened the file from the notebook on WiFi with the file also open on the desktop. Bad news. "Arthur" <no.body.lives.here[at]xoxy.net> wrote in message news:d6r2b0dkhp7apsbou5vrdh3rocs8v4gqj2[at]4ax.com... - quote - > Dick, I am really surprised at your statement below as you seem so > knowledgable. Open Mny, open an account, close everything without > saving and tell me the modify file date. Yep, the file was written. > Only way you might stand a chance is if you remotely accessed the > drive in read only mode and the file isn't opened on the other > machine. Perhaps this is what you did do but that isn't clear in your > statement. > arthur > -- > On Sun, 23 May 2004 18:44:46 -0600, "Dick Watson" wrote: > > time)corruption issues--some traceable to things I did (though opening a > > file from a second machine shouldn't corrupt the file, it tends to). I am |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Dick, I am really surprised at your statement below as you seem so knowledgable. Open Mny, open an account, close everything without saving and tell me the modify file date. Yep, the file was written. Only way you might stand a chance is if you remotely accessed the drive in read only mode and the file isn't opened on the other machine. Perhaps this is what you did do but that isn't clear in your statement. arthur -- On Sun, 23 May 2004 18:44:46 -0600, "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > time)corruption issues--some traceable to things I did (though opening a > file from a second machine shouldn't corrupt the file, it tends to). I am |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| To what Steve wrote, I'd append: I'm entering my 12th year of data on (I'm estimating here) the fifth computer, fifth or sixth different O/S, and 10th different version of Money. My file has never had anything archived from it. I have had occasional (maybe four or five episodes in that period of time)corruption issues--some traceable to things I did (though opening a file from a second machine shouldn't corrupt the file, it tends to). I am manic about backups. I have never lost more than three or four days worth of keyed in data recovering from one of these problems. Clearly some people do not have such good luck. Whatever the sources of the corruption problems people see, they definitely seem to effect some people differentially. Whether this is dumb luck, environmental, a condition of the way these users use it or what, I know not. But this does not seem like a high probability event for all users. Having said that, if the error rate is measurable, it's probably too high. "SJCOHEN730" <sjcohen730[at]aol.com> wrote in message news:20040523191158.21846.00001937[at]mb-m15.aol.com... - quote - > I apologize to you. Obviously you know alot about Microsoft Money > and how it operates. Although I have had minor problems thru the years, I must > say it has worked for me thru 3 computers and 8 1/2 years. The only thought I > had was if your data is now screwed up or your original 2004 disk is screwed > up, that may be your problem. I wish you luck in resolving the problem. Steve. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| The hardware configuration and operating system requirements are printed on the box and I do not remember MS stating anywhere that the target hardware / OS must be "new since yyyy". I'm running M03 Deluxe and don't use a lot of the product's features. Matter of fact I turned off as much stuff as possible. I don't own a house, I have no loans, I can't be bothered with budgets, what's a report? ... hell there are lots of differences between users and that is wherein lies the problem. What is important to me is update of bank, credit card, and investments via TCP/IP. arthur -- On 21 May 2004 17:39:27 GMT, sjcohen730[at]aol.com (SJCOHEN730) wrote: .. .. - quote - > Glenn, it is my guess that something unique to you and your computer is causing
..> the problem. I assume you have a computer bought new since 2002. I assume you .. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Yes, it is safe to assume I have a computer bought since 2002.
and how it operates. Although I have had minor problems thru the years, I must> Hopefully, something with "2004" in the title would accomodate a computer > bought way after 2002.. Yes, it is also safe to assume i have extensive > knowledge in oline banking transactions-i'm not overdoing automatic > downloads. Bank of America only supporta manual tansaction > downloading(QIF/OFX). I enter data, and the bank downloads are to verify > that I have entered the data correctly with the right amounts. > What I disagree with you most is the suggestive nature of your email. I'm > not a dummy trying to click a few buttons to make this software work This > software SHOULD be for me..and the countless others that want it to do as is > advertised, and not slowing down the computer or frustrating us as we enter > lots of data and then seeing the unexpected error that you may or may not > have lost your precious time. > Sorry to sound snippy, but when I spend my $$ for MS Money and it doens't > work, as it doesn't for others, it's time to look for alternatives. Bottom > line is, M$ has been putting out Money for many years and I would hope that > they would have gotten it right and FIXED many moons ago. At this point, we > haven't seen a major upgrade since Money '99 and it looks like Money '05 is > a repackaged title we pay for with no major feature changes or bug fixes. > Heck, they even designed the patform it runs on ..WINDOWS! > Quicken doesn't have that advantage, but it seems to work better Go Figure! > Glenn, I apologize to you. Obviously you know alot about Microsoft Money say it has worked for me thru 3 computers and 8 1/2 years. The only thought I had was if your data is now screwed up or your original 2004 disk is screwed up, that may be your problem. I wish you luck in resolving the problem. Steve. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "SJCOHEN730" <sjcohen730[at]aol.com> wrote in message news:20040521133927.22456.00001030[at]mb-m29.aol.com... - quote - > > Subject: Money 04-Good thing gone bad
No, it's not unique to me..Look through the posts here. I've used MoneyDX> > From: "Glenn B." pkguy323[at]NOSPAMyahoo.com > > Date: 5/21/2004 8:41 AM Eastern Standard Time > > Message-id: <iGnrc.1$ZQ.0[at]nwrddc03.gnilink.net> > > I've reached my end with MS Money. It's so unfortunate that many great ideas > > have been incorporated into the clunkiest piece of software. If it was > > easier to install./reinstall, didn't crash, wasn't SOOOOOOOOO slow even with > > all the bells and whistles turned off(why bother if you can't use the good > > stuff?), it would be #1 in my book. Unfortunately, some never have problems > > with it, others have many problems and a select group can't even get it to > > run. > > > I spent 10 minutes trying to enter two transactions last night. That did it > > for me. it was slow to open, slow to get things to pop up, so I've ditched > > it AGAIN. Yes, I've left it before for similar reasons, but MSM04's > > recurring issues have put that final nail in the coffin. Quicken is out, so > > I'm going back to Money Matters Deluxe. A new version of MMDX comes out in > > August, and I look forward to that as well. It's nice to enter transactions > > without having to spend hours doing it. > > > Anyways, I appreciate all the help provided here and hope you all continue > > your success in finding ways to make MSM04+ work for you. > > > Glenn > > > Glenn, it is my guess that something unique to you and your computer is causing > the problem. I assume you have a computer bought new since 2002. I assume you > have a reasonable understanding of financial transactions. I assume you are not > overdoing the "automatic download" or upload of every piece of data. You are > actually entering most of the data manually. If my assumptions are all correct, > then I will agree that Money is not for you. Good luck anyway. Steve since 2001. Yes, it is safe to assume I have a computer bought since 2002. Hopefully, something with "2004" in the title would accomodate a computer bought way after 2002.. Yes, it is also safe to assume i have extensive knowledge in oline banking transactions-i'm not overdoing automatic downloads. Bank of America only supporta manual tansaction downloading(QIF/OFX). I enter data, and the bank downloads are to verify that I have entered the data correctly with the right amounts. What I disagree with you most is the suggestive nature of your email. I'm not a dummy trying to click a few buttons to make this software work This software SHOULD be for me..and the countless others that want it to do as is advertised, and not slowing down the computer or frustrating us as we enter lots of data and then seeing the unexpected error that you may or may not have lost your precious time. Sorry to sound snippy, but when I spend my $$ for MS Money and it doens't work, as it doesn't for others, it's time to look for alternatives. Bottom line is, M$ has been putting out Money for many years and I would hope that they would have gotten it right and FIXED many moons ago. At this point, we haven't seen a major upgrade since Money '99 and it looks like Money '05 is a repackaged title we pay for with no major feature changes or bug fixes. Heck, they even designed the patform it runs on ..WINDOWS! Quicken doesn't have that advantage, but it seems to work better Go Figure! |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hi Sjcohen730 As much as I hate to agree with Glenn, I have to. For what ever the reason, Money is not very stable and very subjective to corruption for many users. I used Quicken for 10 years prior to switching to Money, and had never heard the word corruption before moving to money. I am running a fairly new system, and have changed every component (excepting for the motherboard) at least once and basically to see if it effected Money, but my problems continue. I had converted the quicken file, started over without converting the old quicken file and then started over again. I use MSN Bill Pay and update my portfolio, but other than that I do not use if for downloading and balancing, etc. I can keep it running and although I haven't had any problems the last two weeks, it is not unusual for me to have to use the Salvage Utilities at least once a week. I have in the past had many conversations with Microsoft, and I really believe that they do not feel that they have corruption problems because very few people are calling in complaints. I believe and advised them to review this newsgroup and they might change their mind. I love the way the software works, and really have a problem with Intuit's way of doing business so I keep working with Money, but in my opinion it is not a very stable program. Of course many users do not have problems with it, so I feel the problems must be unique to the system experiencing the problems, but Microsoft needs to resolve the problem. I am not one of those that bashes Microsoft, but with this product, they have a problem. Bob "SJCOHEN730" <sjcohen730[at]aol.com> wrote in message news:20040521133927.22456.00001030[at]mb-m29.aol.com... - quote - > > Subject: Money 04-Good thing gone bad > > From: "Glenn B." pkguy323[at]NOSPAMyahoo.com > > Date: 5/21/2004 8:41 AM Eastern Standard Time > > Message-id: <iGnrc.1$ZQ.0[at]nwrddc03.gnilink.net> > > I've reached my end with MS Money. It's so unfortunate that many great ideas > > have been incorporated into the clunkiest piece of software. If it was > > easier to install./reinstall, didn't crash, wasn't SOOOOOOOOO slow even with > > all the bells and whistles turned off(why bother if you can't use the good > > stuff?), it would be #1 in my book. Unfortunately, some never have problems > > with it, others have many problems and a select group can't even get it to > > run. > > > I spent 10 minutes trying to enter two transactions last night. That did it > > for me. it was slow to open, slow to get things to pop up, so I've ditched > > it AGAIN. Yes, I've left it before for similar reasons, but MSM04's > > recurring issues have put that final nail in the coffin. Quicken is out, so > > I'm going back to Money Matters Deluxe. A new version of MMDX comes out in > > August, and I look forward to that as well. It's nice to enter transactions > > without having to spend hours doing it. > > > Anyways, I appreciate all the help provided here and hope you all continue > > your success in finding ways to make MSM04+ work for you. > > > Glenn > > > > > > > > > > Glenn, it is my guess that something unique to you and your computer is causing > the problem. I assume you have a computer bought new since 2002. I assume you > have a reasonable understanding of financial transactions. I assume you are not > overdoing the "automatic download" or upload of every piece of data. You are > actually entering most of the data manually. If my assumptions are all correct, > then I will agree that Money is not for you. Good luck anyway. Steve |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > Subject: Money 04-Good thing gone bad
Glenn, it is my guess that something unique to you and your computer is causing> From: "Glenn B." pkguy323[at]NOSPAMyahoo.com > Date: 5/21/2004 8:41 AM Eastern Standard Time > Message-id: <iGnrc.1$ZQ.0[at]nwrddc03.gnilink.net> I've reached my end with MS Money. It's so unfortunate that many great ideas > have been incorporated into the clunkiest piece of software. If it was > easier to install./reinstall, didn't crash, wasn't SOOOOOOOOO slow even with > all the bells and whistles turned off(why bother if you can't use the good > stuff?), it would be #1 in my book. Unfortunately, some never have problems > with it, others have many problems and a select group can't even get it to > run. > I spent 10 minutes trying to enter two transactions last night. That did it > for me. it was slow to open, slow to get things to pop up, so I've ditched > it AGAIN. Yes, I've left it before for similar reasons, but MSM04's > recurring issues have put that final nail in the coffin. Quicken is out, so > I'm going back to Money Matters Deluxe. A new version of MMDX comes out in > August, and I look forward to that as well. It's nice to enter transactions > without having to spend hours doing it. > Anyways, I appreciate all the help provided here and hope you all continue > your success in finding ways to make MSM04+ work for you. > Glenn the problem. I assume you have a computer bought new since 2002. I assume you have a reasonable understanding of financial transactions. I assume you are not overdoing the "automatic download" or upload of every piece of data. You are actually entering most of the data manually. If my assumptions are all correct, then I will agree that Money is not for you. Good luck anyway. Steve |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I've reached my end with MS Money. It's so unfortunate that many great ideas have been incorporated into the clunkiest piece of software. If it was easier to install./reinstall, didn't crash, wasn't SOOOOOOOOO slow even with all the bells and whistles turned off(why bother if you can't use the good stuff?), it would be #1 in my book. Unfortunately, some never have problems with it, others have many problems and a select group can't even get it to run. I spent 10 minutes trying to enter two transactions last night. That did it for me. it was slow to open, slow to get things to pop up, so I've ditched it AGAIN. Yes, I've left it before for similar reasons, but MSM04's recurring issues have put that final nail in the coffin. Quicken is out, so I'm going back to Money Matters Deluxe. A new version of MMDX comes out in August, and I look forward to that as well. It's nice to enter transactions without having to spend hours doing it. Anyways, I appreciate all the help provided here and hope you all continue your success in finding ways to make MSM04+ work for you. Glenn |
| Tags |
| 04good, bad, money, thing |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| good-bye money 2002 charlie: It has been a over a week (mine died 2-14-04 PM) since MS trashed Money 2002 and still no fix. I do not have the disk. I found Money 2003 and... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 02-24-2004 12:06 AM | |
| which version of Money is good for me? Harold Morgan: I've been using standard for about 3 years and just upgraded to Money 2004. I see nothing I need that standard did not offer. That said, I noticed... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 01-27-2004 12:34 AM | |
| good taxcut/money deal at compusa Mike G.: After rebates TaxCut Deluxe: $9.95 Money 2004 Deluxe: $0 CompUSA provided an extra $10 rebate on TaxCut Deluxe. M2004 rings up for $39.99,... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-14-2004 01:06 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |