|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Cal -- I too doubt that the distribution was more than the source account value. It was definitely more than the source account value as shown in MS Money, either because money went into it that I couldn't record, or because of market gains. It could be either. My former employer made some contributions after I stopped working there, probably because it missed making some before -- there was a good reason I left -- so the contributions account was out of whack. The same period was also a good one for the markets. "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:3l5ed4dtcv58cab3tl3mve4tv1tvjljdt5[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, harrelsonesq wrote:
I do know the amount. I just don't know the quantity or price of the shares> > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message > > news:ukvdd4tau0rdsf8itht5gvvpk5s4brcd8k[at]4ax.com... > > > In microsoft.public.money, harrelsonesq wrote: > > > > > > > Here are my thoughts... > > > > > I would probably do a Sell of everything in the 401k. Transfer the > > > amount of cash that made it from the 401k to the IRA (in the cash > > > transactions register). If you were not tracking cash transactions, > > > I don't know how you would want to do it. The rest of any difference > > > in amounts should be accounted for by a possible fee from the 401k > > > provider and possible withholding if it was not a direct custodian > > > to custodian transfer. > > > Actually, the increase in value would be due to net market gains. No fees, > > no withholding. > I am glad to hear that. I had guessed the change was in a negative > direction. There is going to be some amount entered on form > somethingOrOther by the 401K custodian. If you can access the new > IRA account, you can find the amount received from the web site > without waiting for the form. of the funds in the old account that were liquidated - quote - > > In those cases, I believe it would show up as the
I too doubt that the distribution was more than the source account value. It> > distribution being less than the source account balance, not more. Market > > gains(losses) don't go into the cash account. In my opinion, that is one > > of > > the major shortcomings of MS Money: you can never balance an investment > > account -- only the associated cash -- so the total account value is > > always > > off. > I doubt that the distribution was more than the source account > value. You might have lucked out by having the 401K custodian having > sold your holdings earlier than you were calculating, and the check > was in the mail during a market down time. was definitely more than the source account value as shown in MS Money, either because money went into it that I couldn't record, or because of market gains. It could be either. My former employer made some contributions after I stopped working there, probably because it missed making some before -- there was a good reason I left -- so the contributions account was out of whack. The same period was also a good one for the markets. - quote - > > > > > Then enter Buys for the new holdings.
I agree.> > > That's something I can do ( the IRA custodian provides sufficient > > detail -- > > otherwise they wouldn't be the IRA custodian) > So anyway, I guess you could just enter a Deposit for the amount in > the 401K, and do what you do to zero out that 401K account. That > would be simpler than creating a cash transactions register for the > 401K and then doing a Transfer. > > > > > I assume that you are looking into the underlying actual amounts. > > > I can't. All I know is the amount of the rollover, not quantity, price, or > > the source of the extra money. I'm just assuming market gain. > I agree. > > > The amount was less than it would have been a month ago, but still more > > than > > the balance shown in MS Money. The check reached the IRA last Monday. I > > was > > hoping for Thursday. Oh well. > That would have been nice to have the transferred funds used to buy > MFs at the close of Thursday. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, harrelsonesq wrote: - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message
I am glad to hear that. I had guessed the change was in a negative> news:ukvdd4tau0rdsf8itht5gvvpk5s4brcd8k[at]4ax.com... > > In microsoft.public.money, harrelsonesq wrote: > > > Here are my thoughts... > > > I would probably do a Sell of everything in the 401k. Transfer the > > amount of cash that made it from the 401k to the IRA (in the cash > > transactions register). If you were not tracking cash transactions, > > I don't know how you would want to do it. The rest of any difference > > in amounts should be accounted for by a possible fee from the 401k > > provider and possible withholding if it was not a direct custodian > > to custodian transfer. > Actually, the increase in value would be due to net market gains. No fees, > no withholding. direction. There is going to be some amount entered on form somethingOrOther by the 401K custodian. If you can access the new IRA account, you can find the amount received from the web site without waiting for the form. - quote - > In those cases, I believe it would show up as the
I doubt that the distribution was more than the source account> distribution being less than the source account balance, not more. Market > gains(losses) don't go into the cash account. In my opinion, that is one of > the major shortcomings of MS Money: you can never balance an investment > account -- only the associated cash -- so the total account value is always > off. value. You might have lucked out by having the 401K custodian having sold your holdings earlier than you were calculating, and the check was in the mail during a market down time. - quote - > > > Then enter Buys for the new holdings.
So anyway, I guess you could just enter a Deposit for the amount in> That's something I can do ( the IRA custodian provides sufficient detail -- > otherwise they wouldn't be the IRA custodian) the 401K, and do what you do to zero out that 401K account. That would be simpler than creating a cash transactions register for the 401K and then doing a Transfer. - quote - > > > I assume that you are looking into the underlying actual amounts.
I agree.> I can't. All I know is the amount of the rollover, not quantity, price, or > the source of the extra money. I'm just assuming market gain. - quote - > The amount was less than it would have been a month ago, but still more than
That would have been nice to have the transferred funds used to buy> the balance shown in MS Money. The check reached the IRA last Monday. I was > hoping for Thursday. Oh well. MFs at the close of Thursday. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:ukvdd4tau0rdsf8itht5gvvpk5s4brcd8k[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, harrelsonesq wrote: - quote - > Here are my thoughts...
Actually, the increase in value would be due to net market gains. No fees,> I would probably do a Sell of everything in the 401k. Transfer the > amount of cash that made it from the 401k to the IRA (in the cash > transactions register). If you were not tracking cash transactions, > I don't know how you would want to do it. The rest of any difference > in amounts should be accounted for by a possible fee from the 401k > provider and possible withholding if it was not a direct custodian > to custodian transfer. no withholding. In those cases, I believe it would show up as the distribution being less than the source account balance, not more. Market gains(losses) don't go into the cash account. In my opinion, that is one of the major shortcomings of MS Money: you can never balance an investment account -- only the associated cash -- so the total account value is always off. - quote - > Then enter Buys for the new holdings.
That's something I can do ( the IRA custodian provides sufficient detail --otherwise they wouldn't be the IRA custodian) - quote - > I assume that you are looking into the underlying actual amounts.
I can't. All I know is the amount of the rollover, not quantity, price, orthe source of the extra money. I'm just assuming market gain. The amount was less than it would have been a month ago, but still more than the balance shown in MS Money. The check reached the IRA last Monday. I was hoping for Thursday. Oh well. |
| | |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, harrelsonesq wrote: - quote - > I rolled over my 401(k) from a former job to a rollover IRA I set up for
You don't want to use TransferIn for this. That is for securities.> the last time I had a rollover transaction. I have two problems: > The amount in the source account is less than the amount of the rollover, > and I don't have the amount that was sold to provide the distribution. > When I select "transfer in" as the transaction type, I get the following > message, the only option is to enter "quantity." All I have is the amount > transferred from the source account. It was a different investment anyway. I > don't have enough information to enter a sell transaction in the source > account, plus I don't want to mung the Tax Estimator. - quote - > We all know that MS Money doesn't "do" 401(k)'s. What is the best way to
Here are my thoughts...> work around it in this situation? I would probably do a Sell of everything in the 401k. Transfer the amount of cash that made it from the 401k to the IRA (in the cash transactions register). If you were not tracking cash transactions, I don't know how you would want to do it. The rest of any difference in amounts should be accounted for by a possible fee from the 401k provider and possible withholding if it was not a direct custodian to custodian transfer. Then enter Buys for the new holdings. I assume that you are looking into the underlying actual amounts. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I rolled over my 401(k) from a former job to a rollover IRA I set up for the last time I had a rollover transaction. I have two problems: The amount in the source account is less than the amount of the rollover, and I don't have the amount that was sold to provide the distribution. When I select "transfer in" as the transaction type, I get the following message, the only option is to enter "quantity." All I have is the amount transferred from the source account. It was a different investment anyway. I don't have enough information to enter a sell transaction in the source account, plus I don't want to mung the Tax Estimator. We all know that MS Money doesn't "do" 401(k)'s. What is the best way to work around it in this situation? |
| Tags |
| entering, rollover, transaction |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Error message entering investment transaction as split transaction Steven Wissler: I'm trying to enter an investment transaction (Buy Investment) as part of a split transaction on a Paycheck entry. Getting the following... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 11-23-2007 10:01 PM | |
| Entering Categories and Subcategories in a Transaction DeeDeeCee: Hi. When I first started using Money a decade ago, the category and the subcategory were in separate drop-down boxes. This made entering very... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 09-23-2007 07:24 AM | |
| Sound when entering transaction into account Norm: I just upgraded to Money 2004 from Money V5. Is it possible to change the lame "ding" sound when entering a transaction to the satisfying... | Microsoft Money | 10 | 06-24-2004 04:27 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |