|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Cal is a user just like the rest of us (although a very knowledgeable one) and has no connection with Microsoft. So he can't give you the assurances that you seek on behalf of Microsoft. -- Regards Bob Peel, Microsoft MVP - Money For unofficial FAQs see http://money.mvps.org/ or http://umpmfaq.info/ I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for. "David Schwartz" <who4ever[at]optonline.net> wrote in message news:49127691$0$4899$607ed4bc[at]cv.net... - quote - > Sounds a little scary to me to put all my user names and passwords on a > single site. Do you vouch for its safety? > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message > news:rfk3h41fhjlqvb6dj7tfqtkb3l8lisddhj[at]4ax.com... > > In microsoft.public.money, David Schwartz wrote: > > > > Will it make my life easier? Right now I have to go to 8 different > > > institutions' websites, mainly banks, and log in, find the download page, > > > and download what I'm looking for into Money. Even though I only do it > > > once > > > a month, it does take quite a while. Will this service go to all of > > > these > > > institutions for me and do it all at once, then I just download all the > > > info > > > into MS Money at one time? > > > That's the plan, tho the statement fetching from those who provide > > their own OFX servers is usually more reliable. When the third party > > (Yodlee) gets the data, the process can be upset for a while if the > > institution changes the website layout. > > > The bigger brokers and a lot of credit cards have their own OFX > > servers. With banks, while many do that, the majority do not provide > > their own servers, and thus the third party info gathering (they go > > to the web site on your behalf using your credentials) is the method > > available for those banks. If you don't want that for a given > > institution, you could still reduce the number of websites you go to > > manually. > > > > That might be worth it. > > > You might even tend to do it more frequently that way. I like the > > more frequent checking so that my transactions are fresher in my > > mind. It is especially nice to check credit card accounts more > > frequently, in case some anomalous charge were to show up. > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message > > > news:6e92h4dpalu5kvci6r6ke00sfsee7vupv4[at]4ax.com... > > > > In microsoft.public.money, David Schwartz wrote: > > > > > > > > Are these worth signing up for? It gives me the impression that > > > > > Microsoft > > > > > will take over my MS Money database and put it online. > > > > > > > It is necessary if you want a third party contracted by Microsoft to > > > > provide access to your accounts. If you only use web page or direct > > > > OFX access to get data into your file, it is not needed. Look for > > > > the term "third party" on > > > > http://www.microsoft.com/money/bankonline.aspx > > > > Even tho this type of access is available, you may choose to not use > > > > it. There may be web statement download directly from your > > > > institution, and for that, no LiveID is needed. > > > > > > > > > > The info will be on an encrypted web site, using the same SSL > > > > protocol that banks use for their customer account websites. So it > > > > is only put online in the same sense that your bank puts your > > > > account info online. The LiveID is the access authentication method. > > > > > > > > Its hard to tell > > > > > what all of the BS is actually saying. Is there a fee? > > > > > > > No. > > > > > > > > Anyone familiar > > > > > with this seemingly MS hype? > > > > > Thanks > > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, David Schwartz wrote: - quote - > Sounds a little scary to me to put all my user names and passwords on a
Maybe http://privacy.microsoft.com/en-us/default.mspx or> single site. Do you vouch for its safety? http://privacy.microsoft.com/en-us/fullnotice.mspx#use would make you feel better. I don't even understand it all. So I don't vouch, but I don't have rational reasons to suspect danger. I use a mix of the direct OFX (no third party) and web statements (no third party) myself, tho I have at times set up the third party method for some accounts I consider less sensitive. In the case of credit cards, there are many fine ones that provide their own OFX servers. - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message > news:rfk3h41fhjlqvb6dj7tfqtkb3l8lisddhj[at]4ax.com... > > In microsoft.public.money, David Schwartz wrote: > > > > Will it make my life easier? Right now I have to go to 8 different > > > institutions' websites, mainly banks, and log in, find the download page, > > > and download what I'm looking for into Money. Even though I only do it > > > once > > > a month, it does take quite a while. Will this service go to all of these > > > institutions for me and do it all at once, then I just download all the > > > info > > > into MS Money at one time? > > > That's the plan, tho the statement fetching from those who provide > > their own OFX servers is usually more reliable. When the third party > > (Yodlee) gets the data, the process can be upset for a while if the > > institution changes the website layout. > > > The bigger brokers and a lot of credit cards have their own OFX > > servers. With banks, while many do that, the majority do not provide > > their own servers, and thus the third party info gathering (they go > > to the web site on your behalf using your credentials) is the method > > available for those banks. If you don't want that for a given > > institution, you could still reduce the number of websites you go to > > manually. > > > > That might be worth it. > > > You might even tend to do it more frequently that way. I like the > > more frequent checking so that my transactions are fresher in my > > mind. It is especially nice to check credit card accounts more > > frequently, in case some anomalous charge were to show up. > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message > > > news:6e92h4dpalu5kvci6r6ke00sfsee7vupv4[at]4ax.com... > > > > In microsoft.public.money, David Schwartz wrote: > > > > > > > > Are these worth signing up for? It gives me the impression that > > > > > Microsoft > > > > > will take over my MS Money database and put it online. > > > > > > > It is necessary if you want a third party contracted by Microsoft to > > > > provide access to your accounts. If you only use web page or direct > > > > OFX access to get data into your file, it is not needed. Look for > > > > the term "third party" on > > > > http://www.microsoft.com/money/bankonline.aspx > > > > Even tho this type of access is available, you may choose to not use > > > > it. There may be web statement download directly from your > > > > institution, and for that, no LiveID is needed. > > > > > > > > > > The info will be on an encrypted web site, using the same SSL > > > > protocol that banks use for their customer account websites. So it > > > > is only put online in the same sense that your bank puts your > > > > account info online. The LiveID is the access authentication method. > > > > > > > > Its hard to tell > > > > > what all of the BS is actually saying. Is there a fee? > > > > > > > No. > > > > > > > > Anyone familiar > > > > > with this seemingly MS hype? > > > > > Thanks > > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Sounds a little scary to me to put all my user names and passwords on a single site. Do you vouch for its safety? "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:rfk3h41fhjlqvb6dj7tfqtkb3l8lisddhj[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, David Schwartz wrote: > > Will it make my life easier? Right now I have to go to 8 different > > institutions' websites, mainly banks, and log in, find the download page, > > and download what I'm looking for into Money. Even though I only do it > > once > > a month, it does take quite a while. Will this service go to all of these > > institutions for me and do it all at once, then I just download all the > > info > > into MS Money at one time? > That's the plan, tho the statement fetching from those who provide > their own OFX servers is usually more reliable. When the third party > (Yodlee) gets the data, the process can be upset for a while if the > institution changes the website layout. > The bigger brokers and a lot of credit cards have their own OFX > servers. With banks, while many do that, the majority do not provide > their own servers, and thus the third party info gathering (they go > to the web site on your behalf using your credentials) is the method > available for those banks. If you don't want that for a given > institution, you could still reduce the number of websites you go to > manually. > > That might be worth it. > You might even tend to do it more frequently that way. I like the > more frequent checking so that my transactions are fresher in my > mind. It is especially nice to check credit card accounts more > frequently, in case some anomalous charge were to show up. > > Dave > > > > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message > > news:6e92h4dpalu5kvci6r6ke00sfsee7vupv4[at]4ax.com... > > > In microsoft.public.money, David Schwartz wrote: > > > > > > Are these worth signing up for? It gives me the impression that > > > > Microsoft > > > > will take over my MS Money database and put it online. > > > > > It is necessary if you want a third party contracted by Microsoft to > > > provide access to your accounts. If you only use web page or direct > > > OFX access to get data into your file, it is not needed. Look for > > > the term "third party" on > > > http://www.microsoft.com/money/bankonline.aspx > > > Even tho this type of access is available, you may choose to not use > > > it. There may be web statement download directly from your > > > institution, and for that, no LiveID is needed. > > > > > > > The info will be on an encrypted web site, using the same SSL > > > protocol that banks use for their customer account websites. So it > > > is only put online in the same sense that your bank puts your > > > account info online. The LiveID is the access authentication method. > > > > > > Its hard to tell > > > > what all of the BS is actually saying. Is there a fee? > > > > > No. > > > > > > Anyone familiar > > > > with this seemingly MS hype? > > > > Thanks > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, David Schwartz wrote: - quote - > Will it make my life easier? Right now I have to go to 8 different
That's the plan, tho the statement fetching from those who provide> institutions' websites, mainly banks, and log in, find the download page, > and download what I'm looking for into Money. Even though I only do it once > a month, it does take quite a while. Will this service go to all of these > institutions for me and do it all at once, then I just download all the info > into MS Money at one time? their own OFX servers is usually more reliable. When the third party (Yodlee) gets the data, the process can be upset for a while if the institution changes the website layout. The bigger brokers and a lot of credit cards have their own OFX servers. With banks, while many do that, the majority do not provide their own servers, and thus the third party info gathering (they go to the web site on your behalf using your credentials) is the method available for those banks. If you don't want that for a given institution, you could still reduce the number of websites you go to manually. - quote - > That might be worth it.
You might even tend to do it more frequently that way. I like themore frequent checking so that my transactions are fresher in my mind. It is especially nice to check credit card accounts more frequently, in case some anomalous charge were to show up. - quote - > Dave > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message > news:6e92h4dpalu5kvci6r6ke00sfsee7vupv4[at]4ax.com... > > In microsoft.public.money, David Schwartz wrote: > > > > Are these worth signing up for? It gives me the impression that Microsoft > > > will take over my MS Money database and put it online. > > > It is necessary if you want a third party contracted by Microsoft to > > provide access to your accounts. If you only use web page or direct > > OFX access to get data into your file, it is not needed. Look for > > the term "third party" on > > http://www.microsoft.com/money/bankonline.aspx > > Even tho this type of access is available, you may choose to not use > > it. There may be web statement download directly from your > > institution, and for that, no LiveID is needed. > > > > The info will be on an encrypted web site, using the same SSL > > protocol that banks use for their customer account websites. So it > > is only put online in the same sense that your bank puts your > > account info online. The LiveID is the access authentication method. > > > > Its hard to tell > > > what all of the BS is actually saying. Is there a fee? > > > No. > > > > Anyone familiar > > > with this seemingly MS hype? > > > Thanks |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| More information about this is in the following Microsoft KB articles: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/212355/en-us http://support.microsoft.com/kb/914970/en-us -Mark "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:6e92h4dpalu5kvci6r6ke00sfsee7vupv4[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, David Schwartz wrote: > > Are these worth signing up for? It gives me the impression that Microsoft > > will take over my MS Money database and put it online. > It is necessary if you want a third party contracted by Microsoft to > provide access to your accounts. If you only use web page or direct > OFX access to get data into your file, it is not needed. Look for > the term "third party" on > http://www.microsoft.com/money/bankonline.aspx > Even tho this type of access is available, you may choose to not use > it. There may be web statement download directly from your > institution, and for that, no LiveID is needed. > The info will be on an encrypted web site, using the same SSL > protocol that banks use for their customer account websites. So it > is only put online in the same sense that your bank puts your > account info online. The LiveID is the access authentication method. > > Its hard to tell > > what all of the BS is actually saying. Is there a fee? > No. > > Anyone familiar > > with this seemingly MS hype? > > Thanks |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Will it make my life easier? Right now I have to go to 8 different institutions' websites, mainly banks, and log in, find the download page, and download what I'm looking for into Money. Even though I only do it once a month, it does take quite a while. Will this service go to all of these institutions for me and do it all at once, then I just download all the info into MS Money at one time? That might be worth it. Dave "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:6e92h4dpalu5kvci6r6ke00sfsee7vupv4[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, David Schwartz wrote: > > Are these worth signing up for? It gives me the impression that Microsoft > > will take over my MS Money database and put it online. > It is necessary if you want a third party contracted by Microsoft to > provide access to your accounts. If you only use web page or direct > OFX access to get data into your file, it is not needed. Look for > the term "third party" on > http://www.microsoft.com/money/bankonline.aspx > Even tho this type of access is available, you may choose to not use > it. There may be web statement download directly from your > institution, and for that, no LiveID is needed. > The info will be on an encrypted web site, using the same SSL > protocol that banks use for their customer account websites. So it > is only put online in the same sense that your bank puts your > account info online. The LiveID is the access authentication method. > > Its hard to tell > > what all of the BS is actually saying. Is there a fee? > No. > > Anyone familiar > > with this seemingly MS hype? > > Thanks |
| | |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, David Schwartz wrote: - quote - > Are these worth signing up for? It gives me the impression that Microsoft
It is necessary if you want a third party contracted by Microsoft to> will take over my MS Money database and put it online. provide access to your accounts. If you only use web page or direct OFX access to get data into your file, it is not needed. Look for the term "third party" on http://www.microsoft.com/money/bankonline.aspx Even tho this type of access is available, you may choose to not use it. There may be web statement download directly from your institution, and for that, no LiveID is needed. The info will be on an encrypted web site, using the same SSL protocol that banks use for their customer account websites. So it is only put online in the same sense that your bank puts your account info online. The LiveID is the access authentication method. - quote - > Its hard to tell
No.> what all of the BS is actually saying. Is there a fee? - quote - > Anyone familiar > with this seemingly MS hype? > Thanks |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Are these worth signing up for? It gives me the impression that Microsoft will take over my MS Money database and put it online. Its hard to tell what all of the BS is actually saying. Is there a fee? Anyone familiar with this seemingly MS hype? Thanks -- David Schwartz Commack, NY |
| Tags |
| account, live, money, windows |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Money Plus & Windows Live ID Sign-In Problem steve-auction: Hello, For the past week or two, I am unable to sign in to my Money Plus account with my Windows Live ID. On intial attempt when opening the file,... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 09-06-2008 06:06 PM | |
| Disassociate Windows Live from Money 2007 Btfsplk: I want to use Money 2007 without signing in Windows Live. Desktop works fine without signing in Windows Live. The subject never comes up. Laptop... | Microsoft Money | 12 | 11-03-2007 06:51 AM | |
| MS Money 2007 & Windows Live Password tsar IV: I upgraded to Money 2007 1/26/07 and it worked fine for 3 days. Today (1/29/07) it refuses to recognize the Windows Live Password. I've created a... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 02-02-2007 03:43 PM | |
| Sharing Money file with Windows Live ID David B: I'm working in a small office environment where we'd like to set up Money for sharing a single data file; BUT I am leary of using Windows Live ID... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-01-2006 06:22 PM | |
| Money 2007 REQUIRES Windows Live integration? N2: Hello all, Browsed the group without finding a definitive answer. I'd like to give Money 2007 a test drive, but I don't have, nor will ever use,... | Microsoft Money | 9 | 07-25-2006 01:37 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |