Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Microsoft Money

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #15  
Old 02-01-2004, 10:59 AM
Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money VS. Quicken

On Q2000 I was able to set price limits alerts offline for
any investment. When trying to move to Q2003, it no longer
allows offline price alerts setting - must update price
alert limits on a Quicken webpage (so need to be online)
and it only allows alerts for assets Quicken knows about
i.e. stocks and mutual funds. Each release of Quicken
removes user-friendly functionaility functionality.

I'm trying to migrate to MS Money but have found that the
cnoversion capabilities do not convert Quicken Inventory data.

Too bad. I have too much data to rebuild manuualy. Guess
I'm stuck.

My 2 cents

- quote -

> -----Original Message-----
> "Bill Saxon" <bsaxon[at]adelphia.net> wrote in message
> news:a3d46d42.0312280548.438a6243[at]posting.google.com...
> > ...I have a few questions if you would be so kind as to

help me in my
> decision.
> > > 1. I use a Quicken Visa and it download the

transactions, virtually
> > all my living expenses. Can I do this with Money

comparably?
> > 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on

the card.
> > Can I do something like this in Money?

> I've been doing exactly what you want to do for several

years and am happy
> with the system.
> I use Wachovia and a BankOne VISA card (formerly FirstUSA)

to pay for
> everything. Where I feel confident in the vendor and can

arrange it, I have
> routine bills debited directly to one or the other.

Examples of that are
> local utilities and mortgage debit checking, and cell

phone debits the
> credit card. The credit card debits the checking account

for last month's
> balance, less any credits that occur in the interim.
> In addition to the vendors that will debit my accounts

directly, I use
> Wachovia online bill pay (through Money, not the web-based

version) to pay
> both scheduled and unscheduled bills. Wachovia either

prints and mails a
> check, or pays the vendor directly using the ACH system.

It's transparent to
> me.
> All transactions are downloaded directly into Money as

they're posted. For
> checks issued by Wachovia, a separate transaction marks

the checks as
> cleared when cashed by the vendor. Money will remember the

last category for
> a vendor, if you set the options to do that. You can also

have several
> aliases for the same vendor name, e.g., Target 123 and

Target 456 can both
> convert automatically to just plain Target. You can edit

the list of aliases
> if you make an association in error.
> I only use a debit/ATM card for cash withdrawals. I

occasionally buy
> something small with it just so I can get cash back from

the store.
> Otherwise all other retail transactions are made with my

Visa card and paid
> off at the end of the cycle. Since everything is

downloaded automatically,
> there's little editing required by me to get everything

recorded properly.
> Budget actuals and tax history are easy to review as a result.
> If your bank doesn't support direct banking with Money,

you can still use
> Checkfree or an equivalent vendor. I don't recommend using

your bank's
> web-based bill pay, if they don't support Money directly.

In my opinion, it
> defeats the purpose. If the number of transactions is low,

though, perhaps
> you'll not find that a problem.
> --
> Chris Cowles,
> Gainesville, FL
> .

  #14  
Old 01-01-2004, 12:44 AM
Chris Cowles
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money VS. Quicken


"Bill Saxon" <bsaxon[at]adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:a3d46d42.0312280548.438a6243[at]posting.google.com...
- quote -

> ...I have a few questions if you would be so kind as to help me in my
decision.
> 1. I use a Quicken Visa and it download the transactions, virtually
> all my living expenses. Can I do this with Money comparably?
> 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on the card.
> Can I do something like this in Money?


I've been doing exactly what you want to do for several years and am happy
with the system.

I use Wachovia and a BankOne VISA card (formerly FirstUSA) to pay for
everything. Where I feel confident in the vendor and can arrange it, I have
routine bills debited directly to one or the other. Examples of that are
local utilities and mortgage debit checking, and cell phone debits the
credit card. The credit card debits the checking account for last month's
balance, less any credits that occur in the interim.

In addition to the vendors that will debit my accounts directly, I use
Wachovia online bill pay (through Money, not the web-based version) to pay
both scheduled and unscheduled bills. Wachovia either prints and mails a
check, or pays the vendor directly using the ACH system. It's transparent to
me.

All transactions are downloaded directly into Money as they're posted. For
checks issued by Wachovia, a separate transaction marks the checks as
cleared when cashed by the vendor. Money will remember the last category for
a vendor, if you set the options to do that. You can also have several
aliases for the same vendor name, e.g., Target 123 and Target 456 can both
convert automatically to just plain Target. You can edit the list of aliases
if you make an association in error.

I only use a debit/ATM card for cash withdrawals. I occasionally buy
something small with it just so I can get cash back from the store.
Otherwise all other retail transactions are made with my Visa card and paid
off at the end of the cycle. Since everything is downloaded automatically,
there's little editing required by me to get everything recorded properly.
Budget actuals and tax history are easy to review as a result.

If your bank doesn't support direct banking with Money, you can still use
Checkfree or an equivalent vendor. I don't recommend using your bank's
web-based bill pay, if they don't support Money directly. In my opinion, it
defeats the purpose. If the number of transactions is low, though, perhaps
you'll not find that a problem.
--
Chris Cowles,
Gainesville, FL


  #13  
Old 12-30-2003, 12:24 AM
se
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money VS. Quicken

- quote -

> 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on the card.
> Can I do something like this in Money?


Yes, you can do this directly from Money. I set up long ago in an older
version of Money, but I would hazrd you do this by going to your Account
List, then select 'Manage Online Services" on the left. Then click 'set up
electronic bill pay service' near the bottom center.

- quote -

> 3. Is the 25 MB data file size normal for an active Money file?
my file is about 19MB. Thats about 17 active accounts, some with multi-year
histories, and a stock portfolio.


"Bill Saxon" <bsaxon[at]adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:a3d46d42.0312280548.438a6243[at]posting.google.com...
- quote -

> "Jason" <anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:<316F4158-5901-4E65-81B7-2C68790F8203[at]microsoft.com> ...
> > They are both the same in many ways. I used Quicken for about 4 years

before I thought about MS Money. Then for an entire year, I used Quicken
2003 and Money 2003 at the same time.
- quote -

> > > 1.) The first thing that stands out is the Money homepage. Here you can
edit a lot of content that suits your needs.
> > 2.) Another nice feature would be how Money allows you to edit

transactions. This comes especially handy when cleaning up for reporting and
tax season.
- quote -

> > 3.) Money has a much better user interface then Quicken (my opinion).
> > 4.) Bills & Deposit: right from the homepage you can see what you have

coming. It also plays into the forecast. Very easy to setup and customize.
> > 5.) If you have PocketPC, you can download your money to your device

(nothing for smartphone). This utility can be downloaded via the Money
website and uses ActiveSync. Great toy ;-).
- quote -

> > > One downside is the auto-reconcile feature. Quicken has this mastered.
When downloading transaction from bank, Quicken will auto-balance. In Money,
you have to click a few things, but it still does the same job.
- quote -

> > > In closing, I am now a Money user. I uninstalled Quicken and only use
Money now. Download the 30-day trial of Money 2004. Import your Quicken data
and play for awhile. I think you will like it, it does take some getting
used to. So be patient....
- quote -

> > > Thanks, Tim
> Believe it or not my Quicken data file is hugh and growing by leaps
> and bounds daily. It is about 145 MB. It somehow got corrupted
> awhile back, I think when I converted the data in the Q03
> installation.
> Quicken, as you know, has no Support except at $2 a minute but I
> realized an Export/Import was the only fix. I did so with every
> precaution I could think of but still after several attempts to get
> the best transfer I have hours of fixes because of the archaic nature
> of the QIF files. The program doesn't handle transfers and split
> trans too well.
> I downloaded the trial version of Money and it handled the conversion
> perfectly with no problems I have found so far. The file is about 25
> MB. Is this pretty normal in size for Money?
> I can fix the result (with hours spent) and it reduces the file size
> to about 7MB but I felt Intuit left me out to dry. I have a few
> questions if you would be so kind as to help me in my decision.
> 1. I use a Quicken Visa and it download the transactions, virtually
> all my living expenses. Can I do this with Money comparably?
> 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on the card.
> Can I do something like this in Money?
> 3. Is the 25 MB data file size normal for an active Money file?
> Thanks,



  #12  
Old 12-29-2003, 03:07 PM
Arge
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money VS. Quicken

Hi Dick

I find it very annoying and usually do not read the post if I have to scroll
to the bottom to read it. I (as you can see) also "top post"

Bob
"Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in
message news:ONJHBShzDHA.1688[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> What word would you use for this practice?
> I top post for two reasons: 1) I use a newsreader that encourages it. 2)
> Many (most) people who use this newsgroup use it from interfaces that are
> NOT text based--i.e., not terminal emulators--and always show the top of a
> post most prominently and require scrolling to the bottom rather than
> spewing all of the text and requiring scrolling to get back to the top.
> <Trent©> wrote in message

news:3ra0vvo5pm3ni2c7g9ngen1ptu84ubngid[at]4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 14:06:07 -0700, "Dick Watson"
> > <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote:
> > > > But if you go back to Quicken, it really won't hurt many feelings here.

> Why
> > > does everybody feel compelled to threaten us with this when we, by and
> > > large, really couldn't care less?
> > > Why do you consider that a threat?
> > > And why do you top post? lol



  #11  
Old 12-29-2003, 02:24 PM
Bob Becnel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money VS. Quicken



- quote -

> 3. Is the 25 MB data file size normal for an active Money file?
My file size is around 20 MB and has stayed pretty consistent. I feel
that I have a great deal of data in my file, so 20 MB is probably above
average.

Bob
  #10  
Old 12-29-2003, 01:03 PM
Dick Watson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money VS. Quicken

What word would you use for this practice?

I top post for two reasons: 1) I use a newsreader that encourages it. 2)
Many (most) people who use this newsgroup use it from interfaces that are
NOT text based--i.e., not terminal emulators--and always show the top of a
post most prominently and require scrolling to the bottom rather than
spewing all of the text and requiring scrolling to get back to the top.

<Trent©> wrote in message news:3ra0vvo5pm3ni2c7g9ngen1ptu84ubngid[at]4ax.com...
- quote -

> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 14:06:07 -0700, "Dick Watson"
> <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote:
> > But if you go back to Quicken, it really won't hurt many feelings here.

Why
> > does everybody feel compelled to threaten us with this when we, by and
> > large, really couldn't care less?

> Why do you consider that a threat?
> And why do you top post? lol



  #9  
Old 12-29-2003, 12:26 PM
Trent©
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money VS. Quicken

On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 14:06:07 -0700, "Dick Watson"
<littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote:

- quote -

> But if you go back to Quicken, it really won't hurt many feelings here. Why
> does everybody feel compelled to threaten us with this when we, by and
> large, really couldn't care less?


Why do you consider that a threat?

And why do you top post? lol


Have a nice week...

Trent

Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity!
  #8  
Old 12-28-2003, 08:06 PM
Dick Watson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money VS. Quicken

You'll probably get a lot farther starting a new thread rather than jumping
in an unrelated thread.

Are you talking about auto balancing to downloaded transactions? Have you
tried Tools|Options|Online Services|Automatically mark accepted transactions
as reconciled (R)?

But if you go back to Quicken, it really won't hurt many feelings here. Why
does everybody feel compelled to threaten us with this when we, by and
large, really couldn't care less?

"Karen" <anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:010d01c3cd81$74770be0$a401280a[at]phx.gbl...
- quote -

> What few things do you need to click to auto balance in
> Money like Quicken? I am pulling my hair out with the
> auto balance/reconcile thing on Money. I am seriously
> considering going back to Quicken over this.



  #7  
Old 12-28-2003, 07:30 PM
Karen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Money VS. Quicken

What few things do you need to click to auto balance in
Money like Quicken? I am pulling my hair out with the
auto balance/reconcile thing on Money. I am seriously
considering going back to Quicken over this.


- quote -

> -----Original Message-----
> They are both the same in many ways. I used Quicken for

about 4 years before I thought about MS Money. Then for an
entire year, I used Quicken 2003 and Money 2003 at the
same time.
- quote -

> 1.) The first thing that stands out is the Money
homepage. Here you can edit a lot of content that suits
your needs.
- quote -

> 2.) Another nice feature would be how Money allows you to
edit transactions. This comes especially handy when
cleaning up for reporting and tax season.
- quote -

> 3.) Money has a much better user interface then Quicken
(my opinion).
> 4.) Bills & Deposit: right from the homepage you can see

what you have coming. It also plays into the forecast.
Very easy to setup and customize.
- quote -

> 5.) If you have PocketPC, you can download your money to
your device (nothing for smartphone). This utility can be
downloaded via the Money website and uses ActiveSync.
Great toy ;-).
- quote -

> One downside is the auto-reconcile feature. Quicken has
this mastered. When downloading transaction from bank,
Quicken will auto-balance. In Money, you have to click a
few things, but it still does the same job.
- quote -

> In closing, I am now a Money user. I uninstalled Quicken
and only use Money now. Download the 30-day trial of Money
2004. Import your Quicken data and play for awhile. I
think you will like it, it does take some getting used to.
So be patient....
- quote -

> ----- Tim Koltek wrote: -----
> How does Money compare to Quicken?
> Tim Koltek
> tkoltek[at]hotmail.com
> .

  #6  
Old 12-28-2003, 03:02 PM
anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Re: Money VS. Quicken

what....you have not been using auto-pay? i've used auto-
pay for 20+ years now and have no problems. it is too
much trouble sitting and paying bills. surfing to the
sites and doing all that work....
check out auto-pay....save time.
--- ""At any rate, I pay most of my bills by actually going
to the vendor's site...MBNA,electric company, etc...and
paying directly to them. A couple of mybills I pay thru
my bank...for vendor's that don't have a web site set up
for direct pay.""
-----------------------------------------
- quote -

> -----Original Message-----
> On 28 Dec 2003 05:48:27 -0800, bsaxon[at]adelphia.net (Bill

Saxon) wrote:
> > I downloaded the trial version of Money and it handled

the conversion
> > perfectly with no problems I have found so far. The

file is about 25
> > MB. Is this pretty normal in size for Money?

> Hi, Bill...
> I'm not Tim...lol...but...
> My file for the first year is about 4 meg. But I do

only personal,
> simple stuff.
> > 1. I use a Quicken Visa and it download the

transactions, virtually
> > all my living expenses. Can I do this with Money

comparably?
> Yes...quite easily.
> > 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go

on the card.
> > Can I do something like this in Money?

> MONEY doesn't actually pay the bills, does it? At any

rate, I pay
> most of my bills by actually going to the vendor's

site...MBNA,
> electric company, etc...and paying directly to them. A

couple of my
> bills I pay thru my bank...for vendor's that don't have

a web site set
> up for direct pay.
> All this is accessed thru my browser. And there's no

charge for any
> of this, of course.
> I like paying my bills thru the vendor when I

can...which is for most
> of my bills. There's only a day lag time that

way...which means I can
> keep my money working longer for me that way. When I

pay thru the
> bank, they suggest a 7-10 day lead time...which is way

too much for my
> liking.
> > 3. Is the 25 MB data file size normal for an active

Money file?
> I don't think there IS a normal size, Bill. Everybody

would have a
> different size...depending on their usage.
> My wife has an OE index file on her computer that's

approaching 1 gig
> in size...without any major problems. So I would hope

MS has
> incorporated that database technology into Money.
> I personally like the cash flow graph. The only minor

gripe I have
> about that...they don't have an automatic setting that

will do a
> forecast from the current date to the end of the year.

But you CAN
> easily set up a scenario for that.
> I have a coupla other minor gripes, too. But, all in

all, its a very
> good program (2003).
> Good luck.
> Have a nice week...
> Trent
> Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity!
> .

  #5  
Old 12-28-2003, 02:44 PM
NickKnight
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money VS. Quicken

On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 08:16:16 -0000, "Peter Wilkin"
<pw2[at]orbitsville.net.NOSPAM> wrote:

- quote -

> "morjana" <morjana[at]msn.com> wrote in message
> news:7056b415.0312272356.5d7bb2fe[at]posting.google.com...
> > SciFi Channel has an interim web site up for Stargate Atlantis at:
> > > http://www.scifi.com/atlantis/
> > > So far, just a very nice graphic with a copy of their press release

> > announcing the new series.

> Just some promo blurb
> I do like the line near the bottom
> 'SCI FI Channel is a television network where "what if" is what's on.'
> Probably why they cancelled Farscape, it was an exercise in "what if we
> cancel one of our most popular shows, home much of our audience will cancell
> their subscriptions" sort of thing

I use Money 2000 and Quicken 99. The Money file is about 13 meg, the
quicken files are about 2.68 meg.

Until recently if you wanted your financial files on the PPC you had
to use Money. You can now get Pocket Quicken for the PPC.

I will forever stay with Money 2000, since Microsoft in their infinite
wisdom stopped supporting the HPC platform.


------------ "It took us 15 years to McGyver this thing."
-------------------------Carter on Stargate

To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from
my e-mail address.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #4  
Old 12-28-2003, 02:28 PM
Trent©
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money VS. Quicken

On 28 Dec 2003 05:48:27 -0800, bsaxon[at]adelphia.net (Bill Saxon) wrote:


- quote -

> I downloaded the trial version of Money and it handled the conversion
> perfectly with no problems I have found so far. The file is about 25
> MB. Is this pretty normal in size for Money?


Hi, Bill...

I'm not Tim...lol...but...

My file for the first year is about 4 meg. But I do only personal,
simple stuff.

- quote -

> 1. I use a Quicken Visa and it download the transactions, virtually
> all my living expenses. Can I do this with Money comparably?


Yes...quite easily.

- quote -

> 2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on the card.
> Can I do something like this in Money?


MONEY doesn't actually pay the bills, does it? At any rate, I pay
most of my bills by actually going to the vendor's site...MBNA,
electric company, etc...and paying directly to them. A couple of my
bills I pay thru my bank...for vendor's that don't have a web site set
up for direct pay.

All this is accessed thru my browser. And there's no charge for any
of this, of course.

I like paying my bills thru the vendor when I can...which is for most
of my bills. There's only a day lag time that way...which means I can
keep my money working longer for me that way. When I pay thru the
bank, they suggest a 7-10 day lead time...which is way too much for my
liking.

- quote -

> 3. Is the 25 MB data file size normal for an active Money file?

I don't think there IS a normal size, Bill. Everybody would have a
different size...depending on their usage.

My wife has an OE index file on her computer that's approaching 1 gig
in size...without any major problems. So I would hope MS has
incorporated that database technology into Money.

I personally like the cash flow graph. The only minor gripe I have
about that...they don't have an automatic setting that will do a
forecast from the current date to the end of the year. But you CAN
easily set up a scenario for that.

I have a coupla other minor gripes, too. But, all in all, its a very
good program (2003).

Good luck.


Have a nice week...

Trent

Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity!
  #3  
Old 12-28-2003, 02:07 PM
Trent©
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money VS. Quicken

On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 23:21:05 -0800, "Jason"
<anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

- quote -

> They are both the same in many ways. I used Quicken for about 4 years before I thought about MS Money. Then for an entire year, I used Quicken 2003 and Money 2003 at the same time.
> 1.) The first thing that stands out is the Money homepage. Here you can edit a lot of content that suits your needs.
> 2.) Another nice feature would be how Money allows you to edit transactions. This comes especially handy when cleaning up for reporting and tax season.
> 3.) Money has a much better user interface then Quicken (my opinion).
> 4.) Bills & Deposit: right from the homepage you can see what you have coming. It also plays into the forecast. Very easy to setup and customize.
> 5.) If you have PocketPC, you can download your money to your device (nothing for smartphone). This utility can be downloaded via the Money website and uses ActiveSync. Great toy ;-).
> One downside is the auto-reconcile feature. Quicken has this mastered. When downloading transaction from bank, Quicken will auto-balance. In Money, you have to click a few things, but it still does the same job.


I thought the 2004 version of Money does this also.


Have a nice week...

Trent

Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity!
  #2  
Old 12-28-2003, 12:48 PM
Bill Saxon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money VS. Quicken

"Jason" <anonymous[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:<316F4158-5901-4E65-81B7-2C68790F8203[at]microsoft.com> ...
- quote -

> They are both the same in many ways. I used Quicken for about 4 years before I thought about MS Money. Then for an entire year, I used Quicken 2003 and Money 2003 at the same time.
> 1.) The first thing that stands out is the Money homepage. Here you can edit a lot of content that suits your needs.
> 2.) Another nice feature would be how Money allows you to edit transactions. This comes especially handy when cleaning up for reporting and tax season.
> 3.) Money has a much better user interface then Quicken (my opinion).
> 4.) Bills & Deposit: right from the homepage you can see what you have coming. It also plays into the forecast. Very easy to setup and customize.
> 5.) If you have PocketPC, you can download your money to your device (nothing for smartphone). This utility can be downloaded via the Money website and uses ActiveSync. Great toy ;-).
> One downside is the auto-reconcile feature. Quicken has this mastered. When downloading transaction from bank, Quicken will auto-balance. In Money, you have to click a few things, but it still does the same job.
> In closing, I am now a Money user. I uninstalled Quicken and only use Money now. Download the 30-day trial of Money 2004. Import your Quicken data and play for awhile. I think you will like it, it does take some getting used to. So be patient....

Thanks, Tim

Believe it or not my Quicken data file is hugh and growing by leaps
and bounds daily. It is about 145 MB. It somehow got corrupted
awhile back, I think when I converted the data in the Q03
installation.

Quicken, as you know, has no Support except at $2 a minute but I
realized an Export/Import was the only fix. I did so with every
precaution I could think of but still after several attempts to get
the best transfer I have hours of fixes because of the archaic nature
of the QIF files. The program doesn't handle transfers and split
trans too well.

I downloaded the trial version of Money and it handled the conversion
perfectly with no problems I have found so far. The file is about 25
MB. Is this pretty normal in size for Money?

I can fix the result (with hours spent) and it reduces the file size
to about 7MB but I felt Intuit left me out to dry. I have a few
questions if you would be so kind as to help me in my decision.

1. I use a Quicken Visa and it download the transactions, virtually
all my living expenses. Can I do this with Money comparably?
2. I use Checkfree to pay all my bills that don't go on the card.
Can I do something like this in Money?
3. Is the 25 MB data file size normal for an active Money file?


Thanks,
  #1  
Old 12-28-2003, 06:21 AM
Jason
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Money VS. Quicken

They are both the same in many ways. I used Quicken for about 4 years before I thought about MS Money. Then for an entire year, I used Quicken 2003 and Money 2003 at the same time.

1.) The first thing that stands out is the Money homepage. Here you can edit a lot of content that suits your needs.
2.) Another nice feature would be how Money allows you to edit transactions. This comes especially handy when cleaning up for reporting and tax season
3.) Money has a much better user interface then Quicken (my opinion)
4.) Bills & Deposit: right from the homepage you can see what you have coming. It also plays into the forecast. Very easy to setup and customize
5.) If you have PocketPC, you can download your money to your device (nothing for smartphone). This utility can be downloaded via the Money website and uses ActiveSync. Great toy ;-)

One downside is the auto-reconcile feature. Quicken has this mastered. When downloading transaction from bank, Quicken will auto-balance. In Money, you have to click a few things, but it still does the same job

In closing, I am now a Money user. I uninstalled Quicken and only use Money now. Download the 30-day trial of Money 2004. Import your Quicken data and play for awhile. I think you will like it, it does take some getting used to. So be patient...

----- Tim Koltek wrote: ----

How does Money compare to Quicken

Tim Kolte
tkoltek[at]hotmail.co



 
Old 12-28-2003, 01:36 AM
anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Money VS. Quicken

check with the websites and compare?
read all the stuff including any footnotes.
i get money free with rebates and taxcut purchase every
year so that's what i use.

- quote -

> -----Original Message-----
> How does Money compare to Quicken?
> Tim Koltek
> tkoltek[at]hotmail.com
> .

  #-1  
Old 12-28-2003, 12:38 AM
Tim Koltek
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Money VS. Quicken

How does Money compare to Quicken?

Tim Koltek
tkoltek[at]hotmail.com


 

Tags
money, quicken
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Quicken Won't Do It - Will Money?
John Graf: I use Quicken. When I ask it to produce a report showing a historical value of investments, it shows only investments that are still owned today....
Microsoft Money 3 08-10-2003 01:31 PM
Quicken and Money
Jim K: I do not want to use MS Money. I use Quicken, when I down load my bank statement in Quicken format it automaticly goes to MS Money. How can I stop...
Microsoft Money 3 07-30-2003 11:16 AM
Money and Quicken
Jim K: I use Quicken. I just got a new computer with Money installed. When I down load my bank ststement in Quicken format it goes to Money. How can I...
Microsoft Money 1 07-26-2003 02:59 PM
Money vs Quicken ?
Zorian: Can anyone suggest which is better? Thanks!
Microsoft Money 6 07-06-2003 05:31 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:45 AM.