|
#5
| |||
| |||
| And they don't take your favorite feature away because they decided "most users" (whoever they are) preferred it this way. Or because it was so broken that removing it was cheaper than fixing it. "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:vji0u3h0jlibrnqo8jsg3e9one7npn7ohf[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Art McClinton wrote: > > I have even seen people say they would not mind paying the "upgrade > > fee"/"subscription cost" to keep running the same version. At least we > > know > > the bugs/features within the current version. > And you know how to find your favorite features without re-learning. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Art McClinton wrote: - quote - > I have even seen people say they would not mind paying the "upgrade
And you know how to find your favorite features without re-learning.> fee"/"subscription cost" to keep running the same version. At least we know > the bugs/features within the current version. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| I have even seen people say they would not mind paying the "upgrade fee"/"subscription cost" to keep running the same version. At least we know the bugs/features within the current version. Art "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:uZGPzsIiIHA.1944[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > Too bad they haven't actually upgraded much of anything in six years or > so... > "Mike" <Mike[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:4CCDE424-721E-43CE-9D4F-D244D9EB7C65[at]microsoft.com... > > Oh well. I guess the the cost of an upgrade every two years or so is not > > all > > that bad. :-) |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Too bad they haven't actually upgraded much of anything in six years or so... "Mike" <Mike[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4CCDE424-721E-43CE-9D4F-D244D9EB7C65[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Oh well. I guess the the cost of an upgrade every two years or so is not > all > that bad. :-) |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Thanks Carl: I see... And price of this "subscription" I assume is the cost of the upgraded software version whatever that is? Oh well. I guess the the cost of an upgrade every two years or so is not all that bad. :-) -Mike "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Mike wrote: > > I read the following in the Plus on-line manual (under the using Money > > Online section). > > > "Online services are available for two (2) years after activation, or Jan. > > 31, 2011, whichever is earlier." > > > What does this actually mean? > > > Does Money just stop allowing me to access my banking information > No. > > (download > > statememnt and my banking institutions's billpay service) from within Money > > on this date? > Yes. > After expiration you can still enter the data by hand (keyboard). > You can access info that is there and you can still make reports. > You can't download quotes from the MS quote servers, and you > probably won't even be able to download statements from your bank's > website. > > If so, what is the reasoning behind this (coersive upgrade path... ??? ). > You could say that. Microsoft sees it as kind of a subscription > model. |
| | |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Mike wrote: - quote - > I read the following in the Plus on-line manual (under the using Money
No.> Online section). > "Online services are available for two (2) years after activation, or Jan. > 31, 2011, whichever is earlier." > What does this actually mean? > Does Money just stop allowing me to access my banking information - quote - > (download
Yes.> statememnt and my banking institutions's billpay service) from within Money > on this date? After expiration you can still enter the data by hand (keyboard). You can access info that is there and you can still make reports. You can't download quotes from the MS quote servers, and you probably won't even be able to download statements from your bank's website. - quote - > If so, what is the reasoning behind this (coersive upgrade path... ??? ).
You could say that. Microsoft sees it as kind of a subscriptionmodel. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hi all: I read the following in the Plus on-line manual (under the using Money Online section). "Online services are available for two (2) years after activation, or Jan. 31, 2011, whichever is earlier." What does this actually mean? Does Money just stop allowing me to access my banking information (download statememnt and my banking institutions's billpay service) from within Money on this date? If so, what is the reasoning behind this (coersive upgrade path... ??? ). Thanks :-) -Mike |
| Tags |
| clarification, manual, online, read |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Credit Card payment vs. Transfer, looking for more clarification Kindler Chase: Money Premium 2006 I've read through the archives about CC payments v. transfers, but could use some further clarification. I understand the... | Microsoft Money | 22 | 05-02-2007 01:28 AM | |
| MS Money 2007 Online Manual is Atrocious komobu: Any pointers to where I can download an instruction manual to MS Money 2007? The one on the MS Site is the worst ever! I can only open it in a... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 11-05-2006 03:35 PM | |
| Read Online Statement -- All the Time in Money 2006? pjpinella@gmail.com: I just upgraded to Money 2006 from the '04 edition. It appears that it always wants me to "Read Online Statement" for all of my investment... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 03-03-2006 04:51 PM | |
| Clarification Christine: I played around a little bit more, turns out the ONLY view that gives me the correct cost basis is the display by account name option. Any of the... | Microsoft Money | 9 | 02-01-2004 09:23 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |