|
#14
| |||
| |||
| To that point, google offers an on-line spreadsheet that might also be a decent introduction to the concept and would skip the download/installation. "Ken" <PleaseReply[at]NewsGroup.Thanks> wrote in message news:eBFSFigpIHA.4888[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > Try OpenOffice, it's Free..... and it's spreadsheet is similar to Excel. > http://www.openoffice.org/ |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for your reply. I might give that a shot. Thanks for the suggestion. "Ken" wrote: - quote - > Try OpenOffice, it's Free..... and it's spreadsheet is similar to Excel. > http://www.openoffice.org/ > Ken > "Lonnie" <Lonnie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:A05F47D1-0B2E-45B5-97C4-8C131E792794[at]microsoft.com... > | Thank you for your reply. > | > | > | I might just give that Excel a try and see how it works out for me, not > sure > | yet, as it's pretty expensive. > | > | "Dick Watson" wrote: > | > | > I doubt if any of the applications in the "personal financial > management" > | > space do this, but have not used them all. GnuCash, AceMoney, Quicken, > | > MoneyDance and so on would all have the same fundamental issue here in > what > | > formula to use. > | > | > Excel is a program that allows the user to create "spreadsheets" of > defined > | > formulas and values and functions. You could have a value for "balance" > and > | > a value for "interestrate" and a value for "fees" and compute a value > called > | > minimumpayment which was defined as equal to (1.5% * balance) + fees + > | > (balance * (interestrate/12)). Change any value and formula would > | > automagically recalculate the resulting minimumpayment. > | > | > Excel is applicable to all manner of numerical and data problems, > financial > | > and otherwise. But it's pretty much strictly DIY. It's to spreadsheets > as a > | > Word Processor is to Shakespeare. You can use it to write the stuff or > to > | > open other people's documents with the stuff, but when you start it, it > just > | > sits there doing nothing. > | > | > "Lonnie" <Lonnie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > | > news:00DB225F-076A-4CDD-AF45-FF5AB303E2E7[at]microsoft.com... > | > > Again, thank you for your perspective/reply. > | > > | > > I guess I'll just have to keep my eye out for another program. I > dought > | > > very much though if I'll find one with this feature, or one similar. > Do > | > > you > | > > know of any? Possibly another MS program. You mentioned Excel in > your > | > > post. > | > > Is this financial software as well? I've heard the name before, but > have > | > > never had the oportunity to try it out. > | > | > | |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Try OpenOffice, it's Free..... and it's spreadsheet is similar to Excel. http://www.openoffice.org/ Ken "Lonnie" <Lonnie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:A05F47D1-0B2E-45B5-97C4-8C131E792794[at]microsoft.com... | Thank you for your reply. | | | I might just give that Excel a try and see how it works out for me, not sure | yet, as it's pretty expensive. | | "Dick Watson" wrote: | | > I doubt if any of the applications in the "personal financial management" | > space do this, but have not used them all. GnuCash, AceMoney, Quicken, | > MoneyDance and so on would all have the same fundamental issue here in what | > formula to use. | | > Excel is a program that allows the user to create "spreadsheets" of defined | > formulas and values and functions. You could have a value for "balance" and | > a value for "interestrate" and a value for "fees" and compute a value called | > minimumpayment which was defined as equal to (1.5% * balance) + fees + | > (balance * (interestrate/12)). Change any value and formula would | > automagically recalculate the resulting minimumpayment. | | > Excel is applicable to all manner of numerical and data problems, financial | > and otherwise. But it's pretty much strictly DIY. It's to spreadsheets as a | > Word Processor is to Shakespeare. You can use it to write the stuff or to | > open other people's documents with the stuff, but when you start it, it just | > sits there doing nothing. | | > "Lonnie" <Lonnie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message | > news:00DB225F-076A-4CDD-AF45-FF5AB303E2E7[at]microsoft.com... | > > Again, thank you for your perspective/reply. | > | > > I guess I'll just have to keep my eye out for another program. I dought | > > very much though if I'll find one with this feature, or one similar. Do | > > you | > > know of any? Possibly another MS program. You mentioned Excel in your | > > post. | > > Is this financial software as well? I've heard the name before, but have | > > never had the oportunity to try it out. | | | |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Thank you for your reply. I might just give that Excel a try and see how it works out for me, not sure yet, as it's pretty expensive. "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > I doubt if any of the applications in the "personal financial management" > space do