|
#15
| |||
| |||
| On Q2000 I was able to set price limits alerts offline for any investment. When trying to move to Q2003, it no longer allows offline price alerts setting - must update price alert limits on a Quicken webpage (so need to be online) and it only allows alerts for assets Quicken knows about i.e. stocks and mutual funds. Each release of Quicken removes user-friendly functionaility functionality. I'm trying to migrate to MS Money but have found that the cnoversion capabilities do not convert Quicken Inventory data. Too bad. I have too much data to rebuild manuualy. Guess I'm stuck. My 2 cents - quote - > -----Original Message----- > "Bill Saxon" <bsaxon[at]adelphia.net> wrote in message > news:a3d46d42.0312280548.438a6243[at]posting.google.com... > > ...I have a few questions if you would be so kind as to help me in my > decision. > > > 1. I use a Quicken Visa and it download the transactions, virtually > > all my living expenses. Can I do this with Money comparably? > > 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on the card. > > Can I do something like this in Money? > I've been doing exactly what you want to do for several years and am happy > with the system. > I use Wachovia and a BankOne VISA card (formerly FirstUSA) to pay for > everything. Where I feel confident in the vendor and can arrange it, I have > routine bills debited directly to one or the other. Examples of that are > local utilities and mortgage debit checking, and cell phone debits the > credit card. The credit card debits the checking account for last month's > balance, less any credits that occur in the interim. > In addition to the vendors that will debit my accounts directly, I use > Wachovia online bill pay (through Money, not the web-based version) to pay > both scheduled and unscheduled bills. Wachovia either prints and mails a > check, or pays the vendor directly using the ACH system. It's transparent to > me. > All transactions are downloaded directly into Money as they're posted. For > checks issued by Wachovia, a separate transaction marks the checks as > cleared when cashed by the vendor. Money will remember the last category for > a vendor, if you set the options to do that. You can also have several > aliases for the same vendor name, e.g., Target 123 and Target 456 can both > convert automatically to just plain Target. You can edit the list of aliases > if you make an association in error. > I only use a debit/ATM card for cash withdrawals. I occasionally buy > something small with it just so I can get cash back from the store. > Otherwise all other retail transactions are made with my Visa card and paid > off at the end of the cycle. Since everything is downloaded automatically, > there's little editing required by me to get everything recorded properly. > Budget actuals and tax history are easy to review as a result. > If your bank doesn't support direct banking with Money, you can still use > Checkfree or an equivalent vendor. I don't recommend using your bank's > web-based bill pay, if they don't support Money directly. In my opinion, it > defeats the purpose. If the number of transactions is low, though, perhaps > you'll not find that a problem. > -- > Chris Cowles, > Gainesville, FL > . |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| "Bill Saxon" <bsaxon[at]adelphia.net> wrote in message news:a3d46d42.0312280548.438a6243[at]posting.google.com... - quote - > ...I have a few questions if you would be so kind as to help me in my
I've been doing exactly what you want to do for several years and am happydecision. > 1. I use a Quicken Visa and it download the transactions, virtually > all my living expenses. Can I do this with Money comparably? > 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on the card. > Can I do something like this in Money? with the system. I use Wachovia and a BankOne VISA card (formerly FirstUSA) to pay for everything. Where I feel confident in the vendor and can arrange it, I have routine bills debited directly to one or the other. Examples of that are local utilities and mortgage debit checking, and cell phone debits the credit card. The credit card debits the checking account for last month's balance, less any credits that occur in the interim. In addition to the vendors that will debit my accounts directly, I use Wachovia online bill pay (through Money, not the web-based version) to pay both scheduled and unscheduled bills. Wachovia either prints and mails a check, or pays the vendor directly using the ACH system. It's transparent to me. All transactions are downloaded directly into Money as they're posted. For checks issued by Wachovia, a separate transaction marks the checks as cleared when cashed by the vendor. Money will remember the last category for a vendor, if you set the options to do that. You can also have several aliases for the same vendor name, e.g., Target 123 and Target 456 can both convert automatically to just plain Target. You can edit the list of aliases if you make an association in error. I only use a debit/ATM card for cash withdrawals. I occasionally buy something small with it just so I can get cash back from the store. Otherwise all other retail transactions are made with my Visa card and paid off at the end of the cycle. Since everything is downloaded automatically, there's little editing required by me to get everything recorded properly. Budget actuals and tax history are easy to review as a result. If your bank doesn't support direct banking with Money, you can still use Checkfree or an equivalent vendor. I don't recommend using your bank's web-based bill pay, if they don't support Money directly. In my opinion, it defeats the purpose. If the number of transactions is low, though, perhaps you'll not find that a problem. -- Chris Cowles, Gainesville, FL |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on the card.
Yes, you can do this directly from Money. I set up long ago in an older> Can I do something like this in Money? version of Money, but I would hazrd you do this by going to your Account List, then select 'Manage Online Services" on the left. Then click 'set up electronic bill pay service' near the bottom center. - quote - > 3. Is the 25 MB data file size normal for an active Money file?
histories, and a stock portfolio.my file is about 19MB. Thats about 17 active accounts, some with multi-year "Bill Saxon" <bsaxon[at]adelphia.net> wrote in message news:a3d46d42.0312280548.438a6243[at]posting.google.com... - quote - > "Jason" <anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
2003 and Money 2003 at the same time.news:<316F4158-5901-4E65-81B7-2C68790F8203[at]microsoft.com> ... > > They are both the same in many ways. I used Quicken for about 4 years before I thought about MS Money. Then for an entire year, I used Quicken - quote - > > > 1.) The first thing that stands out is the Money homepage. Here you can
tax season.edit a lot of content that suits your needs. > > 2.) Another nice feature would be how Money allows you to edit transactions. This comes especially handy when cleaning up for reporting and - quote - > > 3.) Money has a much better user interface then Quicken (my opinion).
website and uses ActiveSync. Great toy ;-).> > 4.) Bills & Deposit: right from the homepage you can see what you have coming. It also plays into the forecast. Very easy to setup and customize. > > 5.) If you have PocketPC, you can download your money to your device (nothing for smartphone). This utility can be downloaded via the Money - quote - > > > One downside is the auto-reconcile feature. Quicken has this mastered.
you have to click a few things, but it still does the same job.When downloading transaction from bank, Quicken will auto-balance. In Money, - quote - > > > In closing, I am now a Money user. I uninstalled Quicken and only use
and play for awhile. I think you will like it, it does take some gettingMoney now. Download the 30-day trial of Money 2004. Import your Quicken data used to. So be patient.... - quote - > > > Thanks, Tim > Believe it or not my Quicken data file is hugh and growing by leaps > and bounds daily. It is about 145 MB. It somehow got corrupted > awhile back, I think when I converted the data in the Q03 > installation. > Quicken, as you know, has no Support except at $2 a minute but I > realized an Export/Import was the only fix. I did so with every > precaution I could think of but still after several attempts to get > the best transfer I have hours of fixes because of the archaic nature > of the QIF files. The program doesn't handle transfers and split > trans too well. > I downloaded the trial version of Money and it handled the conversion > perfectly with no problems I have found so far. The file is about 25 > MB. Is this pretty normal in size for Money? > I can fix the result (with hours spent) and it reduces the file size > to about 7MB but I felt Intuit left me out to dry. I have a few > questions if you would be so kind as to help me in my decision. > 1. I use a Quicken Visa and it download the transactions, virtually > all my living expenses. Can I do this with Money comparably? > 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on the card. > Can I do something like this in Money? > 3. Is the 25 MB data file size normal for an active Money file? > Thanks, |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Hi Dick I find it very annoying and usually do not read the post if I have to scroll to the bottom to read it. I (as you can see) also "top post" Bob "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:ONJHBShzDHA.1688[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... - quote - > What word would you use for this practice? > I top post for two reasons: 1) I use a newsreader that encourages it. 2) > Many (most) people who use this newsgroup use it from interfaces that are > NOT text based--i.e., not terminal emulators--and always show the top of a > post most prominently and require scrolling to the bottom rather than > spewing all of the text and requiring scrolling to get back to the top. > <Trent©> wrote in message news:3ra0vvo5pm3ni2c7g9ngen1ptu84ubngid[at]4ax.com... > > On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 14:06:07 -0700, "Dick Watson" > > <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote: > > > > But if you go back to Quicken, it really won't hurt many feelings here. > Why > > > does everybody feel compelled to threaten us with this when we, by and > > > large, really couldn't care less? > > > Why do you consider that a threat? > > > And why do you top post? lol |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > 3. Is the 25 MB data file size normal for an active Money file?
that I have a great deal of data in my file, so 20 MB is probably aboveMy file size is around 20 MB and has stayed pretty consistent. I feel average. Bob |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| What word would you use for this practice? I top post for two reasons: 1) I use a newsreader that encourages it. 2) Many (most) people who use this newsgroup use it from interfaces that are NOT text based--i.e., not terminal emulators--and always show the top of a post most prominently and require scrolling to the bottom rather than spewing all of the text and requiring scrolling to get back to the top. <Trent©> wrote in message news:3ra0vvo5pm3ni2c7g9ngen1ptu84ubngid[at]4ax.com... - quote - > On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 14:06:07 -0700, "Dick Watson" > <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote: > > But if you go back to Quicken, it really won't hurt many feelings here. Why > > does everybody feel compelled to threaten us with this when we, by and > > large, really couldn't care less? > Why do you consider that a threat? > And why do you top post? lol |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 14:06:07 -0700, "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote: - quote - > But if you go back to Quicken, it really won't hurt many feelings here. Why
Why do you consider that a threat?> does everybody feel compelled to threaten us with this when we, by and > large, really couldn't care less? And why do you top post? lol Have a nice week... Trent Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity! |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| You'll probably get a lot farther starting a new thread rather than jumping in an unrelated thread. Are you talking about auto balancing to downloaded transactions? Have you tried Tools|Options|Online Services|Automatically mark accepted transactions as reconciled (R)? But if you go back to Quicken, it really won't hurt many feelings here. Why does everybody feel compelled to threaten us with this when we, by and large, really couldn't care less? "Karen" <anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:010d01c3cd81$74770be0$a401280a[at]phx.gbl... - quote - > What few things do you need to click to auto balance in > Money like Quicken? I am pulling my hair out with the > auto balance/reconcile thing on Money. I am seriously > considering going back to Quicken over this. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| What few things do you need to click to auto balance in Money like Quicken? I am pulling my hair out with the auto balance/reconcile thing on Money. I am seriously considering going back to Quicken over this. - quote - > -----Original Message-----
entire year, I used Quicken 2003 and Money 2003 at the> They are both the same in many ways. I used Quicken for about 4 years before I thought about MS Money. Then for an same time. - quote - > 1.) The first thing that stands out is the Money
your needs.homepage. Here you can edit a lot of content that suits - quote - > 2.) Another nice feature would be how Money allows you to
cleaning up for reporting and tax season.edit transactions. This comes especially handy when - quote - > 3.) Money has a much better user interface then Quicken
Very easy to setup and customize.(my opinion). > 4.) Bills & Deposit: right from the homepage you can see what you have coming. It also plays into the forecast. - quote - > 5.) If you have PocketPC, you can download your money to
downloaded via the Money website and uses ActiveSync.your device (nothing for smartphone). This utility can be Great toy ;-). - quote - > One downside is the auto-reconcile feature. Quicken has
Quicken will auto-balance. In Money, you have to click athis mastered. When downloading transaction from bank, few things, but it still does the same job. - quote - > In closing, I am now a Money user. I uninstalled Quicken
2004. Import your Quicken data and play for awhile. Iand only use Money now. Download the 30-day trial of Money think you will like it, it does take some getting used to. So be patient.... - quote - > ----- Tim Koltek wrote: ----- > How does Money compare to Quicken? > Tim Koltek > tkoltek[at]hotmail.com > . |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| what....you have not been using auto-pay? i've used auto- pay for 20+ years now and have no problems. it is too much trouble sitting and paying bills. surfing to the sites and doing all that work.... check out auto-pay....save time. --- ""At any rate, I pay most of my bills by actually going to the vendor's site...MBNA,electric company, etc...and paying directly to them. A couple of mybills I pay thru my bank...for vendor's that don't have a web site set up for direct pay."" ----------------------------------------- - quote - > -----Original Message----- > On 28 Dec 2003 05:48:27 -0800, bsaxon[at]adelphia.net (Bill Saxon) wrote: > > I downloaded the trial version of Money and it handled the conversion > > perfectly with no problems I have found so far. The file is about 25 > > MB. Is this pretty normal in size for Money? > Hi, Bill... > I'm not Tim...lol...but... > My file for the first year is about 4 meg. But I do only personal, > simple stuff. > > 1. I use a Quicken Visa and it download the transactions, virtually > > all my living expenses. Can I do this with Money comparably? > Yes...quite easily. > > 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on the card. > > Can I do something like this in Money? > MONEY doesn't actually pay the bills, does it? At any rate, I pay > most of my bills by actually going to the vendor's site...MBNA, > electric company, etc...and paying directly to them. A couple of my > bills I pay thru my bank...for vendor's that don't have a web site set > up for direct pay. > All this is accessed thru my browser. And there's no charge for any > of this, of course. > I like paying my bills thru the vendor when I can...which is for most > of my bills. There's only a day lag time that way...which means I can > keep my money working longer for me that way. When I pay thru the > bank, they suggest a 7-10 day lead time...which is way too much for my > liking. > > 3. Is the 25 MB data file size normal for an active Money file? > I don't think there IS a normal size, Bill. Everybody would have a > different size...depending on their usage. > My wife has an OE index file on her computer that's approaching 1 gig > in size...without any major problems. So I would hope MS has > incorporated that database technology into Money. > I personally like the cash flow graph. The only minor gripe I have > about that...they don't have an automatic setting that will do a > forecast from the current date to the end of the year. But you CAN > easily set up a scenario for that. > I have a coupla other minor gripes, too. But, all in all, its a very > good program (2003). > Good luck. > Have a nice week... > Trent > Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity! > . |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 08:16:16 -0000, "Peter Wilkin" <pw2[at]orbitsville.net.NOSPAM> wrote: - quote - > "morjana" <morjana[at]msn.com> wrote in message
quicken files are about 2.68 meg.> news:7056b415.0312272356.5d7bb2fe[at]posting.google.com... > > SciFi Channel has an interim web site up for Stargate Atlantis at: > > > http://www.scifi.com/atlantis/ > > > So far, just a very nice graphic with a copy of their press release > > announcing the new series. > Just some promo blurb > I do like the line near the bottom > 'SCI FI Channel is a television network where "what if" is what's on.' > Probably why they cancelled Farscape, it was an exercise in "what if we > cancel one of our most popular shows, home much of our audience will cancell > their subscriptions" sort of thing I use Money 2000 and Quicken 99. The Money file is about 13 meg, the Until recently if you wanted your financial files on the PPC you had to use Money. You can now get Pocket Quicken for the PPC. I will forever stay with Money 2000, since Microsoft in their infinite wisdom stopped supporting the HPC platform. ------------ "It took us 15 years to McGyver this thing." -------------------------Carter on Stargate To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from my e-mail address. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On 28 Dec 2003 05:48:27 -0800, bsaxon[at]adelphia.net (Bill Saxon) wrote: - quote - > I downloaded the trial version of Money and it handled the conversion
Hi, Bill...> perfectly with no problems I have found so far. The file is about 25 > MB. Is this pretty normal in size for Money? I'm not Tim...lol...but... My file for the first year is about 4 meg. But I do only personal, simple stuff. - quote - > 1. I use a Quicken Visa and it download the transactions, virtually
Yes...quite easily.> all my living expenses. Can I do this with Money comparably? - quote - > 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on the card.
MONEY doesn't actually pay the bills, does it? At any rate, I pay> Can I do something like this in Money? most of my bills by actually going to the vendor's site...MBNA, electric company, etc...and paying directly to them. A couple of my bills I pay thru my bank...for vendor's that don't have a web site set up for direct pay. All this is accessed thru my browser. And there's no charge for any of this, of course. I like paying my bills thru the vendor when I can...which is for most of my bills. There's only a day lag time that way...which means I can keep my money working longer for me that way. When I pay thru the bank, they suggest a 7-10 day lead time...which is way too much for my liking. - quote - > 3. Is the 25 MB data file size normal for an active Money file?
I don't think there IS a normal size, Bill. Everybody would have adifferent size...depending on their usage. My wife has an OE index file on her computer that's approaching 1 gig in size...without any major problems. So I would hope MS has incorporated that database technology into Money. I personally like the cash flow graph. The only minor gripe I have about that...they don't have an automatic setting that will do a forecast from the current date to the end of the year. But you CAN easily set up a scenario for that. I have a coupla other minor gripes, too. But, all in all, its a very good program (2003). Good luck. Have a nice week... Trent Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity! |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 23:21:05 -0800, "Jason" <anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: - quote - > They are both the same in many ways. I used Quicken for about 4 years before I thought about MS Money. Then for an entire year, I used Quicken 2003 and Money 2003 at the same time.
I thought the 2004 version of Money does this also.> 1.) The first thing that stands out is the Money homepage. Here you can edit a lot of content that suits your needs. > 2.) Another nice feature would be how Money allows you to edit transactions. This comes especially handy when cleaning up for reporting and tax season. > 3.) Money has a much better user interface then Quicken (my opinion). > 4.) Bills & Deposit: right from the homepage you can see what you have coming. It also plays into the forecast. Very easy to setup and customize. > 5.) If you have PocketPC, you can download your money to your device (nothing for smartphone). This utility can be downloaded via the Money website and uses ActiveSync. Great toy ;-). > One downside is the auto-reconcile feature. Quicken has this mastered. When downloading transaction from bank, Quicken will auto-balance. In Money, you have to click a few things, but it still does the same job. Have a nice week... Trent Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity! |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Jason" <anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:<316F4158-5901-4E65-81B7-2C68790F8203[at]microsoft.com> ... - quote - > They are both the same in many ways. I used Quicken for about 4 years before I thought about MS Money. Then for an entire year, I used Quicken 2003 and Money 2003 at the same time. > 1.) The first thing that stands out is the Money homepage. Here you can edit a lot of content that suits your needs. > 2.) Another nice feature would be how Money allows you to edit transactions. This comes especially handy when cleaning up for reporting and tax season. > 3.) Money has a much better user interface then Quicken (my opinion). > 4.) Bills & Deposit: right from the homepage you can see what you have coming. It also plays into the forecast. Very easy to setup and customize. > 5.) If you have PocketPC, you can download your money to your device (nothing for smartphone). This utility can be downloaded via the Money website and uses ActiveSync. Great toy ;-). > One downside is the auto-reconcile feature. Quicken has this mastered. When downloading transaction from bank, Quicken will auto-balance. In Money, you have to click a few things, but it still does the same job. > In closing, I am now a Money user. I uninstalled Quicken and only use Money now. Download the 30-day trial of Money 2004. Import your Quicken data and play for awhile. I think you will like it, it does take some getting used to. So be patient.... Thanks, Tim Believe it or not my Quicken data file is hugh and growing by leaps and bounds daily. It is about 145 MB. It somehow got corrupted awhile back, I think when I converted the data in the Q03 installation. Quicken, as you know, has no Support except at $2 a minute but I realized an Export/Import was the only fix. I did so with every precaution I could think of but still after several attempts to get the best transfer I have hours of fixes because of the archaic nature of the QIF files. The program doesn't handle transfers and split trans too well. I downloaded the trial version of Money and it handled the conversion perfectly with no problems I have found so far. The file is about 25 MB. Is this pretty normal in size for Money? I can fix the result (with hours spent) and it reduces the file size to about 7MB but I felt Intuit left me out to dry. I have a few questions if you would be so kind as to help me in my decision. 1. I use a Quicken Visa and it download the transactions, virtually all my living expenses. Can I do this with Money comparably? 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on the card. Can I do something like this in Money? 3. Is the 25 MB data file size normal for an active Money file? Thanks, |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| They are both the same in many ways. I used Quicken for about 4 years before I thought about MS Money. Then for an entire year, I used Quicken 2003 and Money 2003 at the same time. 1.) The first thing that stands out is the Money homepage. Here you can edit a lot of content that suits your needs. 2.) Another nice feature would be how Money allows you to edit transactions. This comes especially handy when cleaning up for reporting and tax season 3.) Money has a much better user interface then Quicken (my opinion) 4.) Bills & Deposit: right from the homepage you can see what you have coming. It also plays into the forecast. Very easy to setup and customize 5.) If you have PocketPC, you can download your money to your device (nothing for smartphone). This utility can be downloaded via the Money website and uses ActiveSync. Great toy ;-) One downside is the auto-reconcile feature. Quicken has this mastered. When downloading transaction from bank, Quicken will auto-balance. In Money, you have to click a few things, but it still does the same job In closing, I am now a Money user. I uninstalled Quicken and only use Money now. Download the 30-day trial of Money 2004. Import your Quicken data and play for awhile. I think you will like it, it does take some getting used to. So be patient... ----- Tim Koltek wrote: ---- How does Money compare to Quicken Tim Kolte tkoltek[at]hotmail.co |
| | |||
| |||
| check with the websites and compare? read all the stuff including any footnotes. i get money free with rebates and taxcut purchase every year so that's what i use. - quote - > -----Original Message----- > How does Money compare to Quicken? > Tim Koltek > tkoltek[at]hotmail.com > . |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| How does Money compare to Quicken? Tim Koltek tkoltek[at]hotmail.com |
| Tags |
| money, quicken |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Quicken Won't Do It - Will Money? John Graf: I use Quicken. When I ask it to produce a report showing a historical value of investments, it shows only investments that are still owned today.... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 08-10-2003 01:31 PM | |
| Quicken and Money Jim K: I do not want to use MS Money. I use Quicken, when I down load my bank statement in Quicken format it automaticly goes to MS Money. How can I stop... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 07-30-2003 11:16 AM | |
| Money and Quicken Jim K: I use Quicken. I just got a new computer with Money installed. When I down load my bank ststement in Quicken format it goes to Money. How can I... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-26-2003 02:59 PM | |
| Money vs Quicken ? Zorian: Can anyone suggest which is better? Thanks! | Microsoft Money | 6 | 07-06-2003 05:31 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |