Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Microsoft Money

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #15  
Old 01-07-2004, 02:06 AM
Mountain Bikn' Guy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER


"Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in
message news:eqrIKcU0DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> I don't buy the +Business versions. Oh, and remember that Microsoft gets a
> lot less than the $60 you paid.


I typically buy direct, so they get all my money.

- quote -

> I agree that a more powerful and flexible Money would be nice, but you've
> identified the issue: they feel they have to dumb it down since their

target
> market has to be a whole lot broader than "computer geek."


The target market for PowerPoint, Word and Excel is also a "whole lot
broader than 'computer geek.'" Furthermore, Money probably could generate
more upgrade revenue per customer than Word or Excel. I bet a higher
percentage of users upgrade Money each year than upgrade Word each year.

Word is only $89 or so. You can't tell me that they can't build a product
with Excel's sophistication for the personal finance market and sell it at
the price level of Word or Excel. I just don't agree with your reasoning on
this.

- quote -

> Would what I've
> referred to over the years as Extensible Money be cool for us geeks? Sure.
> But read the NG for a while. It'd be over the head of 95% of the market.
> Support costs would go through the roof. That'd have to run the price of

the
> product--already tailored to a narrow market--up. Way up. Then even fewer
> people would buy it. It's an ugly problem.


Again, I just don't agree.

- quote -

> I guess I don't think of Excel as terribly robust in the sense that it is
> NOT a database worth a darn and Money is, at it's core, a database

problem.

So is Outlook, so let's use Outlook as the reference product rather than
Excel, if you wish.

- quote -

> I also don't necessarily agree that "the Money-style GUI is much more
> expensive to build."


I take it you aren't a software developer. There are several book on
WinForms programming that discuss the issues involved in building
Money-style UIs.



  #14  
Old 01-07-2004, 01:47 AM
Mountain Bikn' Guy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

Let's hope MS reads this and gives it some thought.
Regards,
Mountain

"Paul Pedersen" <prpeders[at]nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:uiTix8T0DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> Boy, wouldn't that be nice. I'd buy it in a minute.
> "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message
> news:RifJb.99141$VB2.224290[at]attbi_s51...
> > Yes, you are right. However, I always seem to end up paying about $60

each
> > year (personal + business version) to upgrade.
> > > And personally, what I would like to see is a product more at the level

of
> > sophistication of Excel or Word. In other words, I think a personal

> finance
> > product that had sophisticated features (such as a macro language, for
> > example) would be a big improvement. Excel and Word are not perfect, but

> MS
> > could surely build a Money-type product at that level. I guess they have
> > spent a lot of R&D dollars trying to build to the lowest common

> denominator
> > (I believe the Money-style GUI is much more expensive to build, for
> > example). For me, this has resulted in a frustrating product that isn't
> > powerful or flexible enough to meet my requirements. On the other hand,
> > since this is "personal finance" the powerful double-entry systems

aren't
> to
> > my liking either.
> > > I'm looking for the "Excel of personal finance" with all the convenience

> > features of Money, but the sophistication (and robustness) of Excel.
> > > > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in

> > message news:urds33M0DHA.1996[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > Hard to argue that it couldn't be done. Going to the moon was do-able.

> But
> > > Microsoft has thrown a fair amount of money down this rathole over the

> > past
> > > decade+ and still have, what, 30% market share compared to Q? And

> selling
> > at
> > > $10 or less per copy won't pay from some new startup to do it, either.

> > Also
> > > note the present relative languishing state of GNUcash.
> > > > > "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message
> > > news:F%2Jb.253637$_M.1159888[at]attbi_s54...
> > > > It seems to me someone could build better personal finance software

> than
> > > > either Money or Quicken...
> > > > >

  #13  
Old 01-02-2004, 05:50 PM
Dick Watson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

So would I but it doesn't matter. See http://www.bollar.org/msmoney/#Q66.
Besides, I'd bet the price would way more than double. Remember that Office
gets paid for by millions of companies worldwide. How many of them will pop
for licenses of Extensible Money? Look at what some of the other
support-intensive, narrow market, software costs. Things like Visual Studio
and AutoCAD.

"Paul Pedersen" <prpeders[at]nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:u2gavzV0DHA.604[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> OK, fine, double the price. I'd still pay it in a minute for a great
> product.



  #12  
Old 01-02-2004, 05:19 PM
Paul Pedersen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

OK, fine, double the price. I'd still pay it in a minute for a great
product.


"Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in
message news:eqrIKcU0DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> I don't buy the +Business versions. Oh, and remember that Microsoft gets a
> lot less than the $60 you paid.
> I agree that a more powerful and flexible Money would be nice, but you've
> identified the issue: they feel they have to dumb it down since their

target
> market has to be a whole lot broader than "computer geek." Would what I've
> referred to over the years as Extensible Money be cool for us geeks? Sure.
> But read the NG for a while. It'd be over the head of 95% of the market.
> Support costs would go through the roof. That'd have to run the price of

the
> product--already tailored to a narrow market--up. Way up. Then even fewer
> people would buy it. It's an ugly problem.
> I guess I don't think of Excel as terribly robust in the sense that it is
> NOT a database worth a darn and Money is, at it's core, a database

problem.
> I also don't necessarily agree that "the Money-style GUI is much more
> expensive to build." More expensive than what? Read the NG. Lots of users
> are mystified by many aspects of the product the way it is. A blank-screen
> product like Excel would never get out of the starting gate. Besides,
> they've wrapped it all around IE to do all of the heavy lifting. They are
> making extensive use of all of the DHTML/XML/CSS stuff. (Wasn't all of

this
> stuff developed to make development easier?) They haven't made much change
> in outward appearance of the UI in six versions (and most of those have

been
> gratuitous dumbing-down and busying-up like Use Transaction Forms

everywhere
> and Make Recurring where R-click|Add... works just fine.
> "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message
> news:RifJb.99141$VB2.224290[at]attbi_s51...
> > Yes, you are right. However, I always seem to end up paying about $60

each
> > year (personal + business version) to upgrade.
> > > And personally, what I would like to see is a product more at the level

of
> > sophistication of Excel or Word. In other words, I think a personal

> finance
> > product that had sophisticated features (such as a macro language, for
> > example) would be a big improvement. Excel and Word are not perfect, but

> MS
> > could surely build a Money-type product at that level. I guess they have
> > spent a lot of R&D dollars trying to build to the lowest common

> denominator
> > (I believe the Money-style GUI is much more expensive to build, for
> > example). For me, this has resulted in a frustrating product that isn't
> > powerful or flexible enough to meet my requirements. On the other hand,
> > since this is "personal finance" the powerful double-entry systems

aren't
> to
> > my liking either.
> > > I'm looking for the "Excel of personal finance" with all the convenience

> > features of Money, but the sophistication (and robustness) of Excel.



  #11  
Old 01-02-2004, 02:42 PM
Dick Watson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

I don't buy the +Business versions. Oh, and remember that Microsoft gets a
lot less than the $60 you paid.

I agree that a more powerful and flexible Money would be nice, but you've
identified the issue: they feel they have to dumb it down since their target
market has to be a whole lot broader than "computer geek." Would what I've
referred to over the years as Extensible Money be cool for us geeks? Sure.
But read the NG for a while. It'd be over the head of 95% of the market.
Support costs would go through the roof. That'd have to run the price of the
product--already tailored to a narrow market--up. Way up. Then even fewer
people would buy it. It's an ugly problem.

I guess I don't think of Excel as terribly robust in the sense that it is
NOT a database worth a darn and Money is, at it's core, a database problem.
I also don't necessarily agree that "the Money-style GUI is much more
expensive to build." More expensive than what? Read the NG. Lots of users
are mystified by many aspects of the product the way it is. A blank-screen
product like Excel would never get out of the starting gate. Besides,
they've wrapped it all around IE to do all of the heavy lifting. They are
making extensive use of all of the DHTML/XML/CSS stuff. (Wasn't all of this
stuff developed to make development easier?) They haven't made much change
in outward appearance of the UI in six versions (and most of those have been
gratuitous dumbing-down and busying-up like Use Transaction Forms everywhere
and Make Recurring where R-click|Add... works just fine.

"Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message
news:RifJb.99141$VB2.224290[at]attbi_s51...
- quote -

> Yes, you are right. However, I always seem to end up paying about $60 each
> year (personal + business version) to upgrade.
> And personally, what I would like to see is a product more at the level of
> sophistication of Excel or Word. In other words, I think a personal

finance
> product that had sophisticated features (such as a macro language, for
> example) would be a big improvement. Excel and Word are not perfect, but

MS
> could surely build a Money-type product at that level. I guess they have
> spent a lot of R&D dollars trying to build to the lowest common

denominator
> (I believe the Money-style GUI is much more expensive to build, for
> example). For me, this has resulted in a frustrating product that isn't
> powerful or flexible enough to meet my requirements. On the other hand,
> since this is "personal finance" the powerful double-entry systems aren't

to
> my liking either.
> I'm looking for the "Excel of personal finance" with all the convenience
> features of Money, but the sophistication (and robustness) of Excel.



  #10  
Old 01-02-2004, 01:46 PM
Paul Pedersen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

Boy, wouldn't that be nice. I'd buy it in a minute.

"Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message
news:RifJb.99141$VB2.224290[at]attbi_s51...
- quote -

> Yes, you are right. However, I always seem to end up paying about $60 each
> year (personal + business version) to upgrade.
> And personally, what I would like to see is a product more at the level of
> sophistication of Excel or Word. In other words, I think a personal

finance
> product that had sophisticated features (such as a macro language, for
> example) would be a big improvement. Excel and Word are not perfect, but

MS
> could surely build a Money-type product at that level. I guess they have
> spent a lot of R&D dollars trying to build to the lowest common

denominator
> (I believe the Money-style GUI is much more expensive to build, for
> example). For me, this has resulted in a frustrating product that isn't
> powerful or flexible enough to meet my requirements. On the other hand,
> since this is "personal finance" the powerful double-entry systems aren't

to
> my liking either.
> I'm looking for the "Excel of personal finance" with all the convenience
> features of Money, but the sophistication (and robustness) of Excel.
> "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in
> message news:urds33M0DHA.1996[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > Hard to argue that it couldn't be done. Going to the moon was do-able.

But
> > Microsoft has thrown a fair amount of money down this rathole over the

> past
> > decade+ and still have, what, 30% market share compared to Q? And

selling
> at
> > $10 or less per copy won't pay from some new startup to do it, either.

> Also
> > note the present relative languishing state of GNUcash.
> > > "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message

> > news:F%2Jb.253637$_M.1159888[at]attbi_s54...
> > > It seems to me someone could build better personal finance software

than
> > > either Money or Quicken...

>

  #9  
Old 01-02-2004, 01:33 PM
Mountain Bikn' Guy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

Yes, you are right. However, I always seem to end up paying about $60 each
year (personal + business version) to upgrade.

And personally, what I would like to see is a product more at the level of
sophistication of Excel or Word. In other words, I think a personal finance
product that had sophisticated features (such as a macro language, for
example) would be a big improvement. Excel and Word are not perfect, but MS
could surely build a Money-type product at that level. I guess they have
spent a lot of R&D dollars trying to build to the lowest common denominator
(I believe the Money-style GUI is much more expensive to build, for
example). For me, this has resulted in a frustrating product that isn't
powerful or flexible enough to meet my requirements. On the other hand,
since this is "personal finance" the powerful double-entry systems aren't to
my liking either.

I'm looking for the "Excel of personal finance" with all the convenience
features of Money, but the sophistication (and robustness) of Excel.


"Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in
message news:urds33M0DHA.1996[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> Hard to argue that it couldn't be done. Going to the moon was do-able. But
> Microsoft has thrown a fair amount of money down this rathole over the

past
> decade+ and still have, what, 30% market share compared to Q? And selling

at
> $10 or less per copy won't pay from some new startup to do it, either.

Also
> note the present relative languishing state of GNUcash.
> "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message
> news:F%2Jb.253637$_M.1159888[at]attbi_s54...
> > It seems to me someone could build better personal finance software than
> > either Money or Quicken...



  #8  
Old 01-02-2004, 12:15 AM
Dick Watson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

Hard to argue that it couldn't be done. Going to the moon was do-able. But
Microsoft has thrown a fair amount of money down this rathole over the past
decade+ and still have, what, 30% market share compared to Q? And selling at
$10 or less per copy won't pay from some new startup to do it, either. Also
note the present relative languishing state of GNUcash.

"Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message
news:F%2Jb.253637$_M.1159888[at]attbi_s54...
- quote -

> It seems to me someone could build better personal finance software than
> either Money or Quicken...



  #7  
Old 01-02-2004, 12:03 AM
Mountain Bikn' Guy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER


"Ken Martin" <KennethRMartin[at]aol.com> wrote in message
news:ucOZdcM0DHA.1684[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> The new version 2004 doesn't fix this problem. I have never been able to
> cancel a hung update with 2004 or 2003, on this computer or my previous

one.
> It seems that Microsoft just propagates the bugs from one version to the
> next.
> The only way I have been able to get out of this is to right click the
> taskbar, bring up the Task Manager, and kill MSM Money application. I

then
> restart MSN Money and go for my updates again. Most times it works the
> second time, sometimes I need to repeat it.
> "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message
> news:xSKIb.182432$8y1.582934[at]attbi_s52...
> > Hi Cal,
> > Thanks again. Is there anything I can do on my end to fix this (rather

> than
> > the work around you suggested)? Do the new versions (2004) fix it?
> > > BTW, I'm a programmer, so you comment caught my attention. Can you

provide
> > any more details on what procedure so I can understand the problem

better?
> > Thanks.
> > Regards,
> > Mountain
> > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message

> > news:tem6vvss6h1ljccag3mjs1a78n81s29dos[at]4ax.com...
> > > In microsoft.public.money, Mountain Bikn' Guy wrote:
> > > > > > Thanks! I'll try this. Any idea what the underlying cause is?
> > > > > It appears that Windows may not have the procedure available to the
> > > programmers.
> > >

  #6  
Old 01-01-2004, 11:33 PM
Mountain Bikn' Guy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER


"Ken Martin" <KennethRMartin[at]aol.com> wrote in message
news:ucOZdcM0DHA.1684[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> The new version 2004 doesn't fix this problem. I have never been able to
> cancel a hung update with 2004 or 2003, on this computer or my previous

one.
> It seems that Microsoft just propagates the bugs from one version to the
> next.
> The only way I have been able to get out of this is to right click the
> taskbar, bring up the Task Manager, and kill MSM Money application. I

then
> restart MSN Money and go for my updates again. Most times it works the
> second time, sometimes I need to repeat it.


Thanks for the info on this problem in 2004.

It seems to me someone could build better personal finance software than
either Money or Quicken...

Regards,
Mountain


  #5  
Old 01-01-2004, 11:21 PM
Ken Martin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

The new version 2004 doesn't fix this problem. I have never been able to
cancel a hung update with 2004 or 2003, on this computer or my previous one.
It seems that Microsoft just propagates the bugs from one version to the
next.

The only way I have been able to get out of this is to right click the
taskbar, bring up the Task Manager, and kill MSM Money application. I then
restart MSN Money and go for my updates again. Most times it works the
second time, sometimes I need to repeat it.

"Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message
news:xSKIb.182432$8y1.582934[at]attbi_s52...
- quote -

> Hi Cal,
> Thanks again. Is there anything I can do on my end to fix this (rather

than
> the work around you suggested)? Do the new versions (2004) fix it?
> BTW, I'm a programmer, so you comment caught my attention. Can you provide
> any more details on what procedure so I can understand the problem better?
> Thanks.
> Regards,
> Mountain
> "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message
> news:tem6vvss6h1ljccag3mjs1a78n81s29dos[at]4ax.com...
> > In microsoft.public.money, Mountain Bikn' Guy wrote:
> > > > Thanks! I'll try this. Any idea what the underlying cause is?
> > > It appears that Windows may not have the procedure available to the

> > programmers.


  #4  
Old 01-01-2004, 08:03 AM
Cal Learner-- MVP
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

In microsoft.public.money, Mountain Bikn' Guy wrote:

- quote -

> Thanks again. Is there anything I can do on my end to fix this (rather than
> the work around you suggested)? Do the new versions (2004) fix it?


I can produce the symptom by disabling data at the modem during the
time a response comes back. The better your connection is, the less
often it would occur. I think it times out eventually for me, but
takes a long time.

If you can identify which data source is the one that is not coming
back with the data usually, you could uncheck that one when
updating. If you set up background banking, the communication is
done in the background. So you would not be hung up. That might be a
decent workaround for you.


- quote -

> BTW, I'm a programmer, so you comment caught my attention. Can you provide
> any more details on what procedure so I can understand the problem better?


No, I don't know the details myself. I find it to be strange.

  #3  
Old 01-01-2004, 12:38 AM
Mountain Bikn' Guy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

Hi Cal,
Thanks again. Is there anything I can do on my end to fix this (rather than
the work around you suggested)? Do the new versions (2004) fix it?

BTW, I'm a programmer, so you comment caught my attention. Can you provide
any more details on what procedure so I can understand the problem better?
Thanks.
Regards,
Mountain

"Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message
news:tem6vvss6h1ljccag3mjs1a78n81s29dos[at]4ax.com...
- quote -

> In microsoft.public.money, Mountain Bikn' Guy wrote:
> > Thanks! I'll try this. Any idea what the underlying cause is?

> It appears that Windows may not have the procedure available to the
> programmers.



  #2  
Old 12-31-2003, 10:23 PM
Cal Learner-- MVP
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

In microsoft.public.money, Mountain Bikn' Guy wrote:

- quote -

> Thanks! I'll try this. Any idea what the underlying cause is?

It appears that Windows may not have the procedure available to the
programmers.

  #1  
Old 12-31-2003, 09:49 PM
Mountain Bikn' Guy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

Thanks! I'll try this. Any idea what the underlying cause is?
Regards,
Mountain
- quote -

> Brent said "I have had success by going to Control Panel > Network
> Connections and right-clicking > Disable on the Internet
> connection. Money apparently detects the loss of the Internet
> connection and completes the programs if at all possible."



 
Old 12-31-2003, 07:19 PM
Cal Learner-- MVP
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

In microsoft.public.money, Mountain Bikn' Guy wrote:

- quote -

> When I initiate an Internet Update in Money 2002, the Call
> Progress dialog comes up and says Updating Provider Data and sits
> there literally FOREVER. I have let it continue overnight even -- but
> it never completes. Selecting "Cancel" causes the dialog to display a
> "Cancelling..." message, but that never completes either. The only way
> to get out of the situation is to end the Money process (end task in Task
> Manager).

<snip
That is an unfortunate situation.


- quote -

> I found some prior posts on this problem -- but no solution was offered:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...om%26rnum%3D13
> I hope someone can shed some light on this for me. TIA!


Brent said "I have had success by going to Control Panel > Network
Connections and right-clicking > Disable on the Internet
connection. Money apparently detects the loss of the Internet
connection and completes the programs if at all possible."
  #-1  
Old 12-31-2003, 06:07 PM
Mountain Bikn' Guy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Internet Updates - Updating Provider Data takes FOREVER

Hi,
When I initiate an Internet Update in Money 2002, the Call
Progress dialog comes up and says Updating Provider Data and sits
there literally FOREVER. I have let it continue overnight even -- but
it never completes. Selecting "Cancel" causes the dialog to display a
"Cancelling..." message, but that never completes either. The only way
to get out of the situation is to end the Money process (end task in Task
Manager).

I'm using Money 2003 (personal & business edition) with Win2k (and all the
latest
service packs and updates). I have a good, reliable cable modem. No other
software
has any problems accessing the Internet. This is related strictly to Money.
It has been
happening since I upgraded to 2003 about a year ago. This problem happens
roughly
9 of every 10 attempts to perform Internet Updates. They only workaround I
have
found is to update each account individually.

(Unless I can find a fix, I'm switching to Quicken for my next upgrade.)

I found some prior posts on this problem -- but no solution was offered:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...om%26rnum%3D13

I hope someone can shed some light on this for me. TIA!

Mountain


 

Tags
data, forever, internet, provider, takes, updates, updating
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Slow Internet Updates with Money 2004 Deluxe
jx0a6b: I'm running Money 2004 Deluxe on Win XP Pro. I don't do any online banking; I just download stock updates (for under 10 stocks) and Money program...
Microsoft Money 2 10-18-2003 02:51 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:51 AM.