|
#15
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:eqrIKcU0DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... - quote - > I don't buy the +Business versions. Oh, and remember that Microsoft gets a
I typically buy direct, so they get all my money.> lot less than the $60 you paid. - quote - > I agree that a more powerful and flexible Money would be nice, but you've
The target market for PowerPoint, Word and Excel is also a "whole lot> identified the issue: they feel they have to dumb it down since their target > market has to be a whole lot broader than "computer geek." broader than 'computer geek.'" Furthermore, Money probably could generate more upgrade revenue per customer than Word or Excel. I bet a higher percentage of users upgrade Money each year than upgrade Word each year. Word is only $89 or so. You can't tell me that they can't build a product with Excel's sophistication for the personal finance market and sell it at the price level of Word or Excel. I just don't agree with your reasoning on this. - quote - > Would what I've
Again, I just don't agree.> referred to over the years as Extensible Money be cool for us geeks? Sure. > But read the NG for a while. It'd be over the head of 95% of the market. > Support costs would go through the roof. That'd have to run the price of the > product--already tailored to a narrow market--up. Way up. Then even fewer > people would buy it. It's an ugly problem. - quote - > I guess I don't think of Excel as terribly robust in the sense that it is > NOT a database worth a darn and Money is, at it's core, a database problem. So is Outlook, so let's use Outlook as the reference product rather than Excel, if you wish. - quote - > I also don't necessarily agree that "the Money-style GUI is much more
I take it you aren't a software developer. There are several book on> expensive to build." WinForms programming that discuss the issues involved in building Money-style UIs. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Let's hope MS reads this and gives it some thought. Regards, Mountain "Paul Pedersen" <prpeders[at]nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message news:uiTix8T0DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... - quote - > Boy, wouldn't that be nice. I'd buy it in a minute. > "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message > news:RifJb.99141$VB2.224290[at]attbi_s51... > > Yes, you are right. However, I always seem to end up paying about $60 each > > year (personal + business version) to upgrade. > > > And personally, what I would like to see is a product more at the level of > > sophistication of Excel or Word. In other words, I think a personal > finance > > product that had sophisticated features (such as a macro language, for > > example) would be a big improvement. Excel and Word are not perfect, but > MS > > could surely build a Money-type product at that level. I guess they have > > spent a lot of R&D dollars trying to build to the lowest common > denominator > > (I believe the Money-style GUI is much more expensive to build, for > > example). For me, this has resulted in a frustrating product that isn't > > powerful or flexible enough to meet my requirements. On the other hand, > > since this is "personal finance" the powerful double-entry systems aren't > to > > my liking either. > > > I'm looking for the "Excel of personal finance" with all the convenience > > features of Money, but the sophistication (and robustness) of Excel. > > > > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > > message news:urds33M0DHA.1996[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > Hard to argue that it couldn't be done. Going to the moon was do-able. > But > > > Microsoft has thrown a fair amount of money down this rathole over the > > past > > > decade+ and still have, what, 30% market share compared to Q? And > selling > > at > > > $10 or less per copy won't pay from some new startup to do it, either. > > Also > > > note the present relative languishing state of GNUcash. > > > > > "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message > > > news:F%2Jb.253637$_M.1159888[at]attbi_s54... > > > > It seems to me someone could build better personal finance software > than > > > > either Money or Quicken... > > > > > |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| So would I but it doesn't matter. See http://www.bollar.org/msmoney/#Q66. Besides, I'd bet the price would way more than double. Remember that Office gets paid for by millions of companies worldwide. How many of them will pop for licenses of Extensible Money? Look at what some of the other support-intensive, narrow market, software costs. Things like Visual Studio and AutoCAD. "Paul Pedersen" <prpeders[at]nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message news:u2gavzV0DHA.604[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... - quote - > OK, fine, double the price. I'd still pay it in a minute for a great > product. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| OK, fine, double the price. I'd still pay it in a minute for a great product. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:eqrIKcU0DHA.2544[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... - quote - > I don't buy the +Business versions. Oh, and remember that Microsoft gets a > lot less than the $60 you paid. > I agree that a more powerful and flexible Money would be nice, but you've > identified the issue: they feel they have to dumb it down since their target > market has to be a whole lot broader than "computer geek." Would what I've > referred to over the years as Extensible Money be cool for us geeks? Sure. > But read the NG for a while. It'd be over the head of 95% of the market. > Support costs would go through the roof. That'd have to run the price of the > product--already tailored to a narrow market--up. Way up. Then even fewer > people would buy it. It's an ugly problem. > I guess I don't think of Excel as terribly robust in the sense that it is > NOT a database worth a darn and Money is, at it's core, a database problem. > I also don't necessarily agree that "the Money-style GUI is much more > expensive to build." More expensive than what? Read the NG. Lots of users > are mystified by many aspects of the product the way it is. A blank-screen > product like Excel would never get out of the starting gate. Besides, > they've wrapped it all around IE to do all of the heavy lifting. They are > making extensive use of all of the DHTML/XML/CSS stuff. (Wasn't all of this > stuff developed to make development easier?) They haven't made much change > in outward appearance of the UI in six versions (and most of those have been > gratuitous dumbing-down and busying-up like Use Transaction Forms everywhere > and Make Recurring where R-click|Add... works just fine. > "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message > news:RifJb.99141$VB2.224290[at]attbi_s51... > > Yes, you are right. However, I always seem to end up paying about $60 each > > year (personal + business version) to upgrade. > > > And personally, what I would like to see is a product more at the level of > > sophistication of Excel or Word. In other words, I think a personal > finance > > product that had sophisticated features (such as a macro language, for > > example) would be a big improvement. Excel and Word are not perfect, but > MS > > could surely build a Money-type product at that level. I guess they have > > spent a lot of R&D dollars trying to build to the lowest common > denominator > > (I believe the Money-style GUI is much more expensive to build, for > > example). For me, this has resulted in a frustrating product that isn't > > powerful or flexible enough to meet my requirements. On the other hand, > > since this is "personal finance" the powerful double-entry systems aren't > to > > my liking either. > > > I'm looking for the "Excel of personal finance" with all the convenience > > features of Money, but the sophistication (and robustness) of Excel. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| I don't buy the +Business versions. Oh, and remember that Microsoft gets a lot less than the $60 you paid. I agree that a more powerful and flexible Money would be nice, but you've identified the issue: they feel they have to dumb it down since their target market has to be a whole lot broader than "computer geek." Would what I've referred to over the years as Extensible Money be cool for us geeks? Sure. But read the NG for a while. It'd be over the head of 95% of the market. Support costs would go through the roof. That'd have to run the price of the product--already tailored to a narrow market--up. Way up. Then even fewer people would buy it. It's an ugly problem. I guess I don't think of Excel as terribly robust in the sense that it is NOT a database worth a darn and Money is, at it's core, a database problem. I also don't necessarily agree that "the Money-style GUI is much more expensive to build." More expensive than what? Read the NG. Lots of users are mystified by many aspects of the product the way it is. A blank-screen product like Excel would never get out of the starting gate. Besides, they've wrapped it all around IE to do all of the heavy lifting. They are making extensive use of all of the DHTML/XML/CSS stuff. (Wasn't all of this stuff developed to make development easier?) They haven't made much change in outward appearance of the UI in six versions (and most of those have been gratuitous dumbing-down and busying-up like Use Transaction Forms everywhere and Make Recurring where R-click|Add... works just fine. "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message news:RifJb.99141$VB2.224290[at]attbi_s51... - quote - > Yes, you are right. However, I always seem to end up paying about $60 each > year (personal + business version) to upgrade. > And personally, what I would like to see is a product more at the level of > sophistication of Excel or Word. In other words, I think a personal finance > product that had sophisticated features (such as a macro language, for > example) would be a big improvement. Excel and Word are not perfect, but MS > could surely build a Money-type product at that level. I guess they have > spent a lot of R&D dollars trying to build to the lowest common denominator > (I believe the Money-style GUI is much more expensive to build, for > example). For me, this has resulted in a frustrating product that isn't > powerful or flexible enough to meet my requirements. On the other hand, > since this is "personal finance" the powerful double-entry systems aren't to > my liking either. > I'm looking for the "Excel of personal finance" with all the convenience > features of Money, but the sophistication (and robustness) of Excel. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Boy, wouldn't that be nice. I'd buy it in a minute. "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message news:RifJb.99141$VB2.224290[at]attbi_s51... - quote - > Yes, you are right. However, I always seem to end up paying about $60 each > year (personal + business version) to upgrade. > And personally, what I would like to see is a product more at the level of > sophistication of Excel or Word. In other words, I think a personal finance > product that had sophisticated features (such as a macro language, for > example) would be a big improvement. Excel and Word are not perfect, but MS > could surely build a Money-type product at that level. I guess they have > spent a lot of R&D dollars trying to build to the lowest common denominator > (I believe the Money-style GUI is much more expensive to build, for > example). For me, this has resulted in a frustrating product that isn't > powerful or flexible enough to meet my requirements. On the other hand, > since this is "personal finance" the powerful double-entry systems aren't to > my liking either. > I'm looking for the "Excel of personal finance" with all the convenience > features of Money, but the sophistication (and robustness) of Excel. > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > message news:urds33M0DHA.1996[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > Hard to argue that it couldn't be done. Going to the moon was do-able. But > > Microsoft has thrown a fair amount of money down this rathole over the > past > > decade+ and still have, what, 30% market share compared to Q? And selling > at > > $10 or less per copy won't pay from some new startup to do it, either. > Also > > note the present relative languishing state of GNUcash. > > > "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message > > news:F%2Jb.253637$_M.1159888[at]attbi_s54... > > > It seems to me someone could build better personal finance software than > > > either Money or Quicken... > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Yes, you are right. However, I always seem to end up paying about $60 each year (personal + business version) to upgrade. And personally, what I would like to see is a product more at the level of sophistication of Excel or Word. In other words, I think a personal finance product that had sophisticated features (such as a macro language, for example) would be a big improvement. Excel and Word are not perfect, but MS could surely build a Money-type product at that level. I guess they have spent a lot of R&D dollars trying to build to the lowest common denominator (I believe the Money-style GUI is much more expensive to build, for example). For me, this has resulted in a frustrating product that isn't powerful or flexible enough to meet my requirements. On the other hand, since this is "personal finance" the powerful double-entry systems aren't to my liking either. I'm looking for the "Excel of personal finance" with all the convenience features of Money, but the sophistication (and robustness) of Excel. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:urds33M0DHA.1996[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... - quote - > Hard to argue that it couldn't be done. Going to the moon was do-able. But > Microsoft has thrown a fair amount of money down this rathole over the past > decade+ and still have, what, 30% market share compared to Q? And selling at > $10 or less per copy won't pay from some new startup to do it, either. Also > note the present relative languishing state of GNUcash. > "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message > news:F%2Jb.253637$_M.1159888[at]attbi_s54... > > It seems to me someone could build better personal finance software than > > either Money or Quicken... |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Hard to argue that it couldn't be done. Going to the moon was do-able. But Microsoft has thrown a fair amount of money down this rathole over the past decade+ and still have, what, 30% market share compared to Q? And selling at $10 or less per copy won't pay from some new startup to do it, either. Also note the present relative languishing state of GNUcash. "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message news:F%2Jb.253637$_M.1159888[at]attbi_s54... - quote - > It seems to me someone could build better personal finance software than > either Money or Quicken... |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Ken Martin" <KennethRMartin[at]aol.com> wrote in message news:ucOZdcM0DHA.1684[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... - quote - > The new version 2004 doesn't fix this problem. I have never been able to > cancel a hung update with 2004 or 2003, on this computer or my previous one. > It seems that Microsoft just propagates the bugs from one version to the > next. > The only way I have been able to get out of this is to right click the > taskbar, bring up the Task Manager, and kill MSM Money application. I then > restart MSN Money and go for my updates again. Most times it works the > second time, sometimes I need to repeat it. > "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message > news:xSKIb.182432$8y1.582934[at]attbi_s52... > > Hi Cal, > > Thanks again. Is there anything I can do on my end to fix this (rather > than > > the work around you suggested)? Do the new versions (2004) fix it? > > > BTW, I'm a programmer, so you comment caught my attention. Can you provide > > any more details on what procedure so I can understand the problem better? > > Thanks. > > Regards, > > Mountain > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message > > news:tem6vvss6h1ljccag3mjs1a78n81s29dos[at]4ax.com... > > > In microsoft.public.money, Mountain Bikn' Guy wrote: > > > > > > Thanks! I'll try this. Any idea what the underlying cause is? > > > > > It appears that Windows may not have the procedure available to the > > > programmers. > > > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Ken Martin" <KennethRMartin[at]aol.com> wrote in message news:ucOZdcM0DHA.1684[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... - quote - > The new version 2004 doesn't fix this problem. I have never been able to
Thanks for the info on this problem in 2004.> cancel a hung update with 2004 or 2003, on this computer or my previous one. > It seems that Microsoft just propagates the bugs from one version to the > next. > The only way I have been able to get out of this is to right click the > taskbar, bring up the Task Manager, and kill MSM Money application. I then > restart MSN Money and go for my updates again. Most times it works the > second time, sometimes I need to repeat it. It seems to me someone could build better personal finance software than either Money or Quicken... Regards, Mountain |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| The new version 2004 doesn't fix this problem. I have never been able to cancel a hung update with 2004 or 2003, on this computer or my previous one. It seems that Microsoft just propagates the bugs from one version to the next. The only way I have been able to get out of this is to right click the taskbar, bring up the Task Manager, and kill MSM Money application. I then restart MSN Money and go for my updates again. Most times it works the second time, sometimes I need to repeat it. "Mountain Bikn' Guy" <vc[at]attbi.com> wrote in message news:xSKIb.182432$8y1.582934[at]attbi_s52... - quote - > Hi Cal, > Thanks again. Is there anything I can do on my end to fix this (rather than > the work around you suggested)? Do the new versions (2004) fix it? > BTW, I'm a programmer, so you comment caught my attention. Can you provide > any more details on what procedure so I can understand the problem better? > Thanks. > Regards, > Mountain > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message > news:tem6vvss6h1ljccag3mjs1a78n81s29dos[at]4ax.com... > > In microsoft.public.money, Mountain Bikn' Guy wrote: > > > > Thanks! I'll try this. Any idea what the underlying cause is? > > > It appears that Windows may not have the procedure available to the > > programmers. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Mountain Bikn' Guy wrote: - quote - > Thanks again. Is there anything I can do on my end to fix this (rather than
I can produce the symptom by disabling data at the modem during the> the work around you suggested)? Do the new versions (2004) fix it? time a response comes back. The better your connection is, the less often it would occur. I think it times out eventually for me, but takes a long time. If you can identify which data source is the one that is not coming back with the data usually, you could uncheck that one when updating. If you set up background banking, the communication is done in the background. So you would not be hung up. That might be a decent workaround for you. - quote - > BTW, I'm a programmer, so you comment caught my attention. Can you provide
No, I don't know the details myself. I find it to be strange.> any more details on what procedure so I can understand the problem better? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Hi Cal, Thanks again. Is there anything I can do on my end to fix this (rather than the work around you suggested)? Do the new versions (2004) fix it? BTW, I'm a programmer, so you comment caught my attention. Can you provide any more details on what procedure so I can understand the problem better? Thanks. Regards, Mountain "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:tem6vvss6h1ljccag3mjs1a78n81s29dos[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Mountain Bikn' Guy wrote: > > Thanks! I'll try this. Any idea what the underlying cause is? > It appears that Windows may not have the procedure available to the > programmers. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Mountain Bikn' Guy wrote: - quote - > Thanks! I'll try this. Any idea what the underlying cause is?
It appears that Windows may not have the procedure available to theprogrammers. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Thanks! I'll try this. Any idea what the underlying cause is? Regards, Mountain - quote - > Brent said "I have had success by going to Control Panel > Network > Connections and right-clicking > Disable on the Internet > connection. Money apparently detects the loss of the Internet > connection and completes the programs if at all possible." |
| | |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Mountain Bikn' Guy wrote: - quote - > When I initiate an Internet Update in Money 2002, the Call
That is an unfortunate situation.> Progress dialog comes up and says Updating Provider Data and sits > there literally FOREVER. I have let it continue overnight even -- but > it never completes. Selecting "Cancel" causes the dialog to display a > "Cancelling..." message, but that never completes either. The only way > to get out of the situation is to end the Money process (end task in Task > Manager). <snip - quote - > I found some prior posts on this problem -- but no solution was offered:
Brent said "I have had success by going to Control Panel > Network> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...om%26rnum%3D13 > I hope someone can shed some light on this for me. TIA! Connections and right-clicking > Disable on the Internet connection. Money apparently detects the loss of the Internet connection and completes the programs if at all possible." |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hi, When I initiate an Internet Update in Money 2002, the Call Progress dialog comes up and says Updating Provider Data and sits there literally FOREVER. I have let it continue overnight even -- but it never completes. Selecting "Cancel" causes the dialog to display a "Cancelling..." message, but that never completes either. The only way to get out of the situation is to end the Money process (end task in Task Manager). I'm using Money 2003 (personal & business edition) with Win2k (and all the latest service packs and updates). I have a good, reliable cable modem. No other software has any problems accessing the Internet. This is related strictly to Money. It has been happening since I upgraded to 2003 about a year ago. This problem happens roughly 9 of every 10 attempts to perform Internet Updates. They only workaround I have found is to update each account individually. (Unless I can find a fix, I'm switching to Quicken for my next upgrade.) I found some prior posts on this problem -- but no solution was offered: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...om%26rnum%3D13 I hope someone can shed some light on this for me. TIA! Mountain |
| Tags |
| data, forever, internet, provider, takes, updates, updating |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Slow Internet Updates with Money 2004 Deluxe jx0a6b: I'm running Money 2004 Deluxe on Win XP Pro. I don't do any online banking; I just download stock updates (for under 10 stocks) and Money program... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-18-2003 02:51 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |