|
#11
| |||
| |||
| I've seen some problems. I just wanted clarification of the specific problem you were encountering. -Mark "Jeff" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:40044b17$1[at]katy-news.txucom.net... - quote - > I appreciate your help, but have you not had any problems with the budget > giving you strange numbers? It seems so overt to me. > "Jeff" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:40044897$1[at]katy-news.txucom.net... > > I deleted out of the Bills & Deposits schedule > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > news:eW9tfeg2DHA.2336[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > > When you said you took out "everything" from Bills and Deposits, how? > > > Did you "delete" the Bills and/or Deposits, or "end" them? > > > Reference > > > http://support.microsoft.com/default...41&Product=mny > > > > > If that wasn't the issue, can you provide some specific examples. i.e. > > > In the Budget, xyz category shows $100 (or on the "Enter your expenses" > > page > > > the total shows $1234.56). Whereas on the "Review your current budget > > > status" page, "Expenses: current month" shows a Budgeted amount of > > $1000.00. > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > "Jeff" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > news:4004043b$1[at]katy-news.txucom.net... > > > > No, I have taken everything out of their and debt reduction planner to > > > make > > > > sure there was nothing to pull from. > > > > > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > > > news:uw2ogmV2DHA.2336[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > > > > Money's Budget pulls from the Bills & Deposits area. So, do you have > > > some > > > > > recurring bills and/or deposits entered in Bills & Deposits? Is that > > the > > > > > difference? > > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:UtDMb.8811$RV5.8011[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... > > > > > > Ok, I will try again. It is not the individual categories that are > > not > > > > > > showing the correct numbers I entered. It is the total on budget > > > > reports. > > > > > > Again when I go to the edit budget and look at all the numbers I > set > > > in > > > > my > > > > > > budget they are correct and the total expenses is correct. Once I > > > finish > > > > > > however and look at the page with "review your current budget" as > > the > > > > page > > > > > > heading there is a mini report at the top that lists my "expense > > > actual" > > > > > > with a different column "budgeted". I do not know where it is > > getting > > > > the > > > > > > number for budgeted expenses because it is hundreds of dollars off > > > from > > > > > what > > > > > > I had just set in my budget. Additionally if I go to the "view > > > reports" > > > > > and > > > > > > choose monthly budget the numbers listed on that report for > > "budgeted > > > > > > expenses" totals is different than I set in my budget and what was > > on > > > > the > > > > > > previous screen. If I go back to "edit budget" the numbers and > > > > categories > > > > > > are all set as I entered them...it is just not showing a monthly > > total > > > > in > > > > > > the reports and on the "Review you current budget status" page. > > > > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > > > > > news:O$GXCTU2DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > > > > > > Provide some specifics. > > > > > > > What numbers did you enter and where specifically. ONLY in the > > > Budget, > > > > > or > > > > > > do > > > > > > > you have some "Bills and Deposits" as well that is being > imported > > > into > > > > > the > > > > > > > Budget? > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > news:0vCMb.8801$RV5.6955[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... > > > > > > > > Examples: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After setting the budget the number entered are all correct > that > > I > > > > > > > entered. > > > > > > > > However, if you then go back to the budget link on the on the > > menu > > > > > there > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > a "Review you current budget status" and in that Income: > Current > > > > Month > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > the "Expenses: Current Month" the amount that is listed as > > > budgeted > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > current month is totally different and what I entered in to be > > the > > > > > > budget. > > > > > > > > And then if you go to "Reports" and then monthly budget the > > amount > > > > > shown > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > budgeted is different than what I had set up in the budget. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > > news:%23A$wCVT2DHA.2184[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > > > > > > > Provide some examples of Money not "showing accurate dollar > > > > > amounts". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it for example a weekly or biweekly paycheck? > > > > > > > > > If so, the budget is going to pro-rate it to give you the > > > monthly > > > > > > > average > > > > > > > > > (i.e. 52 weeks divided by 12, or 26 biweekly divided by 12). > > The > > > > > > actual > > > > > > > vs > > > > > > > > > budget reports will show the months with 4 (or 5) weekly, > and > > 2 > > > > (or > > > > > 3) > > > > > > > > > bi-weekly paychecks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Jonathan Brett" <jonnybrett[at]netzero.net> wrote in message > > > > > > > > > news:051701c3d8b7$05f82870$a001280a[at]phx.gbl... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hear ya. I too am having the same frustrations. After > > > > > > > > > > using 3.0 for 9 years, and upgrading to WindowsXP, 3.0 > > > > > > > > > > didn't function properly. Now, after being indirectly > > > > > > > > > > forced to use a newer version of Money, I bought Money > > > > > > > > > > 2004, and have been very unimpressed due to it's problems > > > > > > > > > > with showing accurate dollar amounts. Specifically in the > > > > > > > > > > budget portion. This is boggling to me: A program that > > > > > > > > > > it's sole purpose is accounting and dealing with numbers > > > > > > > > > > ought to be able to do just that. Instead this new version > > > > > > > > > > is filled with a bunch of wasted grapical tools and > > > > > > > > > > confusing screens that make basic tasks complicated. Show > > > > > > > > > > me the correct numbers not the "soft feel" of cartoonish > > > > > > > > > > screens prevalent on modern day programs. It's unfortunate > > > > > > > > > > today that programmers put way too much emphasis on "user- > > > > > > > > > > friendly" rather than better-performing. I too would love > > > > > > > > > > a version that is straight-forward like 3.0 was, but also > > > > > > > > > > works with XP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| I appreciate your help, but have you not had any problems with the budget giving you strange numbers? It seems so overt to me. "Jeff" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:40044897$1[at]katy-news.txucom.net... - quote - > I deleted out of the Bills & Deposits schedule > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > news:eW9tfeg2DHA.2336[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > When you said you took out "everything" from Bills and Deposits, how? > > Did you "delete" the Bills and/or Deposits, or "end" them? > > Reference > http://support.microsoft.com/default...41&Product=mny > > > If that wasn't the issue, can you provide some specific examples. i.e. > > In the Budget, xyz category shows $100 (or on the "Enter your expenses" > page > > the total shows $1234.56). Whereas on the "Review your current budget > > status" page, "Expenses: current month" shows a Budgeted amount of > $1000.00. > > > -Mark > > > > "Jeff" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:4004043b$1[at]katy-news.txucom.net... > > > No, I have taken everything out of their and debt reduction planner to > > make > > > sure there was nothing to pull from. > > > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > > news:uw2ogmV2DHA.2336[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > > > Money's Budget pulls from the Bills & Deposits area. So, do you have > > some > > > > recurring bills and/or deposits entered in Bills & Deposits? Is that > the > > > > difference? > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > news:UtDMb.8811$RV5.8011[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... > > > > > Ok, I will try again. It is not the individual categories that are > not > > > > > showing the correct numbers I entered. It is the total on budget > > > reports. > > > > > Again when I go to the edit budget and look at all the numbers I set > > in > > > my > > > > > budget they are correct and the total expenses is correct. Once I > > finish > > > > > however and look at the page with "review your current budget" as > the > > > page > > > > > heading there is a mini report at the top that lists my "expense > > actual" > > > > > with a different column "budgeted". I do not know where it is > getting > > > the > > > > > number for budgeted expenses because it is hundreds of dollars off > > from > > > > what > > > > > I had just set in my budget. Additionally if I go to the "view > > reports" > > > > and > > > > > choose monthly budget the numbers listed on that report for > "budgeted > > > > > expenses" totals is different than I set in my budget and what was > on > > > the > > > > > previous screen. If I go back to "edit budget" the numbers and > > > categories > > > > > are all set as I entered them...it is just not showing a monthly > total > > > in > > > > > the reports and on the "Review you current budget status" page. > > > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:O$GXCTU2DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > > > > > Provide some specifics. > > > > > > What numbers did you enter and where specifically. ONLY in the > > Budget, > > > > or > > > > > do > > > > > > you have some "Bills and Deposits" as well that is being imported > > into > > > > the > > > > > > Budget? > > > > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > news:0vCMb.8801$RV5.6955[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... > > > > > > > Examples: > > > > > > > > > > > > > After setting the budget the number entered are all correct that > I > > > > > > entered. > > > > > > > However, if you then go back to the budget link on the on the > menu > > > > there > > > > > > is > > > > > > > a "Review you current budget status" and in that Income: Current > > > Month > > > > > and > > > > > > > the "Expenses: Current Month" the amount that is listed as > > budgeted > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > > current month is totally different and what I entered in to be > the > > > > > budget. > > > > > > > And then if you go to "Reports" and then monthly budget the > amount > > > > shown > > > > > > as > > > > > > > budgeted is different than what I had set up in the budget. > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > news:%23A$wCVT2DHA.2184[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > > > > > > Provide some examples of Money not "showing accurate dollar > > > > amounts". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it for example a weekly or biweekly paycheck? > > > > > > > > If so, the budget is going to pro-rate it to give you the > > monthly > > > > > > average > > > > > > > > (i.e. 52 weeks divided by 12, or 26 biweekly divided by 12). > The > > > > > actual > > > > > > vs > > > > > > > > budget reports will show the months with 4 (or 5) weekly, and > 2 > > > (or > > > > 3) > > > > > > > > bi-weekly paychecks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Jonathan Brett" <jonnybrett[at]netzero.net> wrote in message > > > > > > > > news:051701c3d8b7$05f82870$a001280a[at]phx.gbl... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hear ya. I too am having the same frustrations. After > > > > > > > > > using 3.0 for 9 years, and upgrading to WindowsXP, 3.0 > > > > > > > > > didn't function properly. Now, after being indirectly > > > > > > > > > forced to use a newer version of Money, I bought Money > > > > > > > > > 2004, and have been very unimpressed due to it's problems > > > > > > > > > with showing accurate dollar amounts. Specifically in the > > > > > > > > > budget portion. This is boggling to me: A program that > > > > > > > > > it's sole purpose is accounting and dealing with numbers > > > > > > > > > ought to be able to do just that. Instead this new version > > > > > > > > > is filled with a bunch of wasted grapical tools and > > > > > > > > > confusing screens that make basic tasks complicated. Show > > > > > > > > > me the correct numbers not the "soft feel" of cartoonish > > > > > > > > > screens prevalent on modern day programs. It's unfortunate > > > > > > > > > today that programmers put way too much emphasis on "user- > > > > > > > > > friendly" rather than better-performing. I too would love > > > > > > > > > a version that is straight-forward like 3.0 was, but also > > > > > > > > > works with XP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| I deleted out of the Bills & Deposits schedule "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message news:eW9tfeg2DHA.2336[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... - quote - > When you said you took out "everything" from Bills and Deposits, how? > Did you "delete" the Bills and/or Deposits, or "end" them? > Reference > http://support.microsoft.com/default...41&Product=mny > If that wasn't the issue, can you provide some specific examples. i.e. > In the Budget, xyz category shows $100 (or on the "Enter your expenses" page > the total shows $1234.56). Whereas on the "Review your current budget > status" page, "Expenses: current month" shows a Budgeted amount of $1000.00. > -Mark > "Jeff" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:4004043b$1[at]katy-news.txucom.net... > > No, I have taken everything out of their and debt reduction planner to > make > > sure there was nothing to pull from. > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > news:uw2ogmV2DHA.2336[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > > Money's Budget pulls from the Bills & Deposits area. So, do you have > some > > > recurring bills and/or deposits entered in Bills & Deposits? Is that the > > > difference? > > > > > -Mark > > > > > "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > news:UtDMb.8811$RV5.8011[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... > > > > Ok, I will try again. It is not the individual categories that are not > > > > showing the correct numbers I entered. It is the total on budget > > reports. > > > > Again when I go to the edit budget and look at all the numbers I set > in > > my > > > > budget they are correct and the total expenses is correct. Once I > finish > > > > however and look at the page with "review your current budget" as the > > page > > > > heading there is a mini report at the top that lists my "expense > actual" > > > > with a different column "budgeted". I do not know where it is getting > > the > > > > number for budgeted expenses because it is hundreds of dollars off > from > > > what > > > > I had just set in my budget. Additionally if I go to the "view > reports" > > > and > > > > choose monthly budget the numbers listed on that report for "budgeted > > > > expenses" totals is different than I set in my budget and what was on > > the > > > > previous screen. If I go back to "edit budget" the numbers and > > categories > > > > are all set as I entered them...it is just not showing a monthly total > > in > > > > the reports and on the "Review you current budget status" page. > > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > > > news:O$GXCTU2DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > > > > Provide some specifics. > > > > > What numbers did you enter and where specifically. ONLY in the > Budget, > > > or > > > > do > > > > > you have some "Bills and Deposits" as well that is being imported > into > > > the > > > > > Budget? > > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:0vCMb.8801$RV5.6955[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... > > > > > > Examples: > > > > > > > > > > > After setting the budget the number entered are all correct that I > > > > > entered. > > > > > > However, if you then go back to the budget link on the on the menu > > > there > > > > > is > > > > > > a "Review you current budget status" and in that Income: Current > > Month > > > > and > > > > > > the "Expenses: Current Month" the amount that is listed as > budgeted > > in > > > > the > > > > > > current month is totally different and what I entered in to be the > > > > budget. > > > > > > And then if you go to "Reports" and then monthly budget the amount > > > shown > > > > > as > > > > > > budgeted is different than what I had set up in the budget. > > > > > > > > > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > > > > > news:%23A$wCVT2DHA.2184[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > > > > > Provide some examples of Money not "showing accurate dollar > > > amounts". > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it for example a weekly or biweekly paycheck? > > > > > > > If so, the budget is going to pro-rate it to give you the > monthly > > > > > average > > > > > > > (i.e. 52 weeks divided by 12, or 26 biweekly divided by 12). The > > > > actual > > > > > vs > > > > > > > budget reports will show the months with 4 (or 5) weekly, and 2 > > (or > > > 3) > > > > > > > bi-weekly paychecks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Jonathan Brett" <jonnybrett[at]netzero.net> wrote in message > > > > > > > news:051701c3d8b7$05f82870$a001280a[at]phx.gbl... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hear ya. I too am having the same frustrations. After > > > > > > > > using 3.0 for 9 years, and upgrading to WindowsXP, 3.0 > > > > > > > > didn't function properly. Now, after being indirectly > > > > > > > > forced to use a newer version of Money, I bought Money > > > > > > > > 2004, and have been very unimpressed due to it's problems > > > > > > > > with showing accurate dollar amounts. Specifically in the > > > > > > > > budget portion. This is boggling to me: A program that > > > > > > > > it's sole purpose is accounting and dealing with numbers > > > > > > > > ought to be able to do just that. Instead this new version > > > > > > > > is filled with a bunch of wasted grapical tools and > > > > > > > > confusing screens that make basic tasks complicated. Show > > > > > > > > me the correct numbers not the "soft feel" of cartoonish > > > > > > > > screens prevalent on modern day programs. It's unfortunate > > > > > > > > today that programmers put way too much emphasis on "user- > > > > > > > > friendly" rather than better-performing. I too would love > > > > > > > > a version that is straight-forward like 3.0 was, but also > > > > > > > > works with XP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| When you said you took out "everything" from Bills and Deposits, how? Did you "delete" the Bills and/or Deposits, or "end" them? Reference http://support.microsoft.com/default...41&Product=mny If that wasn't the issue, can you provide some specific examples. i.e. In the Budget, xyz category shows $100 (or on the "Enter your expenses" page the total shows $1234.56). Whereas on the "Review your current budget status" page, "Expenses: current month" shows a Budgeted amount of $1000.00. -Mark "Jeff" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4004043b$1[at]katy-news.txucom.net... - quote - > No, I have taken everything out of their and debt reduction planner to make > sure there was nothing to pull from. > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > news:uw2ogmV2DHA.2336[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > Money's Budget pulls from the Bills & Deposits area. So, do you have some > > recurring bills and/or deposits entered in Bills & Deposits? Is that the > > difference? > > > -Mark > > > "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:UtDMb.8811$RV5.8011[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... > > > Ok, I will try again. It is not the individual categories that are not > > > showing the correct numbers I entered. It is the total on budget > reports. > > > Again when I go to the edit budget and look at all the numbers I set in > my > > > budget they are correct and the total expenses is correct. Once I finish > > > however and look at the page with "review your current budget" as the > page > > > heading there is a mini report at the top that lists my "expense actual" > > > with a different column "budgeted". I do not know where it is getting > the > > > number for budgeted expenses because it is hundreds of dollars off from > > what > > > I had just set in my budget. Additionally if I go to the "view reports" > > and > > > choose monthly budget the numbers listed on that report for "budgeted > > > expenses" totals is different than I set in my budget and what was on > the > > > previous screen. If I go back to "edit budget" the numbers and > categories > > > are all set as I entered them...it is just not showing a monthly total > in > > > the reports and on the "Review you current budget status" page. > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > > news:O$GXCTU2DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > > > Provide some specifics. > > > > What numbers did you enter and where specifically. ONLY in the Budget, > > or > > > do > > > > you have some "Bills and Deposits" as well that is being imported into > > the > > > > Budget? > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > news:0vCMb.8801$RV5.6955[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... > > > > > Examples: > > > > > > > > > After setting the budget the number entered are all correct that I > > > > entered. > > > > > However, if you then go back to the budget link on the on the menu > > there > > > > is > > > > > a "Review you current budget status" and in that Income: Current > Month > > > and > > > > > the "Expenses: Current Month" the amount that is listed as budgeted > in > > > the > > > > > current month is totally different and what I entered in to be the > > > budget. > > > > > And then if you go to "Reports" and then monthly budget the amount > > shown > > > > as > > > > > budgeted is different than what I had set up in the budget. > > > > > > > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:%23A$wCVT2DHA.2184[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > > > > Provide some examples of Money not "showing accurate dollar > > amounts". > > > > > > > > > > > Is it for example a weekly or biweekly paycheck? > > > > > > If so, the budget is going to pro-rate it to give you the monthly > > > > average > > > > > > (i.e. 52 weeks divided by 12, or 26 biweekly divided by 12). The > > > actual > > > > vs > > > > > > budget reports will show the months with 4 (or 5) weekly, and 2 > (or > > 3) > > > > > > bi-weekly paychecks. > > > > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > "Jonathan Brett" <jonnybrett[at]netzero.net> wrote in message > > > > > > news:051701c3d8b7$05f82870$a001280a[at]phx.gbl... > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hear ya. I too am having the same frustrations. After > > > > > > > using 3.0 for 9 years, and upgrading to WindowsXP, 3.0 > > > > > > > didn't function properly. Now, after being indirectly > > > > > > > forced to use a newer version of Money, I bought Money > > > > > > > 2004, and have been very unimpressed due to it's problems > > > > > > > with showing accurate dollar amounts. Specifically in the > > > > > > > budget portion. This is boggling to me: A program that > > > > > > > it's sole purpose is accounting and dealing with numbers > > > > > > > ought to be able to do just that. Instead this new version > > > > > > > is filled with a bunch of wasted grapical tools and > > > > > > > confusing screens that make basic tasks complicated. Show > > > > > > > me the correct numbers not the "soft feel" of cartoonish > > > > > > > screens prevalent on modern day programs. It's unfortunate > > > > > > > today that programmers put way too much emphasis on "user- > > > > > > > friendly" rather than better-performing. I too would love > > > > > > > a version that is straight-forward like 3.0 was, but also > > > > > > > works with XP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| No, I have taken everything out of their and debt reduction planner to make sure there was nothing to pull from. "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message news:uw2ogmV2DHA.2336[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... - quote - > Money's Budget pulls from the Bills & Deposits area. So, do you have some > recurring bills and/or deposits entered in Bills & Deposits? Is that the > difference? > -Mark > "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:UtDMb.8811$RV5.8011[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... > > Ok, I will try again. It is not the individual categories that are not > > showing the correct numbers I entered. It is the total on budget reports. > > Again when I go to the edit budget and look at all the numbers I set in my > > budget they are correct and the total expenses is correct. Once I finish > > however and look at the page with "review your current budget" as the page > > heading there is a mini report at the top that lists my "expense actual" > > with a different column "budgeted". I do not know where it is getting the > > number for budgeted expenses because it is hundreds of dollars off from > what > > I had just set in my budget. Additionally if I go to the "view reports" > and > > choose monthly budget the numbers listed on that report for "budgeted > > expenses" totals is different than I set in my budget and what was on the > > previous screen. If I go back to "edit budget" the numbers and categories > > are all set as I entered them...it is just not showing a monthly total in > > the reports and on the "Review you current budget status" page. > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > news:O$GXCTU2DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > > Provide some specifics. > > > What numbers did you enter and where specifically. ONLY in the Budget, > or > > do > > > you have some "Bills and Deposits" as well that is being imported into > the > > > Budget? > > > > > -Mark > > > > > "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > news:0vCMb.8801$RV5.6955[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... > > > > Examples: > > > > > > > After setting the budget the number entered are all correct that I > > > entered. > > > > However, if you then go back to the budget link on the on the menu > there > > > is > > > > a "Review you current budget status" and in that Income: Current Month > > and > > > > the "Expenses: Current Month" the amount that is listed as budgeted in > > the > > > > current month is totally different and what I entered in to be the > > budget. > > > > And then if you go to "Reports" and then monthly budget the amount > shown > > > as > > > > budgeted is different than what I had set up in the budget. > > > > > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > > > news:%23A$wCVT2DHA.2184[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > > > Provide some examples of Money not "showing accurate dollar > amounts". > > > > > > > > > Is it for example a weekly or biweekly paycheck? > > > > > If so, the budget is going to pro-rate it to give you the monthly > > > average > > > > > (i.e. 52 weeks divided by 12, or 26 biweekly divided by 12). The > > actual > > > vs > > > > > budget reports will show the months with 4 (or 5) weekly, and 2 (or > 3) > > > > > bi-weekly paychecks. > > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > "Jonathan Brett" <jonnybrett[at]netzero.net> wrote in message > > > > > news:051701c3d8b7$05f82870$a001280a[at]phx.gbl... > > > > > > > > > > > I hear ya. I too am having the same frustrations. After > > > > > > using 3.0 for 9 years, and upgrading to WindowsXP, 3.0 > > > > > > didn't function properly. Now, after being indirectly > > > > > > forced to use a newer version of Money, I bought Money > > > > > > 2004, and have been very unimpressed due to it's problems > > > > > > with showing accurate dollar amounts. Specifically in the > > > > > > budget portion. This is boggling to me: A program that > > > > > > it's sole purpose is accounting and dealing with numbers > > > > > > ought to be able to do just that. Instead this new version > > > > > > is filled with a bunch of wasted grapical tools and > > > > > > confusing screens that make basic tasks complicated. Show > > > > > > me the correct numbers not the "soft feel" of cartoonish > > > > > > screens prevalent on modern day programs. It's unfortunate > > > > > > today that programmers put way too much emphasis on "user- > > > > > > friendly" rather than better-performing. I too would love > > > > > > a version that is straight-forward like 3.0 was, but also > > > > > > works with XP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Money's Budget pulls from the Bills & Deposits area. So, do you have some recurring bills and/or deposits entered in Bills & Deposits? Is that the difference? -Mark "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:UtDMb.8811$RV5.8011[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... - quote - > Ok, I will try again. It is not the individual categories that are not > showing the correct numbers I entered. It is the total on budget reports. > Again when I go to the edit budget and look at all the numbers I set in my > budget they are correct and the total expenses is correct. Once I finish > however and look at the page with "review your current budget" as the page > heading there is a mini report at the top that lists my "expense actual" > with a different column "budgeted". I do not know where it is getting the > number for budgeted expenses because it is hundreds of dollars off from what > I had just set in my budget. Additionally if I go to the "view reports" and > choose monthly budget the numbers listed on that report for "budgeted > expenses" totals is different than I set in my budget and what was on the > previous screen. If I go back to "edit budget" the numbers and categories > are all set as I entered them...it is just not showing a monthly total in > the reports and on the "Review you current budget status" page. > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > news:O$GXCTU2DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > Provide some specifics. > > What numbers did you enter and where specifically. ONLY in the Budget, or > do > > you have some "Bills and Deposits" as well that is being imported into the > > Budget? > > > -Mark > > > "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:0vCMb.8801$RV5.6955[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... > > > Examples: > > > > > After setting the budget the number entered are all correct that I > > entered. > > > However, if you then go back to the budget link on the on the menu there > > is > > > a "Review you current budget status" and in that Income: Current Month > and > > > the "Expenses: Current Month" the amount that is listed as budgeted in > the > > > current month is totally different and what I entered in to be the > budget. > > > And then if you go to "Reports" and then monthly budget the amount shown > > as > > > budgeted is different than what I had set up in the budget. > > > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > > news:%23A$wCVT2DHA.2184[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > > Provide some examples of Money not "showing accurate dollar amounts". > > > > > > > Is it for example a weekly or biweekly paycheck? > > > > If so, the budget is going to pro-rate it to give you the monthly > > average > > > > (i.e. 52 weeks divided by 12, or 26 biweekly divided by 12). The > actual > > vs > > > > budget reports will show the months with 4 (or 5) weekly, and 2 (or 3) > > > > bi-weekly paychecks. > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > "Jonathan Brett" <jonnybrett[at]netzero.net> wrote in message > > > > news:051701c3d8b7$05f82870$a001280a[at]phx.gbl... > > > > > > > > > I hear ya. I too am having the same frustrations. After > > > > > using 3.0 for 9 years, and upgrading to WindowsXP, 3.0 > > > > > didn't function properly. Now, after being indirectly > > > > > forced to use a newer version of Money, I bought Money > > > > > 2004, and have been very unimpressed due to it's problems > > > > > with showing accurate dollar amounts. Specifically in the > > > > > budget portion. This is boggling to me: A program that > > > > > it's sole purpose is accounting and dealing with numbers > > > > > ought to be able to do just that. Instead this new version > > > > > is filled with a bunch of wasted grapical tools and > > > > > confusing screens that make basic tasks complicated. Show > > > > > me the correct numbers not the "soft feel" of cartoonish > > > > > screens prevalent on modern day programs. It's unfortunate > > > > > today that programmers put way too much emphasis on "user- > > > > > friendly" rather than better-performing. I too would love > > > > > a version that is straight-forward like 3.0 was, but also > > > > > works with XP. > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Ok, I will try again. It is not the individual categories that are not showing the correct numbers I entered. It is the total on budget reports. Again when I go to the edit budget and look at all the numbers I set in my budget they are correct and the total expenses is correct. Once I finish however and look at the page with "review your current budget" as the page heading there is a mini report at the top that lists my "expense actual" with a different column "budgeted". I do not know where it is getting the number for budgeted expenses because it is hundreds of dollars off from what I had just set in my budget. Additionally if I go to the "view reports" and choose monthly budget the numbers listed on that report for "budgeted expenses" totals is different than I set in my budget and what was on the previous screen. If I go back to "edit budget" the numbers and categories are all set as I entered them...it is just not showing a monthly total in the reports and on the "Review you current budget status" page. "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message news:O$GXCTU2DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... - quote - > Provide some specifics. > What numbers did you enter and where specifically. ONLY in the Budget, or do > you have some "Bills and Deposits" as well that is being imported into the > Budget? > -Mark > "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:0vCMb.8801$RV5.6955[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... > > Examples: > > > After setting the budget the number entered are all correct that I > entered. > > However, if you then go back to the budget link on the on the menu there > is > > a "Review you current budget status" and in that Income: Current Month and > > the "Expenses: Current Month" the amount that is listed as budgeted in the > > current month is totally different and what I entered in to be the budget. > > And then if you go to "Reports" and then monthly budget the amount shown > as > > budgeted is different than what I had set up in the budget. > > > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > > news:%23A$wCVT2DHA.2184[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > Provide some examples of Money not "showing accurate dollar amounts". > > > > > Is it for example a weekly or biweekly paycheck? > > > If so, the budget is going to pro-rate it to give you the monthly > average > > > (i.e. 52 weeks divided by 12, or 26 biweekly divided by 12). The actual > vs > > > budget reports will show the months with 4 (or 5) weekly, and 2 (or 3) > > > bi-weekly paychecks. > > > > > -Mark > > > > > "Jonathan Brett" <jonnybrett[at]netzero.net> wrote in message > > > news:051701c3d8b7$05f82870$a001280a[at]phx.gbl... > > > > > > > I hear ya. I too am having the same frustrations. After > > > > using 3.0 for 9 years, and upgrading to WindowsXP, 3.0 > > > > didn't function properly. Now, after being indirectly > > > > forced to use a newer version of Money, I bought Money > > > > 2004, and have been very unimpressed due to it's problems > > > > with showing accurate dollar amounts. Specifically in the > > > > budget portion. This is boggling to me: A program that > > > > it's sole purpose is accounting and dealing with numbers > > > > ought to be able to do just that. Instead this new version > > > > is filled with a bunch of wasted grapical tools and > > > > confusing screens that make basic tasks complicated. Show > > > > me the correct numbers not the "soft feel" of cartoonish > > > > screens prevalent on modern day programs. It's unfortunate > > > > today that programmers put way too much emphasis on "user- > > > > friendly" rather than better-performing. I too would love > > > > a version that is straight-forward like 3.0 was, but also > > > > works with XP. > > > > > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Provide some specifics. What numbers did you enter and where specifically. ONLY in the Budget, or do you have some "Bills and Deposits" as well that is being imported into the Budget? -Mark "J Davidson" <jldavid[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:0vCMb.8801$RV5.6955[at]fe2.texas.rr.com... - quote - > Examples: > After setting the budget the number entered are all correct that I entered. > However, if you then go back to the budget link on the on the menu there is > a "Review you current budget status" and in that Income: Current Month and > the "Expenses: Current Month" the amount that is listed as budgeted in the > current month is totally different and what I entered in to be the budget. > And then if you go to "Reports" and then monthly budget the amount shown as > budgeted is different than what I had set up in the budget. > "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message > news:%23A$wCVT2DHA.2184[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > Provide some examples of Money not "showing accurate dollar amounts". > > > Is it for example a weekly or biweekly paycheck? > > If so, the budget is going to pro-rate it to give you the monthly average > > (i.e. 52 weeks divided by 12, or 26 biweekly divided by 12). The actual vs > > budget reports will show the months with 4 (or 5) weekly, and 2 (or 3) > > bi-weekly paychecks. > > > -Mark > > > "Jonathan Brett" <jonnybrett[at]netzero.net> wrote in message > > news:051701c3d8b7$05f82870$a001280a[at]phx.gbl... > > > > > I hear ya. I too am having the same frustrations. After > > > using 3.0 for 9 years, and upgrading to WindowsXP, 3.0 > > > didn't function properly. Now, after being indirectly > > > forced to use a newer version of Money, I bought Money > > > 2004, and have been very unimpressed due to it's problems > > > with showing accurate dollar amounts. Specifically in the > > > budget portion. This is boggling to me: A program that > > > it's sole purpose is accounting and dealing with numbers > > > ought to be able to do just that. Instead this new version > > > is filled with a bunch of wasted grapical tools and > > > confusing screens that make basic tasks complicated. Show > > > me the correct numbers not the "soft feel" of cartoonish > > > screens prevalent on modern day programs. It's unfortunate > > > today that programmers put way too much emphasis on "user- > > > friendly" rather than better-performing. I too would love > > > a version that is straight-forward like 3.0 was, but also > > > works with XP. > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Examples: After setting the budget the number entered are all correct that I entered. However, if you then go back to the budget link on the on the menu there is a "Review you current budget status" and in that Income: Current Month and the "Expenses: Current Month" the amount that is listed as budgeted in the current month is totally different and what I entered in to be the budget. And then if you go to "Reports" and then monthly budget the amount shown as budgeted is different than what I had set up in the budget. "Mark" <abcd[at]abcd.com> wrote in message news:%23A$wCVT2DHA.2184[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... - quote - > Provide some examples of Money not "showing accurate dollar amounts". > Is it for example a weekly or biweekly paycheck? > If so, the budget is going to pro-rate it to give you the monthly average > (i.e. 52 weeks divided by 12, or 26 biweekly divided by 12). The actual vs > budget reports will show the months with 4 (or 5) weekly, and 2 (or 3) > bi-weekly paychecks. > -Mark > "Jonathan Brett" <jonnybrett[at]netzero.net> wrote in message > news:051701c3d8b7$05f82870$a001280a[at]phx.gbl... > > > I hear ya. I too am having the same frustrations. After > > using 3.0 for 9 years, and upgrading to WindowsXP, 3.0 > > didn't function properly. Now, after being indirectly > > forced to use a newer version of Money, I bought Money > > 2004, and have been very unimpressed due to it's problems > > with showing accurate dollar amounts. Specifically in the > > budget portion. This is boggling to me: A program that > > it's sole purpose is accounting and dealing with numbers > > ought to be able to do just that. Instead this new version > > is filled with a bunch of wasted grapical tools and > > confusing screens that make basic tasks complicated. Show > > me the correct numbers not the "soft feel" of cartoonish > > screens prevalent on modern day programs. It's unfortunate > > today that programmers put way too much emphasis on "user- > > friendly" rather than better-performing. I too would love > > a version that is straight-forward like 3.0 was, but also > > works with XP. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Provide some examples of Money not "showing accurate dollar amounts". Is it for example a weekly or biweekly paycheck? If so, the budget is going to pro-rate it to give you the monthly average (i.e. 52 weeks divided by 12, or 26 biweekly divided by 12). The actual vs budget reports will show the months with 4 (or 5) weekly, and 2 (or 3) bi-weekly paychecks. -Mark "Jonathan Brett" <jonnybrett[at]netzero.net> wrote in message news:051701c3d8b7$05f82870$a001280a[at]phx.gbl... - quote - > I hear ya. I too am having the same frustrations. After > using 3.0 for 9 years, and upgrading to WindowsXP, 3.0 > didn't function properly. Now, after being indirectly > forced to use a newer version of Money, I bought Money > 2004, and have been very unimpressed due to it's problems > with showing accurate dollar amounts. Specifically in the > budget portion. This is boggling to me: A program that > it's sole purpose is accounting and dealing with numbers > ought to be able to do just that. Instead this new version > is filled with a bunch of wasted grapical tools and > confusing screens that make basic tasks complicated. Show > me the correct numbers not the "soft feel" of cartoonish > screens prevalent on modern day programs. It's unfortunate > today that programmers put way too much emphasis on "user- > friendly" rather than better-performing. I too would love > a version that is straight-forward like 3.0 was, but also > works with XP. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I hear ya. I too am having the same frustrations. After using 3.0 for 9 years, and upgrading to WindowsXP, 3.0 didn't function properly. Now, after being indirectly forced to use a newer version of Money, I bought Money 2004, and have been very unimpressed due to it's problems with showing accurate dollar amounts. Specifically in the budget portion. This is boggling to me: A program that it's sole purpose is accounting and dealing with numbers ought to be able to do just that. Instead this new version is filled with a bunch of wasted grapical tools and confusing screens that make basic tasks complicated. Show me the correct numbers not the "soft feel" of cartoonish screens prevalent on modern day programs. It's unfortunate today that programmers put way too much emphasis on "user- friendly" rather than better-performing. I too would love a version that is straight-forward like 3.0 was, but also works with XP. |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > Subject: Money budgets
My suggestion is that you forget about Money 2.0 and use a simple worksheet> From: anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com > Date: 1/7/2004 11:06 PM Eastern Standard Time > Message-id: <061301c3d59c$d286f420$a601280a[at]phx.gbl> I have used Money 2.0 for years for my fire department > budgets and have 10 years of data. I could keep tabs of > year to date spending with actual, budgeted, and > difference. I had to upgrade to XP for my fire software, > and now money 2.0 does not work. I upgraded to Money 2000 > but the budgeting does not work like in Money 2.0, the > budgeted amounts change, and they have all this occasional > fields and monthly and fields I don't need. Microsoft > recognizes this problem. Is there a version that will work > with XP and have the old budgeting like in Money 2.0? > Maybe 4.0 or 97 that will work on XP. like Excel to do your actual versus budget analysis. Steve |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have used Money 2.0 for years for my fire department budgets and have 10 years of data. I could keep tabs of year to date spending with actual, budgeted, and difference. I had to upgrade to XP for my fire software, and now money 2.0 does not work. I upgraded to Money 2000 but the budgeting does not work like in Money 2.0, the budgeted amounts change, and they have all this occasional fields and monthly and fields I don't need. Microsoft recognizes this problem. Is there a version that will work with XP and have the old budgeting like in Money 2.0? Maybe 4.0 or 97 that will work on XP. |
| Tags |
| budgets, money |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Question about budgets Ron A.: I currently manage my money using several separate checking accounts. I'm just about to start using Money and that looks like it's going to be a... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 11-01-2003 12:13 AM | |
| Credit Transactions & Budgets Ed F.: Looking for recommendations: Trying to figure out how to best set up my budget to reflect credit charges and the payments I then make the to the... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 08-14-2003 02:17 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |