|
#11
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Ed Hansberry, MS-MVP/Mobile Devices wrote: - quote - > That did it! I had to mark it unvoid from the bank vendor window. Then
Glad to hear it.> when I imported it the system tried to match it up with my manual $2 > entry. I clicked "Choose another" and the downloaded entry was there. > Checked it and it was accepted and now visible and fully editable. :-) |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx(Cal Learner-- MVP) wrote: - quote - > What I would try is this: prepare a QIF file that matches the hidden
That did it! I had to mark it unvoid from the bank vendor window. Then> transaction. You could do this by exporting a QIF with your > manually-entered transaction, and deleting all of the records except > for the one. Then delete the manually-entered transaction in the > register. File-> Import the small QIF file as a statement from your > bank. The hope is that it will match the hidden transaction, and > make it visible. when I imported it the system tried to match it up with my manual $2 entry. I clicked "Choose another" and the downloaded entry was there. Checked it and it was accepted and now visible and fully editable. :-) Thanks! -- _______________________ Ed H. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Ed Hansberry, MS-MVP/Mobile Devices wrote: - quote - > "Ed Hansberry, MS-MVP/Mobile Devices"
Yes. Nicely done.> <spamfree-silvernino[at]hotmail.spambegone.com> wrote: > > via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx(Cal Learner-- MVP) wrote: > > > > What I would try is this: prepare a QIF file that matches the hidden > > > transaction. You could do this by exporting a QIF with your > > > manually-entered transaction, and deleting all of the records except > > > for the one. Then delete the manually-entered transaction in the > > > register. File-> Import the small QIF file as a statement from your > > > bank. The hope is that it will match the hidden transaction, and > > > make it visible. > > > Hrm... I'll give that a shot. Thanks. > Ok, never really fooled with a QIF file before. Here is what I have so > far: > !Type:Bank > D3/15'2004 > CX > MATM Fee waived > T2.00 > PBankname > LBank Charges:ATM Fees > ^ - quote - > What is the "CX" line? I notice that later unmatched transactions
Cleared Status. In other words, it is cleared.> don't have that. Should I remove that before trying to import? http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/financeformats.html I don't think it is going to matter, but you could try it both ways. Interesting point. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Ed Hansberry, MS-MVP/Mobile Devices" <spamfree-silvernino[at]hotmail.spambegone.com> wrote: - quote - > via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx(Cal Learner-- MVP) wrote:
Ok, never really fooled with a QIF file before. Here is what I have so> > What I would try is this: prepare a QIF file that matches the hidden > > transaction. You could do this by exporting a QIF with your > > manually-entered transaction, and deleting all of the records except > > for the one. Then delete the manually-entered transaction in the > > register. File-> Import the small QIF file as a statement from your > > bank. The hope is that it will match the hidden transaction, and > > make it visible. > Hrm... I'll give that a shot. Thanks. far: !Type:Bank D3/15'2004 CX MATM Fee waived T2.00 PBankname LBank Charges:ATM Fees ^ What is the "CX" line? I notice that later unmatched transactions don't have that. Should I remove that before trying to import? -- _______________________ Ed H. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Retired Coal Miner wrote: - quote - > That is an interesting trick, great to save for future reference.
I have used a variation. However you are not going to be able to> I'm curious if you've ever actually done this, and did it match up? I > suppose one could create a dummy/test money file and play around with it... intentionally produce the hidden transaction to attempt the un-hide. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| That is an interesting trick, great to save for future reference. I'm curious if you've ever actually done this, and did it match up? I suppose one could create a dummy/test money file and play around with it... Cal Learner-- MVP wrote: - quote - > What I would try is this: prepare a QIF file that matches the hidden > transaction. You could do this by exporting a QIF with your > manually-entered transaction, and deleting all of the records except > for the one. Then delete the manually-entered transaction in the > register. File-> Import the small QIF file as a statement from your > bank. The hope is that it will match the hidden transaction, and > make it visible. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx(Cal Learner-- MVP) wrote: - quote - > What I would try is this: prepare a QIF file that matches the hidden
Hrm... I'll give that a shot. Thanks.> transaction. You could do this by exporting a QIF with your > manually-entered transaction, and deleting all of the records except > for the one. Then delete the manually-entered transaction in the > register. File-> Import the small QIF file as a statement from your > bank. The hope is that it will match the hidden transaction, and > make it visible. -- _______________________ Ed H. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Ed Hansberry, MS-MVP/Mobile Devices wrote: - quote - > (Cal Learner-- MVP) wrote:
What I would try is this: prepare a QIF file that matches the hidden> > Does the balance at the bottom of the register change based as the > > register view is changed to show only unreconciled transactions or > > in some other way? > No. Marking the hidden transaction as VOID or unvoided has *no* effect > in the transaction window's account balance line. I had marked the > manual one void and left the hidden one active. Because that seems to > make my transaction register off by the $2, I have now marked the > hidden one void and used my manual entry as the valid one. > Marking the hidden transaction VOID does effect the "Balance this > account" screen, so some items are being calculated off of it. Marking > as VOID also impacts reports. > It seems just the transaction screen and the FIND utility are stumped > by this transaction. Well, and me! transaction. You could do this by exporting a QIF with your manually-entered transaction, and deleting all of the records except for the one. Then delete the manually-entered transaction in the register. File-> Import the small QIF file as a statement from your bank. The hope is that it will match the hidden transaction, and make it visible. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Ed Hansberry, MS-MVP/Mobile Devices" <spamfree-silvernino[at]hotmail.spambegone.com> wrote: - quote - > > *The MoneyLink.XLA can pull it into Excel.
This is incorrect. I was looking at the wrong line. The $2 deposit isnot being shown. I mistakenly looked at the original $2 withdrawal. So, Find, the transaction window and the moneylink.XLA cannot see this. -- _______________________ Ed H. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx(Cal Learner-- MVP) wrote: - quote - > Does the balance at the bottom of the register change based as the
No. Marking the hidden transaction as VOID or unvoided has *no* effect> register view is changed to show only unreconciled transactions or > in some other way? in the transaction window's account balance line. I had marked the manual one void and left the hidden one active. Because that seems to make my transaction register off by the $2, I have now marked the hidden one void and used my manual entry as the valid one. Marking the hidden transaction VOID does effect the "Balance this account" screen, so some items are being calculated off of it. Marking as VOID also impacts reports. It seems just the transaction screen and the FIND utility are stumped by this transaction. Well, and me! -- _______________________ Ed H. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Ed Hansberry, MS-MVP/Mobile Devices wrote: - quote - > "Ed Hansberry, MS-MVP/Mobile Devices"
Does the balance at the bottom of the register change based as the> <spamfree-silvernino[at]hotmail.spambegone.com> wrote: > > The downloaded transaction is not available for viewing in: > > *The account register, no matter what filtering I have set. > > *The Advanced Find menu > > > It is visible in: > > *The category section for ATM/Bank fees window in the lower right > > *The Payee section for my bank in the lower window > > *The Account Balance History report > > *The MoneyLink.XLA can pull it into Excel. > Another tidbit. If you right-click and edit the transaction in the > Payee or category window, the Date, Amount and Account are uneditible > - grayed out. All other transactions, even reconciled ones, are > totally editable, though they will warn you if you edit them and are > marked as reconciled. register view is changed to show only unreconciled transactions or in some other way? |
| | |||
| |||
| "Ed Hansberry, MS-MVP/Mobile Devices" <spamfree-silvernino[at]hotmail.spambegone.com> wrote: - quote - > The downloaded transaction is not available for viewing in:
Another tidbit. If you right-click and edit the transaction in the> *The account register, no matter what filtering I have set. > *The Advanced Find menu > It is visible in: > *The category section for ATM/Bank fees window in the lower right > *The Payee section for my bank in the lower window > *The Account Balance History report > *The MoneyLink.XLA can pull it into Excel. Payee or category window, the Date, Amount and Account are uneditible - grayed out. All other transactions, even reconciled ones, are totally editable, though they will warn you if you edit them and are marked as reconciled. Very strange. -- _______________________ Ed H. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a transaction that drove me nuts last weekend causing my checking account to be out of balance. It is a downloaded deposit of $2.00 (an ATM reimbursement fee) in my account. The amount is not visible in the account register so I of course added it manually which meant to Money, it is now in there twice, my manual entry plus it's invisible one. The downloaded transaction is not available for viewing in: *The account register, no matter what filtering I have set. *The Advanced Find menu It is visible in: *The category section for ATM/Bank fees window in the lower right *The Payee section for my bank in the lower window *The Account Balance History report *The MoneyLink.XLA can pull it into Excel. I've run the salv.exe program and it found no bad records. The amount is correctly computing for the balance, but I don't know how the amount is in the transaction register. If I start 3 transactions above where it should be and manually add/subdtract amounts, the "Balance" column is correct, so it is as if it is in the opening balance calculation. It is properly dated 3/15/04 in all reports. Suggestions? -- _______________________ Ed H. |
| Tags |
| account, hidden, invisible, m2004, record, register |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Invisible transaction except if view by payee or category JML: Using Money 04 Deluxe. Been using Money for *years*. I couldn't balance an account and if I unchecked one of the transactions, the statements... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 03-06-2004 11:42 PM | |
| Error between account list balances and actual account register Tony: Hi - I've raised this as a support call but I'm running Money 2004 and my account balance on the account list view is differenct than that on the... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 01-18-2004 02:18 PM | |
| Budget Record for Dividends in Broker Account Strongca: I am trying to set up my budget to include dividends from one of my Investment accounts. =the account has the "include in Budget Planner" box... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 11-03-2003 12:29 AM | |
| M2004 cash account on pocket money Mike Vanecek: Under investments, Pocket M2004 Deluxe does not show the cash or contributions amounts, only the specific securities. Also, it groups all the... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 08-22-2003 09:55 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |