|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Like President Reagan used to say, trust but verify. MS Money is a tool you use to manage your money. If you want reliable information, like any manager it is your responsibility to implement controls. Your procedures should include regular, frequent backups, especially before importing downloaded data. For each account, you should be able to devise an easy method to check the accuracy of Money's downloads. My experience over eight years has been that the process is usually reliable but that errors do occur. By catching the errors immediately with controls and reverting to backup copies of the Money database, I've never been forced to resort to the major recovery efforts you describe. <fletchb[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:9c40671d-d4fe-473b-a385-66f1efeea3fa[at]j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com... - quote - > I would appreciate some feedback on how reliable MS Money is in > regards to online banking? I currently have Quicken 2008 and it has > never been reliable in that regard. It was a pain to setup, but after > correctly initial balance errors all was well for maybe a week. Then > it had problems downloading transactions with bank #1 After fixing > that a few times bank #1 seems to be stable Bank #2 starting bombing > out shortly there after and has never worked more than a day at the > most since. Sometimes the error would say it was on quicken's end and > they would fix withing 48 hours yet a month later and I am still > waiting. I bought the software to save time not waste it and It's not > worth the hassle to remove/reinstall every time I need to download new > transactions . How does money compare as far as online stability is > concerned? > Thanks, > Fletch |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I posted two replies earlier that seem to have gotten snarfed up in some anti-spam filter or some such. So then I did some binary search testing in microsoft.public.test and several more attempts at posting to identify the offender. Now that I think I know it, let me try yet again: 1) Many of the same underlying technologies are being used by both. 2) Sometimes problems in these regards come from the application, sometimes from the vendor's online systems (Intuit or Microsoft, that is), sometimes for the FIs systems (i.e., the bank involved) and sometimes from "third parties" (screen scrapers like Yodlee). 3) There are variables from the users' end like what kind of firewalls and so forth they have setup. 4) None of the bank computer systems were ever designed with this kind of usage in mind. Worse, not many of the banks really want to let you see their data accompanied by Microsoft's ads instead of their own. Given all of this, even the "true believers" in this technology (of whom I am not one) will have an almost impossible time telling you that one will be more reliable than the other for your usage with any degree of certainty. Read the posts here and in the Quicken NG. (Note I'd post the URL or the name, but that seems to make msnews.microsoft.com eat the post. Go figure. If you want the URL, drop me an email.) See what you can determine about reliability. Bear in mind that people who are getting along don't post daily reports of lack of problems. FWIW, I don't think many people have ever found remove/reinstall the application itself a helpful technique for dealing with download issues. I'd be surprised if this is a terribly helpful technique with Quicken, given the limitations and constraints listed above. The app could be bulletproof but there are just a huge number of failure modes completely beyond its control. <fletchb[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:9c40671d-d4fe-473b-a385-66f1efeea3fa[at]j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com... - quote - > How does money compare as far as online stability is > concerned? |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| <fletchb[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:9c40671d-d4fe-473b-a385-66f1efeea3fa[at]j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com... - quote - > I would appreciate some feedback on how reliable MS Money is in
It depends what you're looking for. If you want to download> regards to online banking? I currently have Quicken 2008 and it has > never been reliable in that regard. transactions with fairly accurate payee matching and category assignment, based on the most recent transaction for the payee matched, and online bill pay, yes, it's reliable. If you want to assume every transaction downloaded is 100% accurate, reconciled automatically, and the downloaded bank balance snapshot always equals your register balance, no, it's not. I don't think anything could be. I've always been an early adopter of electronic banking in some form, starting with telephone bill pay at University Savings Bank in Houston in 1985. I started downloading transactions from my bank onto my computer as soon as it was practical. MS Money has been my PFS of choice since NationsBank abandoned Managing Your Money in 1997. I chose it over Quicken because online banking with Money was cheaper at that time, and other advantages and disadvantages seemed to be a wash. Money has always been cheaper than Quicken to buy, and telephone tech support is free. Quicken telephone tech support is definitely not. I've been happy with my choice since that time. Money has aggravating bugs and limitations, but they're probably not worse than Quicken. Software of this nature is neither perfect nor effortless. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL |
| | |||
| |||
| I have used Money for years and it is fairly reliable. Why don't you download the trial and setup your bank accounts and use it a while to see if you are happy with it. Usually when there is a problem, it is because of the Internet or because the bank is not updating. http://www.microsoft.com/money/freetrial_info.mspx <fletchb[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:9c40671d-d4fe-473b-a385-66f1efeea3fa[at]j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com... I would appreciate some feedback on how reliable MS Money is in regards to online banking? I currently have Quicken 2008 and it has never been reliable in that regard. It was a pain to setup, but after correctly initial balance errors all was well for maybe a week. Then it had problems downloading transactions with bank #1 After fixing that a few times bank #1 seems to be stable Bank #2 starting bombing out shortly there after and has never worked more than a day at the most since. Sometimes the error would say it was on quicken's end and they would fix withing 48 hours yet a month later and I am still waiting. I bought the software to save time not waste it and It's not worth the hassle to remove/reinstall every time I need to download new transactions . How does money compare as far as online stability is concerned? Thanks, Fletch |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I would appreciate some feedback on how reliable MS Money is in regards to online banking? I currently have Quicken 2008 and it has never been reliable in that regard. It was a pain to setup, but after correctly initial balance errors all was well for maybe a week. Then it had problems downloading transactions with bank #1 After fixing that a few times bank #1 seems to be stable Bank #2 starting bombing out shortly there after and has never worked more than a day at the most since. Sometimes the error would say it was on quicken's end and they would fix withing 48 hours yet a month later and I am still waiting. I bought the software to save time not waste it and It's not worth the hassle to remove/reinstall every time I need to download new transactions . How does money compare as far as online stability is concerned? Thanks, Fletch |
| Tags |
| money, reliable |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Will online updates ever be reliable? pat: Maybe I just have too many accounts at the same institution, but it's very frustrating to not have reliable money updates. Am I alone? Should I be... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 12-14-2006 02:52 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |