|
#21
| |||
| |||
| Great minds think alike. Two insights that made sure I understood the process. Great job. I am on my way. -- Mike "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > IF you are using Advanced Register/Reports and IF you categorize the > downloaded transactions and IF you use Transfer : [name of CC account] or > Credit Card Payment : [name of CC account], THEN you should be able to > customize the report to include the CC account and it will show all of the > categorized expenses from the transactions in that account. > "Mike" <Mike[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:68428281-8CDA-4B26-A7FE-F2D544E9C300[at]microsoft.com... > > Is their an automatic way to transfer the CC Account Category Breakdown > > into > > the Monthly Expense Report category breakdown in lieu of the single lump > > sum > > amount? |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| The directions were very clear and helped me get it done. I appreciate the generousity of your time. -- Mike "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Mike wrote: > > I am a non-financial type new Money Plus user in the midst of a 60 Day trial > > and so far so good with one exception. > > > I have downloaded my credit card (CC) expenditures and they reside in my CC > > Account with all expendures categorized. The lump sums payment from my > > checking account however appears as a single entry in my monthy expense > > report. > > > Is their an automatic way to transfer the CC Account Category Breakdown into > > the Monthly Expense Report category breakdown in lieu of the single lump sum > > amount? > When you process the first transaction of the credit card payment, > set the category as a transfer to the other ( credit card or bank > account), or use the equivalent "SPECIAL Credit Card Payment" > category. When you process the second transaction, Money should > match it. Be careful to not just Accept if Money did not find the > match on its own for some reason. Click Change and match it to the > transfer you already made if Money did not match it for you. I > would consider this the classic of the ways I like. Note that for > this you would *not* use the Money "EXPENSE Credit Card Payment". > I would Delete that category. > For existing transactions that are already accepted, convert one to > a Transfer and Void/Delete the other. > If you don't see the SPECIAL Transfer category at the bottom of the > list, switch to advanced register. One way is > Tools-> Settings-> AccountSettings-> DisplayAllAccountsInTheAdvancedRegister |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| IF you are using Advanced Register/Reports and IF you categorize the downloaded transactions and IF you use Transfer : [name of CC account] or Credit Card Payment : [name of CC account], THEN you should be able to customize the report to include the CC account and it will show all of the categorized expenses from the transactions in that account. "Mike" <Mike[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:68428281-8CDA-4B26-A7FE-F2D544E9C300[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Is their an automatic way to transfer the CC Account Category Breakdown > into > the Monthly Expense Report category breakdown in lieu of the single lump > sum > amount? |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Mike wrote: - quote - > I am a non-financial type new Money Plus user in the midst of a 60 Day trial
When you process the first transaction of the credit card payment,> and so far so good with one exception. > I have downloaded my credit card (CC) expenditures and they reside in my CC > Account with all expendures categorized. The lump sums payment from my > checking account however appears as a single entry in my monthy expense > report. > Is their an automatic way to transfer the CC Account Category Breakdown into > the Monthly Expense Report category breakdown in lieu of the single lump sum > amount? set the category as a transfer to the other ( credit card or bank account), or use the equivalent "SPECIAL Credit Card Payment" category. When you process the second transaction, Money should match it. Be careful to not just Accept if Money did not find the match on its own for some reason. Click Change and match it to the transfer you already made if Money did not match it for you. I would consider this the classic of the ways I like. Note that for this you would *not* use the Money "EXPENSE Credit Card Payment". I would Delete that category. For existing transactions that are already accepted, convert one to a Transfer and Void/Delete the other. If you don't see the SPECIAL Transfer category at the bottom of the list, switch to advanced register. One way is Tools-> Settings-> AccountSettings-> DisplayAllAccountsInTheAdvancedRegister |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| I am a non-financial type new Money Plus user in the midst of a 60 Day trial and so far so good with one exception. I have downloaded my credit card (CC) expenditures and they reside in my CC Account with all expendures categorized. The lump sums payment from my checking account however appears as a single entry in my monthy expense report. Is their an automatic way to transfer the CC Account Category Breakdown into the Monthly Expense Report category breakdown in lieu of the single lump sum amount? -- Mike "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > I posted a lengthy reply, but our crap network here appears to be in the > process of swallowing it up. Apologies if it gets there and this duplicates. > I'm not sure what you mean by assigning Categories to Payees. Except as note > in the following they are separate unassociated things. > You can Delete, Rename, or Move Categories from Account List|Categories and > Payees|Categories. Deleting all, one at a time, will mangle your transaction > history. Not recommended. Be careful there and first work in a COPY of your > data file to make sure you are getting the intended result. Some operations > have maybe non-obvious results that can be very difficult to undo. For > instance Move Food:Groceries to Eating does not result in Eating:Groceries or > Food:Eating. > You may be referring to "auto complete" of Categories where it offers to use > the same Category used the last time for Payee "X" when entering a new > transaction for Payee "X". Just use the Category you want to use instead. It > you are auto accepting downloaded transactions, turn that off. Then you will > ge tthe chance to change them before accepting. > You mat be referring to Categories in Scheduled Bills & Deposits. Go to > Bills and Deposits and Edite the Series and change the Category. > "Boblink" wrote: > > Hi, I've been using MSMoney for years and have upgraded version and currently > > have MoneyPlus Deluxe version 17.0120.1415 installed. Over the years I have > > either "assigned" CATEGORIES to Payees or accepted the system default > > category and would like to RESET Categories (start a CLEAN SLATE for > > categories) and would appreciate if someone could please advise me how to > > DELETE ALL CATEGORIES that are currently stored in Money so that I can enter > > NEW categories as they come up? If this is NOT possible, then another option > > would be for me to review and CHANGE / RENAME, the categories that I have > > assigned to each Payee. > > If this is an option, I would appreciate if you would advise me how this is > > done and if neither of these options are available, I would appreciate any > > asuggestions that you can offer! Again, my objective is to RENAME the > > CATEGORIES that are assigned to Payees. Thanks, Bob |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| The Bills (Advanced Bills, anyway) are like transactions but are "scheduled" to occur at some frequency in the future. When you "Edit Series", you are editing a scheduled series of future transactions. Think of them as prototype transactions. You might want to look at Bills Summary in the sample data file or create a new file, set Advanced Bills, and go there and play around. Likewise, you can take a transaction you've entered and schedule it to recur in the future. R-click on a transaction in an account register and pick Add to Bills... (Or similar.) I have over 100 scheduled bills. Probably half of my transactions are entered from predefined Bills I saved a long time ago. Sound like you may be using Essential Bills. "Boblink" <Boblink[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:8D93592B-A4E2-4E98-9EEF-F8551ECE2BEA[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Do you mean to click on a specific bill that has already been paid, > Right-click on it and select Edit and make the changes that I want and > then > do this for all the other Bills that I want to change / adjust? |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Thanks Dick, I made the changes where needed (some settings were already set as you suggested) and will see that happens. I do have one follow-up / clarification question concerning: How do I fix Scheduled Bills? Bills Summary, select a bill, r-click on it, select Edit | Edit series... I'm assuming you are using Advanced Bills. Probabaly similar in Essential Bills Do you mean to click on a specific bill that has already been paid, Right-click on it and select Edit and make the changes that I want and then do this for all the other Bills that I want to change / adjust? Thanks again, Bob |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| comments inline below "Boblink" <Boblink[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:9196891E-4650-4173-B520-2957DCDD9F26[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Reply: 31,000 transaction WOW, I guess that I have 1,000 a year, WOW and
I've been at it since '93. I do make some errors by hand but I don't have 24> your right, it ain't for everyone and I think I would make more > transcription > errors (sloppiness) if I did it by hand than by downloading them. It sure > would be nice if I can figure out a way that to have the Best of Both > Worlds different variants of WalMart in my Payees and so on. And practice helps a lot. Of course, I have over 100 scheduled bills and the most complex/frequent transactions are there so I don't have to re-enter them completely from scratch. For instance, I get paid weekly and that's over a dozen split entries. But I haven't typed one in from scratch for a decade or more. - quote - > One is turn off Auto Complete. (Tools|Settings|General|something or
The setting I'm thinking of is Tools | Settings | Account settings (global)> other--don't have Money on this machine.) > Reply: I couldn't find the Auto Compete so I copied Tools---> Setting and > the > topics that are listed are: (apologies if I can't read my handwriting and > typed something wrong, also SETTINGS follows almost all of these > categories): > Account, alert, BU, Browser, Budget, Category, Home Page Display, Inv, > Online > Services, Online Update, Planner, Print check, Program, Report, Sharing, > Tax, > Toolbar Display | Transaction entry options | Use AutoComplete. - quote - > You can also just start correcting the auto-completed ones (turn off
Try Tools | Settings | Online service settings | Downlolading statements |> transaction auto-accept) before entering them in the register. Future > downloads for that Payee will use the most recent one you corrected to. > Reply: where do I find Auto-Accept? Automatically accept all downloaded transactions from banking statements. Take what I say in this area with a grain of salts--I don't download transactions so some of my specifics about proper workflow are ones I've learned here but never tested myself. - quote - > The other is fixing Scheduled Bills.
Bills Summary, select a bill, r-click on it, select Edit | Edit series...> Reply: how do I fix Scheduled Bills? I'm assuming you are using Advanced Bills. Probabaly similar in Essential Bills. - quote - > Last, what are your thoughts about Starting MSMoney from scratch on 1/1/09
That's one strategy. The choice probably comes down to whether you want to> scenario? report on all of the data you've ever collected or be able to search for stuff in all of the data you've ever collected or so forth. I have every data entry in my fifteen years with Money in the same file. Because I enter things like serial numbers and warranties and so on in memo fields, I frequently go looking through old transactions. But entering that kind of informaiton also comes as a set with the manual transaction entry thing. - quote - > One big problem with dependence on downloaded transactions is that new
See if getting a chance to accept the downloaded transactions--you can edit> users > never get exposed to lots of these details about how transactions get the > way they get. > Reply: I use Downloads for my bank accounts (checking, savings, MM, Credit > Cards, and brokerage accounts and would love to have MORE CONTROL of what > I > am doing (instead of accepting the defaults since I don't knwo better). them before accepting them I'm told--helps you get that greater control over the data being captured. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Thank you for ALL your help Dick, I really appreciate you helping me out. I enter transactions by hand. I don't have to mess with the side effects reported here on a daily basis. It's not for everybody, but I've collected something like 31,000 transactions with an average of two split entries per transaction this way. Reply: 31,000 transaction WOW, I guess that I have 1,000 a year, WOW and your right, it ain't for everyone and I think I would make more transcription errors (sloppiness) if I did it by hand than by downloading them. It sure would be nice if I can figure out a way that to have the Best of Both Worlds One is turn off Auto Complete. (Tools|Settings|General|something or other--don't have Money on this machine.) Reply: I couldn't find the Auto Compete so I copied Tools---> Setting and the topics that are listed are: (apologies if I can't read my handwriting and typed something wrong, also SETTINGS follows almost all of these categories): Account, alert, BU, Browser, Budget, Category, Home Page Display, Inv, Online Services, Online Update, Planner, Print check, Program, Report, Sharing, Tax, Toolbar Display You can also just start correcting the auto-completed ones (turn off transaction auto-accept) before entering them in the register. Future downloads for that Payee will use the most recent one you corrected to. Reply: where do I find Auto-Accept? The other is fixing Scheduled Bills. Reply: how do I fix Scheduled Bills? Last, what are your thoughts about Starting MSMoney from scratch on 1/1/09 scenario? One big problem with dependence on downloaded transactions is that new users never get exposed to lots of these details about how transactions get the way they get. Reply: I use Downloads for my bank accounts (checking, savings, MM, Credit Cards, and brokerage accounts and would love to have MORE CONTROL of what I am doing (instead of accepting the defaults since I don't knwo better). Thanks again Dick, Bob |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Again, if you want to control what CATEGORIES get applied to transactions as a function of PAYEE, you need to control this at one of two places--the only two places this association gets made before transactions are entered. One is turn off Auto Complete. (Tools|Settings|General|something or other--don't have Money on this machine.) You can also just start correcting the auto-completed ones (turn off transaction auto-accept) before entering them in the register. Future downloads for that Payee will use the most recent one you corrected to. The other is fixing Scheduled Bills. One big problem with dependence on downloaded transactions is that new users never get exposed to lots of these details about how transactions get the way they get. "Boblink" <Boblink[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:685C069F-B891-48B5-9FFA-71DC175C3530[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Hi guys, I must be a glutton for punishment and am back for some more > advice. > I tried the REPLACE Account List|Categories -ď* Payees|Categories solution > and understand why it was not recommended. All it did was remove the > category from the items on my check register that I replaced (with a > BLANK) > and obviously that was not what I wanted so I restored the current version > of > Money and tried Set Up Prefered Payee Names but am confused. > The list has two columns, Payee Name Variation and Payee and it appears > that > I there are about 200 listings (Payee Name Variation and Payee) but the > list > only contains names that begin with âAâ, âBâs and âCâ (âEâ thru âZâ do not > appear)? > Is this correct? > Anyway, I will play around a little more and would appreciate if you could > advise me what to try next? > Also, you said âProblems with data pollution are one reason I DO NOT use > downloaded transaction data and recommend others consider not using it as > wellâ so my question is, WHAT do you do / what do you use? > Thank you again for ALL your help guys, > Bob |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| I enter transactions by hand. I don't have to mess with the side effects reported here on a daily basis. I get the data collected my way the first time. And I don't mess with outages and passwords and merging accounts and payees in the memo field and bad auto categorization and so forth. It's not for everybody, but I've collected something like 31,000 transactions with an average of two split entries per transaction this way. "Boblink" <Boblink[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:685C069F-B891-48B5-9FFA-71DC175C3530[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Also, you said âProblems with data pollution are one reason I DO NOT use > downloaded transaction data and recommend others consider not using it as > wellâ so my question is, WHAT do you do / what do you use? |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Boblink wrote: - quote - > Hi again, let me try another approach to see if this might work?
Instead of reinstalling, just do File-> New-> NewFile. Choose a new> If I make a copy of my current MSMoney file, I will always be able to go > back for future reference so I was thinking, can I start from scratch in 2009? > Specifically, uninstall MSMoney and the reinstall it and instead of loading > all my past history, I start a brand new Money file in 2009. I would then > re-enter the information to create links to my bank and investment accounts > and assume that I will have a Clean Slate of Categories, Payees, .. to work > with. descriptive name. You could then switch back and forth between files easily by using the MRU (most recently used) list at the bottom of the File menu. Keep both files up to date until you decide which one you want to update. Note that the resulting backup files should have different names too. Check on that. When you start over with a new file, with a new name, that should be automatic I think. If you are starting with a copy of an existing file, you would need to address that manually. - quote - > I wont be able to perform year to year analysis (at least for the first > year) and if I need to go back for some historical data (I cant think of any > situation except if I am audited), I can also install the old Money file > (and save the new Money file(. > Once I am finished doing what I have to do with the old Money file, I > would then uninstall Money and then reinstall it again (so that I have a > Clean Slate to work with i..e none of the old categories, sub-categories, .) > Anyway, I am thinking out load and await your replies. > Thanks, > Bob |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Use the scroll bar on the right, the wheel on your wheel mouse, the PageDown key, or the down cursor key to see the rest. Reply: Sorry, I really am NOT that dumb, I APged Down and it only showed the "A", "B" and "C" and it looked like the Scroll Down bar was at the bottom. Sorry Now suppose you see that "Bank Card Purchase" has been associated with Acme Grocery. Now you know that the next time the stupid credit card company sends you a transaction with "Bank Card Purchase", it should not be assumed to be Acme Grocery. "Bank Card Purchase" should have been in the memo field. But it wasn't. It should be ignored as a Payee. That is what Excluded Payee Names is about. Reply: Yep, this is exactly what's causing all the confusion. A Name (category) is assigned and it lives on perpetually even thou it is wrong. This is ONE of the problems that I am trying to correct, thanks I also suggest the use of ShowStandardizedPayeeNames. Tools-> Settings-> OnlineServiceSettings-> ShowStandardizedPayeeNames will cause you to match an existing payee that differ only by a numbers or punctuation. Click MoreDetails to the right of the setting for more information. Reply: Another one of the "pet peeves", thanks again Bob |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Hi again, let me try another approach to see if this might work? If I make a copy of my current MSMoney file, I will always be able to go back for future reference so I was thinking, can I start from scratch in 2009? Specifically, uninstall MSMoney and the reinstall it and instead of loading all my past history, I start a brand new Money file in 2009. I would then re-enter the information to create links to my bank and investment accounts and assume that I will have a Clean Slate of Categories, Payees,âŚâŚ.. to work with. I wonât be able to perform year to year analysis (at least for the first year) and if I need to go back for some historical data (I canât think of any situation except if I am audited), I can also install the âoldâ Money file (and save the ânewâ Money file(. Once I am finished doing what I have to do with the âoldâ Money file, I would then uninstall Money and then reinstall it again (so that I have a Clean Slate to work with i..e none of the âoldâ categories, sub-categories,âŚ.) Anyway, I am thinking out load and await your replies. Thanks, Bob |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Boblink wrote: - quote - > Hi guys, I must be a glutton for punishment and am back for some more advice.
Use the scroll bar on the right, the wheel on your wheel mouse, the> I tried the REPLACE Account List|Categories -? Payees|Categories solution > and understand why it was not recommended. All it did was remove the > category from the items on my check register that I replaced (with a BLANK) > and obviously that was not what I wanted so I restored the current version of > Money and tried Set Up Prefered Payee Names but am confused. > The list has two columns, Payee Name Variation and Payee and it appears that > I there are about 200 listings (Payee Name Variation and Payee) but the list > only contains names that begin with A, Bs and C (E thru Z do not > appear)? > Is this correct? PageDown key, or the down cursor key to see the rest. Now suppose you see that "Bank Card Purchase" has been associated with Acme Grocery. Now you know that the next time the stupid credit card company sends you a transaction with "Bank Card Purchase", it should not be assumed to be Acme Grocery. "Bank Card Purchase" should have been in the memo field. But it wasn't. It should be ignored as a Payee. That is what Excluded Payee Names is about. Go to Payees-> PreferredPayeeNames which shows how downloaded names are translated into Payees. Record the Payee Name Variation(s) shown for the wrong payee. Delete the entries that correspond to the wrong payee. Then click on GoToPayeeRulesManager. Excluded Payee Names identifies words and phrases that should be ignored from the payee field (e.g., check, deposit). Add each word or phrase that was listed as a Payee Name Variation that you recorded. It is usually a good idea to select Tools-> Settings-> OnlineServiceSettings-> ReplacePayeeNames.... You may want to set Tools-> Settings-> OnlineServices-> AddADescriptionToTheMemoField I also suggest the use of ShowStandardizedPayeeNames. Tools-> Settings-> OnlineServiceSettings-> ShowStandardizedPayeeNames will cause you to match an existing payee that differ only by a numbers or punctuation. Click MoreDetails to the right of the setting for more information. - quote - > Anyway, I will play around a little more and would appreciate if you could
Well *I*, like most people, use downloaded data. It is much easier> advise me what to try next? > Also, you said Problems with data pollution are one reason I DO NOT use > downloaded transaction data and recommend others consider not using it as > well so my question is, WHAT do you do / what do you use? for me. They make fewer mistakes than I do, plus I am better at finding the mistakes of others. Tools-> Settings-> AccountSettings(global)-> ConfirmNewPayees will give you the option to not add a payee to the list that you are using one time only. Unfortunately it does not apply to downloaded transactions. - quote - > Thank you again for ALL your help guys, > Bob |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Hi guys, I must be a glutton for punishment and am back for some more advice. I tried the REPLACE Account List|Categories -ď* Payees|Categories solution and understand why it was not recommended. All it did was remove the category from the items on my check register that I replaced (with a BLANK) and obviously that was not what I wanted so I restored the current version of Money and tried Set Up Prefered Payee Names but am confused. The list has two columns, Payee Name Variation and Payee and it appears that I there are about 200 listings (Payee Name Variation and Payee) but the list only contains names that begin with âAâ, âBâs and âCâ (âEâ thru âZâ do not appear)? Is this correct? Anyway, I will play around a little more and would appreciate if you could advise me what to try next? Also, you said âProblems with data pollution are one reason I DO NOT use downloaded transaction data and recommend others consider not using it as wellâ so my question is, WHAT do you do / what do you use? Thank you again for ALL your help guys, Bob |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Another way to look at this: they are always relevant to figuring out your deductions. If you cateorize it right from the get go, then at the end of the year you won't find yourself asking: "Gee, we did have a lot of medical after all, maybe it was 7.5% of AGIâŚ" and not have an easy way to figure out if it was or not since you didn't collect the data right in the first place. My operating concept is that it's never easier to get the data right than when it first gets captured in Money. "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In particular, the things that are tax-deductible would be > best to be differentiated. The threshhold makes most prescriptions > not deductible to healthy working people |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| That puts a slightly different spin on things. There is no simple way to touch up all of the categories in all of the transactions. Find and Replace could probably get you there, but it will be painful. Understand that Transactions are almost the ONLY place where a Payee and a Category intersect. (A Bill is another place, but it's just a transaction in drag.) So, If you have 10,000 transactions and each is categorized, there are 10,000 of these intersections. Also, there may be cases where, say, Walgreen's makes sense for Healthcare and Household Goods as separate cases (sometimes in the same total transaction, even). I'm not sure that you really want to think this is, ipso facto, a problem. I have this case all over my data. When I get cash back or buy an expensive prescription at the grocery store, I don't want it all categorized as Food : Groceries. For this reason, analyzing the data, by Payee and Category makes little sense. If I analyze by Category, I may see Food : Groceries at the WalMArt and the grocery store and the gas station. So what? IF that's what the spending was for, then the Payees are just noise in that analysis. Ignore them. OTOH, if you've been sometimes right and sometimes sloppy in fixing the (usually lousy from what I hear and see) category guesses that the FIs download, this will be a problem. (I see things like my Web Hosting provider on my Discover bill as Retail. Yikes.) Or if you got an association that was good one time (WalMart for Automobile : Gasoline, say) and then let it auto correct the next 100 WalMart transactions to Automobile : Gasoline--even if you never bought gas there again--this will also be a problem. But either is a problem with no simple fix. Problems with data pollution are one reason I DO NOT use downloaded transaction data and recommend others consider not using it as well. "Boblink" wrote: - quote - > I have about 20 > different accounts (Checking, Savings, Money Market, Investment, IRAs, > Roths,......) and download / update, these accounts (just about) everyday and > when I try and analyze the data, the categories are "all screwed up" (i.e. > Walgreenâs appears as Healthcare as well as Household Goods) so what I would > like to do is DELETE all Categories (that are stored / in MSMoneys "memory") > and start over. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Boblink wrote: - quote - > P.S-just to give you an idea of what I am dealing with, I have about 20
Considering Walgreens', that sounds as if it a very appropriate> different accounts (Checking, Savings, Money Market, Investment, IRAs, > Roths,......) and download / update, these accounts (just about) everyday and > when I try and analyze the data, the categories are "all screwed up" (i.e. > Walgreens appears as Healthcare as well as Household Goods) thing that you make some purchases Healthcare and some Household Goods. In particular, the things that are tax-deductible would be best to be differentiated. The threshhold makes most prescriptions not deductible to healthy working people, but that might not always be the case. But if you wanted to change all Walgreens purchases to Healthcare, the advanced find and replace is pretty powerful for that. - quote - > so what I would
That can work too. Maybe you could use Find and Replace to> like to do is DELETE all Categories (that are stored / in MSMoneys "memory") > and start over. repopulate some of the categories of some transactions. - quote - > I understand that I will screw up "history" but I will keep a copy of the > current Money file (on Memory Stick and External Drive) so if I ever have a > need to look at "history", I can always SAVE the "new" Money data file (with > NEW Categories) and load the "old" Money data file to find what I need. > Thanks again guys |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Hello Dick and Carl, thank you so much for your prompt and EXTREMELY helpful responses. I think the best plan of attack would be to BACKUP my Money file on Memory Stick, External Drive and another location on my computer (to insure that I am able to get back to where I started) and the play around with your suggestions to see if the achieve what I want. I probably will not get a chance to do this until the weekend so I may POST again and want to thank you guys again for all the great help! Bob P.S-just to give you an idea of what I am dealing with, I have about 20 different accounts (Checking, Savings, Money Market, Investment, IRAs, Roths,......) and download / update, these accounts (just about) everyday and when I try and analyze the data, the categories are "all screwed up" (i.e. Walgreenâs appears as Healthcare as well as Household Goods) so what I would like to do is DELETE all Categories (that are stored / in MSMoneys "memory") and start over. I understand that I will screw up "history" but I will keep a copy of the current Money file (on Memory Stick and External Drive) so if I ever have a need to look at "history", I can always SAVE the "new" Money data file (with NEW Categories) and load the "old" Money data file to find what I need. Thanks again guys |
| Tags |
| categories, deluxe, moneyplus |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Automatic MoneyPlus update fails repeatedly Wayne Farmer: I have Microsoft MoneyPlus (v17.0) running on a Windows XP SP2 system. When I started the program today, it informed me that it needed to download... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 09-22-2008 03:05 AM | |
| How to handle gift cards in MoneyPlus Deluxe KenDev: My school offers gift cards for various retailers as a funding source. I am trying to determine the best way to handle these gift cards using... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 11-29-2007 12:33 AM | |
| Desperate - MoneyPlus Crashed!!! John Gallagher: I am desperate. This morning I booted up my system. When Vista came up, a message box came up stating that Insights had stopped working. There... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-26-2007 11:58 AM | |
| moneyplus -- why can't you just leave cashflow alone? beachhouse: I post here about once a year whenever the newest version of Money comes out... I'm still running Money 2001. The virtual checkbook register in... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 08-17-2007 06:41 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |