|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "David" <david[at]*removethisbit*networkdesigns.co.uk> wrote in message news:3f0f11eb$0$29681$fa0fcedb[at]lovejoy.zen.co.uk... - quote - > "Stuart" <chamber[at]egroup.ca> wrote in message
Yes, no early redemption penalties is important to moving lenders but> news:61253f70.0307110940.3b918b41[at]posting.google.com... > > Hi - > > > Anyone I should explicitly avoid? Any issues I should be aware of > > which are particular to the UK market that I need to deal with (i.e. > > can I transfer mortgages after, say, 2 years by which time I would > > hope to have a profile more acceptable to High Street banks? > > As long as you go for a mortgage which has no early redemption penalties, or > which is "portable" then moving to a new lender further down the line is not > a problem. > -- > David Miles > Independent Corporate Planning > ------------------- > For instant mortgage quotes visit > www.icplanning.co.uk > ------------------- portability will not help move lender, only move house and stay with current lender. Besides, the guy will not get what he wants (105%, self cert) so the point is moot. Arfie |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| In article <61253f70.0307110940.3b918b41[at]posting.google.com> , Stuart <chamber[at]egroup.ca> writes - quote - > Anyone I should explicitly avoid?
Anyone who would lend you money on the terms you want.I cant believe that your question is serious! -- Richard Faulkner |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Stephen" <indiantravelcompany[at]yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:bemvqo$ufp$1[at]news7.svr.pol.co.uk... - quote - > Doug Ramage <doug-ramage[at]lineone.net> wrote in message
Doug Ramage> news:bemv5r$74cnh$1[at]ID-34015.news.uni-berlin.de... > > > "Stuart" <chamber[at]egroup.ca> wrote in message > > news:61253f70.0307110940.3b918b41[at]posting.google.com... > > > Hi - > > > > > I want to apply for a mortgage of £400k. Ideally it would be interest > > > only and for 105% of the purchase price to accommodate legal and > > > related fees. > > > > > I have a few things working against me - I am self-employed, without > > > accounts and have been resident in the UK for less than 3 years. In > > > one high street bank's words, I am "looking for all the variables". > > > > > Working in my favour are several matters - the real estate market is > > > depressed, so the lender would be holding a security which - according > > > to most analysts - will soon rise in value. Also, I have excellent > > > reference letters from landlords over the last 5 years for both my > > > personal accommodation as well as office space indicating that I > > > honour my monthly commitments. My credit record is strong. > > > > > So - no doubt I will be taking a hit with a non-high street lender who > > > will take advantage of my situation. How do I minimise the hit? Are > > > there recommendations for lenders or mortgage brokers which treat > > > their customers more fairly than others? > > > > > Anyone I should explicitly avoid? Any issues I should be aware of > > > which are particular to the UK market that I need to deal with (i.e. > > > can I transfer mortgages after, say, 2 years by which time I would > > > hope to have a profile more acceptable to High Street banks? > > > > > Thanks, > > > Stu > > > Unfortunately, I don't think you will any lender for this deal - not > without > > more security/guarantee. > > -- > > Doug Ramage > I was allways under the impression the general rule was that if your > "unsecured with no accounts" your generally talking about putting up at > least 25% as an absolute golden minimum. > But I have also seen those adverts claiming to offer 105% etc.etc. on > various deals.. > Are they true? Will people actually lend on those kind of terms? Or perhaps > only if you have prooven historical records with a good income? > > Both those options are available - but not together, AFAIK. -- |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Doug Ramage <doug-ramage[at]lineone.net> wrote in message news:bemv5r$74cnh$1[at]ID-34015.news.uni-berlin.de... - quote - > "Stuart" <chamber[at]egroup.ca> wrote in message > news:61253f70.0307110940.3b918b41[at]posting.google.com... > > Hi - > > > I want to apply for a mortgage of £400k. Ideally it would be interest > > only and for 105% of the purchase price to accommodate legal and > > related fees. > > > I have a few things working against me - I am self-employed, without > > accounts and have been resident in the UK for less than 3 years. In > > one high street bank's words, I am "looking for all the variables". > > > Working in my favour are several matters - the real estate market is > > depressed, so the lender would be holding a security which - according > > to most analysts - will soon rise in value. Also, I have excellent > > reference letters from landlords over the last 5 years for both my > > personal accommodation as well as office space indicating that I > > honour my monthly commitments. My credit record is strong. > > > So - no doubt I will be taking a hit with a non-high street lender who > > will take advantage of my situation. How do I minimise the hit? Are > > there recommendations for lenders or mortgage brokers which treat > > their customers more fairly than others? > > > Anyone I should explicitly avoid? Any issues I should be aware of > > which are particular to the UK market that I need to deal with (i.e. > > can I transfer mortgages after, say, 2 years by which time I would > > hope to have a profile more acceptable to High Street banks? > > > Thanks, > > Stu > Unfortunately, I don't think you will any lender for this deal - not without > more security/guarantee. > -- > Doug Ramage I was allways under the impression the general rule was that if your "unsecured with no accounts" your generally talking about putting up at least 25% as an absolute golden minimum. But I have also seen those adverts claiming to offer 105% etc.etc. on various deals.. Are they true? Will people actually lend on those kind of terms? Or perhaps only if you have prooven historical records with a good income? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Stuart" <chamber[at]egroup.ca> wrote in message news:61253f70.0307110940.3b918b41[at]posting.google.com... - quote - > Hi -
Someone who thinks that it will be possible to get a 'no status' mortgage> I want to apply for a mortgage of £400k. Ideally it would be interest > only and for 105% of the purchase price to accommodate legal and > related fees. > I have a few things working against me - I am self-employed, without > accounts and have been resident in the UK for less than 3 years. In > one high street bank's words, I am "looking for all the variables". for more than about 75% LTV is living in cloud-cookoo land. Lenders expect to see the purchasor taking some of the risk, if they were in the business of taking all the risk themselves they'd be the ones buying the properties to rent out in the first place. - quote - > Working in my favour are several matters - the real estate market is
Even if this were true, it would count for nothing, as above, lenders lend> depressed, so the lender would be holding a security which - according > to most analysts - will soon rise in value. money for the (smallish) lending premium, if they wanted to take the capital risk they'd be buying the properties themselves - quote - > Also, I have excellent
So what?> reference letters from landlords over the last 5 years for both my > personal accommodation as well as office space indicating that I > honour my monthly commitments. - quote - > My credit record is strong.
No-one will take advantage, they will show you the door whilst trying to> So - no doubt I will be taking a hit with a non-high street lender who > will take advantage of my situation. supress a fit of laughter. - quote - > How do I minimise the hit? Are
Define fair? I can't see any way that "lending money to someone who> there recommendations for lenders or mortgage brokers which treat > their customers more fairly than others? can't prove that they can pay it back" fits the bill? - quote - > Anyone I should explicitly avoid? Any issues I should be aware of
And if you have a loss you declare bankruptcy and walk away.> which are particular to the UK market that I need to deal with (i.e. > can I transfer mortgages after, say, 2 years by which time I would > hope to have a profile more acceptable to High Street banks? As you're not putting anything into this deal, why should a bank? Tim - quote - > Thanks, > Stu |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Stuart" <chamber[at]egroup.ca> wrote in message news:61253f70.0307110940.3b918b41[at]posting.google.com... - quote - > Hi -
Unfortunately, I don't think you will any lender for this deal - not without> I want to apply for a mortgage of £400k. Ideally it would be interest > only and for 105% of the purchase price to accommodate legal and > related fees. > I have a few things working against me - I am self-employed, without > accounts and have been resident in the UK for less than 3 years. In > one high street bank's words, I am "looking for all the variables". > Working in my favour are several matters - the real estate market is > depressed, so the lender would be holding a security which - according > to most analysts - will soon rise in value. Also, I have excellent > reference letters from landlords over the last 5 years for both my > personal accommodation as well as office space indicating that I > honour my monthly commitments. My credit record is strong. > So - no doubt I will be taking a hit with a non-high street lender who > will take advantage of my situation. How do I minimise the hit? Are > there recommendations for lenders or mortgage brokers which treat > their customers more fairly than others? > Anyone I should explicitly avoid? Any issues I should be aware of > which are particular to the UK market that I need to deal with (i.e. > can I transfer mortgages after, say, 2 years by which time I would > hope to have a profile more acceptable to High Street banks? > Thanks, > Stu more security/guarantee. -- Doug Ramage |
| | |||
| |||
| "Stuart" <chamber[at]egroup.ca> wrote in message news:61253f70.0307110940.3b918b41[at]posting.google.com... - quote - > Working in my favour are several matters - the real estate market is
This is *uk*.consultants. I don't know where you're writing about, but> depressed, so the lender would be holding a security which - according > to most analysts - will soon rise in value. anyone expecting house prices to go up is not talking about the UK market. See the Business section of the BBC News web site on almost any day over the last few months. -- Tim Ward - posting as an individual unless otherwise clear Brett Ward Ltd - www.brettward.co.uk Cambridge Accommodation Notice Board - www.brettward.co.uk/canb Cambridge City Councillor |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hi - I want to apply for a mortgage of £400k. Ideally it would be interest only and for 105% of the purchase price to accommodate legal and related fees. I have a few things working against me - I am self-employed, without accounts and have been resident in the UK for less than 3 years. In one high street bank's words, I am "looking for all the variables". Working in my favour are several matters - the real estate market is depressed, so the lender would be holding a security which - according to most analysts - will soon rise in value. Also, I have excellent reference letters from landlords over the last 5 years for both my personal accommodation as well as office space indicating that I honour my monthly commitments. My credit record is strong. So - no doubt I will be taking a hit with a non-high street lender who will take advantage of my situation. How do I minimise the hit? Are there recommendations for lenders or mortgage brokers which treat their customers more fairly than others? Anyone I should explicitly avoid? Any issues I should be aware of which are particular to the UK market that I need to deal with (i.e. can I transfer mortgages after, say, 2 years by which time I would hope to have a profile more acceptable to High Street banks? Thanks, Stu |
| Tags |
| accounts, company, mortgate, recommendation, selfemployed |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |