|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, bill w wrote: - quote - > the cut and paste option seemed the most satisfactory
Since you left the dividends in place for the moved securities, it> (i actually set up a bogus transfer immediately after the purchase date and > voided the transfer on the correct transfer date for tracking purposes) > this left all the cash and dividend transactions in place > while allowing tracking of long term returns is not going to contribute to the return analysis. That would matter unless you are one of those who think dividends don't matter much. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| thanks cal the cut and paste option seemed the most satisfactory (i actually set up a bogus transfer immediately after the purchase date and voided the transfer on the correct transfer date for tracking purposes) this left all the cash and dividend transactions in place while allowing tracking of long term returns "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, bill w wrote: > > allow me to clarify > > i have 2 different accounts > > account A has a number of stocks in it > > account B has a number of stocks in it > > both have a history of cash dividends etc. dating prior to the transfer. > > > i am transferring stocks from account A to account B. > > if i do the renaming etc that you have descrbed i will not be able to track > > the stocks/cash that are already in account B. > > > does this make sense? > Yes. So you don't like having the performance calculations starting > over, so the regular transfer in Money doesn't appeal to you. > You could not just rename the account. > So you could Cut and Paste each original transactions from the old > account to the surviving. > You could export the old account (investment and cash account both) > to QIF and import both all at once as recovered account to the > surviving account and delete the old account. > You are limited to available choices. > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > In microsoft.public.money, bill w wrote: > > > > > > thanks for the reply > > > > it's not an issue of old and new accounts > > > > it's a transfer from stocks from one established account > > > > to another established account > > > > > > > so deleting the new account is not an option > > > > > Suppose you are moving everything from BrokerA to BrokerB. What I > > > was proposing was that you essentially rename the existing account > > > to be BrokerB. It will contain the original transactions, and > > > therefore the return calculations will not start over. That would > > > be the method I would use initially or if you Restore to such a > > > point. > > > > > If that is not practical, I would essentially make it as if you were > > > doing the same thing. You would have a BrokerB account that > > > contained all transactions. The fact that you actually changed > > > brokers could be noted in the comments for the account. So the > > > account you recently created in Money would not contain anything, > > > and it could be deleted. > > > > > So if you still think that is not an option, there is a different > > > option that I think you would like less well-- at least I would like > > > it less well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > > > > > In microsoft.public.money, bill w <bill w[at]discussions.microsoft.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I transferred stocks from one account into another > > > > > > the problem is that the annualized return and return on all dates > > > > > > is calculated from the date for transfer rather than purchase. > > > > > > the cost basis/valuation figures are correct. > > > > > > is there any fix or work around for this? > > > > > > > > > Yes. If you moved everything, either File-> Restore to a point before > > > > > your transfer, or delete the transfer transactions. Delete the NEW > > > > > account. Disable the old account for online transactions, change the > > > > > name and account info to that of the new account, and set up for > > > > > online. > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, bill w wrote: - quote - > allow me to clarify
Yes. So you don't like having the performance calculations starting> i have 2 different accounts > account A has a number of stocks in it > account B has a number of stocks in it > both have a history of cash dividends etc. dating prior to the transfer. > i am transferring stocks from account A to account B. > if i do the renaming etc that you have descrbed i will not be able to track > the stocks/cash that are already in account B. > does this make sense? over, so the regular transfer in Money doesn't appeal to you. You could not just rename the account. So you could Cut and Paste each original transactions from the old account to the surviving. You could export the old account (investment and cash account both) to QIF and import both all at once as recovered account to the surviving account and delete the old account. You are limited to available choices. - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, bill w wrote: > > > > thanks for the reply > > > it's not an issue of old and new accounts > > > it's a transfer from stocks from one established account > > > to another established account > > > > > so deleting the new account is not an option > > > Suppose you are moving everything from BrokerA to BrokerB. What I > > was proposing was that you essentially rename the existing account > > to be BrokerB. It will contain the original transactions, and > > therefore the return calculations will not start over. That would > > be the method I would use initially or if you Restore to such a > > point. > > > If that is not practical, I would essentially make it as if you were > > doing the same thing. You would have a BrokerB account that > > contained all transactions. The fact that you actually changed > > brokers could be noted in the comments for the account. So the > > account you recently created in Money would not contain anything, > > and it could be deleted. > > > So if you still think that is not an option, there is a different > > option that I think you would like less well-- at least I would like > > it less well. > > > > > > > > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > > > In microsoft.public.money, bill w <bill w[at]discussions.microsoft.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I transferred stocks from one account into another > > > > > the problem is that the annualized return and return on all dates > > > > > is calculated from the date for transfer rather than purchase. > > > > > the cost basis/valuation figures are correct. > > > > > is there any fix or work around for this? > > > > > > > Yes. If you moved everything, either File-> Restore to a point before > > > > your transfer, or delete the transfer transactions. Delete the NEW > > > > account. Disable the old account for online transactions, change the > > > > name and account info to that of the new account, and set up for > > > > online. > > > > > > > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| allow me to clarify i have 2 different accounts account A has a number of stocks in it account B has a number of stocks in it both have a history of cash dividends etc. dating prior to the transfer. i am transferring stocks from account A to account B. if i do the renaming etc that you have descrbed i will not be able to track the stocks/cash that are already in account B. does this make sense? "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, bill w wrote: > > thanks for the reply > > it's not an issue of old and new accounts > > it's a transfer from stocks from one established account > > to another established account > > > so deleting the new account is not an option > Suppose you are moving everything from BrokerA to BrokerB. What I > was proposing was that you essentially rename the existing account > to be BrokerB. It will contain the original transactions, and > therefore the return calculations will not start over. That would > be the method I would use initially or if you Restore to such a > point. > If that is not practical, I would essentially make it as if you were > doing the same thing. You would have a BrokerB account that > contained all transactions. The fact that you actually changed > brokers could be noted in the comments for the account. So the > account you recently created in Money would not contain anything, > and it could be deleted. > So if you still think that is not an option, there is a different > option that I think you would like less well-- at least I would like > it less well. > > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > In microsoft.public.money, bill w <bill w[at]discussions.microsoft.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > I transferred stocks from one account into another > > > > the problem is that the annualized return and return on all dates > > > > is calculated from the date for transfer rather than purchase. > > > > the cost basis/valuation figures are correct. > > > > is there any fix or work around for this? > > > > > Yes. If you moved everything, either File-> Restore to a point before > > > your transfer, or delete the transfer transactions. Delete the NEW > > > account. Disable the old account for online transactions, change the > > > name and account info to that of the new account, and set up for > > > online. > > > > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, bill w wrote: - quote - > thanks for the reply
Suppose you are moving everything from BrokerA to BrokerB. What I> it's not an issue of old and new accounts > it's a transfer from stocks from one established account > to another established account > so deleting the new account is not an option was proposing was that you essentially rename the existing account to be BrokerB. It will contain the original transactions, and therefore the return calculations will not start over. That would be the method I would use initially or if you Restore to such a point. If that is not practical, I would essentially make it as if you were doing the same thing. You would have a BrokerB account that contained all transactions. The fact that you actually changed brokers could be noted in the comments for the account. So the account you recently created in Money would not contain anything, and it could be deleted. So if you still think that is not an option, there is a different option that I think you would like less well-- at least I would like it less well. - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, bill w <bill w[at]discussions.microsoft.com> > wrote: > > > > I transferred stocks from one account into another > > > the problem is that the annualized return and return on all dates > > > is calculated from the date for transfer rather than purchase. > > > the cost basis/valuation figures are correct. > > > is there any fix or work around for this? > > > Yes. If you moved everything, either File-> Restore to a point before > > your transfer, or delete the transfer transactions. Delete the NEW > > account. Disable the old account for online transactions, change the > > name and account info to that of the new account, and set up for > > online. > > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| thanks for the reply it's not an issue of old and new accounts it's a transfer from stocks from one established account to another established account so deleting the new account is not an option "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, bill w <bill w[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > I transferred stocks from one account into another > > the problem is that the annualized return and return on all dates > > is calculated from the date for transfer rather than purchase. > > the cost basis/valuation figures are correct. > > is there any fix or work around for this? > Yes. If you moved everything, either File-> Restore to a point before > your transfer, or delete the transfer transactions. Delete the NEW > account. Disable the old account for online transactions, change the > name and account info to that of the new account, and set up for > online. |
| | |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, bill w <bill w[at]discussions.microsoft.comwrote: - quote - > I transferred stocks from one account into another
Yes. If you moved everything, either File-> Restore to a point before> the problem is that the annualized return and return on all dates > is calculated from the date for transfer rather than purchase. > the cost basis/valuation figures are correct. > is there any fix or work around for this? your transfer, or delete the transfer transactions. Delete the NEW account. Disable the old account for online transactions, change the name and account info to that of the new account, and set up for online. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| hello I transferred stocks from one account into another the problem is that the annualized return and return on all dates is calculated from the date for transfer rather than purchase. the cost basis/valuation figures are correct. is there any fix or work around for this? -thanks |
| Tags |
| annualized, incorrect, return, stocks, transferred |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Annualized Return Calculation Formula Geoffrey Zhu: Hi, Does anyone know how Money calculates Annulized return? Thanks, g | Microsoft Money | 4 | 03-30-2007 03:12 AM | |
| Annualized Return N/A Mr Ed: I have 5 accounts in Microsoft Money 2005 Deluxe Version -14.0.120.1105 all of which display the percentage of Annualized Return in Portfolio... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 03-27-2005 06:07 AM | |
| Annualized Return of individual stock lots Jeff: Does anyone know how you can get the annualized return for each lot of stock you purchase. For instance, if you purchase GE three different times,... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 12-01-2003 12:35 AM | |
| Cost Basis of Transferred Stocks Dad: I transferred stocks from my IRA to another account as part of a mandatory distribution. The stock now has a new cost basis based on the price at... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 09-09-2003 07:23 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |