|
#4
| |||
| |||
| comments inline "Thinker" <Thinker[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:F5DFE12F-BAEC-4843-8A7F-6CA31D7953B6[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > So I also wonder what people who don't use subcategories see. Do they see
Sure.> Transfer to : Checking Account > Some Expense Category > ? - quote - > I am thinking that's what happens--which means that the Transfer to: is
Yah, but as you noted in the original post, this is *very* easily remedied> just > coincidentally like the Cat:Subcat -- because if I list all my > transactions > and sort in Excel by the Auto : Gas category, I get all the positive and > negative transactions (correctly sorted), but if I list all my Checking > transactions and then sort, it (Excel) treats the negative and positive > transactions like two different "Accounts", with the positive listed as > Transfer to: and the negative ones as Transfer from" in Excel. - quote - > -- so I do think they
It might be a nice improvement but: a) I think they view reports exported to> should fix this--it's not the same as the category, subcategory. Excel as an incredibly low priority use case and what they are doing now is not *wrong* or hard to work around--unlike, say, the lack of classifications when exporting via MoneyLink, b) of the top 100 things I'd like to see fixed or improved in Money I wouldn't even get close to this issue. I've written code and queries to take specially customized reports and get ALL of the account transasaction data from all of my accounts out of Money and re-normalized into a schema I developed in Access. That experience emboldens me to say that if you think this is the worst sin of the way they report/export data to Excel, you haven't played enough in this area. Again, I'm not for a moment saying that the issue you raise isn't "correct". It's just not a biggie by comparison. - quote - > If I list
??? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| comments inline "Thinker" <Thinker[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:FA9226F5-6003-4ECE-BD24-45C0FE1B43F8[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Yeah, so MoneyLink is an option I guess. I do double entry accounting in
Like at Money version 1? Seriously, I'm not sure what they've ever changed> Money, which was impossible up until they allowed me to have negative or > positive entries in every account in this regard that made it more possible to enter every transaction as a debit or credit. - quote - > --so I basically have to spoof things
Since Money presents everyting in "Accounts" if you think of an Account as> (because Money won't force the debits and credits to be equal). Asset or Liability, then every entry is a double entry. - quote - > So I can credit or debit an expense account (i.e., what Money calls a
Maybe, but MOST users do not have the sophisticated understanding of> category) and it doesn't say whether it is debit or crediting, that's > assumed > by the +/- sign of the amount. So it's odd that it has to say transfer in > or > out. accounting principles and are aided by semantic assistance from place to place and time to time. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| So I also wonder what people who don't use subcategories see. Do they see Transfer to : Checking Account Some Expense Category ? I am thinking that's what happens--which means that the Transfer to: is just coincidentally like the Cat:Subcat -- because if I list all my transactions and sort in Excel by the Auto : Gas category, I get all the positive and negative transactions (correctly sorted), but if I list all my Checking transactions and then sort, it (Excel) treats the negative and positive transactions like two different "Accounts", with the positive listed as Transfer to: and the negative ones as Transfer from" -- so I do think they should fix this--it's not the same as the category, subcategory. If I list "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > You don't say HOW you are exporting to Excel. But when I do it from reports, > I get in one column: > Category > Computer : Service Access > Automobile : Gasoline > .... > Transfer From : WF Checking > NOTE that the Transfer From : is no different than any other entries--it > needs to be parsed at the " : ". I agree this is somewhat tedious, but my > point is that the ENTIRE Category : Subcategory thing has the exact same > issue. > But when I use MoneyLink to extract, I get in separate columns: > Category Subcategory > Transfer WF Checking > If that's what you like, I'd suggest you investigate MoneyLink. Of course, > as these things go, it has its own set of issues like you can't get > classification out with it. > "Thinker" <Thinker[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:EEF4929B-1D5C-4430-94A8-A641696B3CF8[at]microsoft.com... > > When I export to excel, the account names of transfers are listed as: > > > Transfer from: XYZ Checking > > Transfer to: XYZ Checking |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Yeah, so MoneyLink is an option I guess. I do double entry accounting in Money, which was impossible up until they allowed me to have negative or positive entries in every account--so I basically have to spoof things (because Money won't force the debits and credits to be equal). So I can credit or debit an expense account (i.e., what Money calls a category) and it doesn't say whether it is debit or crediting, that's assumed by the +/- sign of the amount. So it's odd that it has to say transfer in or out. "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > You don't say HOW you are exporting to Excel. But when I do it from reports, > I get in one column: > Category > Computer : Service Access > Automobile : Gasoline > .... > Transfer From : WF Checking > NOTE that the Transfer From : is no different than any other entries--it > needs to be parsed at the " : ". I agree this is somewhat tedious, but my > point is that the ENTIRE Category : Subcategory thing has the exact same > issue. > But when I use MoneyLink to extract, I get in separate columns: > Category Subcategory > Transfer WF Checking > If that's what you like, I'd suggest you investigate MoneyLink. Of course, > as these things go, it has its own set of issues like you can't get > classification out with it. > "Thinker" <Thinker[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:EEF4929B-1D5C-4430-94A8-A641696B3CF8[at]microsoft.com... > > When I export to excel, the account names of transfers are listed as: > > > Transfer from: XYZ Checking > > Transfer to: XYZ Checking |
| | |||
| |||
| You don't say HOW you are exporting to Excel. But when I do it from reports, I get in one column: Category Computer : Service Access Automobile : Gasoline .... Transfer From : WF Checking NOTE that the Transfer From : is no different than any other entries--it needs to be parsed at the " : ". I agree this is somewhat tedious, but my point is that the ENTIRE Category : Subcategory thing has the exact same issue. But when I use MoneyLink to extract, I get in separate columns: Category Subcategory Transfer WF Checking If that's what you like, I'd suggest you investigate MoneyLink. Of course, as these things go, it has its own set of issues like you can't get classification out with it. "Thinker" <Thinker[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:EEF4929B-1D5C-4430-94A8-A641696B3CF8[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > When I export to excel, the account names of transfers are listed as: > Transfer from: XYZ Checking > Transfer to: XYZ Checking |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| When I export to excel, the account names of transfers are listed as: Transfer from: XYZ Checking Transfer to: XYZ Checking This screws up my ability to sort by account name in excel--and while I can write a function to cut those off, I shouldn't have to do that. The account name is not "Transfer to" or "Transfer from". Obviously, if the source account is a bank account and the other account is another asset or liability account, it is a transfer. Please take the words out of the exported data. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/communities...t.public.money |
| Tags |
| account, exported, names |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| removing names from list of common WITHDRAWAL names? MSFT MONEY BUSINESS aaronep@pacbell.net: I have Msft MOney 2000 Business & Personal, which is used for checkbook transactions. I use it for my year end accounting which assigns a pay out... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 02-10-2006 02:54 PM | |
| License gives MS access to your account names, transactions, etc?? Clint: I just read the EULA on my new copy of Money 2006 and noticed a clause that reads "These features send to Microsoft information which may... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-13-2005 06:51 PM | |
| Mutual Fund Names and Stock Names displayed on multiple lines Greg: In 2005 Deluxe, Portfolio Manager, Group by Investment Type, the same mutual fund is incorrectly listed on multiple lines. And, if I move the... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 01-13-2005 02:48 AM | |
| Exported payee info appearing in memo field? Delia: Whenever I download information from one particular bank the payee field is not filled in and the memo field has the payee information in it.... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 08-02-2004 11:28 PM | |
| deleting investment account names Stewart: I have Microsoft Money 2002 and wish to remove a few investment account names from the table "update prices". I have removed all entries to the... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 01-17-2004 06:49 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |