|
#11
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Whose software?
The brokerage house.- quote - > Do you believe that MS Money is responsible for the dating of
No I don't. In an earlier post in this thread I made that abundantly clear> the transactions? when I wrote: "I'm not absolutely convinced that this is a Money issue vs. a brokerage issue. I've sent several emails regarding this, but have yet to receive a response that makes sense. " - quote - > The OFX specs allow for both the trade date and the settlement
I have not as I don't save the downloaded files (using Open vs. Save). But> date to be provided by the financial institution. Have you > checked your downloaded data (as in: the OFX file/data) to see > what values are being provided by the fi for those two fields? saving a test file is easy enough and I'll read the OFX documentation to see what they're doing. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Aviator wrote: - quote - > > I was just trying to simply recap. So if you Buy XYZ on
Whose software?> > Monday the > > first, you might download a Buy on Tuesday the 2nd that lists > > a date > > of the 4th. > OK, got it. Sorry, I was reading way too much into that one > sentence. > You're absolutely right in the example above. > I've listed this as the biggest issue with their software. Do you believe that MS Money is responsible for the dating of the transactions? The OFX specs allow for both the trade date and the settlement date to be provided by the financial institution. Have you checked your downloaded data (as in: the OFX file/data) to see what values are being provided by the fi for those two fields? -- John Pollard First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com Please reply to newsgroup |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I was just trying to simply recap. So if you Buy XYZ on Monday the
OK, got it. Sorry, I was reading way too much into that one sentence. You're> first, you might download a Buy on Tuesday the 2nd that lists a date > of the 4th. absolutely right in the example above. I've listed this as the biggest issue with their software. IMHO, there should be *no* post-dated transactions, period. If they can't (or won't) allow the user to have a "to date" for downloads, then the date of the download should be the default to-date behind the curtains. Any post-dated transactions left behind should be for a future download. And there should be no reason, technologically speaking, for the dates to be off. I'm sure there are best practices or standards out there, but I don't know why this continues to happen. The good news is that I'm less concerned about duplicate transactions as I was before this thread was started. Bad news is that I'll still have to manually change the post-dated transaction dates in order for the accounts to balance. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Aviator wrote: - quote - > > And just to be clear, the transaction appears before the settlement
I was just trying to simply recap. So if you Buy XYZ on Monday the> > date but with the settlement date in the Date field. > I'm a little confused by this question, especially the part where you ask if > "the transaction appears before the settlement date but with the settlement > date in the Date field. " first, you might download a Buy on Tuesday the 2nd that lists a date of the 4th. - quote - > The sell transaction downloaded into Money contains the Settlement date.
For me, I use the 1099 DIV and INT form data. For example, even if> There is no way to tell what the Trade date is by just looking at the > downloaded transaction. But when I go online and view the transaction there, > I can drill into the transaction and see the Trade date which, of course, is > typically 3 days before the Settlement date. > > Odd. I guess I would go with that from a simplicity point of view, > > tho when you prepare your schedule D (Money can provide the data for > > TaxCut or TurboTax) then the settlement date would appear instead of > > the transaction date. > For this reason, I've never relied on Money for tax information. I can > balance the accounts to the penny, but the official tax information I get > from the brokerage is always off (sometime higher, sometime lower) than what > Money indicates. I use the tax feature in Money only for roughly estimating > the tax bill or refund. you had all of the numbers, Money is not going to know what is qualified, and it is not going to know what is return of capital, and it will not know what is section xxx gains. The 1099s (if you wait for the corrected versions) have that broken out. I don't use the 1099B info directly except to compare against. The 1099B does not include the acquisition dates or amounts. So I have Money prepare a .txf file with just the long- and short-term schedule D. It's really good. - quote - > The only other time it would matter is when calculating short term vs. long > term capital gains. It's quite possible that the date discrepancy would take > a short term cap gain and call it long term. But given the discrepancies > between Money's tax info and theirs, I rely on their information as that's > what goes to the IRS. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > And just to be clear, the transaction appears before the settlement
I'm a little confused by this question, especially the part where you ask if> date but with the settlement date in the Date field. "the transaction appears before the settlement date but with the settlement date in the Date field. " The sell transaction downloaded into Money contains the Settlement date. There is no way to tell what the Trade date is by just looking at the downloaded transaction. But when I go online and view the transaction there, I can drill into the transaction and see the Trade date which, of course, is typically 3 days before the Settlement date. - quote - > Odd. I guess I would go with that from a simplicity point of view,
For this reason, I've never relied on Money for tax information. I can> tho when you prepare your schedule D (Money can provide the data for > TaxCut or TurboTax) then the settlement date would appear instead of > the transaction date. balance the accounts to the penny, but the official tax information I get from the brokerage is always off (sometime higher, sometime lower) than what Money indicates. I use the tax feature in Money only for roughly estimating the tax bill or refund. The only other time it would matter is when calculating short term vs. long term capital gains. It's quite possible that the date discrepancy would take a short term cap gain and call it long term. But given the discrepancies between Money's tax info and theirs, I rely on their information as that's what goes to the IRS. - quote - > That would be especially bad in the last few
Tax harvesting typically occurs right before Christmas and is settled 1 or 2> days of the year where the settlement moves to the next year. days after. I've never seen them span the year. Whether this is by coincidence or by design, I don't know. But it appears that they are careful about not bridging years. - quote - > To rigorously work around this, you could manually change the date
That's exactly what I've been doing to "force" the Money accounts to balance> on the Buys and Sells. to their online numbers. But I just change the date of the postdated transactions to the date of the download -- too much trouble to research each transaction for when it actually was traded. - quote - > Note that the '-' key will move the date a
Good tip. Thanks.> day sooner. Poke that typically 3 or 5 times as appropriate. - quote - > Care to name the broker?
I'd prefer not to until I get a response from them regarding this issue.- quote - > What can complicate things is if the broker sends "Bank Balance"
They do, and that was the catalyst for this thread.> field that includes sweep MMF holdings, that will confuse things. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Aviator wrote: - quote - > > OK. So in your case, what downloads into Money regarding the Sell of
And just to be clear, the transaction appears before the settlement> > XYZ itself? > Two transactions: > 1. The transaction with the Settlement date. In Money, I'd find a Sell > transaction of 100 XYZ shares [at] $10/share *on the date of settlement*. (For > the sake of clarity, I'm omitting commissions.) date but with the settlement date in the Date field. Odd. I guess I would go with that from a simplicity point of view, tho when you prepare your schedule D (Money can provide the data for TaxCut or TurboTax) then the settlement date would appear instead of the transaction date. That would be especially bad in the last few days of the year where the settlement moves to the next year. I would check the 1099B from 2007, if you have one, to see what date is being reported on that. I expect it reports the transaction date. To rigorously work around this, you could manually change the date on the Buys and Sells. Note that the '-' key will move the date a day sooner. Poke that typically 3 or 5 times as appropriate. Care to name the broker? - quote - > 2. A transaction to buy $1000 of a Money Market account.
Now that part can work nicely. The nice part of that is that thecash transactions register will normally contain $0. What is good about that is that it is easy to spot something missing or duplicated by the non-zero balance hanging around. What can complicate things is if the broker sends "Bank Balance" field that includes sweep MMF holdings, that will confuse things. Just learn to ignore the "Bank Balance" number as far as expecting it to match your cash transactions register. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > OK. So in your case, what downloads into Money regarding the Sell of
Two transactions:> XYZ itself? 1. The transaction with the Settlement date. In Money, I'd find a Sell transaction of 100 XYZ shares [at] $10/share *on the date of settlement*. (For the sake of clarity, I'm omitting commissions.) 2. A transaction to buy $1000 of a Money Market account. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Aviator wrote: - quote - > > Assuming we are talking about current US rules...
OK. So in your case, what downloads into Money regarding the Sell of> Correct, these are US accounts and US rules. > > ... it is the trade date > > for a Buy or Sell which is used for tax and therefore Money use. > And here is where it gets interesting. I can view transaction data online > before downloading. Without exception, the transaction date is the settlement > date, *not* the trade date. If I click on a transaction to drill down into > its detail, I can see the trade date which is a few days earlier than the > settlement date. > What's interesting is that the brokerage has two groups of transactions: > Posted and Pending. Only the posted transactions are downloaded into Money. > The Pending transactions, I'm assuming, are awaiting settlement. But, once > again, the Posted transactions are downloaded with the settlement date, not > the trade date. > > Order to Sell 100 XYZ [at]$10 executes on Monday the first. In Money > > the cash transactions register's balance increases by $1000 On > > Thursday the 4th the broker takes the $1000 proceeds and invests it > > into the sweep money market account. The cash transactions > > register's balance decreases by $1000. So if you don't do any > > transactions for four business days, the cash transactions register > > normally shows a balance of $0.00. When there are trades that have > > yet to settle, the balance in the cash transactions shows the amount > > not yet settled. > Your example above makes sense if only the brokerage handled it that way. XYZ itself? - quote - > Instead, the sell order sits as a Pending transaction until it settles (and
I think you are describing what you see in Money. That works fine> Pending transactions don't get downloaded into Money). Once it settles, the > transaction then becomes a Posted transaction and is eligible for download. > The way it works with this particular brokerage house is that the sell and > sweep into the Money Market account happen almost simultaneously, usually on > the same day and, if not on the same day, one business day later. So on the > day the transaction settles, I will see two transactions (based on your > example above): One for the actual sale of the security; the other for the > proceeds of said sale to buy into the Money Market account. regarding the buy of the MMF. But what is the date that Money shows for the Sell? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Assuming we are talking about current US rules...
Correct, these are US accounts and US rules.- quote - > ... it is the trade date
And here is where it gets interesting. I can view transaction data online> for a Buy or Sell which is used for tax and therefore Money use. before downloading. Without exception, the transaction date is the settlement date, *not* the trade date. If I click on a transaction to drill down into its detail, I can see the trade date which is a few days earlier than the settlement date. What's interesting is that the brokerage has two groups of transactions: Posted and Pending. Only the posted transactions are downloaded into Money. The Pending transactions, I'm assuming, are awaiting settlement. But, once again, the Posted transactions are downloaded with the settlement date, not the trade date. - quote - > Order to Sell 100 XYZ [at]$10 executes on Monday the first. In Money
Your example above makes sense if only the brokerage handled it that way.> the cash transactions register's balance increases by $1000 On > Thursday the 4th the broker takes the $1000 proceeds and invests it > into the sweep money market account. The cash transactions > register's balance decreases by $1000. So if you don't do any > transactions for four business days, the cash transactions register > normally shows a balance of $0.00. When there are trades that have > yet to settle, the balance in the cash transactions shows the amount > not yet settled. Instead, the sell order sits as a Pending transaction until it settles (and Pending transactions don't get downloaded into Money). Once it settles, the transaction then becomes a Posted transaction and is eligible for download. The way it works with this particular brokerage house is that the sell and sweep into the Money Market account happen almost simultaneously, usually on the same day and, if not on the same day, one business day later. So on the day the transaction settles, I will see two transactions (based on your example above): One for the actual sale of the security; the other for the proceeds of said sale to buy into the Money Market account. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Aviator wrote: <snip> Agreed. I'd already done that. I've been relying on the brokerage data to - quote - > record dividends. And you're right -- these transactions are more than just
Assuming we are talking about current US rules, it is the trade date> dividends. Essentially, *any* transaction that has settled (defined as money > changing hands) and has a future date is included. for a Buy or Sell which is used for tax and therefore Money use. While there is a "settlement" date three days later for a stock, for most purposes that date can be ignored by the investor. That is more for the internal use of the broker. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/t+1.asp What I suspect you are describing is the broker actually sending data for future dividends, maybe a week or more ahead, dated for the pay date. But maybe this is it, and it would be *a* normal way of doing things: Order to Sell 100 XYZ [at]$10 executes on Monday the first. In Money the cash transactions register's balance increases by $1000 On Thursday the 4th the broker takes the $1000 proceeds and invests it into the sweep money market account. The cash transactions register's balance decreases by $1000. So if you don't do any transactions for four business days, the cash transactions register normally shows a balance of $0.00. When there are trades that have yet to settle, the balance in the cash transactions shows the amount not yet settled. Could that be what you are seeing? Just checking. I have had a broker where it works that way, and it has some advantages. - quote - > > Interesting unusual behavior. Let us know what you learn. > I'm not absolutely convinced that this is a Money issue vs. a brokerage > issue. I've sent several emails regarding this, but have yet to receive a > response that makes sense. As they've just started offering Money and Quicken > downloads, it's quite possible that something is wrong on their end. > > OFX does track duplicates, as long as the institution maintains the > > transaction ID, which it should. So it should know to avoid > > duplication. > Very good information, thanks. I've been manually tracking (read pencil and > paper) those accounts which have postdated transactions and which ones don't. > I then adjust the "As-of" date accordingly to avoid duplicate transactions. > This weekend I'll test one account to see if the duplicates download. > > That said, I don't have experience with a broker > > sending future transactions in the download. > Me neither. > Thanks again for your help. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Cal, as usual thanks for the prompt and informative reply. - quote - > Even so, you
Agreed. I'd already done that. I've been relying on the brokerage data to> might want to avoid confusion by unticking > Portfolio-> OtherTasks-> ChangePortfolioSettings-> (GeneralTab)NotifyMeOfDividendsForMyHoldings > in which Money makes a guess about future dividends and usually gets > the date wrong. record dividends. And you're right -- these transactions are more than just dividends. Essentially, *any* transaction that has settled (defined as money changing hands) and has a future date is included. - quote - > Interesting unusual behavior. Let us know what you learn.
I'm not absolutely convinced that this is a Money issue vs. a brokerageissue. I've sent several emails regarding this, but have yet to receive a response that makes sense. As they've just started offering Money and Quicken downloads, it's quite possible that something is wrong on their end. - quote - > OFX does track duplicates, as long as the institution maintains the
Very good information, thanks. I've been manually tracking (read pencil and> transaction ID, which it should. So it should know to avoid > duplication. paper) those accounts which have postdated transactions and which ones don't. I then adjust the "As-of" date accordingly to avoid duplicate transactions. This weekend I'll test one account to see if the duplicates download. - quote - > That said, I don't have experience with a broker
Me neither.> sending future transactions in the download. Thanks again for your help. |
| | |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Aviator wrote: - quote - > 3. Money doesn't handle post-dated transaction well. While it accepts them
In the register, post-dated transactions are separated in the> just fine, the account balances don't reflect the post-dated transactions. > This makes account balancing difficult because my Money balances differ from > they say I should have. (I'm aware of the Ending Balance switch, but it's > applied universally which won't work well for me.) register by a slightly thicker line. In the cash transactions register, maybe you could use the balance from the right column just before that line as the balance to use. - quote - > 4. After each download, Money attempts to reconcile my holdings with that of
So these are Buys and Sells, and not just dividends. Even so, you> the brokerage. Since post-dated transactions aren't recognized, there is a > discrepancy and Money asks if I want to adjust Money's holdings to that of > the brokerage. (Obviously I don't because I know the cause of the > discrepancy.) might want to avoid confusion by unticking Portfolio-> OtherTasks-> ChangePortfolioSettings-> (GeneralTab)NotifyMeOfDividendsForMyHoldings in which Money makes a guess about future dividends and usually gets the date wrong. Interesting unusual behavior. Let us know what you learn. - quote - > 5. Does OFX know if duplicate transactions have been downloaded? I know QIF
OFX does track duplicates, as long as the institution maintains the> will accept duplicates, but I'm not sure of OFX. For example, if I download > today (using OFX) which includes a postdated transaction for 7/12/2008, what > happens if I perform a download in the future and use an "As-of" date of > 7/10/2008? Will I get the 7/12 transaction again or is OFX (or Money) smart > enough to recognize that that transaction has already been downloaded? transaction ID, which it should. So it should know to avoid duplication. That said, I don't have experience with a broker sending future transactions in the download. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My investment bank has just started offering downloads of transactions into Money (or Quicken). Here's a problem I've encountered and any advice would be greatly appreciated: 1. Their download screen offers an "As of" date, but no "To date". For example, I can tell them I want transactions as of a certain date, but I cannot tell them the cutoff date. They assume I want ALL transactions from the "As of" date forward. 2. The downloads include post-dated transactions. For example, if an investment will pay a dividend payment 3 days from now, that transaction will be included in the download as a post-dated transaction. 3. Money doesn't handle post-dated transaction well. While it accepts them just fine, the account balances don't reflect the post-dated transactions. This makes account balancing difficult because my Money balances differ from they say I should have. (I'm aware of the Ending Balance switch, but it's applied universally which won't work well for me.) 4. After each download, Money attempts to reconcile my holdings with that of the brokerage. Since post-dated transactions aren't recognized, there is a discrepancy and Money asks if I want to adjust Money's holdings to that of the brokerage. (Obviously I don't because I know the cause of the discrepancy.) 5. Does OFX know if duplicate transactions have been downloaded? I know QIF will accept duplicates, but I'm not sure of OFX. For example, if I download today (using OFX) which includes a postdated transaction for 7/12/2008, what happens if I perform a download in the future and use an "As-of" date of 7/10/2008? Will I get the 7/12 transaction again or is OFX (or Money) smart enough to recognize that that transaction has already been downloaded? Thanks in advance for your help. |