this, but have not used them all. GnuCash, AceMoney, Quicken, > MoneyDance and so on would all have the same fundamental issue here in what > formula to use. > Excel is a program that allows the user to create "spreadsheets" of defined > formulas and values and functions. You could have a value for "balance" and > a value for "interestrate" and a value for "fees" and compute a value called > minimumpayment which was defined as equal to (1.5% * balance) + fees + > (balance * (interestrate/12)). Change any value and formula would > automagically recalculate the resulting minimumpayment. > Excel is applicable to all manner of numerical and data problems, financial > and otherwise. But it's pretty much strictly DIY. It's to spreadsheets as a > Word Processor is to Shakespeare. You can use it to write the stuff or to > open other people's documents with the stuff, but when you start it, it just > sits there doing nothing. > "Lonnie" <Lonnie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:00DB225F-076A-4CDD-AF45-FF5AB303E2E7[at]microsoft.com... > > Again, thank you for your perspective/reply. > > > I guess I'll just have to keep my eye out for another program. I dought > > very much though if I'll find one with this feature, or one similar. Do > > you > > know of any? Possibly another MS program. You mentioned Excel in your > > post. > > Is this financial software as well? I've heard the name before, but have > > never had the oportunity to try it out. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| I doubt if any of the applications in the "personal financial management" space do this, but have not used them all. GnuCash, AceMoney, Quicken, MoneyDance and so on would all have the same fundamental issue here in what formula to use. Excel is a program that allows the user to create "spreadsheets" of defined formulas and values and functions. You could have a value for "balance" and a value for "interestrate" and a value for "fees" and compute a value called minimumpayment which was defined as equal to (1.5% * balance) + fees + (balance * (interestrate/12)). Change any value and formula would automagically recalculate the resulting minimumpayment. Excel is applicable to all manner of numerical and data problems, financial and otherwise. But it's pretty much strictly DIY. It's to spreadsheets as a Word Processor is to Shakespeare. You can use it to write the stuff or to open other people's documents with the stuff, but when you start it, it just sits there doing nothing. "Lonnie" <Lonnie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:00DB225F-076A-4CDD-AF45-FF5AB303E2E7[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Again, thank you for your perspective/reply. > I guess I'll just have to keep my eye out for another program. I dought > very much though if I'll find one with this feature, or one similar. Do > you > know of any? Possibly another MS program. You mentioned Excel in your > post. > Is this financial software as well? I've heard the name before, but have > never had the oportunity to try it out. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Again, thank you for your perspective/reply. I guess I'll just have to keep my eye out for another program. I dought very much though if I'll find one with this feature, or one similar. Do you know of any? Possibly another MS program. You mentioned Excel in your post. Is this financial software as well? I've heard the name before, but have never had the oportunity to try it out. "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > But it's a regulatory minimum of the moment. Nothing prevents an FI from > computing any number of minimum payments that are at least as high as the > regulatory amount and number of different ways. > And even if you find a place to ram in this formula, where do you do it? > There are only two places in Money bills where Money calculates ANYTHING. > Those are, to my knowledge, DRP and the interest/principal components of a > Loan Payment. DRP is calculated on the basis of free cash flow and least cost > of money. Loan Payments are calculated on a simple interest formula. The > latter is a great example: how many threads are there a month about Money's > canned calculation getting this "wrong"? > I'm not saying they couldn't program it. I'm saying they won't and if they > did, the oly way that would make sense from just about any PoV is to expose a > way for the USER to define the formula, not the application since there is no > one formula they could use and get it consistently right. They won't do the > programmability thing since user support scares them and their estimation of > the average Money user (or target Money user or median Money user or > whatever--the mythical user they CARE THE MOST ABOUT) is as a user who only > wants to avoid logging in to many bank websites to see their ads and his > financial information and just wants to look in Money to see Microsoft's ads > and all of his financial information--exactly as percieved by the banks--in > one place. I don't think they view planning payment amounts strategically as > something that the mythical user cares about, wants to do, or even would > understand how to do. Clearly they don't think this user would know how to > define a payment in terms of some Excel-like formula. > "Lonnie" wrote: > > Surely it should be easy enough to incorporate that into the program since > > ALL banks have to meet those basics of calculating the minimum payments. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| But it's a regulatory minimum of the moment. Nothing prevents an FI from computing any number of minimum payments that are at least as high as the regulatory amount and number of different ways. And even if you find a place to ram in this formula, where do you do it? There are only two places in Money bills where Money calculates ANYTHING. Those are, to my knowledge, DRP and the interest/principal components of a Loan Payment. DRP is calculated on the basis of free cash flow and least cost of money. Loan Payments are calculated on a simple interest formula. The latter is a great example: how many threads are there a month about Money's canned calculation getting this "wrong"? I'm not saying they couldn't program it. I'm saying they won't and if they did, the oly way that would make sense from just about any PoV is to expose a way for the USER to define the formula, not the application since there is no one formula they could use and get it consistently right. They won't do the programmability thing since user support scares them and their estimation of the average Money user (or target Money user or median Money user or whatever--the mythical user they CARE THE MOST ABOUT) is as a user who only wants to avoid logging in to many bank websites to see their ads and his financial information and just wants to look in Money to see Microsoft's ads and all of his financial information--exactly as percieved by the banks--in one place. I don't think they view planning payment amounts strategically as something that the mythical user cares about, wants to do, or even would understand how to do. Clearly they don't think this user would know how to define a payment in terms of some Excel-like formula. "Lonnie" wrote: - quote - > Surely it should be easy enough to incorporate that into the program since > ALL banks have to meet those basics of calculating the minimum payments. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Well, :-) although I'd be inclined to do that NOW in my life, I wasn't always inclined to do things that way earlier in my life. I don't know of too many people who can pay for a house all up front, do you? :-) Anymore these days, you just can't get by without some form of debt. This isn't a biggy or anything, I'll have it paid off before too much longer, it's just I would've liked to continue to use the debt reduction planner to help me plan better. The DRP is pretty much the only reason why I purchased money in the first place. I like it very much and the competition doesn't have anything near it in MHO. Now, in my opinion, Money has NOTHING to distinguish it from its competition. I might as well go out an buy Quicken :-( YUK Thanks for the reply. "Taylor" wrote: - quote - > "Lonnie" <Lonnie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:8F47B359-4DA9-44BB-A8A2-C19744C88446[at]microsoft.com... > > Thanks for the reply. > > > Not everyone is able to pay off the balance at the end of the month, at > > least I'm not. :-) > Why not? Just don't spend more than you can pay! > > I would think that since Moeny is able to keep track of > > balances .. etc, that it shouldn't be too hard to incorporate that into > > the > > program. Otherwise, this new way that CC companies are using to figure > > minimum payments kind of does away with the need for a Debt Reduction > > Planner. The DRP is pretty much the ONLY reason I like to run Money in > > the > > first place. I hope MS incorporates it into their program soon. > > > "Taylor" wrote: > > > > > > "Lonnie" <Lonnie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > > news:36BF66BC-7AEB-435C-9BC4-2FC8594A788F[at]microsoft.com... > > > > I'm just wondering if Money can be used somehow to calculate these new > > > > darn > > > > ways that Credit Card companies are using to figure out Minimum > > > > Payments. > > > > It > > > > used to be that all you did was pay a certain percentage of the overall > > > > balance, now it's that percentage + any new finance charges. Is there > > > > ANY > > > > version of Money that allows for this? I've got Money 2006, but all > > > > I've > > > > ever seen in the Planner in regards to this minimum payment is putting > > > > in > > > > a > > > > percentage and/or a minimum payment in cash. > > > > > > > Any and all help is appreciated. > > > > > > > Thank you for your time. > > > > > > > > I am not aware of any. > > > > > Advice: pay off your credit card balance in full every month. > > > > > > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Lonnie" <Lonnie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:8F47B359-4DA9-44BB-A8A2-C19744C88446[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Thanks for the reply.
Why not? Just don't spend more than you can pay!> Not everyone is able to pay off the balance at the end of the month, at > least I'm not. :-) - quote - > I would think that since Moeny is able to keep track of > balances .. etc, that it shouldn't be too hard to incorporate that into > the > program. Otherwise, this new way that CC companies are using to figure > minimum payments kind of does away with the need for a Debt Reduction > Planner. The DRP is pretty much the ONLY reason I like to run Money in > the > first place. I hope MS incorporates it into their program soon. > "Taylor" wrote: > > > "Lonnie" <Lonnie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:36BF66BC-7AEB-435C-9BC4-2FC8594A788F[at]microsoft.com... > > > I'm just wondering if Money can be used somehow to calculate these new > > > darn > > > ways that Credit Card companies are using to figure out Minimum > > > Payments. > > > It > > > used to be that all you did was pay a certain percentage of the overall > > > balance, now it's that percentage + any new finance charges. Is there > > > ANY > > > version of Money that allows for this? I've got Money 2006, but all > > > I've > > > ever seen in the Planner in regards to this minimum payment is putting > > > in > > > a > > > percentage and/or a minimum payment in cash. > > > > > Any and all help is appreciated. > > > > > Thank you for your time. > > > > > I am not aware of any. > > > Advice: pay off your credit card balance in full every month. > > > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Oh, here is a link I found stating the specifics of what I just mentioned about the new minimum payment calculations. http://www.money-zine.com/Financial-...imum-Payments/ "Lonnie" wrote: - quote - > Thank you for your reply. > I suppose that could be a problem. But why not just leave that in the hands > of the individuals who purchase the program? First off, I don't really think > it would be truly infinite, but I get what you mean. If it's left up to the > individual to put in the parameters, strickly for the planners calculations > for minimum payment. From what I've seen, it looks as though there are only > a few different ways that the CC companies are using right now, and they are > all pretty much based on a percentage of the overall amount owed + all the > NEW interest. Money is already capable of handling adding up the overall > amount owed, and it is already capable of working in the interest in there, > otherwise it couldn't give you the "Out of debt" by date. Anyway, it's just > a thought. > Again, thanks for your prespective/reply. > "Dick Watson" wrote: > > Any individual scheme probably shouldn't be hard. From the developer's PoV, > > though, the problem very quickly becomes that there are an almost infinite > > number of credit card companies figuring out an almost infinite number of > > ways to do these kinds of things. That's a really hard case to design for. > > > I've long advocated some kind of Excel-like (or VB/object like) grammar to > > define payment amounts in the Bills scheduler. Anything like this, however, > > is more advanced than the target user for the product and scares Microsoft to > > death about potential support costs. So instead of "Programmatic Bills" we > > get "Essential Bills" and get told--with zero evidence--that the dumbed-down > > model is what "most users prefer." > > > And so it goes. > > > "Lonnie" wrote: > > > > I would think that since Moeny is able to keep track of > > > balances .. etc, that it shouldn't be too hard to incorporate that into the > > > program. Otherwise, this new way that CC companies are using to figure > > > minimum payments kind of does away with the need for a Debt Reduction > > > Planner. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Hmmm, interesting. It looks as though the changes have been mandated by the government, federal banking regulators to be specific, and cannot be changed. As far as I can tell, it cannot differ (very much) from what I've already described...ie...a percentage, 1% to be exact, of the new overall balance, + new finace charges, + any fees assiciated with the account (like over limit fees, late payment fees...etc.). Add all that up and you have your minimum payment. When I received a notice from my CC company about the changes to the calculation of minimum payments, it had on it that the changes were mandated by the federal banking regulators, and is NOT negotiable and cannot be declined, even if you close your account (which I did), you still have to pay by the new minimum payment as calculated by the formula above. Surely it should be easy enough to incorporate that into the program since ALL banks have to meet those basics of calculating the minimum payments. :-) It has been a LONG TIME since I did any programming, but I'm sure I can do it. All I need is the permission to do it. And I wouldn't even ask for compensation for my programming skills. :-) "Lonnie" wrote: - quote - > Thank you for your reply. > I suppose that could be a problem. But why not just leave that in the hands > of the individuals who purchase the program? First off, I don't really think > it would be truly infinite, but I get what you mean. If it's left up to the > individual to put in the parameters, strickly for the planners calculations > for minimum payment. From what I've seen, it looks as though there are only > a few different ways that the CC companies are using right now, and they are > all pretty much based on a percentage of the overall amount owed + all the > NEW interest. Money is already capable of handling adding up the overall > amount owed, and it is already capable of working in the interest in there, > otherwise it couldn't give you the "Out of debt" by date. Anyway, it's just > a thought. > Again, thanks for your prespective/reply. > "Dick Watson" wrote: > > Any individual scheme probably shouldn't be hard. From the developer's PoV, > > though, the problem very quickly becomes that there are an almost infinite > > number of credit card companies figuring out an almost infinite number of > > ways to do these kinds of things. That's a really hard case to design for. > > > I've long advocated some kind of Excel-like (or VB/object like) grammar to > > define payment amounts in the Bills scheduler. Anything like this, however, > > is more advanced than the target user for the product and scares Microsoft to > > death about potential support costs. So instead of "Programmatic Bills" we > > get "Essential Bills" and get told--with zero evidence--that the dumbed-down > > model is what "most users prefer." > > > And so it goes. > > > "Lonnie" wrote: > > > > I would think that since Moeny is able to keep track of > > > balances .. etc, that it shouldn't be too hard to incorporate that into the > > > program. Otherwise, this new way that CC companies are using to figure > > > minimum payments kind of does away with the need for a Debt Reduction > > > Planner. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thank you for your reply. I suppose that could be a problem. But why not just leave that in the hands of the individuals who purchase the program? First off, I don't really think it would be truly infinite, but I get what you mean. If it's left up to the individual to put in the parameters, strickly for the planners calculations for minimum payment. From what I've seen, it looks as though there are only a few different ways that the CC companies are using right now, and they are all pretty much based on a percentage of the overall amount owed + all the NEW interest. Money is already capable of handling adding up the overall amount owed, and it is already capable of working in the interest in there, otherwise it couldn't give you the "Out of debt" by date. Anyway, it's just a thought. Again, thanks for your prespective/reply. "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > Any individual scheme probably shouldn't be hard. From the developer's PoV, > though, the problem very quickly becomes that there are an almost infinite > number of credit card companies figuring out an almost infinite number of > ways to do these kinds of things. That's a really hard case to design for. > I've long advocated some kind of Excel-like (or VB/object like) grammar to > define payment amounts in the Bills scheduler. Anything like this, however, > is more advanced than the target user for the product and scares Microsoft to > death about potential support costs. So instead of "Programmatic Bills" we > get "Essential Bills" and get told--with zero evidence--that the dumbed-down > model is what "most users prefer." > And so it goes. > "Lonnie" wrote: > > I would think that since Moeny is able to keep track of > > balances .. etc, that it shouldn't be too hard to incorporate that into the > > program. Otherwise, this new way that CC companies are using to figure > > minimum payments kind of does away with the need for a Debt Reduction > > Planner. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Any individual scheme probably shouldn't be hard. From the developer's PoV, though, the problem very quickly becomes that there are an almost infinite number of credit card companies figuring out an almost infinite number of ways to do these kinds of things. That's a really hard case to design for. I've long advocated some kind of Excel-like (or VB/object like) grammar to define payment amounts in the Bills scheduler. Anything like this, however, is more advanced than the target user for the product and scares Microsoft to death about potential support costs. So instead of "Programmatic Bills" we get "Essential Bills" and get told--with zero evidence--that the dumbed-down model is what "most users prefer." And so it goes. "Lonnie" wrote: - quote - > I would think that since Moeny is able to keep track of > balances .. etc, that it shouldn't be too hard to incorporate that into the > program. Otherwise, this new way that CC companies are using to figure > minimum payments kind of does away with the need for a Debt Reduction > Planner. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for the reply. Not everyone is able to pay off the balance at the end of the month, at least I'm not. :-) I would think that since Moeny is able to keep track of balances .. etc, that it shouldn't be too hard to incorporate that into the program. Otherwise, this new way that CC companies are using to figure minimum payments kind of does away with the need for a Debt Reduction Planner. The DRP is pretty much the ONLY reason I like to run Money in the first place. I hope MS incorporates it into their program soon. "Taylor" wrote: - quote - > "Lonnie" <Lonnie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:36BF66BC-7AEB-435C-9BC4-2FC8594A788F[at]microsoft.com... > > I'm just wondering if Money can be used somehow to calculate these new > > darn > > ways that Credit Card companies are using to figure out Minimum Payments. > > It > > used to be that all you did was pay a certain percentage of the overall > > balance, now it's that percentage + any new finance charges. Is there ANY > > version of Money that allows for this? I've got Money 2006, but all I've > > ever seen in the Planner in regards to this minimum payment is putting in > > a > > percentage and/or a minimum payment in cash. > > > Any and all help is appreciated. > > > Thank you for your time. > > I am not aware of any. > Advice: pay off your credit card balance in full every month. |
| | |||
| |||
| "Lonnie" <Lonnie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:36BF66BC-7AEB-435C-9BC4-2FC8594A788F[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > I'm just wondering if Money can be used somehow to calculate these new
I am not aware of any.> darn > ways that Credit Card companies are using to figure out Minimum Payments. > It > used to be that all you did was pay a certain percentage of the overall > balance, now it's that percentage + any new finance charges. Is there ANY > version of Money that allows for this? I've got Money 2006, but all I've > ever seen in the Planner in regards to this minimum payment is putting in > a > percentage and/or a minimum payment in cash. > Any and all help is appreciated. > Thank you for your time. Advice: pay off your credit card balance in full every month. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I'm just wondering if Money can be used somehow to calculate these new darn ways that Credit Card companies are using to figure out Minimum Payments. It used to be that all you did was pay a certain percentage of the overall balance, now it's that percentage + any new finance charges. Is there ANY version of Money that allows for this? I've got Money 2006, but all I've ever seen in the Planner in regards to this minimum payment is putting in a percentage and/or a minimum payment in cash. Any and all help is appreciated. Thank you for your time. |
| Tags |
| answer, can or will, hope |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| HELP! Why doesn't someone answer my question? hankgentry: I have MS Money 2006 SB, and am trying to make a long invoice (19 pages). Everything is fine until I go to print, then it only prints detail on the... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 11-29-2007 02:27 PM | |
| A ray of hope Pierre Aterianus: Looks like the gods at MS must have been working overtime this week since my accounts seem to be finally be settling in and no new or duplicate... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 10-08-2004 03:14 AM | |
| Answer Me This : If I don't connect to the internet and such, is Money 2005 ok to use ? | Microsoft Money | 4 | 10-04-2004 10:08 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |