|
#3
| |||
| |||
| RE: << A friend of mine had never been overdrawn on their account. .. . . They had 6 checks come in one day in the following amounts. $7.43 $11.44 $16.49 $49.80 $234.00 $421.00 - this is important because they were only overdrawn -$41.16 for the day..read on. .. . . My friend got clobbered with not (1) overdraft fee, but (4) $33.00 overdraft fees, they took the first 4 checks posting, smaller ones and slammed overdraft fees on them, their explanation to my friend was they are entitled to collect fees on all of them since the account was overdrawn that day. .. . . > Sarah - I hope your friend contacted Wells Fargo and reminded them of their clean record with regard to previous overdrafts -- and asked that the four charges for overdrafts on the small checks be reduced to one overdraft charge for the one larger check. Charging $33 for a $7 and $16 checks would seem excessive. Did your friend ask Wells Fargo if they would reduce the overdraft fee to one charge in this one case? Did Wells Fargo flatly refuse? Almost any business that intends to maintain good customer relations would honor such a request - whether they were technically right in what they were doing or not. If Wells Fargo refused to do the reasonable thing, then certainly your friend should terminate doing business with this firm and other customers should think twice about their relationship with a business that seems so predatory. Also, if Wells Fargo would not adjust the fee to one charge (and your friend has the time), it would be worth taking the issue to small claims court. The claim being that the $421 check caused the overdraft and not the four smaller checks. A small claims judge might be sympathetic and - win or lose - Wells Fargo would not like the publicity. My bet would be that Wells Fargo would not let the small claims charge go to court. If nothing else, the friend should file a complaint with the better business bureau and ask that they ask Wells Fargo to reduce the fees to just one overdraft charge. The Better Business Bureau will simply pass the complaint over to Wells Fargo, but it doesn't cost your friend anything more than filling out the complaint. Further, the BBB complaint puts the problem on record and will also document what Wells Fargo did in reply. Even though the BBB has no power to force Wells Fargo to do the right or ethical thing, most companies would like the BBB records to show that there was a mutually agreeable resolution of the problem. I wish your friend well. As far a Paul Thomas's comments, he is a person who has always been bewildered by words such as "fair" and "ethical" and "decent." Most of us understand what these terms mean, and that these words are the foundation of good government and good law. Greedy policies that may be within the law technically, but violate basic principles of justice can still be addressed by the courts. So, when Paul Thomas kicks in his opinions , be sure to have the salt shaker handy. And don't let his cryptic comments get to you. Whether Wells Fargo was operating totally within the law or not, your friend has a very valid complaint! ak "Paul A Thomas" <taxman[at]negia.net> wrote in message news:102nvtqe3kg4a29[at]corp.supernews.com... - quote - > "Sarah Miller" <sarahmille[at]aol.com> wrote > > My friend got clobbered with not (1) overdraft fee, but (4) $33.00 > > overdraft fees, they took the first 4 checks posting, smaller ones and > > slammed overdraft fees on them, their explanation to my friend was > > they are entitled to collect fees on all of them since the account was > > overdrawn that day. > They most likely post the checks as they come in (cashed at the counter), > then in the afternoon/evening from the different banks where your friend's > creditors deposited the checks at (and these don't hit at the same time > usually). The order in which WF decided to post them and remove the funds > is their choice I suppose, and yes, most state bank laws allow for multiple > bank charges for multiple overdraft checks (each one being a separate > incident). > I suggest seeking a bank that can set up an "over-draft" account, which is a > line-of-credit, where they can pull the funds to cover potential NSF checks. > There's generally an annual fee for this, and generally the interest rates > are high, but it's a grand "insurance policy" on those few times it becomes > necessary. > Other than that, chalk it up to a learning lesson and be done with it. > -- > ------- > Life may not be the party we hoped for, > but while we are here, > we might as well dance. > ------- > Paul A. Thomas, CPA > taxman at negia.net |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| It's only fraudulant if the bank did not fully inform your friend of the overdraft policies. And I am sure that their team of lawyers made sure every customer is given the full disclosure. They do pay those lawyers well. A lot of the big banks are doing the exact same thing. Besides, your post has nothing to do with taxes. "Sarah Miller" <sarahmille[at]aol.com> wrote in message news:fa2f1eef.0402121420.19190350[at]posting.google.com... - quote - > Wells Fargo is a rip off artist I recently found out from an experince > my goods friends had with them. > A friend of mine had never been overdrawn on their account. They are > retired. They recently made an error forgetting to deduct a $80.00 > check from their balance in their checkbook. They also had forgotten > to make a sizeable deposit one day, but that was not the problem, > however, they always carried a large balance in their account before > what happened to them. > They had 6 checks come in one day in the following amounts. > $7.43 > $11.44 > $16.49 > $49.80 > $234.00 > $421.00 - this is important because they were only overdrawn -$41.16 > for the day..read on. > The account became overdrawn -41.16 that day. > If you don't know this, you better. Wells Fargo posts smaller amount > checks first to create excessive additional overdraft fees. > My friend got clobbered with not (1) overdraft fee, but (4) $33.00 > overdraft fees, they took the first 4 checks posting, smaller ones and > slammed overdraft fees on them, their explanation to my friend was > they are entitled to collect fees on all of them since the account was > overdrawn that day. > Now you would think that my friends check for $49.80 and they were > overdrawn only $41.16, they would have only been charged one $33.00 > fee, no, they were charged (4) $33.00, total $132.00 for being > overdrawn $41.16 on day. This is highway robbery, ethically and > morally wrong. > No wonder the CEO of Wells Fargo last year got a $2.4 million bonus on > top of his salary of $1.7 million, robbing from the retired and middle > income. > My friends has since closed their account after being at that bank for > over 20 years, it was previously a Northwest bank that Wells Fargo > bought out years ago. My friends are also seeking an attorney to sure > Wells Fargo for fraudulent business practices. I have also closed my > account and moved to another bank that does not do this deceptive > practice > I have read on other message boards that this thing is rampant > throughout Wells Fargo, > ripping off people like this. Beware if you get slighlty overdrawn > like my friends were and have small checks come in, you'll be fee to > death. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Sarah Miller" <sarahmille[at]aol.com> wrote - quote - > My friend got clobbered with not (1) overdraft fee, but (4) $33.00 > overdraft fees, they took the first 4 checks posting, smaller ones and > slammed overdraft fees on them, their explanation to my friend was > they are entitled to collect fees on all of them since the account was > overdrawn that day. They most likely post the checks as they come in (cashed at the counter), then in the afternoon/evening from the different banks where your friend's creditors deposited the checks at (and these don't hit at the same time usually). The order in which WF decided to post them and remove the funds is their choice I suppose, and yes, most state bank laws allow for multiple bank charges for multiple overdraft checks (each one being a separate incident). I suggest seeking a bank that can set up an "over-draft" account, which is a line-of-credit, where they can pull the funds to cover potential NSF checks. There's generally an annual fee for this, and generally the interest rates are high, but it's a grand "insurance policy" on those few times it becomes necessary. Other than that, chalk it up to a learning lesson and be done with it. -- ------- Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we are here, we might as well dance. ------- Paul A. Thomas, CPA taxman at negia.net |
| | |||
| |||
| And this has what to do with MS Money software? "Sarah Miller" <sarahmille[at]aol.com> wrote in message news:fa2f1eef.0402121420.19190350[at]posting.google.com... Wells Fargo is a rip off artist I recently found out from an experince my goods friends had with them. A friend of mine had never been overdrawn on their account. They are retired. They recently made an error forgetting to deduct a $80.00 check from their balance in their checkbook. They also had forgotten to make a sizeable deposit one day, but that was not the problem, however, they always carried a large balance in their account before what happened to them. They had 6 checks come in one day in the following amounts. $7.43 $11.44 $16.49 $49.80 $234.00 $421.00 - this is important because they were only overdrawn -$41.16 for the day..read on. The account became overdrawn -41.16 that day. If you don't know this, you better. Wells Fargo posts smaller amount checks first to create excessive additional overdraft fees. My friend got clobbered with not (1) overdraft fee, but (4) $33.00 overdraft fees, they took the first 4 checks posting, smaller ones and slammed overdraft fees on them, their explanation to my friend was they are entitled to collect fees on all of them since the account was overdrawn that day. Now you would think that my friends check for $49.80 and they were overdrawn only $41.16, they would have only been charged one $33.00 fee, no, they were charged (4) $33.00, total $132.00 for being overdrawn $41.16 on day. This is highway robbery, ethically and morally wrong. No wonder the CEO of Wells Fargo last year got a $2.4 million bonus on top of his salary of $1.7 million, robbing from the retired and middle income. My friends has since closed their account after being at that bank for over 20 years, it was previously a Northwest bank that Wells Fargo bought out years ago. My friends are also seeking an attorney to sure Wells Fargo for fraudulent business practices. I have also closed my account and moved to another bank that does not do this deceptive practice I have read on other message boards that this thing is rampant throughout Wells Fargo, ripping off people like this. Beware if you get slighlty overdrawn like my friends were and have small checks come in, you'll be fee to death. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Wells Fargo is a rip off artist I recently found out from an experince my goods friends had with them. A friend of mine had never been overdrawn on their account. They are retired. They recently made an error forgetting to deduct a $80.00 check from their balance in their checkbook. They also had forgotten to make a sizeable deposit one day, but that was not the problem, however, they always carried a large balance in their account before what happened to them. They had 6 checks come in one day in the following amounts. $7.43 $11.44 $16.49 $49.80 $234.00 $421.00 - this is important because they were only overdrawn -$41.16 for the day..read on. The account became overdrawn -41.16 that day. If you don't know this, you better. Wells Fargo posts smaller amount checks first to create excessive additional overdraft fees. My friend got clobbered with not (1) overdraft fee, but (4) $33.00 overdraft fees, they took the first 4 checks posting, smaller ones and slammed overdraft fees on them, their explanation to my friend was they are entitled to collect fees on all of them since the account was overdrawn that day. Now you would think that my friends check for $49.80 and they were overdrawn only $41.16, they would have only been charged one $33.00 fee, no, they were charged (4) $33.00, total $132.00 for being overdrawn $41.16 on day. This is highway robbery, ethically and morally wrong. No wonder the CEO of Wells Fargo last year got a $2.4 million bonus on top of his salary of $1.7 million, robbing from the retired and middle income. My friends has since closed their account after being at that bank for over 20 years, it was previously a Northwest bank that Wells Fargo bought out years ago. My friends are also seeking an attorney to sure Wells Fargo for fraudulent business practices. I have also closed my account and moved to another bank that does not do this deceptive practice I have read on other message boards that this thing is rampant throughout Wells Fargo, ripping off people like this. Beware if you get slighlty overdrawn like my friends were and have small checks come in, you'll be fee to death. |
| Tags |
| fargos, fees, fradulent, overdraft, wells |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| line of credit - checking acct overdraft protection : i set up a line of credit acct in money 2003 tied to my checking account. this is credit card acting like an overdraft protection acct. if i... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 02-09-2004 12:02 AM | |
| Wells Fargo bank download Tony Linguini: Forgive me for being upset, but this is CRAP !! In M2002 and M2003 there was a problem with listing separate checks and when the transaction... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-26-2003 02:38 PM | |
| setup for Wells Fargo ben: Money is still stuck with a 4 character password and my Well Fargo account is a 6 word password. There must be a way around this. I have installed... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-11-2003 01:48 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |