|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Chris Cowles wrote: - quote - > "jeaninel" <jeaninel[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
That link is old. The converter does have some problems, but> message > news:F80A8E6C-9315-4E88-B88A-DAC674854ACF[at]microsoft.com... > > Thanks to all for the responses. I feel a bit kicked in the > > teeth > > since I > > only upgraded for the ease of transferring data and I thought > > my > > unresolved > > via chat deposit issue would go away. Unfortunatly that > > problem > > wasn't fixed > > and I gained an even more time consuming problem. Next time, > > I am > > going for > > Quicken. > Be aware that the convertor utility provided by Intuit does > not work > for Quicken 2008. From a message posted 1/29/08 with subject > "thinking > of switching to Quicken?": > http://quicken.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/...p_sp=undefined there are work arounds for most, if not all. -- John Pollard First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com Please reply to newsgroup |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "jeaninel" <jeaninel[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:F80A8E6C-9315-4E88-B88A-DAC674854ACF[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Thanks to all for the responses. I feel a bit kicked in the teeth
Be aware that the convertor utility provided by Intuit does not work> since I > only upgraded for the ease of transferring data and I thought my > unresolved > via chat deposit issue would go away. Unfortunatly that problem > wasn't fixed > and I gained an even more time consuming problem. Next time, I am > going for > Quicken. for Quicken 2008. From a message posted 1/29/08 with subject "thinking of switching to Quicken?": http://quicken.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/...p_sp=undefined |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Thanks to all for the responses. I feel a bit kicked in the teeth since I only upgraded for the ease of transferring data and I thought my unresolved via chat deposit issue would go away. Unfortunatly that problem wasn't fixed and I gained an even more time consuming problem. Next time, I am going for Quicken. "Marilyn & Bob" wrote: - quote - > If the bill has a Pay On Line check box (if your accounts are set up for > online services, most bills do have that check box, except for Direct Debit > and Apays, all deposits do not), you can get what you want by placing a > checkmark in the boxes of those payments. Just remember to remove them, if > you intend to pay by check. > -- > Peace, > BobJ > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > message news:ucI6jDyWIHA.4548[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > The latter. They put it in. They take it out. For some reason, they just > > don't like this feature. > > > "jeaninel" <jeaninel[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:96617A57-86D7-4A3E-8F64-16A4EE16F228[at]microsoft.com... > > > In my previous version I could hold control and select each of my bills > > > to > > > see my projected balance. I can't do that anymore. Is there something > > > else > > > I need to do or has this function been removed? > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| If the bill has a Pay On Line check box (if your accounts are set up for online services, most bills do have that check box, except for Direct Debit and Apays, all deposits do not), you can get what you want by placing a checkmark in the boxes of those payments. Just remember to remove them, if you intend to pay by check. -- Peace, BobJ "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:ucI6jDyWIHA.4548[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > The latter. They put it in. They take it out. For some reason, they just > don't like this feature. > "jeaninel" <jeaninel[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:96617A57-86D7-4A3E-8F64-16A4EE16F228[at]microsoft.com... > > In my previous version I could hold control and select each of my bills > > to > > see my projected balance. I can't do that anymore. Is there something > > else > > I need to do or has this function been removed? |
| | |||
| |||
| The latter. They put it in. They take it out. For some reason, they just don't like this feature. "jeaninel" <jeaninel[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:96617A57-86D7-4A3E-8F64-16A4EE16F228[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > In my previous version I could hold control and select each of my bills to > see my projected balance. I can't do that anymore. Is there something > else > I need to do or has this function been removed? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| In my previous version I could hold control and select each of my bills to see my projected balance. I can't do that anymore. Is there something else I need to do or has this function been removed? |
| Tags |
| bill, bott, multiselect, summary, total |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Bill not showing in summary Andrew: In Money 2006, a monthly bill wasn't showing in the Bill Summary when I knew it was the date. I was surprised, but I entered it as a new monthly... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 02-09-2008 06:36 PM | |
| Bill Summary Balance Ed Simmons: Has Microsoft fixed the bill summary balance feature in Money 2006 yet? Or does anyone know if they are even planning to? I purchased 2006 but... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-20-2006 08:05 PM | |
| Bill Summary NET: How to print the bill summary listing alphabetically? After clicking on the Payee header, the listing is displayed alphabetically, but will only... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-01-2006 01:14 PM | |
| Bill Summary Jaime: Money 2005 - When you select a bill to register it showed the current balance and the balance after payment, Does any one know where its located or... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 10-18-2005 08:16 PM | |
| Bill Summary Graham: Interesting that when my "Bill Summary" is sorted by "Next Due" date things look okay (as okay as it can ever be). But when I sort by "Payee" some... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 12-26-2004 12:11 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |