|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Cal (and Dick if he's lurking), I let MDlx download my trans. There were 6 pending items; I manually created entries in my register for them (AFTER converting to Advanced Register), yesterday. Last night, the bank's download updated 4 of them, matched their trans with mine and asked me which one I wanted to keep in my register. Slick! No duplications (at least, not yet). The auto download did Jan 20, 08 to Jun 19, so, I went into my BofA online banking and created an ofx file for the trans from 6/20/2007 to 1/20/2008, imported those. I spun through them, assigning accounts and, now, I'm working montlhly bank recs. Thanks for your advice and encouragement. Now that my feet are wet, this isn't quite so daunting. Cheers! Ron --- Ron Mckenzie Orlando, FL "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, RonMcK3 wrote: > > That makes sense. Since I want to catch pending transactions (deposits, debit > > card items, handwritten cks, etc) as soon as I know about each one, I assume > > I should copy the formatting that the bank uses for the description for other > > transactions like this one? > In general, I want to pick a way compatible with what I download > from the FI. In an investment account, sometimes the sweep money > market Buys and Sells are downloaded. Another broker will just let > the cash balance reflect the sweep funds. Both are fine. If I had > two brokers that provided a different paradigm, I would use the two > different paradigms. Now if I entered everything by hand, I could do > it all consistently. I would rather have the net advantage to me of > downloading. > Entering transactions before downloading is a nice concept. I do it > occasionally. But I am not rigorous enough to do it all of the time. > > > I notice that Money picks up as pending all of the online payments scheduled > > for the next 30 days. This throws my calculated balance off considerably. I > > want them to count against my balance on the day each is to be paid (debited > > against my acct); or, worst case, to be debited on the day the check is sent > > (4 days or 1 day prior, or same day). I would like to have a true book > > balance to compare with the bank balance. > > > Your guidance? Thanks in advance! > There is more than one right way. And it is OK to change methods. > One advantage that downloading gives is it enters the transactions > for me while they are fresh in my mind. Twice in several years I > have had a credit card charge downloaded that I did not make. Since > I downloaded while any such transaction would be fresh in my mind, I > was able to pursue the possibly fraudulent transactions long before > statement time. > So yes, I guess I tend to take the FI's numbers. But I inspect and > at least sanity check. I also apply categories to be able to > analyze. > What works well for you is the, or at least "a", right way. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| some comments inline... "RonMcK3" wrote: - quote - > That makes sense. Since I want to catch pending transactions (deposits, debit
Well, the data that comes from the FIs may not be the best example to copy> card items, handwritten cks, etc) as soon as I know about each one, I assume > I should copy the formatting that the bank uses for the description for other > transactions like this one? but you will see this and adapt as time goes along. One reason this can be an issue is that they tend to include data you don't want or need in Payees and/or Memos like merchant numbers or store numbers or 800 numbers. Many users want all the variations of WalMArt, for instance, to be normalized to WalMart. This is probably more of an issue with debit card and/or credit card use than, say, with drafts and/or epays. - quote - > I notice that Money picks up as pending all of the online payments scheduled
I'm not sure where you are seeing this because I keep my epayment stuff> for the next 30 days. This throws my calculated balance off considerably. I > want them to count against my balance on the day each is to be paid (debited > against my acct); or, worst case, to be debited on the day the check is sent > (4 days or 1 day prior, or same day). I would like to have a true book > balance to compare with the bank balance. separate from Money. But you can look at the register and the bold line is today. Stuff below may be pending or similar stuff above--and the running balance immediately above--should be pretty close to real. Likewise, you may find the Forecast Cash Flow (a link off of the Bills & Deposits page) a most useful tool. You may have to customize it and/or hand select the accounts to be displayed to get the data you really want. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, RonMcK3 wrote: - quote - > That makes sense. Since I want to catch pending transactions (deposits, debit
In general, I want to pick a way compatible with what I download> card items, handwritten cks, etc) as soon as I know about each one, I assume > I should copy the formatting that the bank uses for the description for other > transactions like this one? from the FI. In an investment account, sometimes the sweep money market Buys and Sells are downloaded. Another broker will just let the cash balance reflect the sweep funds. Both are fine. If I had two brokers that provided a different paradigm, I would use the two different paradigms. Now if I entered everything by hand, I could do it all consistently. I would rather have the net advantage to me of downloading. Entering transactions before downloading is a nice concept. I do it occasionally. But I am not rigorous enough to do it all of the time. - quote - > I notice that Money picks up as pending all of the online payments scheduled
There is more than one right way. And it is OK to change methods.> for the next 30 days. This throws my calculated balance off considerably. I > want them to count against my balance on the day each is to be paid (debited > against my acct); or, worst case, to be debited on the day the check is sent > (4 days or 1 day prior, or same day). I would like to have a true book > balance to compare with the bank balance. > Your guidance? Thanks in advance! One advantage that downloading gives is it enters the transactions for me while they are fresh in my mind. Twice in several years I have had a credit card charge downloaded that I did not make. Since I downloaded while any such transaction would be fresh in my mind, I was able to pursue the possibly fraudulent transactions long before statement time. So yes, I guess I tend to take the FI's numbers. But I inspect and at least sanity check. I also apply categories to be able to analyze. What works well for you is the, or at least "a", right way. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| That makes sense. Since I want to catch pending transactions (deposits, debit card items, handwritten cks, etc) as soon as I know about each one, I assume I should copy the formatting that the bank uses for the description for other transactions like this one? I notice that Money picks up as pending all of the online payments scheduled for the next 30 days. This throws my calculated balance off considerably. I want them to count against my balance on the day each is to be paid (debited against my acct); or, worst case, to be debited on the day the check is sent (4 days or 1 day prior, or same day). I would like to have a true book balance to compare with the bank balance. Your guidance? Thanks in advance! -- --- Ron Mckenzie Orlando, FL "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, RonMcK3 wrote: > > > > Or, can it turn off the downloads? > You can turn off downloads for any FI. I would not do so myself; I > like downloading. I am better at finding the mistakes of others than > I am at finding my own mistakes. |
| | |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, RonMcK3 wrote: - quote - > Or, can it turn off the downloads?
You can turn off downloads for any FI. I would not do so myself; Ilike downloading. I am better at finding the mistakes of others than I am at finding my own mistakes. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Dick and/or Cal, Or, can it turn off the downloads? --- Ron Mckenzie Orlando, FL |
| Tags |
| blank, entering, file, manually, start |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Haven't used Money in a while - keep old file or start fresh? Steve: I haven't used Money since September 2005. One of my new years resolutions for this quarter is to get back into it. I will probably do things to... | Microsoft Money | 11 | 04-26-2007 11:42 PM | |
| Manually adding a transaction requires manually entering category neal.wilkinson@gmail.com: I posted about this before and didn't get a resolution. Before I buy a new financial package can anyone tell me if you personally can enter a... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 08-26-2006 10:31 PM | |
| Upgraded to 2005 - Blank File Pat Coleman: Upgraded from 2002 to 2005 Trial version Opened the File and there is nothing in there - no accounts - nothing. The money File size is 3500kb ... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-17-2005 12:41 PM | |
| Keep old Money file or start a new one? Anton: I've been using MS Money for more than 3 years and now have a lot of data, that is be very valuable for averaging and correct statistics. Last... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 08-05-2004 01:46 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |