|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Create yourself a 'cash' account. The you can use it like a bank account. Accounts in Money don't have to match physical bank accounts - an account can quite easily be the cash in your pocket. -- Glyn Simpson, Microsoft MVP - Money Check http://support.microsoft.com/default...d=fh;EN-GB;mny for UK tips and fixes for MS Money. To send Microsoft your wishes or suggestions, use http://register.microsoft.com/mswish/suggestion.asp or email mnyukwsh[at]microsoft.com especially if it's a UK specific wish. I do not respond to any unsolicited email regarding Money "Bryan" <wassomeoneelse[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:0c3501c3ec0e$c2dc2350$3501280a[at]phx.gbl... - quote - > I am having the same problem. I want to manually enter in > expenses that I pay cash with. I have yet to figure out > how to do this. I do not want to do a budget. I just want > to enter in my expenses under certain accounts, but the > only thing I have made sense off is to set up a onetime > payment. Am I missing something here? I really need to > enter in cash payments. Please email me with any > suggestions you have. I am using money 2003. > > -----Original Message----- > > I know it wasn't your question, but it seemed the only > relevant comment I > > could make to your question. > > > The question you asked has no meaning. One enters > transactions in Money to > > keep track of expenses. Transactions in Money go in > accounts just like trees > > go in forests. > > > You could just enter all of your expenses in one big > account--but what would > > be the point? You could never learn much of anything from > this. It wouldn't > > really enable you to manage or plan anything. It really > wouldn't be much > > more useful--at the cost of a lot more work--than just > piling all of the > > receipts in a shoebox. Putting them in accounts makes > collecting expense > > information about 1% harder. > > > What is it about setting up accounts that scares you? > > > "Jill" <anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > message > > news:760101c3e858$0332c1d0$a301280a[at]phx.gbl... > > > That was not the question. The question is as follows: > > > Is there a way to track expenses with out keeping all > the > > > accounts? > > > > . > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Jill" <jillandbruce[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<759401c3e842$8c22c3c0$a301280a[at]phx.gbl> ... - quote - > Is there any way to just track expensed with out keeping
You can also have an account for cash if that is what you mean. I> a check book, savings account, mortgage and so forth. > Not all of my expenses are paid for from my checking > account or the other accounts I list so they are not > being tracked. Besides it is double work to keep a chck > book and a money check book. track expenses by recording them from the account they happen and allocating them to an expense category for reimbursed expenses. Once a month I submit an expense report for the months transactions. I use Money to remind me of them when I fill in my companies expense form. When I receive the check, I deposit it but then allocate that income to the expense category. Money warns me that this does not make sense but then does it if I request it. I glance at the category now and then. I do think it is getting used by the cash flow but the numbers are small enough that I have not bothered to figure this out yet. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| I am having the same problem. I want to manually enter in expenses that I pay cash with. I have yet to figure out how to do this. I do not want to do a budget. I just want to enter in my expenses under certain accounts, but the only thing I have made sense off is to set up a onetime payment. Am I missing something here? I really need to enter in cash payments. Please email me with any suggestions you have. I am using money 2003. - quote - > -----Original Message----- > I know it wasn't your question, but it seemed the only relevant comment I > could make to your question. > The question you asked has no meaning. One enters transactions in Money to > keep track of expenses. Transactions in Money go in accounts just like trees > go in forests. > You could just enter all of your expenses in one big account--but what would > be the point? You could never learn much of anything from this. It wouldn't > really enable you to manage or plan anything. It really wouldn't be much > more useful--at the cost of a lot more work--than just piling all of the > receipts in a shoebox. Putting them in accounts makes collecting expense > information about 1% harder. > What is it about setting up accounts that scares you? > "Jill" <anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:760101c3e858$0332c1d0$a301280a[at]phx.gbl... > > That was not the question. The question is as follows: > > Is there a way to track expenses with out keeping all the > > accounts? > . |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| BTW, careful re-reading of your post will reveal one thing: you never did state a question, at least not in the conventional form of using a question mark as punctuation. "Jill" <anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:760101c3e858$0332c1d0$a301280a[at]phx.gbl... - quote - > That was not the question. The question is as follows: > Is there a way to track expenses with out keeping all the > accounts? > > -----Original Message----- > > Most of us do not keep a check book anymore. > > > "Jill" <jillandbruce[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > > news:759401c3e842$8c22c3c0$a301280a[at]phx.gbl... > > > Is there any way to just track expensed with out > keeping > > > a check book, savings account, mortgage and so forth. > > > Not all of my expenses are paid for from my checking > > > account or the other accounts I list so they are not > > > being tracked. Besides it is double work to keep a > chck > > > book and a money check book. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Jill, if I understand your question correctly... Yes, you can do what you want to do. You can use all the categories for expense accounts to track all your expenses. But you will need to set up one account to pay them from. If all you are interested in is the expense reports then just ignore the big negative value that will grow in the account you use to pay the expenses from. But...MS Money can do alot more than just track expenses. I would take some time and look at all the features of the product before you decide to use just one small piece of it. Good Luck, -- Jeff Atherton http://www.4mywealth.net |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I know it wasn't your question, but it seemed the only relevant comment I could make to your question. The question you asked has no meaning. One enters transactions in Money to keep track of expenses. Transactions in Money go in accounts just like trees go in forests. You could just enter all of your expenses in one big account--but what would be the point? You could never learn much of anything from this. It wouldn't really enable you to manage or plan anything. It really wouldn't be much more useful--at the cost of a lot more work--than just piling all of the receipts in a shoebox. Putting them in accounts makes collecting expense information about 1% harder. What is it about setting up accounts that scares you? "Jill" <anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:760101c3e858$0332c1d0$a301280a[at]phx.gbl... - quote - > That was not the question. The question is as follows: > Is there a way to track expenses with out keeping all the > accounts? |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| That was not the question. The question is as follows: Is there a way to track expenses with out keeping all the accounts? - quote - > -----Original Message----- > Most of us do not keep a check book anymore. > "Jill" <jillandbruce[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:759401c3e842$8c22c3c0$a301280a[at]phx.gbl... > > Is there any way to just track expensed with out keeping > > a check book, savings account, mortgage and so forth. > > Not all of my expenses are paid for from my checking > > account or the other accounts I list so they are not > > being tracked. Besides it is double work to keep a chck > > book and a money check book. > . |
| | |||
| |||
| Most of us do not keep a check book anymore. "Jill" <jillandbruce[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:759401c3e842$8c22c3c0$a301280a[at]phx.gbl... - quote - > Is there any way to just track expensed with out keeping > a check book, savings account, mortgage and so forth. > Not all of my expenses are paid for from my checking > account or the other accounts I list so they are not > being tracked. Besides it is double work to keep a chck > book and a money check book. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Is there any way to just track expensed with out keeping a check book, savings account, mortgage and so forth. Not all of my expenses are paid for from my checking account or the other accounts I list so they are not being tracked. Besides it is double work to keep a chck book and a money check book. |
| Tags |
| expense, tracking |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Car Payments, Special or Expense Category? Jason: I am using Money 2004. My registry has a car payment in it. I decided to place it in a category of loan payment- then selecing the loan account... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-25-2004 03:59 AM | |
| Money expense scheduling problem Tom: I'm using money 2003 standard at home, and I am unable to schedule a reocurring bill every three weeks. They have a multitude of choices... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 09-23-2003 11:00 PM | |
| expense category for commissions? Paul: When I enter a buy/sell and indicate a broker's commission, what expense category does that commission show up under? I can't find it anywhere. | Microsoft Money | 1 | 08-20-2003 04:43 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |