|
#4
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Matt McLelland wrote: - quote - > Cal - played around with the Combine With - it didn't work, although I
I am glad that the backup restoration did it. It's nice that Money> understood why is should have worked. > After spending about 3 hours trying to resolve this, I pulled a backup from > last week (before the update that caused all these problems) and > re-downloaded - taking special precautions to map the new positions to a > brand new symbol, instead of erronousely pointing them to an existing one. > Once I processed 7 days worth of new transactions (about 15 minutes), I'm now > balanced and back up-n-running. Thank goodness for backups. Thanks Cal. keeps multiple backups. You might want to consider increasing the number that Money keeps, if you have a big hard drive with a lot of unused space. Thinking about it, I think that CombineWith working on the older version to be combined with the newer version, rather than working from the Details page the newer version, might have worked right for you. But it's moot at this point. Again, I am glad that it is doing right for you now. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Cal - played around with the Combine With - it didn't work, although I understood why is should have worked. After spending about 3 hours trying to resolve this, I pulled a backup from last week (before the update that caused all these problems) and re-downloaded - taking special precautions to map the new positions to a brand new symbol, instead of erronousely pointing them to an existing one. Once I processed 7 days worth of new transactions (about 15 minutes), I'm now balanced and back up-n-running. Thank goodness for backups. Thanks Cal. "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Matt McLelland wrote: > > THanks Cal - here's that I think happened. During the update where Money > > finds all the new positions from the last time you updated, if Money detects > > a new position the user is asked to add a new fund or map to an existing one. > > Usually Money gets it right and it defaults to a new fund - but I think what > > I did was I incorrectly mapped it to an existing fund. So when I was done, I > > had too many shares - and I deleted them and hoped a new "update positions" > > would allow me to remap. However, Money is now "suck" thinking it needs to > > update the wrong position (does this make sense?). > > > I tried your suggestion - when I checked Addshares / update my position (to > > make the error go away), it does add them to my position and everything > > appears normal. But the next time I click "Update my positions", it reports > > (correctly) that I have too many shares - and I'm in a loop. > > > So I deleted the positions that Money was trying to add and compared this > > money account to my online statement - quantities match exactly - so why does > > Money think there is a discrepency? How can I "un-map" the incorrect mapping > > that I mentioned in my first paragraph? THanks for your advice Cal. > > The method will depend on whether you have Money 2007 or newer, or > if you have an older version. Money 2007 added the CombineWith > operation. > The way it works is that there is a CombineWith button on the > Details page. You can select a security of the SAME Investment > Type. When you go to FundA details and click CombineWith, a list of > mutual funds already defined comes up. A pop-up tells you that all > of this investment will be renamed as the other selected investment. > If you combine with FundB, in the register, All FundA transactions > will now appear as FundB. > One case where this should be useful is in a fund rename downloaded > from the broker. If the OFX has a RemoveShares of Acme and an > AddShares of AcmeNew, you can work around that endless circle of > saying they are the same shares. Just accept the new one, and then > do a CombineWith. he history an basis data will be intact. > Make an extra backup/copy first in case you want to undo something. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Matt McLelland wrote: - quote - > THanks Cal - here's that I think happened. During the update where Money
if you have an older version. Money 2007 added the CombineWith> finds all the new positions from the last time you updated, if Money detects > a new position the user is asked to add a new fund or map to an existing one. > Usually Money gets it right and it defaults to a new fund - but I think what > I did was I incorrectly mapped it to an existing fund. So when I was done, I > had too many shares - and I deleted them and hoped a new "update positions" > would allow me to remap. However, Money is now "suck" thinking it needs to > update the wrong position (does this make sense?). > I tried your suggestion - when I checked Addshares / update my position (to > make the error go away), it does add them to my position and everything > appears normal. But the next time I click "Update my positions", it reports > (correctly) that I have too many shares - and I'm in a loop. > So I deleted the positions that Money was trying to add and compared this > money account to my online statement - quantities match exactly - so why does > Money think there is a discrepency? How can I "un-map" the incorrect mapping > that I mentioned in my first paragraph? THanks for your advice Cal. The method will depend on whether you have Money 2007 or newer, or operation. The way it works is that there is a CombineWith button on the Details page. You can select a security of the SAME Investment Type. When you go to FundA details and click CombineWith, a list of mutual funds already defined comes up. A pop-up tells you that all of this investment will be renamed as the other selected investment. If you combine with FundB, in the register, All FundA transactions will now appear as FundB. One case where this should be useful is in a fund rename downloaded from the broker. If the OFX has a RemoveShares of Acme and an AddShares of AcmeNew, you can work around that endless circle of saying they are the same shares. Just accept the new one, and then do a CombineWith. he history an basis data will be intact. Make an extra backup/copy first in case you want to undo something. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| THanks Cal - here's that I think happened. During the update where Money finds all the new positions from the last time you updated, if Money detects a new position the user is asked to add a new fund or map to an existing one. Usually Money gets it right and it defaults to a new fund - but I think what I did was I incorrectly mapped it to an existing fund. So when I was done, I had too many shares - and I deleted them and hoped a new "update positions" would allow me to remap. However, Money is now "suck" thinking it needs to update the wrong position (does this make sense?). I tried your suggestion - when I checked Addshares / update my position (to make the error go away), it does add them to my position and everything appears normal. But the next time I click "Update my positions", it reports (correctly) that I have too many shares - and I'm in a loop. So I deleted the positions that Money was trying to add and compared this money account to my online statement - quantities match exactly - so why does Money think there is a discrepency? How can I "un-map" the incorrect mapping that I mentioned in my first paragraph? THanks for your advice Cal. "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Matt McLelland wrote: > > I've been downloading my stock portfolio details for years with no problem. > > For some reason one of my brokerage accounts has gotten out of whack - Money > > is reporting "Positions reported....don't match those in your money account". > > If I don't update and manually compare the account summary with my online > > statement, every quantity for every symbol matches exactly. Yet for some > > reason, Money thinks it can only fix this problem by creating an empty symbol > > and inserting some shares. I think that somehow money is trying to map a few > > new transactions into the wrong account - is there a manual way to check > > which downloaded transactions are being mapped in Money? > Doesn't Money tell you which positions appear to mis-match? > To get around it, normally decline Money's offer to adjust your > portfolio. This will require a change to the default on the radio > buttons each time it occurs. Yet you definitely want to check what > the cause of this is. Make a note of the StatementQuantity (what > the download said your holding was) and the AccountQuantity (what > Money thought your holding was). One of those two values differs > from reality. > You need to figure out which one differs, and figure out why. If > you go to and investment and choose InvestmentActivites, you will > get a list of transactions for that investment. Maybe you will > have a bogus AddShares from previously accepting an adjustment. > This can come from the broker having the statement position > quantity a little out of phase with the transaction. e.g., you > bought Google. The position data was updated but the transaction > did not make it into this download somehow. Money offers to > AddShares (Update my positions). You accept. Then later the Buy > gets downloaded. So Money will offer to Remove/AddShares (Update my > positions). Or the thing could be in the reverse order. |
| | |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Matt McLelland wrote: - quote - > I've been downloading my stock portfolio details for years with no problem.
Doesn't Money tell you which positions appear to mis-match?> For some reason one of my brokerage accounts has gotten out of whack - Money > is reporting "Positions reported....don't match those in your money account". > If I don't update and manually compare the account summary with my online > statement, every quantity for every symbol matches exactly. Yet for some > reason, Money thinks it can only fix this problem by creating an empty symbol > and inserting some shares. I think that somehow money is trying to map a few > new transactions into the wrong account - is there a manual way to check > which downloaded transactions are being mapped in Money? To get around it, normally decline Money's offer to adjust your portfolio. This will require a change to the default on the radio buttons each time it occurs. Yet you definitely want to check what the cause of this is. Make a note of the StatementQuantity (what the download said your holding was) and the AccountQuantity (what Money thought your holding was). One of those two values differs from reality. You need to figure out which one differs, and figure out why. If you go to and investment and choose InvestmentActivites, you will get a list of transactions for that investment. Maybe you will have a bogus AddShares from previously accepting an adjustment. This can come from the broker having the statement position quantity a little out of phase with the transaction. e.g., you bought Google. The position data was updated but the transaction did not make it into this download somehow. Money offers to AddShares (Update my positions). You accept. Then later the Buy gets downloaded. So Money will offer to Remove/AddShares (Update my positions). Or the thing could be in the reverse order. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I've been downloading my stock portfolio details for years with no problem. For some reason one of my brokerage accounts has gotten out of whack - Money is reporting "Positions reported....don't match those in your money account". If I don't update and manually compare the account summary with my online statement, every quantity for every symbol matches exactly. Yet for some reason, Money thinks it can only fix this problem by creating an empty symbol and inserting some shares. I think that somehow money is trying to map a few new transactions into the wrong account - is there a manual way to check which downloaded transactions are being mapped in Money? |
| Tags |
| account, match, money, positions, reported |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Positions adjusted to match balance at institution - A big Problem Brandt: Recently I noticed that the ballance of my investment account in money (2007) did not match fidelity's ballance and I started researching. I... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 09-04-2006 01:31 AM | |
| Adding Short Positions to an Investment Account Adheer Pai: I recently started using Money 2005. I have a brokerage account that does not support online synchronization with Money 2005. There are two short... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-11-2004 04:00 PM | |
| Account listing total doesn't match actual account Matthew Schwaberow: Hey all. I've got an interesting problem that hopefully you'll be able to help with. In the Account List of Money 2004, the total for one of my... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 09-18-2004 02:09 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |