|
#12
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: - quote - > After I did the math on it, I think that's exactly what's happening. I did
You might try customizing the "Performance by investment account"> what you suggested previously and changed my old transactions (including > dividends) to DUK_Sold. They're 2 years old, so I won't be using them on > this years taxes anyway. I just wish I could get Money to show current Gain > w/out including those old dividends. Still open to any other ideas. Thanks > though. At least I know Money isn't just making up numbers! and similar reports. There you can set a date range. Note that the Annual%Return is a more complex IRR calculation like the APR of a bank account. - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > > > OK Cal...you were partially right...I was partially wrong. Here's the > > > scenario. > > > I backed up and deleted the new transaction so everything was old (and > > > closed). I checked "Show Closed Positions" and the grey 'Gain' amout shown > > > was 644.38. > > > > > Next, I recorded a mock buy of $100.00 of DUK at $15.81. It closed today at > > > $15.45, leaving a net loss of $2.28 for the day (and overall). This is the > > > 'Gain' amount I want displayed. > > > > > If I Mark 'Show Closed Positions', it shows a Gain of $642.10... This is the > > > old value of $644.38 minus the loss for the day $2.28. (This is correct). > > > > > Now, if I uncheck 'Show Closed Positions', the 'Gain' changes to $194.46. > > > (I have no idea where the heck this number comes from.) My previous > > > assumption was incorrect. I had to pull an old datafile and re-create this > > > scenario...but as you can see, $194.46 is not the number I need. > > > My suspicion is that for Gain, which includes dividends, that the > > old dividends earned by the old shares are being attributed to the > > current holdings. The PriceAppreciation column ignores dividends. So > > it could be of use. Today nobody says that dividends don't matter. > > That was a very common claim late in the previous century, but not > > from DUK investors. > > > If you had no old dividends during the last year, the TR return > > columns as far back as a year could be useful too. > |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| After I did the math on it, I think that's exactly what's happening. I did what you suggested previously and changed my old transactions (including dividends) to DUK_Sold. They're 2 years old, so I won't be using them on this years taxes anyway. I just wish I could get Money to show current Gain w/out including those old dividends. Still open to any other ideas. Thanks though. At least I know Money isn't just making up numbers! "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > OK Cal...you were partially right...I was partially wrong. Here's the > > scenario. > > I backed up and deleted the new transaction so everything was old (and > > closed). I checked "Show Closed Positions" and the grey 'Gain' amout shown > > was 644.38. > > > Next, I recorded a mock buy of $100.00 of DUK at $15.81. It closed today at > > $15.45, leaving a net loss of $2.28 for the day (and overall). This is the > > 'Gain' amount I want displayed. > > > If I Mark 'Show Closed Positions', it shows a Gain of $642.10... This is the > > old value of $644.38 minus the loss for the day $2.28. (This is correct). > > > Now, if I uncheck 'Show Closed Positions', the 'Gain' changes to $194.46. > > (I have no idea where the heck this number comes from.) My previous > > assumption was incorrect. I had to pull an old datafile and re-create this > > scenario...but as you can see, $194.46 is not the number I need. > My suspicion is that for Gain, which includes dividends, that the > old dividends earned by the old shares are being attributed to the > current holdings. The PriceAppreciation column ignores dividends. So > it could be of use. Today nobody says that dividends don't matter. > That was a very common claim late in the previous century, but not > from DUK investors. > If you had no old dividends during the last year, the TR return > columns as far back as a year could be useful too. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: - quote - > OK Cal...you were partially right...I was partially wrong. Here's the
My suspicion is that for Gain, which includes dividends, that the> scenario. > I backed up and deleted the new transaction so everything was old (and > closed). I checked "Show Closed Positions" and the grey 'Gain' amout shown > was 644.38. > Next, I recorded a mock buy of $100.00 of DUK at $15.81. It closed today at > $15.45, leaving a net loss of $2.28 for the day (and overall). This is the > 'Gain' amount I want displayed. > If I Mark 'Show Closed Positions', it shows a Gain of $642.10... This is the > old value of $644.38 minus the loss for the day $2.28. (This is correct). > Now, if I uncheck 'Show Closed Positions', the 'Gain' changes to $194.46. > (I have no idea where the heck this number comes from.) My previous > assumption was incorrect. I had to pull an old datafile and re-create this > scenario...but as you can see, $194.46 is not the number I need. old dividends earned by the old shares are being attributed to the current holdings. The PriceAppreciation column ignores dividends. So it could be of use. Today nobody says that dividends don't matter. That was a very common claim late in the previous century, but not from DUK investors. If you had no old dividends during the last year, the TR return columns as far back as a year could be useful too. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| OK Cal...you were partially right...I was partially wrong. Here's the scenario. I backed up and deleted the new transaction so everything was old (and closed). I checked "Show Closed Positions" and the grey 'Gain' amout shown was 644.38. Next, I recorded a mock buy of $100.00 of DUK at $15.81. It closed today at $15.45, leaving a net loss of $2.28 for the day (and overall). This is the 'Gain' amount I want displayed. If I Mark 'Show Closed Positions', it shows a Gain of $642.10... This is the old value of $644.38 minus the loss for the day $2.28. (This is correct). Now, if I uncheck 'Show Closed Positions', the 'Gain' changes to $194.46. (I have no idea where the heck this number comes from.) My previous assumption was incorrect. I had to pull an old datafile and re-create this scenario...but as you can see, $194.46 is not the number I need. "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > I wish that was the case, but it isn't. Deselecting 'ShowClosedPositions' > > will do just that...make 'truly closed' positions disappear from view. > > However, if you buy the security again, Money, in effect, re-opens the > > position and includes any profit or loss related to the original closing > > (complete sale) of said security along with the present position [gain] > > (current value minus current basis). > > > If Money did what you described, that would be ideal. Wish it could...maybe > > it can...but it's not by use of the ShowClosedPositions checkmark. And I > > can't find any other way to make it do it; and believe me, I've looked!! > Are you saying that if you have a mix of open and closed positions > in a security and toggle ShowClosedPositions, that the > PriceAppreciaton column and Gain column do not change? > They do when I try it on Money 2007. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: - quote - > I wish that was the case, but it isn't. Deselecting 'ShowClosedPositions'
Are you saying that if you have a mix of open and closed positions> will do just that...make 'truly closed' positions disappear from view. > However, if you buy the security again, Money, in effect, re-opens the > position and includes any profit or loss related to the original closing > (complete sale) of said security along with the present position [gain] > (current value minus current basis). > If Money did what you described, that would be ideal. Wish it could...maybe > it can...but it's not by use of the ShowClosedPositions checkmark. And I > can't find any other way to make it do it; and believe me, I've looked!! in a security and toggle ShowClosedPositions, that the PriceAppreciaton column and Gain column do not change? They do when I try it on Money 2007. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I wish that was the case, but it isn't. Deselecting 'ShowClosedPositions' will do just that...make 'truly closed' positions disappear from view. However, if you buy the security again, Money, in effect, re-opens the position and includes any profit or loss related to the original closing (complete sale) of said security along with the present position [gain] (current value minus current basis). If Money did what you described, that would be ideal. Wish it could...maybe it can...but it's not by use of the ShowClosedPositions checkmark. And I can't find any other way to make it do it; and believe me, I've looked!! "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > Money 2007 (I think Ver. 16.x...) > In that case, de-selecting ChangePortfolioView-> ShowClosedPositions > should cause the Portfolio PriceAppreciaton column should tell you > what you what your current value minus the current basis is. The > Gain column would be the same, except that it includes dividends. > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > > > > > Already done... That just hides the stocks that you have sold all shares of. > > > > Once I enter the buy on the previously owned stock (in this case DUK), then > > > > pull up the transaction history for that stock, all the old transactions are > > > > listed as well (which is the issue I'm trying to correct/prevent). > > > > > I assume you are using an older version of Money. > > > > > > > > > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > > > > > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I recently re-invested in a stock that I haven't used since 2006 in one of my > > > > > > investment accounts. I also bought 4 other stocks that were new to me. The > > > > > > 4 new ones show a Gain amount equal to their cost minus their current > > > > > > value...what it should be. The other, however, (I believe) is taking that > > > > > > amount and adding it to the amount that I profited 2 years ago...which throws > > > > > > everything off for me. Is there any way to make Money think this is a new > > > > > > investment so the Gain will make sense for this year, and not add in data > > > > > > from years past? > > > > > > > > > Try de-selecting ChangePortfolioView-> ShowClosedPositions. > > > > > > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: - quote - > Money 2007 (I think Ver. 16.x...)
In that case, de-selecting ChangePortfolioView-> ShowClosedPositionsshould cause the Portfolio PriceAppreciaton column should tell you what you what your current value minus the current basis is. The Gain column would be the same, except that it includes dividends. - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > > > Already done... That just hides the stocks that you have sold all shares of. > > > Once I enter the buy on the previously owned stock (in this case DUK), then > > > pull up the transaction history for that stock, all the old transactions are > > > listed as well (which is the issue I'm trying to correct/prevent). > > > I assume you are using an older version of Money. > > > > > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > > > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > > > > > > > I recently re-invested in a stock that I haven't used since 2006 in one of my > > > > > investment accounts. I also bought 4 other stocks that were new to me. The > > > > > 4 new ones show a Gain amount equal to their cost minus their current > > > > > value...what it should be. The other, however, (I believe) is taking that > > > > > amount and adding it to the amount that I profited 2 years ago...which throws > > > > > everything off for me. Is there any way to make Money think this is a new > > > > > investment so the Gain will make sense for this year, and not add in data > > > > > from years past? > > > > > > > Try de-selecting ChangePortfolioView-> ShowClosedPositions. > > > > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Money 2007 (I think Ver. 16.x...) "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > Already done... That just hides the stocks that you have sold all shares of. > > Once I enter the buy on the previously owned stock (in this case DUK), then > > pull up the transaction history for that stock, all the old transactions are > > listed as well (which is the issue I'm trying to correct/prevent). > I assume you are using an older version of Money. > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > > > > > I recently re-invested in a stock that I haven't used since 2006 in one of my > > > > investment accounts. I also bought 4 other stocks that were new to me. The > > > > 4 new ones show a Gain amount equal to their cost minus their current > > > > value...what it should be. The other, however, (I believe) is taking that > > > > amount and adding it to the amount that I profited 2 years ago...which throws > > > > everything off for me. Is there any way to make Money think this is a new > > > > investment so the Gain will make sense for this year, and not add in data > > > > from years past? > > > > > Try de-selecting ChangePortfolioView-> ShowClosedPositions. > > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: - quote - > Already done... That just hides the stocks that you have sold all shares of.
I assume you are using an older version of Money.> Once I enter the buy on the previously owned stock (in this case DUK), then > pull up the transaction history for that stock, all the old transactions are > listed as well (which is the issue I'm trying to correct/prevent). - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > > > I recently re-invested in a stock that I haven't used since 2006 in one of my > > > investment accounts. I also bought 4 other stocks that were new to me. The > > > 4 new ones show a Gain amount equal to their cost minus their current > > > value...what it should be. The other, however, (I believe) is taking that > > > amount and adding it to the amount that I profited 2 years ago...which throws > > > everything off for me. Is there any way to make Money think this is a new > > > investment so the Gain will make sense for this year, and not add in data > > > from years past? > > > Try de-selecting ChangePortfolioView-> ShowClosedPositions. > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| I think that'll do it. I do my Sched. D the old-fashioned way. I wish I could keep the old transactions there, but like I said, it throws off my Gain. I just bought shares today, DUK dropped a few cents/share, and I still showed a profit. I know that's the 'overall' picture, but I could care less about that now. I want to know the performance of the Money I just put in, my dividend reinvestments, and any future money I put into DUK...not so much how I've fared investing in DUK over the past 5 years off-and-on. "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > Already done... That just hides the stocks that you have sold all shares of. > > Once I enter the buy on the previously owned stock (in this case DUK), then > > pull up the transaction history for that stock, all the old transactions are > > listed as well (which is the issue I'm trying to correct/prevent). > I thought you were talking about the Gain column on the Portfolio in > your original post. > To do what I think you say you want to do, create a new stock called > DUK_sold old, with no symbol. Do a fake big AddShares of DUK > pre-dating the oldest existing DUK transaction. Change each old DUK > transaction from DUK to DUK_sold, starting with the oldest > transaction. Then Delete the fake DUK AddShares. > If you are going to have Money fill out your schedule D, don't > actually call it DUK_sold; that name goes onto your schedule D. > I don't actually recommend that you do that. Your latest objection > is that you see the old transactions in the list of the transaction > history. That's the way I would want it to be. > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > > > > > I recently re-invested in a stock that I haven't used since 2006 in one of my > > > > investment accounts. I also bought 4 other stocks that were new to me. The > > > > 4 new ones show a Gain amount equal to their cost minus their current > > > > value...what it should be. The other, however, (I believe) is taking that > > > > amount and adding it to the amount that I profited 2 years ago...which throws > > > > everything off for me. Is there any way to make Money think this is a new > > > > investment so the Gain will make sense for this year, and not add in data > > > > from years past? > > > > > Try de-selecting ChangePortfolioView-> ShowClosedPositions. > > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: - quote - > Already done... That just hides the stocks that you have sold all shares of.
I thought you were talking about the Gain column on the Portfolio in> Once I enter the buy on the previously owned stock (in this case DUK), then > pull up the transaction history for that stock, all the old transactions are > listed as well (which is the issue I'm trying to correct/prevent). your original post. To do what I think you say you want to do, create a new stock called DUK_sold old, with no symbol. Do a fake big AddShares of DUK pre-dating the oldest existing DUK transaction. Change each old DUK transaction from DUK to DUK_sold, starting with the oldest transaction. Then Delete the fake DUK AddShares. If you are going to have Money fill out your schedule D, don't actually call it DUK_sold; that name goes onto your schedule D. I don't actually recommend that you do that. Your latest objection is that you see the old transactions in the list of the transaction history. That's the way I would want it to be. - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > > > I recently re-invested in a stock that I haven't used since 2006 in one of my > > > investment accounts. I also bought 4 other stocks that were new to me. The > > > 4 new ones show a Gain amount equal to their cost minus their current > > > value...what it should be. The other, however, (I believe) is taking that > > > amount and adding it to the amount that I profited 2 years ago...which throws > > > everything off for me. Is there any way to make Money think this is a new > > > investment so the Gain will make sense for this year, and not add in data > > > from years past? > > > Try de-selecting ChangePortfolioView-> ShowClosedPositions. > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Already done... That just hides the stocks that you have sold all shares of. Once I enter the buy on the previously owned stock (in this case DUK), then pull up the transaction history for that stock, all the old transactions are listed as well (which is the issue I'm trying to correct/prevent). "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: > > I recently re-invested in a stock that I haven't used since 2006 in one of my > > investment accounts. I also bought 4 other stocks that were new to me. The > > 4 new ones show a Gain amount equal to their cost minus their current > > value...what it should be. The other, however, (I believe) is taking that > > amount and adding it to the amount that I profited 2 years ago...which throws > > everything off for me. Is there any way to make Money think this is a new > > investment so the Gain will make sense for this year, and not add in data > > from years past? > Try de-selecting ChangePortfolioView-> ShowClosedPositions. |
| | |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Brannon wrote: - quote - > I recently re-invested in a stock that I haven't used since 2006 in one of my
Try de-selecting ChangePortfolioView-> ShowClosedPositions.> investment accounts. I also bought 4 other stocks that were new to me. The > 4 new ones show a Gain amount equal to their cost minus their current > value...what it should be. The other, however, (I believe) is taking that > amount and adding it to the amount that I profited 2 years ago...which throws > everything off for me. Is there any way to make Money think this is a new > investment so the Gain will make sense for this year, and not add in data > from years past? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I recently re-invested in a stock that I haven't used since 2006 in one of my investment accounts. I also bought 4 other stocks that were new to me. The 4 new ones show a Gain amount equal to their cost minus their current value...what it should be. The other, however, (I believe) is taking that amount and adding it to the amount that I profited 2 years ago...which throws everything off for me. Is there any way to make Money think this is a new investment so the Gain will make sense for this year, and not add in data from years past? |
| Tags |
| calculation, gain, problem |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Investment Gain Calculation Wrong Ryan A: Hello - I've had a problem with 1 investment in my 401k for some time now. 3/4 of the funds I'm in calculate the Gain/Loss accurately but 1 does... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 05-12-2008 09:10 PM | |
| Money 2006 Capital Gain Problem Javeed: My daughter invest $50 per month in a mutual fund. In 2006, she sold some shares. She has entered all the transaction in Money 2006. She tried to... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 02-08-2007 03:48 PM | |
| Reinv Gain from 2003 shows now as gain in IRA - M2004 - Bobb -: I'm REBUYING a mutual fund in an IRA that I owned years ago. I previously sold it all in 2003 and not problem until I just entered my new purchase... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 04-05-2006 06:24 PM | |
| Calculation of Ann. Ret. Retired Trader: Does anyone know how Money 2004 calculates the Ann. Ret. in the stock portfolio???? I get different percentages when I do it manually. Thanks for... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-07-2005 07:37 AM | |
| Gain column includes previous historical sale gain amount? Chris Barker: I've discovered a curious bug in Money 2004. I had an investment in a mutual fund that I sold and liquidated in its entirety. Several months later I... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-12-2004 05:17 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |