|
#14
| |||
| |||
| "Bob Peel, MVP" <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote: - quote - > There's so many examples of bad design that I have given up all hope
Hey, that's my line.> of their being fixed. :-( R.P. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| There's so many examples of bad design that I have given up all hope of their being fixed. :-( -- Regards Bob Peel, Microsoft MVP - Money For unofficial FAQs see http://money.mvps.org/ or http://umpmfaq.info/ I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%232mkQcx7IHA.2016[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > You mean like you didn't end up re-creating the bills completely by hand? > Sure. If you could "export" then "import" them--all of their data, not > just the limited amount that the report prints--then maybe that would be > "better". But still a crutch for bad design somewhere else in the program > that should be fixed instead. > "Bob Peel, MVP" <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote in > message news:%23HbJUgu7IHA.1468[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > It wouldn't be so bad if MS automated the process. I wouldn't mind doing > > an auto-Nuke once a quarter - say! |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| You mean like you didn't end up re-creating the bills completely by hand? Sure. If you could "export" then "import" them--all of their data, not just the limited amount that the report prints--then maybe that would be "better". But still a crutch for bad design somewhere else in the program that should be fixed instead. "Bob Peel, MVP" <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote in message news:%23HbJUgu7IHA.1468[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > It wouldn't be so bad if MS automated the process. I wouldn't mind doing > an auto-Nuke once a quarter - say! |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| It wouldn't be so bad if MS automated the process. I wouldn't mind doing an auto-Nuke once a quarter - say! -- Regards Bob Peel, Microsoft MVP - Money For unofficial FAQs see http://money.mvps.org/ or http://umpmfaq.info/ I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:O7dJEHo7IHA.1420[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... - quote - > I'm getting that feeling as time goes on as well. You'd sure think they > **could** make the app clean up after itself better along the way... > "Bob Peel, MVP" <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote in > message news:%23gVIESm7IHA.2072[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > I have a feeling that Nuking the Bills is a one time fix but with no > > ongoing benefit. The problem with the bills will, IMHO, start building up > > again and at some stage one will have to perform another Nuke! :-( |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Well, it is what it is. But you might still want to at least test a copy of your file in a version M07 or newer with Nuke The Bills to see if it has the same dramatic effect for you it has had for many others. If you want to change Money being slow in saving data, that is. "R. P." <r_pol12gar[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23mMS9%23o7IHA.3724[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote: > > No. Did you read the link I sent you to? > Yes, I did, but didn't like the procedure; too much work and risky. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote: - quote - > No. Did you read the link I sent you to?
Yes, I did, but didn't like the procedure; too much work and risky.- quote - > There are probably many of these kinds of issues in the Money database
So what are we to do then? I think I'll be looking for a better designed> design. It goes back to '92. alternate program with similar functionality. R. P. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| I'm getting that feeling as time goes on as well. You'd sure think they **could** make the app clean up after itself better along the way... "Bob Peel, MVP" <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote in message news:%23gVIESm7IHA.2072[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > I have a feeling that Nuking the Bills is a one time fix but with no > ongoing benefit. The problem with the bills will, IMHO, start building up > again and at some stage one will have to perform another Nuke! :-( |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Dick, I have a feeling that Nuking the Bills is a one time fix but with no ongoing benefit. The problem with the bills will, IMHO, start building up again and at some stage one will have to perform another Nuke! :-( -- Regards Bob Peel, Microsoft MVP - Money For unofficial FAQs see http://money.mvps.org/ or http://umpmfaq.info/ I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%2369j26f7IHA.1080[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... - quote - > Surely the database is the issue. My experience was that Nuke The Bills > made a huge improvement. That improvement seems to be disappearing with > time. > "R. P." <r_pol12gar[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:%23GluE0c7IHA.1468[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > I have a feeling that the gradual performance degradation might be caused > > by the database structure used to store data. I see the same kind of > > degradation in Outlook Express which tends to take longer and longer time > > to catch-up a larger news group. I suspect the same db structure is used > > there too, to store and index the data. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| See comments inline. "R. P." <r_pol12gar[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23T7C%23Hg7IHA.3696[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > I have not noticed major performance improvement though after I archived
No one has ever reported a performance increase from archiving. No one has> last year's data and saved it in a separate file. ever reported any worthwhile effect from archiving. Many of us Just Say No to archiving for these and lots of other reasons. - quote - > This amounts to nuking the bills, right?
No. Did you read the link I sent you to?- quote - > My experience is that Money does not handle frequently repeating similar
There are probably many of these kinds of issues in the Money database> transactions, such as ATM withdrawals. Those take forever to register but > the infrequent deposits are registering fast. This definitley suggest some > type of inefficient DB indexing problem just like indexing large news > group discussion threads in OE. I used to work with databases a lot a few > years ago, and have seen this type of behavior often. It usually required > a redesign of the DB. design. It goes back to '92. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%2369j26f7IHA.1080[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... - quote - > Surely the database is the issue. My experience was that Nuke The
I have not noticed major performance improvement though after I archived> Bills made a huge improvement. That improvement seems to be > disappearing with time. last year's data and saved it in a separate file. This amounts to nuking the bills, right? My experience is that Money does not handle frequently repeating similar transactions, such as ATM withdrawals. Those take forever to register but the infrequent deposits are registering fast. This definitley suggest some type of inefficient DB indexing problem just like indexing large news group discussion threads in OE. I used to work with databases a lot a few years ago, and have seen this type of behavior often. It usually required a redesign of the DB. R. P. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Surely the database is the issue. My experience was that Nuke The Bills made a huge improvement. That improvement seems to be disappearing with time. "R. P." <r_pol12gar[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23GluE0c7IHA.1468[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > I have a feeling that the gradual performance degradation might be caused > by the database structure used to store data. I see the same kind of > degradation in Outlook Express which tends to take longer and longer time > to catch-up a larger news group. I suspect the same db structure is used > there too, to store and index the data. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote: - quote - > I don't know that the answer its that simple or I would have
I have a feeling that the gradual performance degradation might be> recommended it. Some people have real technical issues with M05 or > higher. Others have emotional issues with M05 (less so with higher > versions). Nuke the bills might not even solve the issue you came here > with and even if it does it is not a simple thing to go do if you have > more than a few very simple scheduled bills. Consider yourself advised. > It's all I can do. > At any rate, to your comment, it SHOULD find your file and upgrade it > to the new versions format since it was the most recently used and the > installer looks for that in the older version's metadata. It does NOT > "import" the data. "Import" in Money's context is for a totally > different and unrelated operation. Always keep copies and backups. > Never take anything for granted. caused by the database structure used to store data. I see the same kind of degradation in Outlook Express which tends to take longer and longer time to catch-up a larger news group. I suspect the same db structure is used there too, to store and index the data. R. P. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I don't know that the answer its that simple or I would have recommended it. Some people have real technical issues with M05 or higher. Others have emotional issues with M05 (less so with higher versions). Nuke the bills might not even solve the issue you came here with and even if it does it is not a simple thing to go do if you have more than a few very simple scheduled bills. Consider yourself advised. It's all I can do. At any rate, to your comment, it SHOULD find your file and upgrade it to the new versions format since it was the most recently used and the installer looks for that in the older version's metadata. It does NOT "import" the data. "Import" in Money's context is for a totally different and unrelated operation. Always keep copies and backups. Never take anything for granted. "R. P." <r_pol12gar[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:O895eHQ7IHA.3692[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > Oh, then I might as well just cough up the money for the latest version > and install that. I'm just not sure if it would automatically find and > import the data from the old install. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote: - quote - > I would consider trying this: download and install, on a separate
Oh, then I might as well just cough up the money for the latest version> machine if possible or in a separate directory--and be sure you have > media to reinstall M04 and do this SOON before Microsoft makes the > service patches disappear--the M+ trial version. Open a COPY of your > data file with M+. Try the Nuke the Bills tool. (See > http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=187 for more info.) Then try entering > data in your file. If it's remarkably faster, this may point a > direction for you. It's one that will force you to M07 or M+, But if it > gets you the performance improvement you seek, it MAY be worthwhile. > But read http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=187 again before doing > anything rash. and install that. I'm just not sure if it would automatically find and import the data from the old install. R.P. |
| | |||
| |||
| I would consider trying this: download and install, on a separate machine if possible or in a separate directory--and be sure you have media to reinstall M04 and do this SOON before Microsoft makes the service patches disappear--the M+ trial version. Open a COPY of your data file with M+. Try the Nuke the Bills tool. (See http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=187 for more info.) Then try entering data in your file. If it's remarkably faster, this may point a direction for you. It's one that will force you to M07 or M+, But if it gets you the performance improvement you seek, it MAY be worthwhile. But read http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=187 again before doing anything rash. "R. P." <r_pol12gar[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:edB4fPE6IHA.1200[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > I've seen a lot of complaints about slow reporting but my problem is the > slowness of saving new billing or withdrawal entries. Recording deposits > is usually much faster. I guess the number of that type of transaction may > have to so something with it. Anybody else having similar problems? I use > Money 2004, std edition. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I've seen a lot of complaints about slow reporting but my problem is the slowness of saving new billing or withdrawal entries. Recording deposits is usually much faster. I guess the number of that type of transaction may have to so something with it. Anybody else having similar problems? I use Money 2004, std edition. R.P. |
| Tags |
| data, money, saving, slow |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Money Plus not saving changes Scarlett: I have used Money for years. I bought a new computer with Vista a couple of months ago and downloaded Money Plus Deluxe. I've been using it with... | Microsoft Money | 14 | 06-30-2008 10:35 PM | |
| Cash flow forecast does not match saving goals data Dmitry Korolyov [MVP]: When editing advanced budget: I set up income and expense parameters. I also set up saving goal. At the final step of the budget set up, it... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 12-04-2005 01:03 PM | |
| saving money 2000 cancan: How do you save my books on to a cd. There is no save to and I can't change it to save from a c drive to a d drive. Thanks for the help | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-14-2003 03:25 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |